Did this coupon
work for you?
work for you?
Sorry, this deal has expired.
Get notified of deals like this in the future.
Add Deal Alert for this Item
Popular
27" Dell FHD 280Hz Gaming Monitor - $200 (Best Buy)
$199.99
$299.99
Dell.com [dell.com] has the 27" Dell G2723H FHD 280Hz AMD FreeSync, NVIDIA G-Sync Compatible Gaming Monitor on sale for $199.99. Shipping is free.
Best Buy [bestbuy.com] has the 27" Dell G2723H FHD 280Hz AMD FreeSync, NVIDIA G-Sync Compatible Gaming Monitor on sale for $199.99. Shipping is free. - Dead
About this monitor:
Best Buy [bestbuy.com] has the 27" Dell G2723H FHD 280Hz AMD FreeSync, NVIDIA G-Sync Compatible Gaming Monitor on sale for $199.99. Shipping is free. - Dead
About this monitor:
- Full HD 1920 x 1080 resolution
- 0.5ms response time
- 280Hz Refresh Rate
- IPS Technology
- 27.0" LED Edgelight Monitor
- AMD FreeSync Technology
- Fully Ergonomic Stand
- VESA Mountable
- 350 cd/m² brightness
- 1,000 : 1 Contrast Ratio (Typical)
- 3-year Advanced Exchange Service & Premium Panel Exchange (see full warranty for details).
in
Monitors
(6)
If you purchase something through a post on our site, Slickdeals may get a small share of the sale.
Check Out Similar Monitors Deals
View AllPopular
Frontpage
$1099
+ Free Shipping
18
27
Frontpage
Price Intelligence
Give Feedback Model: Dell - G2723H 27.0" IPS LED FHD - AMD FreeSync - NVIDIA G-Sync Compatible - VESA - Gaming Monitor (Display Port, HDMI, USB) - Ascent Gray
Deal History
Deal History includes data from multiple reputable stores, such as Best Buy, Target, and Walmart. The lowest price among stores for a given day is selected as the "Sale Price".
Sale Price does not include sale prices at Amazon unless a deal was posted by a community member.
Sale Price does not include sale prices at Amazon unless a deal was posted by a community member.
| Product Name: | Dell - G2723H 27.0" IPS LED FHD - AMD FreeSync - NVIDIA G-Sync Compatible - 280Hz - Gaming Monitor (Display Port, HDMI, USB) - Ascent Gray |
| Product SKU: | 6517613_6517613 |
| UPC: | 884116431473 |
14 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank massivepacattak
https://www.dell.com/en-us/shop/d...ccessories
This is a better option for those that have the AmEx $40 off of $200 deal making the total $160. Remember that AmEx counts the tax so this would break the required $200 threshold and would qualify for the discount.
It can give a slight edge with response times in competitive games. If you're a professional gamer, it might be worth it. It's not something that's really noticeable, though. I can't even tell the difference between 120fps and 165fps, fwiw.
Does High FPS make you a better gamer? Ft. Shroud - FINAL ANSWER
https://youtu.be/OX31kZbAXsA
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
But 280 vs 240? Isn't there a legitimate limit to the human eye and refresh rates? According to this recent article from 2022 (https://www.pcgamer.com/how-many-...eally-see/), the limit is ~200hz as it says after 200hz it is imperceptible to real-life motion for the eye.
https://www.dell.com/en-us/shop/d...ccessories
This is a better option for those that have the AmEx $40 off of $200 deal making the total $160. Remember that AmEx counts the tax so this would break the required $200 threshold and would qualify for the discount.
How do I get this deal?
* 1440p
But 280 vs 240? Isn't there a legitimate limit to the human eye and refresh rates? According to this recent article from 2022 (https://www.pcgamer.com/how-many-...eally-see/), the limit is ~200hz as it says after 200hz it is imperceptible to real-life motion for the eye.
That quote you posted is someone's opinion and is based on no scientific data. The right answer is: it's complicated. The human eye takes in images at the equivalent of 79 trillion hz. The visual cortex of our brains only processes these images at 17hz. The rest is our brain trying to fill in the gaps with what it expects those images in between those 17hz should be. That's why motion optical illusions trick our brains into seeing things that aren't really there. That's all irrelevant for a gaming monitor, because even if we can't "see" in these much higher frame-rates, we CAN perceive motion (or a lack of smooth motion) at much higher frame-rates. I doubt anyone could tell the difference, visually, in a blind test between 240hz and 280hz, though. Higher frame-rates do lower response time, though. A single millisecond (that's 1,000fps) could be the deciding factor between who pulled the trigger first in a competitive first-person shooter. After about 120hz, there are diminishing returns. For a professional gamer, every competitive advantage they can get helps, even if it's as small of one as this. Those couple millisecond shorter response times could be the difference between winning millions of dollars and losing. For someone that mostly plays single player games, like myself, anything above 90ish fps is fine.
I've got a 300hz that looks vastly smoother than my 165hz monitor, but it's also almost double the hz. I only use the 300hz for Apex and Valorant though, 1440p @ 165hz just looks better no matter how smooth 1080p @ 300hz is.