Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Missed This Deal? Get alerts when similar deals are posted.
expired
Teaser38 48.3K Views
Oct 25, 2022 11:15 PM

2TB Kingston NV2 M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe Solid State Drive

$130

$160

18% off
+ Free Shippingat Amazon
Visit Amazon

Why are you downvoting this deal?

Good Deal?
52Comments
Save
Share
Deal Details
Amazon has 2TB Kingston NV2 M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe Solid State Drive (SNV2S/2000G) on sale for $129.99. Shipping is free.

Kingston has 2TB Kingston NV2 M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe Solid State Drive (SNV2S/2000G) on sale for $129.99. Shipping is free.

Thanks to community member Teaser38 for finding this deal.

Product Details:
  • 2TB Capacity
  • 3500 MB/s Maximum Read Speed
  • 2800 MB/s Maximum Write Speed
  • PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe Interface
  • M.2 2280 Form Factor
  • Limited 3-Year Warranty

Editor's Notes

Written by StrawMan86 | Staff
  • About this deal:
    • This deal is $30 off (18.75% savings) the listed retail price of $159.99.
    • Our research indicates that this offer is $10 lower (7.14% savings) than the next best available price from a reputable merchant with prices starting from $139.99 and higher.
  • Ratings & Reviews:
    • Rated 4.3 out of 5 stars based on 14 Amazon customer reviews.
  • About this store:

Original Post

Written by Teaser38
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Amazon has 2TB Kingston NV2 M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe Solid State Drive (SNV2S/2000G) on sale for $129.99. Shipping is free.

Kingston has 2TB Kingston NV2 M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe Solid State Drive (SNV2S/2000G) on sale for $129.99. Shipping is free.

Thanks to community member Teaser38 for finding this deal.

Product Details:
  • 2TB Capacity
  • 3500 MB/s Maximum Read Speed
  • 2800 MB/s Maximum Write Speed
  • PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe Interface
  • M.2 2280 Form Factor
  • Limited 3-Year Warranty

Editor's Notes

Written by StrawMan86 | Staff
  • About this deal:
    • This deal is $30 off (18.75% savings) the listed retail price of $159.99.
    • Our research indicates that this offer is $10 lower (7.14% savings) than the next best available price from a reputable merchant with prices starting from $139.99 and higher.
  • Ratings & Reviews:
    • Rated 4.3 out of 5 stars based on 14 Amazon customer reviews.
  • About this store:

Original Post

Written by Teaser38

Community Voting

Deal Score
+46
Good Deal
Bad Deal

Why are you downvoting this deal?

Top Comments

Join The Conversation

Share your experience with the Slickdeals community

Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!

52 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Pro
Oct 26, 2022 10:47 PM
5.4K Comments
Joined Aug 2009
Undisclosed
Pro
Oct 26, 2022 10:47 PM
5.4K Comments
Does this have DRAM?
Oct 26, 2022 10:56 PM
4.1K Comments
Joined Dec 2015
shouthouseOct 26, 2022 10:56 PM
4.1K Comments
Quote from RandomMandom View quoted comment :
Not sure why this drive is even PCIe 4.0 considering it has PCIe 3.0 speeds (beaten by the better PCIe 3.0 NVMe drives)

I'd recommend just getting a PCIe 3.0 drive. PCIe 4.0 generally runs hotter than PCIe 3.0 so if you're getting the same speeds out of both... just get the 3.0 imo

EDIT: Removed the part about getting a PCIe 3.0 drive for PS5 due to possible compatibility issues
Possible compatibility issues? PCIe 3.0 flat out will NOT work with PS5. If you're going to make a correction just be accurate.
Oct 26, 2022 11:12 PM
2.2K Comments
Joined Jun 2004
jrb531Oct 26, 2022 11:12 PM
2.2K Comments
It's cheap cause it's dramless. I guess as a secondary drive maybe as the reviews are good but as a main drive I would always go with one with dram.
Oct 26, 2022 11:24 PM
4.4K Comments
Joined Oct 2011
turbodogOct 26, 2022 11:24 PM
4.4K Comments
Can anyone recommend a good 2TB OS drive for a laptop with good random 4K speeds and high TBW? I use an Optane 900P U.2 280GB in my desktop.
Oct 26, 2022 11:35 PM
4.4K Comments
Joined Oct 2011
turbodogOct 26, 2022 11:35 PM
4.4K Comments
Quote from WingsOfF View quoted comment :

Pretty decent review

https://www.techpowerup.com/revie...-nvme-ssd/
Hey yeah that is a pretty positive review. Not too shabby at all especially for $130. Also laptop recommended so maybe this is a good fit for my use case.
Oct 27, 2022 12:32 AM
321 Comments
Joined Feb 2014
tu1820Oct 27, 2022 12:32 AM
321 Comments
Quote from UltraLaser View quoted comment :
Eh, 640 TBW...

