Original Post
Written by
Edited May 25, 2023
at 02:21 PM
by
Sierra [sierra.com] has select
Men's Running, Hiking & Golf Shoes on sale as listed below.
Shipping is free on orders $89+ with promo code
SHIP89, otherwise shipping is $9.99.
Example Deals:
25 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Featured Comments
The Asics Magic Speed series originally seemed compelling to me but as I have become more familiar with Asics GuideSole models such as the EvoRide and GlideRide I have soured on Asics in general. These models, Magic Speed included, use either overly firm midsoles or rigid plates that lead to a proscriptive ride. The shoes are simply too inflexible to be enjoyable. Unsurprisingly, there's a few reviews for the Magic Speed 2 on Running Warehouse noting with dissatisfaction the firmness of the midsole. The Magic Speed 2 uses two different plates, one carbon and another either unexpanded Pebax or TPU, which seems like overkill. Those plates negate the cushioning of the FF Blast foam.
The other shoes Sierra currently has are no better. There's been a paucity of compelling options from this retailer. They only seem to get the unwanted scraps that other retailers don't want to touch.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
The Asics Magic Speed series originally seemed compelling to me but as I have become more familiar with Asics GuideSole models such as the EvoRide and GlideRide I have soured on Asics in general. These models, Magic Speed included, use either overly firm midsoles or rigid plates that lead to a proscriptive ride. The shoes are simply too inflexible to be enjoyable. Unsurprisingly, there's a few reviews for the Magic Speed 2 on Running Warehouse noting with dissatisfaction the firmness of the midsole. The Magic Speed 2 uses two different plates, one carbon and another either unexpanded Pebax or TPU, which seems like overkill. Those plates negate the cushioning of the FF Blast foam.
The other shoes Sierra currently has are no better. There's been a paucity of compelling options from this retailer. They only seem to get the unwanted scraps that other retailers don't want to touch.
https://shop.marathonsp
https://shop.marathonsp
That's a good deal for the Freedom. I may order another pair of the Freedom 4 because the upper on the v5 is apparently less roomy. The Freedom is the best casual sneaker I have come across. I purchased a Triumph 19 and a 1080v12. The Triumph is a comfortable shoe but the 8mm heel drop feels too high. The 1080 has a nice roll to it when walking but it's just too clunky.
There's a still a lot of 2nd generation Endorphins in the sales channel. Quite an overhang of excess inventory on old product. I purchased a pair of Endo Speed 2s for $62 off Amazon (direct) in April. Some merchants have the Pro 2s for under $100. I think one retailer has either the Speed or Pro 2s for as little as $72.
Saucony has the least restraint when it comes to discounting. They always capitulate and end up deep discounting their best models.
Worst case scenario just keep buying the v2 Endorphins for super cheap. The v3s are not worth the full MSRP pricetag.
New Balance is practically giving away their Rebel v3 on their outlet site, Joe's, for $56. That shoe doesn't get a refresh for another 4 months. In April it was available for even less, $52. I like the Rebel as much as the Endo Speed. I will not pay $170 for a shoe.
There's going to be great deals in the coming months on the ye SuperComp Trainer v1, Nike Flyknit Invincible v3, and the Puma Deviate NITRO v2. Already seeing one colorway at a retailer for the Deviate for $100 ($60 off MSRP) with a coupon code and it's not even on clearance yet. The Brooks Catamount 2 is another nice TPU based shoe that is starting to see some discounts well ahead of refresh.
The Nimbus 25 is also seeing some nice discounting even though it doesn't refresh until early 2024. This evidence that retailers are definitely feeling pressure.
Those super deep discounts on the Nike Zoom Fly v5 earlier this year were also notable. They were selling for $100 off more than 6 months away from the refresh. Not that I would buy that brick of a shoe but this price activity bodes well for the more useful Invincible model.
We're a couple months away from a HOKA Mach refresh. Last year a bunch of Mach v4 inventory got bought up TJX Corporation. These Mach 4s ended up selling for $70 on one of TJX's websites, far below the HOKA's stringent MAP guidelines. Eventually TJX slashed the price of the Mach to $40 at their bricks and mortars stores.
It feels like the economy is ready to finally crack. Great deals on running shoes should be forthcoming. These greedy shoe companies that have been marching prices up for the past decade to ridiculous levels need to eat some humble pie. Pebax, TPU, Olefin, nitrogen gas, carbon, and other materials don't warrant the hefty price tags today's shoe command. The earnings reports from Deckers demonstrate how high the profit margins are on running shoes.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I had a pair of NB 1040 (?) back in 2009. Those were dinosaur shoes compared to what's available on the market today. Today's midsole foams, even EVA based varieties, are far superior to what existed 12 years ago.
If I had to choose one brand it would probably be Saucony. But every brand has its strengths and fills a niche.
If I had to choose one brand it would probably be Saucony. But every brand has its strengths and fills a niche.
I remember the 1064 and I may have had a pair of the 1062.
https://www.roadrunners
Back then the uppers on most shoes used thick mesh with synthetic leather overlays. Those materials are robust but they added weight.
Today's shoes have lighter engineered mesh or knit uppers and use lighter and thinner TPU overlays. For running purposes these newer materials result in lower weight and cooler feet.
When it comes to midsoles there's no comparison. Today's supercritical and super foams are far and away better than the EVA foams of circa 2010. Even today's best EVA midsoles are better than what was available in 2010. Some companies have found ways to squeeze out more performance from EVA by using supercritical processes that can include nitrogen infusion or mixing the EVA with more resilient compounds such as TPU.
I think we're living in a golden age for running shoes. I've come across interesting anecdotal comments about this topic. For example, there are older runners who were once competitive distance runners in HS and college 20 or more years ago who are amazed by how much better the shoes are today compared to what was available back in the day. This is thanks to the innovations of the past several years.
https://www.reddit.com/r/RunningS...in_p
I'm surprised how easily people on Reddit are duped by the supposed rationale for moving from a one-year to a two-year product refresh cycle. This is basic Business 101. Saucony is seeking to increase gross margins and profits by prolonging the time period they can sell shoe models at ridiculously high MSRPs. The shrewd running shoe consumer targets clearance sales. Moving to a two-year time frame reduces those lower margin sales. HOKA started this trend well before the pandemic. Brooks then followed suit. Now apparently, Saucony is adopting this strategy.