Sceptre E249W-19203R 24-inch FHD LED Gaming Monitor 2X HDMI VGA 75Hz Build-in Speakers, Machine Black [amazon.com]
Blue Light Shift: Blue Light Shift reduces blue light, allowing you to comfortably work, watch, or play applications without straining your eyes.
Up to 75Hz Refresh Rate: With 75Hz refresh rate, images change faster and smoother than the standard, reducing screen tearing
Fast response time: Fast response times reduce ghosting & blurring while transitioning pixels, always keeping the enemy & terrain precisely in focus during chaotic moments.
Multiple Ports: Two HDMI and One VGA port provide up to 75Hz refresh rate, refining picture clarity in all action-packed gaming sequences and graphic design projects. Audio In and a Headphone Jack provide diverse audio options.
Built in Speakers: Perfectly suited to work & gaming settings, built-in speakers deliver robust & smooth audio while saving space on your desk.
Leave a Comment
7 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank The_Love_Spud
For some time I used a 32" 1080p LCD setup as it closely matched the effective dots/pixels per inch of my preferred configuration for a prior CRT. At the time, my Windows setup (XP and later Windows 7) lacked scaling functionality and 32" LCDs were eventually available at a killer price (sub-$300) for the amount of screen real estate they offered in addition to the massive return of desk real estate (vs. a 20" CRT running at 1152 by 864).
These days it is trivially easy to adjust the UI scaling in Windows [microsoft.com] to compensate for the native pixel size of a given monitor when driving it at the native resolution. This key functionality made it possible for me to make 4k screens on both desktop and my laptop usable (though to this day I still bump into Windows applications that don't handle UI scaling properly).
Good luck!
Jon
For some time I used a 32" 1080p LCD setup as it closely matched the effective dots/pixels per inch of my preferred configuration for a prior CRT. At the time, my Windows setup (XP and later Windows 7) lacked scaling functionality and 32" LCDs were eventually available at a killer price (sub-$300) for the amount of screen real estate they offered in addition to the massive return of desk real estate (vs. a 20" CRT running at 1152 by 864).
These days it is trivially easy to adjust the UI scaling in Windows [microsoft.com] to compensate for the native pixel size of a given monitor when driving it at the native resolution. This key functionality made it possible for me to make 4k screens on both desktop and my laptop usable (though to this day I still bump into Windows applications that don't handle UI scaling properly).
Good luck!
Jon
My personal vision was a limiting factor as to what setting I found most comfortable at the chosen distance (which is why I had resolution cranked so "low").
Good luck!
Jon
My personal vision was a limiting factor as to what setting I found most comfortable at the chosen distance (which is why I had resolution cranked so "low".
Good luck!
Jon
Now if I'd held onto that ginormous monitor for 13 years I could be selling it for $1000 after having bought it secondhand for presumably near-nothing. Of course, the storage space demands were definitely non-zero and might've come close to the $6 a month it seems to have appreciated in that time. In my defense, the computer components which connected to that monitor are generally worthless.
Good luck!
Jon
Leave a Comment