Solidigm is Intel QLC, 800 TBW.
I mean on paper yes. Will the vast majority of people come close to that during a reasonable life time of this drive? No.

To put it into perspective, I have a Samsung SSD in my machine at work, it's been powered on for a bit more than 3 hoursyears. I build a fairly big code base on average every day (sometimes less, sometimes multiple times). I'm now getting close to 21 TBW. The drive is rated at 600 TBW. At this rate I could continue to use this for another 25 years. Is that reasonable? No. And I bet it will fail well before that.

Bottom line, unless you have especially taxing disk write intensive use cases, for the vast majority of people TBW, even extremely low ones, are meaningless. Though one could argue they could be used as an indicator for quality/longevity.

EDIT: Accidentally wrote "3 hours" instead of "3 years".
Last edited by tu1820 October 26, 2022 at 07:00 PM.
Oct 27, 2022 12:45 AM
41 Comments
Joined Jan 2020
7DeuceDeuceOct 27, 2022 12:45 AM
41 Comments
Quote from tu1820 View quoted comment :
I mean on paper yes. Will the vast majority of people come close to that during a reasonable life time of this drive? No.

To put it into perspective, I have a Samsung SSD in my machine at work, it's been powered on for a bit more than 3 hours. I build a fairly big code base on average every day (sometimes less, sometimes multiple times). I'm now getting close to 21 TBW. The drive is rated at 600 TBW. At this rate I could continue to use this for another 25 years. Is that reasonable? No. And I bet it will fail well before that.

Bottom line, unless you have especially taxing disk write intensive use cases, for the vast majority of people TBW, even extremely low ones, are meaningless. Though one could argue they could be used as an indicator for quality/longevity.
There's a lot of variables including environmental and the controller itself that contributes to the early failure of NAND. Read, not only write is also a contributing factor.

Rule of thumb, you don't buy cheap crap if you're worried about risk- if you don't care, buy cheap, they're all the same.

With that said, Kingston does a VERY good job with their controllers to maximize life expectancy of their drives. They do however put more support effort in to their premium product lines than their "budget" lines like this one.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Oct 27, 2022 12:52 AM
4.4K Comments
Joined Oct 2011
turbodogOct 27, 2022 12:52 AM
4.4K Comments
Quote from tu1820 View quoted comment :
I mean on paper yes. Will the vast majority of people come close to that during a reasonable life time of this drive? No.

To put it into perspective, I have a Samsung SSD in my machine at work, it's been powered on for a bit more than 3 hours. I build a fairly big code base on average every day (sometimes less, sometimes multiple times). I'm now getting close to 21 TBW. The drive is rated at 600 TBW. At this rate I could continue to use this for another 25 years. Is that reasonable? No. And I bet it will fail well before that.

Bottom line, unless you have especially taxing disk write intensive use cases, for the vast majority of people TBW, even extremely low ones, are meaningless. Though one could argue they could be used as an indicator for quality/longevity.
I've got about 26 TB written to my 260GB 900P Optane drive over the last 3 years, so with a 5.11 PBW rating and continued usage at the current rate, I could use the drive until about the year 2600 A.D. or so. LMAO
Last edited by turbodog October 27, 2022 at 05:56 AM.
Oct 27, 2022 1:06 AM
1.8K Comments
Joined Jan 2014
olsonbri1Oct 27, 2022 1:06 AM
1.8K Comments
Quote from max1001 View quoted comment :
The solidigm deal was better.
Which deal, the P41? It's still available.
Oct 27, 2022 1:23 AM
3.7K Comments
Joined Nov 2012
WingsOfFOct 27, 2022 1:23 AM
3.7K Comments

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank

Quote from RandomMandom View quoted comment :
Not sure why this drive is even PCIe 4.0 considering it has PCIe 3.0 speeds (beaten by the better PCIe 3.0 NVMe drives)

I'd recommend just getting a PCIe 3.0 drive. PCIe 4.0 generally runs hotter than PCIe 3.0 so if you're getting the same speeds out of both... just get the 3.0 imo

EDIT: Removed the part about getting a PCIe 3.0 drive for PS5 due to compatibility issues
Too much bad information in this post.

