Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands or deals, including promoted items.
Frontpage

Merrell Men's Altalight Hiking Shoes or Saucony Men's Freedom 5 Running Shoes

$50 each
$100.00
+ Free S/H on $89 & More
+33 Deal Score
50,899 Views
Sierra has various Men's Running, Hiking & Golf Shoes on sale below. Shipping is free on $89+ orders when you apply promo code SHIP89 in your cart.

Thanks to Deal Hunter Navy-Wife for sharing this deal.

Note: Available sizes may vary by style/color.

Examples:
Good Deal?

Original Post

Written by
Edited May 25, 2023 at 02:21 PM by
Sierra [sierra.com] has select Men's Running, Hiking & Golf Shoes on sale as listed below. Shipping is free on orders $89+ with promo code SHIP89, otherwise shipping is $9.99.

Example Deals:
Add Comment
Created 05-25-2023 at 01:25 PM by Navy-Wife | Staff
If you purchase something through a post on our site, Slickdeals may get a small share of the sale.
Deal
Score
+33
50,899 Views
$50 each
$100.00

Your comment cannot be blank.

Featured Comments

The Freedom 5 hasn't fared as well with reviewers as the 4th iteration. Check the RunRepeat page. The v4 is a nice walk-around shoe. I like to slip it on for short trips to the store. But I wouldn't run in it despite the Pebax midsole. It's more of a casual shoe.

The Asics Magic Speed series originally seemed compelling to me but as I have become more familiar with Asics GuideSole models such as the EvoRide and GlideRide I have soured on Asics in general. These models, Magic Speed included, use either overly firm midsoles or rigid plates that lead to a proscriptive ride. The shoes are simply too inflexible to be enjoyable. Unsurprisingly, there's a few reviews for the Magic Speed 2 on Running Warehouse noting with dissatisfaction the firmness of the midsole. The Magic Speed 2 uses two different plates, one carbon and another either unexpanded Pebax or TPU, which seems like overkill. Those plates negate the cushioning of the FF Blast foam.

The other shoes Sierra currently has are no better. There's been a paucity of compelling options from this retailer. They only seem to get the unwanted scraps that other retailers don't want to touch.
deleted

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined Dec 2015
L2: Beginner
> bubble2 58 Posts
18 Reputation
jacobjcwilliams
05-26-2023 at 04:25 PM.
05-26-2023 at 04:25 PM.
Be careful buying from these places. They typically sell defected shoes. Bought a pair from a previous SD and they were 18 months old on the production tag. Foam in the shoes can only go 12-18 months before it breaks down and the glue starts to crack. Plus the stitching was all off and had weird creases. Had to return.
2
1
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Jun 2017
L3: Novice
> bubble2 125 Posts
97 Reputation
cfranchile
05-26-2023 at 07:19 PM.
05-26-2023 at 07:19 PM.
Quote from brucknerfan :
The Freedom 5 hasn't fared as well with reviewers as the 4th iteration. Check the RunRepeat page. The v4 is a nice walk-around shoe. I like to slip it on for short trips to the store. But I wouldn't run in it despite the Pebax midsole. It's more of a casual shoe.

The Asics Magic Speed series originally seemed compelling to me but as I have become more familiar with Asics GuideSole models such as the EvoRide and GlideRide I have soured on Asics in general. These models, Magic Speed included, use either overly firm midsoles or rigid plates that lead to a proscriptive ride. The shoes are simply too inflexible to be enjoyable. Unsurprisingly, there's a few reviews for the Magic Speed 2 on Running Warehouse noting with dissatisfaction the firmness of the midsole. The Magic Speed 2 uses two different plates, one carbon and another either unexpanded Pebax or TPU, which seems like overkill. Those plates negate the cushioning of the FF Blast foam.

The other shoes Sierra currently has are no better. There's been a paucity of compelling options from this retailer. They only seem to get the unwanted scraps that other retailers don't want to touch.
I agree with everything you said about the freedoms. I like the freedom 4 as a casual shoe, although it took me some coming around because initially I was disappointed it was firmer (with pebax) than version 3 with pwrrun plus. For what it's worth, several sizes of the 4th version in black are available for $47 from marathon sports. Free shipping with code slickdeals (there's another post on marathon sports shoe deals right now).

https://shop.marathonsports.com/p...2120015933
1
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Dec 2014
L7: Teacher
> bubble2 2,149 Posts
304 Reputation
brucknerfan
05-26-2023 at 11:08 PM.
05-26-2023 at 11:08 PM.
Quote from cfranchile :
I agree with everything you said about the freedoms. I like the freedom 4 as a casual shoe, although it took me some coming around because initially I was disappointed it was firmer (with pebax) than version 3 with pwrrun plus. For what it's worth, several sizes of the 4th version in black are available for $47 from marathon sports. Free shipping with code slickdeals (there's another post on marathon sports shoe deals right now).

