expiredvns1 posted Dec 13, 2022 05:43 AM
Item 1 of 6
Item 1 of 6
expiredvns1 posted Dec 13, 2022 05:43 AM
QNAP TS-653D-4G 6-Bay NAS Enclosure
+ Free Shipping$520
$649
19% offB&H Photo Video
Visit B&H Photo VideoGood Deal
Bad Deal
Save
Share
Post Date | Sold By | Sale Price | Activity |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | $550 |
10 |
Leave a Comment
Top Comments
Sorry for rambling. TL;DR: this is completely inadequate for transcoding really anything (not just 4k), but you shouldn't need too nowadays.
QTS isn't terrible, I do think it's behind Synology or the others that you mentioned if you're just looking to NAS this device.
QNAP does have a lot of zero days - but it's pretty well documented about not opening up anything to internet on their forums, well any forums for QNAP due to this. Pretty standard for any type of App/Hardware these days to limit the attack surface as much as possible.
There's the third-party / maintained QPKG repos out there to help. But yeah, they're slow to update and they're third-party. I didn't find them clunky and worked as expected.
I migrated all my Apps (Sonarr/Radarr/Sab/PiHole...ect) to container station via Portainer / Compose. I do think Container Station would be okay but just for overall management Portainer is the way to go.
Not sure where you're getting the VM loading times and specifically for Home Assistant, as that's how I'm running my HA instance. It's back up in less than minute during updates via the App or system reboots (well maybe slightly on VM restart, def no where near 20mins)
I also have an Microsoft Intune/ConfigMgr lab running in there with multiple different client OS's for testing; Ubuntu and Ansible/Teraform lab - they're all speedy, I haven't found any issues.
I've updated the memory to 32gigs and haven't had any Kernel Panics / stops. The VMs see the memory I assigned and it's def over the allotted 8gbs.
I don't know, I just haven't had the experience you've outlined above with mine. I've maxed out the drives with 14TB disks, 32gb RAM. I did a lot of research when I first started looking and it was between this guy and a 6 bay Synology, I ended up on the QNAP just for the hardware and I knew coming in EVERYONE said QNAP software sucks and is inferior to Synology - I was worried I was going to see that. I've never used Synology - but I can say that I haven't felt I couldn't do something I wanted or had issues with so far. I don't regret going QNAP.
1. This is a Celeron CPU - so, expectations need to be adjusted accordingly. Don't expect some tremendous performance with transcoding videos for example - but it will still do the job.
2. RAM - it does support and can use 32GB (which is super handy if you want to run a few containers). That's what I have, tested and confirmed. The caveat - you must use dual-rank memory modules. Here are the details: https://forum.qnap.com/viewtopic.php?t
3. Fan noise - I have the 4-drive unit, fan is practically silent.
4. HDD temperatures - it is more than good. To do initial burn-in on the drives I ran ShredOS (similar to DBAN) to fill 4x16TB drives multiple times with random data. This was a 100% load for the drives for over a week - which is way beyond what's typical for a NAS - and all drives kept 40-41C and the entire system performed flawlessly.
5. Do you need 2.5G Ethernet ports - YES! With 4 drives at 160-180MB/sec I was getting 600-700Mb/sec combined easily from the drives. Your bottleneck is the LAN port. Even if you bridge the two you will still hit the limit.
6. Extra PCIe slot is very handy. I was surprised that a 10GBps Mellanox 311 SFP+ card was literally a plug-and-play thing. It was fully supported and just worked.
Minor annoyance with that - you will have to mess with the low-profile bracket as QNAP decided to use a non-standard bracket. Not that it was a big deal - I had to bent one bit, and drill a new hole for the screw (as I insisted on it being installed and screwed properly). You could just install it without the bracket and it will be mostly fine - after all you will likely put the NAS somewhere once and never move it from there.
7. The 6-drive unit is extra tempting as drives are really cheap those days. So, instead of transcoding or do other magics to reduce file size I would just get a few extra drives.
74 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank Dead_Cow
Sorry for rambling. TL;DR: this is completely inadequate for transcoding really anything (not just 4k), but you shouldn't need too nowadays.
Sorry for rambling. TL;DR: this is completely inadequate for transcoding really anything (not just 4k), but you shouldn't need too nowadays.
Edit: Quick google-fu shows it may be that only native QNAP applications can access the iGPU for hardware transcoding on QNAP devices. Ouch.
Edit2: I've been corrected by post #19 in this thread that this unit can transcode in Plex. User of post #19 states personal experience with a 4bay unit from this series. Link to post.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
If you are cool with not letting anyone outside your house access the QNAP (turn off myCloud, turn off UPNP) then it seems like a great device. I think most people wouldn't find a backup/nas that has limited internet access very useful though.
Personally in the future I'm gonna build out my own custom mini PC NAS with TrueNAS or unRAID so I can do exactly what I want with drives, but I think a synology is better as your "first" NAS. I love having one though, I put my torrent client on it, have all my movies and TV shows on it and it works great in the house over WiFi. With modern TV smart apps you just install Plex and don't need transcoding or anything, the only downside is DoVi (DolbyVision) encoded MKVs won't play but they will if you use an Apple TV+ or nvidia Shield TV. Other devices and native apps - PS5, xbox, roku, Plex app, Kodi app, chromecast - don't play Dolby Vision encoded streams.
HDR/HDR10 work perfectly fine in the plex app though so if you just avoid DoVi encodes you are fine.
Sorry for rambling. TL;DR: this is completely inadequate for transcoding really anything (not just 4k), but you shouldn't need too nowadays.
Edit: Quick google-fu shows it may be that only native QNAP applications can access the iGPU for hardware transcoding on QNAP devices. Ouch.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Plus most people have video catalog with variety of media and do view their content on-the-go where bandwidth may play a bigger role than native playback. Most of the time, you cannot stream 4k HDR content on a mobile signal natively even if the device is capable.
Sure, it would be wonderful for all of us to have devices, connectivity and bandwidth for native playback of 4K HDR 10bit content, but that is not the case. Transcoding solves all those issues as it can adjust video output on the fly.
Leave a Comment