Did this coupon
work for you?
work for you?
Post Date | Sold By | Sale Price | Activity |
---|---|---|---|
06/05/24 | Amazon | $42.95 |
4 |
12/18/23 | Amazon | $39.75 frontpage |
45 |
12/04/23 | Amazon | $96.93 |
5 |
11/07/23 | Amazon | $50.20 frontpage |
46 |
12/31/22 | Amazon | $47.48 popular |
39 |
11/08/22 | Amazon | $47.76 popular |
54 |
09/13/22 | Amazon | $45 |
8 |
08/26/22 | Amazon | $47.90 |
20 |
07/15/22 | Amazon | $37.49 |
9 |
10/11/21 | Amazon | $30.75 frontpage |
146 |
03/28/21 | Amazon | $70.37 |
5 |
03/19/21 | Amazon | $82.10 popular |
36 |
01/06/21 | Amazon | $31 |
5 |
01/06/21 | Amazon | $41.05 |
2 |
01/06/21 | Amazon | $39 |
4 |
Sold By | Sale Price |
---|---|
Amazon | $78.1 |
Product Name: | Optimum Nutrition Gold Standard 100% Whey Protein Powder, Double Rich Chocolate, 5 Pound (Packaging May Vary) |
Manufacturer: | Optimum Nutrition |
Model Number: | 1054618 |
Product SKU: | B000QSNYGI |
The link has been copied to the clipboard.
64 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Featured Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I'm getting 10% for this with more than 5 subscriptions.
I'm getting 10% for this with more than 5 subscriptions.
Not every item qualifies for the 15%, no matter how many items you have in your monthly shipment.
I average 20 Subscribe & Save items every month, and even though the majority get 15% off, some of them only get 5% off.
Nowadays, it seems like 80 bucks will get me a measly scoop sheesh. If I can get that deal back then today, I'd be throwing protein powder in the gym. Protein powder for you! Protein powder for you there! Everybody gets protein powder!!!
That's almost 2 decades ago. Of course it's cheaper. That's life.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I'm getting 10% for this with more than 5 subscriptions.
Sucks to have 10lb of protein powder unused
Pretty much all whey proteins are crap these days and give me GI issues.
....
Some are warning consumers to avoid stevia because it may reduce fertility. The root of this is a 1968 paper claiming certain tribes in Paraguay (Matto Grosso Indians) used stevia tea as a contraceptive.
To investigate this claim, Professor Joseph Kruc of Purdue University performed a study using rats (1968). He fed the rats stevia (enormous quantities by human standards), and they produced fewer offspring than the control group. (2, 3, 4) However, the study has been described as having dubious scientific methodology, and multiple studies attempting to replicate its findings failed. Kruc later admitted that the rats' lower fertility rates may have resulted from his "overdosing" them on the compound. (5)
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Some are warning consumers to avoid stevia because it may reduce fertility. The root of this is a 1968 paper claiming certain tribes in Paraguay (Matto Grosso Indians) used stevia tea as a contraceptive.
To investigate this claim, Professor Joseph Kruc of Purdue University performed a study using rats (1968). He fed the rats stevia (enormous quantities by human standards), and they produced fewer offspring than the control group. (2, 3, 4) However, the study has been described as having dubious scientific methodology, and multiple studies attempting to replicate its findings failed. Kruc later admitted that the rats' lower fertility rates may have resulted from his "overdosing" them on the compound. (5)
It is also touched on in "Population, Resources, Enviroment" by Paul and Anne Ehlrich from 1970.