https://shop.marathonsports.com/p...2120015933

That's a good deal for the Freedom. I may order another pair of the Freedom 4 because the upper on the v5 is apparently less roomy. The Freedom is the best casual sneaker I have come across. I purchased a Triumph 19 and a 1080v12. The Triumph is a comfortable shoe but the 8mm heel drop feels too high. The 1080 has a nice roll to it when walking but it's just too clunky.
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Jan 2017
New User
> bubble2 8 Posts
14 Reputation
ohnoanotherdeal
05-27-2023 at 12:04 PM.
05-27-2023 at 12:04 PM.
Any recommendation on what's the most comfy running shoes for the price?
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined May 2021
L2: Beginner
> bubble2 92 Posts
14 Reputation
AquaSnake8613
05-28-2023 at 07:39 AM.
05-28-2023 at 07:39 AM.
Saucony - no thx on the rainbow symbol on the back of my shoes. Enough is enough, it is no wonder why they didn't sell.
1
4
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Jul 2020
L3: Novice
> bubble2 167 Posts
42 Reputation
AquaKitten830
05-28-2023 at 06:34 PM.
05-28-2023 at 06:34 PM.
Quote from jacobjcwilliams :
Be careful buying from these places. They typically sell defected shoes. Bought a pair from a previous SD and they were 18 months old on the production tag. Foam in the shoes can only go 12-18 months before it breaks down and the glue starts to crack. Plus the stitching was all off and had weird creases. Had to return.
Sierra sells overstock and discontinued items, not typically second-quality items. (sometimes those go together, though) The first thing that usually fails in properly stored shoes is the adhesive. The foam should last at least a few years before any noticeable breakdown occurs.
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Jul 2008
L9: Master
> bubble2 4,092 Posts
373 Reputation
MrBlackFriday
05-29-2023 at 04:18 AM.
05-29-2023 at 04:18 AM.
Quote from brucknerfan :
That would surprise me. There haven't been any delayed refreshes with any other Saucony models. Shoe sales are also tanking right now. Check the stock prices for Nike, Crocs, Deckers, and On. All down over the past couple months. Freight data in the US and transoceanic is showing the worst pullback since records have been kept. New Orders in the PMI reports for durables are also tanking into contraction territory. Consumers are pulling back.

There's a still a lot of 2nd generation Endorphins in the sales channel. Quite an overhang of excess inventory on old product. I purchased a pair of Endo Speed 2s for $62 off Amazon (direct) in April. Some merchants have the Pro 2s for under $100. I think one retailer has either the Speed or Pro 2s for as little as $72.

Saucony has the least restraint when it comes to discounting. They always capitulate and end up deep discounting their best models.

Worst case scenario just keep buying the v2 Endorphins for super cheap. The v3s are not worth the full MSRP pricetag.

New Balance is practically giving away their Rebel v3 on their outlet site, Joe's, for $56. That shoe doesn't get a refresh for another 4 months. In April it was available for even less, $52. I like the Rebel as much as the Endo Speed. I will not pay $170 for a shoe.

There's going to be great deals in the coming months on the ye SuperComp Trainer v1, Nike Flyknit Invincible v3, and the Puma Deviate NITRO v2. Already seeing one colorway at a retailer for the Deviate for $100 ($60 off MSRP) with a coupon code and it's not even on clearance yet. The Brooks Catamount 2 is another nice TPU based shoe that is starting to see some discounts well ahead of refresh.

The Nimbus 25 is also seeing some nice discounting even though it doesn't refresh until early 2024. This evidence that retailers are definitely feeling pressure.

Those super deep discounts on the Nike Zoom Fly v5 earlier this year were also notable. They were selling for $100 off more than 6 months away from the refresh. Not that I would buy that brick of a shoe but this price activity bodes well for the more useful Invincible model.

We're a couple months away from a HOKA Mach refresh. Last year a bunch of Mach v4 inventory got bought up TJX Corporation. These Mach 4s ended up selling for $70 on one of TJX's websites, far below the HOKA's stringent MAP guidelines. Eventually TJX slashed the price of the Mach to $40 at their bricks and mortars stores.

