Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands or deals, including promoted items.
Sorry, this deal has expired. Get notified of deals like this in the future. Add Deal Alert for this Item
Frontpage

ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger Video Card Expired

$230
$289.99
+ Free Shipping
+84 Deal Score
31,050 Views
Update: This popular deal is still available.

Newegg has ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger Dual Fan 8GB GDDR6 PCIe 4.0 Graphics Card on sale for $229.99. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Deal Hunter SehoneyDP for finding this deal.

Specs
  • 8GB 256-Bit GDDR6
  • OpenGL Support: OpenGL 4.6
  • DirectX Support: DirectX 12
  • Core Clock Speed: 2200MHz
  • HDCP Support: HDCP 2.3
Good Deal?

Original Post

Written by
Edited March 15, 2023 at 04:30 PM by
Newegg [newegg.com] has ASRock Challenger Arc A750 8GB GDDR6 PCI Express 4.0 x16 ATX Video Card GPU on sale for $229.99. Shipping is free.
If you purchase something through a post on our site, Slickdeals may get a small share of the sale.
Deal
Score
+84
31,050 Views
$230
$289.99

Community Wiki

Last Edited by eyeslick March 11, 2023 at 02:02 PM
https://www.tomshardware.com/revi...n-review/8

The Intel Arc A750 makes the RTX 3050 look pathetic and even gives some tough competition to the 3060, though AMD's RX 6600 makes Intel's offering a little less enticing. Still, it's good to see competition from Intel in the GPU space.

Your comment cannot be blank.

Featured Comments

Hoping Intel keeps making cards. Competition is good for everyone (except AMD and Nvidia).
They aren't dropped the GPU business. They already have a couple generations coming out over the next couple of years. They have reported they are selling more GPUs. And their drivers have gotten a lot better.
Nope. I work for a company that get lots of Intels test business. GPU business not going away...if anything, its a big part of their future lol. They made the right moves attacking the affordable sector first to iron their kinks out. Arc was never meant to be a big hit off the bat, nobody shouldve ever expected that. The improvements theyve made "thus far" have been more than impressive. Battlemage is where the big guns will be revealed. Theyll still be behind by that time, but it will rival current gen of high end cards from the competition sans 4090. You gotta root for them because both amd and nv really suck these days regarding pricing and need to be humbled.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined Sep 2022
L3: Novice
> bubble2 220 Posts
78 Reputation
AnonymousOctopus
03-13-2023 at 02:22 AM.
03-13-2023 at 02:22 AM.
Quote from essix8 :
I dont agree. While Arc isnt perfect, this is a far better buy.

Current drivers are significantly better than launch ones. Performance is between 6700XT and 3070 levels in a lot of newer games, and at worst around 6650xt levels.

If you enable ray tracing Arc blows RDNA2 out of the water, as the RT performance is RTX 3000 levels/ RDNA3 levels. For example here is Hogwarts Legacy 1440p RT, no upscaling:
https://tpucdn.com/review/hogwart...0-1440.png [tpucdn.com]

XeSS is a much better upscaler than FSR, but can do both XeSS and FSR.

The XMX cores accelerate AI application use, like upscaling in Gigapixel AI and GANs. It's not as widespread adopted as CUDA, but better than what AMD offerings in AI performance.

Encoding quality and performance is the best in the industry, Quicksync is better than NVENC and both are better than AMD, even on their newest flagships. The A750 also supports AV1 encoding, which neither RDNA2 or RTX 3000 support (you have to pay $800+ for their latest GPUs to get this).
Regarding your statements on gaming performance (RX 6700 XT/RTX 3070), that's a bit off based on updates from major reviewers who retested them. Hardware Unboxed on Youtube published updates a few days ago. They published an article as well: https://www.techspot.com/review/2...0-revisit/

The more expensive A770 was tested. The A750 is about 10% slower in raster https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-s...a750.c3929. At 1080p we have averages: A770 111 fps, RX 6650 XT 120 fps, RX 6700 XT 140 fps, RTX 3070 143 fps. At 1440p the Arc A770 did go up slightly to be 2 fps faster than the RX 6650 XT. FPS averages are a bit inflated for all because CSGO was included to test DX9 in the 12 game suite.

This price bracket/tier of GPU is fine for 1080p on current games (no RT) or 1440p (no RT) on older and less demanding games. The RX 6600 XT/RTX 3060 commonly shows up as the recommended GPU for 1080p (no RT) on recent releases so I wouldn't rely on anything in this tier for 1440p or RT moving forward.

