This post can be edited by most users to provide up-to-date information about developments of this thread based on user responses, and user findings. Feel free to add, change or remove information shown here as it becomes available. This includes new coupons, rebates, ideas, thread summary, and similar items.
Once a Thread Wiki is added to a thread, "Create Wiki" button will disappear. If you would like to learn more about Thread Wiki feature, click here.
expiredpersian_mafia | Staff posted Sep 07, 2022 08:59 PM
Item 1 of 3
Item 1 of 3
expiredpersian_mafia | Staff posted Sep 07, 2022 08:59 PM
New/Returning Disney+ Subscribers: 1-Month Disney+ Subscription
(Valid thru 9/19)$2.00
$7.99
74% offDisney Plus
Visit Disney PlusGood Deal
Bad Deal
Save
Share
Leave a Comment
Top Comments
156 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
https://epl.paypal-communication..
https://epl.paypal-communication..
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
The free Paramount+ was outstanding with a much larger selection of programs.
Also there is speculation of Disney doing a free service with ads.
Disney was outstanding when they stuck to the mission!
Walt was a good and great man.
The free Paramount+ was outstanding with a much larger selection of programs.
Also there is speculation of Disney doing a free service with ads.
Disney was outstanding when they stuck to the mission!
Walt was a good and great man.
And then after signing up, we realized that most of the important U.S. Open matches were not on ESPN+. Only the less popular round one and round two matches, doubles matches etc. For example, the Serena Williams matches were not there on ESPN+. But other Round 2 matches were available. For the Serena matches you needed login via regular cable service, or a live TV service like YouTube TV.
We were so disappointed. What is the point of subscribing to a paid service, if there are further pay walls. I can understand pay-per-view content like special boxing matches etc. won't be included in a regular subscription. But what is the point of blocking a round two women's tennis match just because they knew that it will be a popular match due to Serena's upcoming retirement.
We are happy paying $10 per month just for ESPN, but that's not enough. We are supposed to pay $50 to $70 per month for a regular cable subscription otherwise we cannot see random matches which ESPN thinks has higher value.
It's such a stupid anti- consumer move.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Obviously they earn more from cable revenue and that's why they are doing this. I'm aware of that. Just that the difference can't be that much to warrant such an anti-consumer experience.
The way I see it - there should not be any difference in content between folks that access espn app by linking to their cable tv service, and folks that pay directly to espn via espn+. Or they should have two tiers of espn+. One shouldn't have to pay for full cable tv access to watch a match if we are willing to pay directly for just espn++ (for example).
Leave a Comment