It feels like the economy is ready to finally crack. Great deals on running shoes should be forthcoming. These greedy shoe companies that have been marching prices up for the past decade to ridiculous levels need to eat some humble pie. Pebax, TPU, Olefin, nitrogen gas, carbon, and other materials don't warrant the hefty price tags today's shoe command. The earnings reports from Deckers demonstrate how high the profit margins are on running shoes.
Very informative post, thank you. Most running shoes have been lower quality since NB quit their 1060 line around 2011 imo. What are the best brands you think now.? Is it good to only buy top models? Wi th h so many fake reviews its impossible to know what's good.
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Last edited by MrBlackFriday May 29, 2023 at 04:20 AM.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined Dec 2014
L7: Teacher
> bubble2 2,149 Posts
304 Reputation
brucknerfan
05-29-2023 at 01:55 PM.
05-29-2023 at 01:55 PM.
Quote from MrBlackFriday :
Very informative post, thank you. Most running shoes have been lower quality since NB quit their 1060 line around 2011 imo. What are the best brands you think now.? Is it good to only buy top models? Wi th h so many fake reviews its impossible to know what's good.

I had a pair of NB 1040 (?) back in 2009. Those were dinosaur shoes compared to what's available on the market today. Today's midsole foams, even EVA based varieties, are far superior to what existed 12 years ago.

If I had to choose one brand it would probably be Saucony. But every brand has its strengths and fills a niche.
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Jul 2008
L9: Master
> bubble2 4,092 Posts
373 Reputation
MrBlackFriday
05-29-2023 at 08:07 PM.
05-29-2023 at 08:07 PM.
Quote from brucknerfan :
I had a pair of NB 1040 (?) back in 2009. Those were dinosaur shoes compared to what's available on the market today. Today's midsole foams, even EVA based varieties, are far superior to what existed 12 years ago.

If I had to choose one brand it would probably be Saucony. But every brand has its strengths and fills a niche.
The New Balance 1064 was higher quality materials and more durable than anything they offer for a neutral runner today. They were far better than the asic gel cumulus 13-15s and keyanos of the early years which were all better than the cheap cloth wrapped foam shoes today. Despite not having newer foam, they didn't use 1$ of materials back then and many of the 2010-2014 shoes lasted hundreds of miles more.
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Dec 2014
L7: Teacher
> bubble2 2,149 Posts
304 Reputation
brucknerfan
05-29-2023 at 08:28 PM.
05-29-2023 at 08:28 PM.
Quote from MrBlackFriday :
The New Balance 1064 was higher quality materials and more durable than anything they offer for a neutral runner today. They were far better than the asic gel cumulus 13-15s and keyanos of the early years which were all better than the cheap cloth wrapped foam shoes today. Despite not having newer foam, they didn't use 1$ of materials back then and many of the 2010-2014 shoes lasted hundreds of miles more.

I remember the 1064 and I may have had a pair of the 1062.

https://www.roadrunnersports.com/...lance-1062

Back then the uppers on most shoes used thick mesh with synthetic leather overlays. Those materials are robust but they added weight.

Today's shoes have lighter engineered mesh or knit uppers and use lighter and thinner TPU overlays. For running purposes these newer materials result in lower weight and cooler feet.

When it comes to midsoles there's no comparison. Today's supercritical and super foams are far and away better than the EVA foams of circa 2010. Even today's best EVA midsoles are better than what was available in 2010. Some companies have found ways to squeeze out more performance from EVA by using supercritical processes that can include nitrogen infusion or mixing the EVA with more resilient compounds such as TPU.

I think we're living in a golden age for running shoes. I've come across interesting anecdotal comments about this topic. For example, there are older runners who were once competitive distance runners in HS and college 20 or more years ago who are amazed by how much better the shoes are today compared to what was available back in the day. This is thanks to the innovations of the past several years.
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Dec 2014
L7: Teacher
> bubble2 2,149 Posts
304 Reputation
brucknerfan
06-06-2023 at 04:02 AM.
06-06-2023 at 04:02 AM.
Quote from Exmoor :
I know there are sites that say that, but the word from Saucony reps is that the Speed 4 and Pro 4 aren't being released until Q2 2024. I'm hoping that's incorrect, but I'm not holding my breath on being able to get a pair of 3's for half price anytime soon.
I have since come across the following Reddit post that echos your comment.

https://www.reddit.com/r/RunningS...in_person/

I'm surprised how easily people on Reddit are duped by the supposed rationale for moving from a one-year to a two-year product refresh cycle. This is basic Business 101. Saucony is seeking to increase gross margins and profits by prolonging the time period they can sell shoe models at ridiculously high MSRPs. The shrewd running shoe consumer targets clearance sales. Moving to a two-year time frame reduces those lower margin sales. HOKA started this trend well before the pandemic. Brooks then followed suit. Now apparently, Saucony is adopting this strategy.
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Last edited by brucknerfan June 6, 2023 at 04:10 AM.
Page 2 of 2
Start the Conversation
 

More Men's Shoes Deals & Discounts

Link Copied

The link has been copied to the clipboard.