Original Post
Written by
Edited October 24, 2022
at 09:30 PM
by
Features:
2500 mAh
Duracell Rechargeable Pre-charged Nimh Batteries Let You Charge Hundreds of Times
Guaranteed 10 Years or up to 400 Recharges, Whichever Comes First
P.S. Sale applies to other duracell batteries too such as AA alkaline, AA charger kit plus batteries, lithium ion 2032 coin batteries, AAA recharegable 12 pack
Only the D cells, C cells, and Power Block are NOT on sale.
https://www.costco.com/duracell-r...79880.html
QA Note: AA's are OOS but AAA's still available. See Front Page for a link.
124 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Featured Comments
Project Farm did a fantastic video on rechargeable batteries using several tests: resistance, discharge rates, etc.
Basically all Chinese brands performed the worst and the Japanese ones did the best. While the Duracell tested was 2450 and these are 2500 in OP posted, they should be regarded as virtually the same. Duracell's 2450 and IKEA's Ladda 2450 did the best in about all the tests. Fantastic batteries.
Given the IKEA and Duracell are so close in performance, the Duracell is a much better buy (if they were made in Japan) at $1.67/battery vs. IKEA Laddas at $2.25/battery.
As for the Energizer, they are $1.25/battery right now and 2300 rating. The ones tested were 2000 mAh. While they didn't come out on top like previous two, they were near the top ahead of Amazon black and silver rechargeables in some tests. Overall scores, they placed 5th behind Duracell 2450 (1.7), IKEA Ladda 2450 (2.0), Black Amazon Basics 1900 (4.0), Eneloop 1900 (4.3), and Energizer 2000 (5.0).
The fact they are 5th, I'd grab Duracells (if they were made in Japan) given the $1.67 cost just a little more than the $1.25 of Energizer, but should watch the video for your specific needs as Energizer was pretty impressive in couple of the tests.
https://youtu.be/-jXQNY6rve8
I'll stick with the Japanese made cells for now...
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank thaskett
https://www.costco.com/energizer-...12744.html
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank Scoreracing
https://www.costco.com/energizer-...12744.html
These Duracell are technically better, IF they were made in Japan. These appear to be made in China according to picture on website. I would therefore pass and get the Energizers instead or IKEA Laddas, albeit Laddas are bit bulkier and may not fit well in slots that are in the tube shape of a AA.
Project Farm did a fantastic video on rechargeable batteries using several tests: resistance, discharge rates, etc.
Basically all Chinese brands performed the worst and the Japanese ones did the best. While the Duracell tested was 2450 and these are 2500 in OP posted, they should be regarded as virtually the same. Duracell's 2450 and IKEA's Ladda 2450 did the best in about all the tests. Fantastic batteries.
Given the IKEA and Duracell are so close in performance, the Duracell is a much better buy (if they were made in Japan) at $1.67/battery vs. IKEA Laddas at $2.25/battery.
As for the Energizer, they are $1.25/battery right now and 2300 rating. The ones tested were 2000 mAh. While they didn't come out on top like previous two, they were near the top ahead of Amazon black and silver rechargeables in some tests. Overall scores, they placed 5th behind Duracell 2450 (1.7), IKEA Ladda 2450 (2.0), Black Amazon Basics 1900 (4.0), Eneloop 1900 (4.3), and Energizer 2000 (5.0).
The fact they are 5th, I'd grab Duracells (if they were made in Japan) given the $1.67 cost just a little more than the $1.25 of Energizer, but should watch the video for your specific needs as Energizer was pretty impressive in couple of the tests.
https://youtu.be/-jXQNY6rve8
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Where are people buying? Sam's looks to be the cheapest. 1.94 a battery.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank HapShaughnessy
Basically all Chinese brands performed the worst and the Japanese ones did the best. While the Duracell tested was 2450 and these are 2500 in OP posted, they should be regarded as virtually the same. Duracell's 2450 and IKEA's Ladda 2450 did the best in about all the tests. Fantastic batteries.
Given the IKEA and Duracell are so close in performance, the Duracell is a much better buy at $1.67/battery vs. IKEA Laddas at $2.25/battery.
As for the Energizer, they are $1.25/battery right now and 2300 rating. The ones tested were 2000 mAh. While they didn't come out on top like previous two, they were near the top ahead of Amazon black and silver rechargeables in some tests. Overall scores, they placed 5th behind Duracell 2450 (1.7), IKEA Ladda 2450 (2.0), Black Amazon Basics 1900 (4.0), Eneloop 1900 (4.3), and Energizer 2000 (5.0).
The fact they are 5th, I'd grab Duracells given the $1.67 cost just a little more than the $1.25 of Energizer, but should watch the video for your specific needs as Energizer was pretty impressive in couple of the tests.
https://youtu.be/-jXQNY6rve8
https://www.costco.com/energizer-...12744.html
The one I linked to is 2 yrs old and his first is 3 yrs old. And yes a lot can change with a battery, which is why he did that on purpose to show how batteries hold up over time. Maybe trying watching first? I don't buy argument that Japanese made batteries would get worse on the whole or that Duracell or IKEA Ladda would be all of a sudden a crap battery, but if you're that skeptical maybe buy the Chinese ones?