Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Heads up, this deal has expired. Want to create a deal alert for this item?
expired Posted by tDames | Staff • Nov 19, 2023
expired Posted by tDames | Staff • Nov 19, 2023

4TB TEAMGROUP QX QLC 3D NAND 2.5" SATA III Solid State Drive

+ Free Shipping

$140

$163

14% off
Amazon
24 Comments 15,842 Views
Visit Amazon
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
Various Retailers have 4TB TeamGroup QX QLC 3D NAND 2.5" SATA III Solid State Drive (T253X7004T0C101) on sale for $139.99. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Deal Hunter tDames for sharing this deal.

Available from:Specs:
  • Sequential Read: up to 540 MB/s
  • Sequential Write: up to 490 MB/s
  • TBW: 1000
  • No DRAM Cache

Editor's Notes

Written by RevOne | Staff

Original Post

Written by tDames | Staff
Product Info
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Product Info
Community Notes
About the Poster
Various Retailers have 4TB TeamGroup QX QLC 3D NAND 2.5" SATA III Solid State Drive (T253X7004T0C101) on sale for $139.99. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Deal Hunter tDames for sharing this deal.

Available from:Specs:
  • Sequential Read: up to 540 MB/s
  • Sequential Write: up to 490 MB/s
  • TBW: 1000
  • No DRAM Cache

Editor's Notes

Written by RevOne | Staff

Original Post

Written by tDames | Staff

Community Voting

Deal Score
+16
Good Deal
Visit Amazon

Price Intelligence

Model: TEAMGROUP QX 4TB 3D NAND QLC 2.5 Inch SATA III Internal Solid State Drive SSD (Read/Write Speed up to 560/500 MB/s) 1000TBW Compatible with Laptop & PC Desktop T253X7004T0C101

Deal History 

Sort: Most Recent
Post Date Sold By Sale Price Activity
09/05/23Amazon$141
14
07/26/23Newegg$143 frontpage
43
06/19/23Amazon$152 frontpage
41
06/10/23Amazon$163
8
05/24/23Amazon$177 frontpage
65
Show More

Current Prices

Sort: Lowest to Highest | Last Updated 7/5/2025, 10:26 AM
Sold By Sale Price
Amazon$185.99

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Top Comments

MWink
2129 Posts
3139 Reputation
You don't really know what you're getting with either, aside from QLC NAND. In my experience, the *X line is more likely to use a Phison S11 controller and the Vulcan line tends to use the SMI 2259XT controller. They're both low end DRAM-less controllers. The Phison drives have a very small static pSLC cache, meaning write speeds drop after only a few GB of writes. The SMI based drives usually have a much larger dynamic pSLC cache, which shrinks as the drive fills. For a QLC drive, this may be 1/4 of the free space. However, once the pSLC cache is full, the SMI drives tend to drop considerably lower than the Phison drives. The QLC SMI 2259XT based drive I've tested drops to an average of about 38MB/s, once the pSLC is filled. Additionally, I've experienced rapid, severe degradation in READ (and sometimes write) speeds on the SMI based drives.

Overall, I'm not a big fan of Team Group's flash products. I've found them to be inferior to comparable drives from other brands.

23 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Nov 19, 2023
99 Posts
Joined Jun 2016
Nov 19, 2023
unclescary42
Nov 19, 2023
99 Posts
How is this versus the Vulcan counterpart?
Nov 20, 2023
2,129 Posts
Joined Oct 2011
Nov 20, 2023
MWink
Nov 20, 2023
2,129 Posts

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank MWink

Quote from unclescary42 :
How is this versus the Vulcan counterpart?
You don't really know what you're getting with either, aside from QLC NAND. In my experience, the *X line is more likely to use a Phison S11 controller and the Vulcan line tends to use the SMI 2259XT controller. They're both low end DRAM-less controllers. The Phison drives have a very small static pSLC cache, meaning write speeds drop after only a few GB of writes. The SMI based drives usually have a much larger dynamic pSLC cache, which shrinks as the drive fills. For a QLC drive, this may be 1/4 of the free space. However, once the pSLC cache is full, the SMI drives tend to drop considerably lower than the Phison drives. The QLC SMI 2259XT based drive I've tested drops to an average of about 38MB/s, once the pSLC is filled. Additionally, I've experienced rapid, severe degradation in READ (and sometimes write) speeds on the SMI based drives.

Overall, I'm not a big fan of Team Group's flash products. I've found them to be inferior to comparable drives from other brands.
11
Nov 20, 2023
1,023 Posts
Joined Jun 2014
Nov 20, 2023
partypooper32
Nov 20, 2023
1,023 Posts
I'm not too concerned with speed.. How's the reliability of this brand?
Nov 20, 2023
99 Posts
Joined Jun 2016
Nov 20, 2023
unclescary42
Nov 20, 2023
99 Posts
Quote from MWink :
You don't really know what you're getting with either, aside from QLC NAND. In my experience, the *X line is more likely to use a Phison S11 controller and the Vulcan line tends to use the SMI 2259XT controller. They're both low end DRAM-less controllers. The Phison drives have a very small static pSLC cache, meaning write speeds drop after only a few GB of writes. The SMI based drives usually have a much larger dynamic pSLC cache, which shrinks as the drive fills. For a QLC drive, this may be 1/4 of the free space. However, once the pSLC cache is full, the SMI drives tend to drop considerably lower than the Phison drives. The QLC SMI 2259XT based drive I've tested drops to an average of about 38MB/s, once the pSLC is filled. Additionally, I've experienced rapid, severe degradation in READ (and sometimes write) speeds on the SMI based drives.