That said, $230-250 is within reason given pricing of the competition. Hopefully Battlemage can go up a few tiers and fix the higher than expected power draw at idle and load. Going up 2 or more tiers, then more people would care about RT.

Btw, another updated review from Techtesters specifically for the A750 (including power draw): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYb5PhPSIpE
1
>
1
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Last edited by AnonymousOctopus March 13, 2023 at 02:36 AM.
Joined Jul 2009
L4: Apprentice
> bubble2 379 Posts
31 Reputation
tjmini-note
03-13-2023 at 08:22 AM.
03-13-2023 at 08:22 AM.
Quote from Teaser38 :
Arguably, they have been the #1 graphic company of all time seeing as their integrated graphics are in almost all their CPUs.
That may be where the consumer apprehension originiates. I've had half a dozen laptops with integrated intel graphics and without fail they have each, in the graphics department, been utter shaite.
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Jun 2010
L6: Expert
> bubble2 1,531 Posts
242 Reputation
HansGruber
03-13-2023 at 11:39 AM.
03-13-2023 at 11:39 AM.
Quote from BrianO5815 :
Intel loses on perf per watt, runs about the same price and is less mature. Go used 6600 or 5700 and win.
You don't win with the two cards you mentioned. You win if you wait for next generation cards which are overdue in the midgrade level. The GPU prices are still inflated while demand is low. If the A750 was $150, it would be a no brainer fill card that will mature with drivers over the next few months.

The 6700xt would be the card @ $250 but the pricing is not their yet. Waiting 2-3 months for the 4060 and AMD midgrade 7 series cards is the best bet.
2
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Jan 2017
L3: Novice
> bubble2 247 Posts
38 Reputation
Welshman
03-13-2023 at 11:52 AM.
03-13-2023 at 11:52 AM.
Kinda curious how this is considered a hot deal?
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Jan 2017
L3: Novice
> bubble2 247 Posts
38 Reputation
Welshman
03-13-2023 at 12:02 PM.
03-13-2023 at 12:02 PM.
Quote from Sysop :
I've been a PC gamer since the Commodore 64 days and GPUs on motherboards were never common from the mid 90's through the late 2000's. In fact, I used to work in television and I've tracked digital editing capabilities over the decades from the Amiga and the Video Toaster through modern CPUs and even dedicated video editing computers always had daughter boards.

Amiga 3000T with the Video toaster was the shit. It would of been amazing to see where the Amiga would have landed had commodore not dice rolled the company for that ridiculous CD32 to go against Sega.
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Jan 2007
L6: Expert
> bubble2 1,639 Posts
275 Reputation
Sysop
03-13-2023 at 01:20 PM.
03-13-2023 at 01:20 PM.
Quote from Welshman :
Amiga 3000T with the Video toaster was the shit. It would of been amazing to see where the Amiga would have landed had commodore not dice rolled the company for that ridiculous CD32 to go against Sega.
Agreed.
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Apr 2018
L3: Novice
> bubble2 244 Posts
45 Reputation
TrevynA
03-13-2023 at 02:24 PM.
03-13-2023 at 02:24 PM.
Quote from BrianO5815 :
Intel loses on perf per watt, runs about the same price and is less mature. Go used 6600 or 5700 and win.

Even new rx 6600 goes on sale cheaper than this. You don't have to buy used. You can get a 6650xt in this price range new.

The question is, what are the benefits of this Intel GPU over a 6650xt? I'm open minded and I agree with the idea of supporting competition in the GPU space, but it has to make sense.
2
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined Dec 2006
L9: Master
> bubble2 4,457 Posts
2,820 Reputation
Thelnel52
03-13-2023 at 02:30 PM.
03-13-2023 at 02:30 PM.
Quote from TrevynA :
Even new rx 6600 goes on sale cheaper than this. You don't have to buy used. You can get a 6650xt in this price range new.

The question is, what are the benefits of this Intel GPU over a 6650xt? I'm open minded and I agree with the idea of supporting competition in the GPU space, but it has to make sense.
I like to make bad decisions, but to me, the novelty is worth something.
1
1
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Sep 2009
L10: Grand Master
> bubble2 15,154 Posts
4,278 Reputation
Knightshade
03-13-2023 at 05:03 PM.
03-13-2023 at 05:03 PM.
Quote from TrevynA :
Even new rx 6600 goes on sale cheaper than this. You don't have to buy used. You can get a 6650xt in this price range new.

