Did this coupon
work for you?
work for you?
Sorry, this deal has expired.
Get notified of deals like this in the future.
Add Deal Alert for this Item
Forum Thread
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 CORE 8GB GDDR6 Graphics Card - $239.99 @ Amazon
in
Video Cards
(6)
If you purchase something through a post on our site, Slickdeals may get a small share of the sale.
Check Out Similar Computers Deals
View AllFrontpage
$67.50
& More + Free Shipping
45
49
Frontpage
$180
+ Free Shipping
30
15
Frontpage
$239.50
+ Free Shipping
34
27
Price Intelligence
Give Feedback Model: XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 CORE Gaming Graphics Card with 8GB GDDR6 HDMI 3xDP, AMD RDNA 2 RX-66XL8LFDQ
Deal History
Deal History includes data from multiple reputable stores, such as Best Buy, Target, and Walmart. The lowest price among stores for a given day is selected as the "Sale Price".
Sale Price does not include sale prices at Amazon unless a deal was posted by a community member.
Sale Price does not include sale prices at Amazon unless a deal was posted by a community member.
Current Prices
Sort: Lowest to Highest | Last Updated 5/7/2024, 11:05 PM| Sold By | Sale Price |
|---|---|
 Amazon | $209.99 |
Don't have Amazon Prime? Students can get a free 6-Month Amazon Prime trial with free 2-day shipping, unlimited video streaming & more.
If you're not a student, there's also a free 1-Month Amazon Prime trial available.
You can also earn cash back rewards on Amazon and Whole Foods purchases with the Amazon Prime Visa credit card. Read our review to see if it’s the right card for you.
9 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
The RX6600 is 42% faster than the 1660Ti/1660S according to real world performance.
Userbenchmark's estimates seems to have reached a new level of stupidity and uselessness if it estimates a 1660S is better if the 1660S actually loses by such a huge margin in games and benchmarks.
The RX6600 is 42% faster than the 1660Ti/1660S according to real world performance.
Userbenchmark's estimates seems to have reached a new level of stupidity and uselessness if it estimates a 1660S is better if the 1660S actually loses by such a huge margin in games and benchmarks.
Thanks man. I think I looked at it wrong on userbenchmarks, but the difference isn't as obvious as techpoweup.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.