Waterbury Chronograph
- Watches2U is a legit UK retailer
- Timex store is sold out
- Used models are all over $200 on ebay
- No tax + FREE shipping
- Coupon code
AUT10 = 10% OFF
LINK - > https://www.watches2u.com/watches...40&irgwc=1
Specifications TW2V42400
Attachment Color: Stainless Steel
Band Material: Stainless Steel
Buckle/Clasp: Clasp (Deployment)
Case Color: Stainless Steel
Case Diameter: 41 mm
Case Finish: Brushed/Polished
Case Height: 13 mm
Case Material: Stainless Steel
Crystal Lens: Mineral Glass
Dial Color: Silver-Tone
Dial Markings: Applied Markers (Full)
Strap and Lug Width: 20 mm
Watch Movement: Quartz Analog
Water Resistance: 100 meters
REVIEW - > https://youtu.be/YKnEAXMcuig?si=bna1xx2_FKwD4ltP
4 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
If you use PayPal or your CC it will convert to GBP and the rate is not accurate. It makes the Waterbury chrono $174 vs. $166. If you use ApplePay you can checkout in USD. You can also take advantage of the DiscoverCard 5% CB (digital wallets) through ApplePay. There's also a rebate site that I can't post to save an additional 1.01%. So you can net this watch to $156.
Thanks for stating that. I thought it was a total scam site.
If you use PayPal or your CC it will convert to GBP and the rate is not accurate. It makes the Waterbury chrono $174 vs. $166. If you use ApplePay you can checkout in USD. You can also take advantage of the DiscoverCard 5% CB (digital wallets) through ApplePay. There's also a rebate site that I can't post to save an additional 1.01%. So you can net this watch to $156.
I'm getting £162 after applying the discount code (£179.99-17.99), which comes out to close to $198. Even with the current exchange rate, $166 is about £136, which is too big of a difference (vs.£162) to be based on exchange rate variations.
Am I missing something here?
I'm getting £162 after applying the discount code (£179.99-17.99), which comes out to close to $198. Even with the current exchange rate, $166 is about £136, which is too big of a difference (vs.£162) to be based on exchange rate variations.
Am I missing something here?