The question is, what are the benefits of this Intel GPU over a 6650xt? I'm open minded and I agree with the idea of supporting competition in the GPU space, but it has to make sense.

With the newer drivers most testing seems to put the Arc750 in between the 66xx XT and 67xx cards performance wise... and at 1440p the Intel seems to get nearer the 67xx than the 66xx cards.

It also beats the hell out of comparable AMD cards in ray tracing- though I dunno how much you're doing of that in this price class anyway and if RT is a huge deal to you you prob still want Nvidia?


So it's a reasonable buy in that sense (prob a touch moreso if looking at 1440p), and supporting more competition can be your cherry on top of that I suppose.
1
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Sep 2022
L3: Novice
> bubble2 220 Posts
78 Reputation
AnonymousOctopus
03-13-2023 at 09:29 PM.
03-13-2023 at 09:29 PM.
Quote from Knightshade :
With the newer drivers most testing seems to put the Arc750 in between the 66xx XT and 67xx cards performance wise... and at 1440p the Intel seems to get nearer the 67xx than the 66xx cards.

It also beats the hell out of comparable AMD cards in ray tracing- though I dunno how much you're doing of that in this price class anyway and if RT is a huge deal to you you prob still want Nvidia?


So it's a reasonable buy in that sense (prob a touch moreso if looking at 1440p), and supporting more competition can be your cherry on top of that I suppose.
I linked a couple updated benchmarks in my earlier comment. Both Hardware Unboxed and Techtesters 1080p results would still put the A750 at roughly an RX 6600 fyi. Benchmarks were done after the major driver update and marketing push that included DX9 improvements.

I benchmarked the RX 6600 XT, RX 5700 XT, and 3060 Ti over the past year. Based on what I'm seeing on more demanding games (Forspoken, Hogwarts Legacy, Witcher 3 next gen etc), I'd say the Arc A750, RX 6600 and similar are only going to be consistent at 1080p raster high/ultra for newer releases. Forspoken in particular was only running at 50 fps at 1080p high on an ultrawide on the RX 5700 XT (about same as RTX 3060 and Arc A750, per techpowerup).

1
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Oct 2018
New User
> bubble2 4 Posts
10 Reputation
YavorG
03-13-2023 at 10:38 PM.
03-13-2023 at 10:38 PM.
How good would it be to pair with the old trusty sandy bridge i7-2600?
2
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Jul 2006
L6: Expert
> bubble2 1,466 Posts
1,301 Reputation
jchu14
03-13-2023 at 11:10 PM.

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank jchu14

03-13-2023 at 11:10 PM.
Buyers beware: If you're running an older CPU and motherboard (some Ryzen 3000 and older and Intel 9th gen and older) that doesn't have resizeable BAR (ReBAR) then an Intel ARC GPU would be significantly handicapped.

I have a Ryzen 3700x but on a motherboard that doesn't support ReBAR and the A750's performance is noticeably worse than with the Radeon 6650xt at 1080P.

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2...recommend/
2
>
1
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Dec 2005
L5: Journeyman
> bubble2 731 Posts
63 Reputation
shiki
03-15-2023 at 04:39 AM.
03-15-2023 at 04:39 AM.
I think most of you guys only care about the game performance, but there are few of us who are buying this for AV1 encoding performance. Software encoding is good but even with my Ryzen 9 5900, average FPS is 58 w/ full load. Hardware AV1 apparently goes above 200FPS, that's near 4x faster than 12 core CPU.
1
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Dec 2005
L5: Journeyman
> bubble2 731 Posts
63 Reputation
shiki
03-15-2023 at 04:41 AM.
03-15-2023 at 04:41 AM.
Quote from TrevynA :
Even new rx 6600 goes on sale cheaper than this. You don't have to buy used. You can get a 6650xt in this price range new.

The question is, what are the benefits of this Intel GPU over a 6650xt? I'm open minded and I agree with the idea of supporting competition in the GPU space, but it has to make sense.
AV1 encoding. For Nvidia and AMD, their last generation does not support hardware av1 encoding at all.
1
>
1
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined Jul 2017
L3: Novice
> bubble2 125 Posts
14 Reputation
euhenius
03-15-2023 at 09:29 AM.
03-15-2023 at 09:29 AM.
I'm not sure if I really want it even at $200 price tag. It seems like they manufactured a ton and trying to get rid of them.
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Page 6 of 8
Start the Conversation
 

More Newegg Deals

More ASRock Deals

Link Copied

The link has been copied to the clipboard.