PCIe 4 drives run hotter when the memory is clocked and controllers have powerful enough hardware to push to PCIe 4 speeds. The interface controller is not what is creating the heat. If the NAND and controller is running at PCIe 3 speeds, then it isn't creating any more heat than PCIe drives. Better to understand why the heat is created before making such bad correlation assertions.

People have already given reason why the interface is needed for PS5 use. The interface is enforced, speeds are not.


Quote from RandomMandom View quoted comment :
I'm honestly surprised PS5 is restricted to PCIe 4.0 since its advantage over 3.0 on PC isn't that great for standard gaming use. I believe most PC users who use PCIe 4.0 do it for massive amounts of transfers for certain types of projects.
It has a minimum hardware requirement because there are a lot of crappy Gen 3 SSDs (with high latencies and inconsisten throughput, etc) which some people are going to pop in, have missing frames or stuttering and are going to bad mouth the PS5 or worse for them try to get technical support or return the PS5.

Making a minimum of Gen 4 avoids most of that crap.
3
1
Oct 27, 2022 2:32 AM
875 Comments
Joined Nov 2013
JesseH5623Oct 27, 2022 2:32 AM
875 Comments
PC is Running out of room on a wd blue drive and need more games will this be good enough? My mobo is a z490 pcie 3.0
Oct 27, 2022 4:00 AM
781 Comments
Joined Jun 2022
DillDozerOct 27, 2022 4:00 AM
781 Comments
Quote from SharpDeer386 View quoted comment :
5500 MB/s sequential reading speed is required. This one here has just 3500 MB/s. Should work fine with most current titles, but you never know if there'll be some future games that fully utilize the PS5's SSD speed.
It's all marketing fluff. A slow ssd is fast enough for streaming data.
More like consoles are trash, b/c very limited memory and may need high speed drive to constantly shuffle data in/out (basically slow ram). Meanwhile, on PC, a budget ssd from many years ago plays new titles perfectly that are marketed for muh ps5 speeeeed.
Last edited by DillDozer October 26, 2022 at 09:03 PM.
Oct 27, 2022 12:58 PM
4.4K Comments
Joined Oct 2011
turbodogOct 27, 2022 12:58 PM
4.4K Comments
So I did actually order this from Amazon last night, will use it in a Thinkbook 13s 6800U I've got on order. If Techpowerup says it performs and doesn't get hot, that's good enough for me.
Oct 27, 2022 2:41 PM
54 Comments
Joined Nov 2014
ArnoPOct 27, 2022 2:41 PM
54 Comments
Quote from bigcheese53 View quoted comment :
I thought gen 4 was the only requirement? Is there something else? Apologies for ignorance
I think it has to have a read speed of 5500 or more.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Oct 27, 2022 2:58 PM
3.7K Comments
Joined Nov 2012
WingsOfFOct 27, 2022 2:58 PM
3.7K Comments

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank

Quote from DillDozer View quoted comment :
It's all marketing fluff. A slow ssd is fast enough for streaming data.
More like consoles are trash, b/c very limited memory and may need high speed drive to constantly shuffle data in/out (basically slow ram). Meanwhile, on PC, a budget ssd from many years ago plays new titles perfectly that are marketed for muh ps5 speeeeed.
A gaming console isn't just a media player for streaming data. It is a specialized gaming computer.

PS5 has a 16GB/256byte GDDR6 which is plenty fast with high throughput for a single task machine (it uses a smaller separate memory for background tasks). Its built in SSD storage is also a custom high throughput storage with 12 channels. Most retail SSDs have 4 or less channels.

The expansion storage is for keeping games and persistent game data larger than the built in SSD can store. Their speed affects game loading and saving (it isn't constant rate media streaming) as well as game switching.

The minimum interface specs are for making sure people don't use crappy versions of older SSDs which have problems with sustained or consistent throughput for reads and writes even if the full Gen 4 throughput is not required. PS5 does not support HMB like PC operating systems might so dramless SSDs crap out in speed and latency if a minimum standard isn't maintained.

Above the minimum standards (not just peak numbers), it may not make much difference but that is a far cry from saying any SSD will work equally well because there are a lot of crappy Gen 3 SSDs that will behave badly.
Last edited by WingsOfF October 27, 2022 at 09:46 AM.
2

Join The Conversation

Share your experience with the Slickdeals community

Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!