Overall, I'm not a big fan of Team Group's flash products. I've found them to be inferior to comparable drives from other brands.
Holy wow, thank you! Its going to take a while for me to digest all this info, but Im truly thankful you sent it so I can learn. Have a great holiday!
Nov 20, 2023
99 Posts
Joined Jun 2016
Nov 20, 2023
unclescary42
Nov 20, 2023
99 Posts
Quote from MWink :
You don't really know what you're getting with either, aside from QLC NAND. In my experience, the *X line is more likely to use a Phison S11 controller and the Vulcan line tends to use the SMI 2259XT controller. They're both low end DRAM-less controllers. The Phison drives have a very small static pSLC cache, meaning write speeds drop after only a few GB of writes. The SMI based drives usually have a much larger dynamic pSLC cache, which shrinks as the drive fills. For a QLC drive, this may be 1/4 of the free space. However, once the pSLC cache is full, the SMI drives tend to drop considerably lower than the Phison drives. The QLC SMI 2259XT based drive I've tested drops to an average of about 38MB/s, once the pSLC is filled. Additionally, I've experienced rapid, severe degradation in READ (and sometimes write) speeds on the SMI based drives.

Overall, I'm not a big fan of Team Group's flash products. I've found them to be inferior to comparable drives from other brands.
Sorry - I was about to start putting together a server - any companies you can recommend for Hard Drives? Or is it case-by-case? Ill stay away from TeamGroup.
Nov 21, 2023
1,445 Posts
Joined Oct 2006
Nov 21, 2023
clsA
Nov 21, 2023
1,445 Posts
I put the 2tb version of this in my PS4 and it seems like it's doing ok.
I don't plan on loading it much past half full.

I generally like to keep all my NVME and SSD at 60% compacity or less.
I keep an older 8tg WD Black in the system also and it gets closer to 3/4 full at times without any problems.
Last edited by clsA November 20, 2023 at 04:30 PM.
Nov 21, 2023
2,129 Posts
Joined Oct 2011
Nov 21, 2023
MWink
Nov 21, 2023
2,129 Posts
Quote from partypooper32 :
I'm not too concerned with speed.. How's the reliability of this brand?
IMO, mediocre at best.

Quote from unclescary42 :
Holy wow, thank you! Its going to take a while for me to digest all this info, but Im truly thankful you sent it so I can learn. Have a great holiday!
Glad I could help. Let me know if you need any clarifications.

Quote from unclescary42 :
Sorry - I was about to start putting together a server - any companies you can recommend for Hard Drives? Or is it case-by-case? Ill stay away from TeamGroup.
Hard drives or SSDs? This deal is for an SSD. For hard drives, I prefer Western Digital/Hitachi. For SSDs, Samsung and Crucial are the readily available brands I favor. Western Digital/SanDisk also has some good drives (and some bad ones). Many other common brands don't actually manufacture SSDs and just slap their label on drives made by other companies.

Quote from clsA :
I put the 2tb version of this in my PS4 and it seems like it's doing ok.
I don't plan on loading it much past half full.

I generally like to keep all my NVME and SSD at 60% compacity or less.
I keep an older 8tg WD Black in the system also and it gets closer to 3/4 full at times without any problems.
Yes, having free space on an SSD is beneficial for its performance and longevity (which isn't likely to be an issue). With some of the SMI 2259XT based drives I've seen, if they're kept really empty, they seem like they may functionally act as pSLC drives. They don't appear to start flushing their pSLC cache to native TLC/QLC until they reach roughly 25% full for TLC or 20% full for QLC.

Conventional hard drives don't really care how full they are. Transfer rates do drop the closer you get to the end of the logical drive (physically, the innermost tracks) and file fragmentation is more likely to become an issue, but it's unlikely to have an appreciable impact on the drive's lifespan. I've kept plenty of hard drives >99% full for long periods, without issue.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Nov 24, 2023
471 Posts
Joined Jun 2023
Nov 24, 2023
brownedpants
Nov 24, 2023
471 Posts
Does it come with glasses to see the 3D nand?
1
3
Nov 26, 2023
101 Posts
Joined May 2014
Nov 26, 2023
kemontasmom
Nov 26, 2023
101 Posts
Whole team can catch these …..
Nov 26, 2023
268 Posts
Joined Oct 2008
Nov 26, 2023
Spankybean
Nov 26, 2023
268 Posts
If prices keep dropping I'm filling my NAS with these
Nov 26, 2023
4,605 Posts
Joined Dec 2009
Nov 26, 2023
masterz13
Nov 26, 2023
4,605 Posts
I don't see a point in SATA SSDs when M.2 is a thing, and they're just as economical and way faster.
1
Nov 26, 2023
944 Posts
Joined Nov 2013
Nov 26, 2023
dalto
Nov 26, 2023
944 Posts
Personally, I would spend a few dollars more and get a TLC drive. QLC performance drops off a cliff as it gets more data on it. I have regretted every QLC drive I have bought.

Quote from masterz13 :
I don't see a point in SATA SSDs when M.2 is a thing, and they're just as economical and way faster.
I agree but that assumes you have M.2 slots available which isn't always the case. Older machines don't have them and even for machines that do have them, they can be fully populated.
Nov 26, 2023
896 Posts
Joined Oct 2010
Nov 26, 2023
privater
Nov 26, 2023
896 Posts
Extra large, I was thought it's for condoms
2
Nov 26, 2023
233 Posts
Joined Feb 2019
Nov 26, 2023
Luds34
Nov 26, 2023
233 Posts
IF you wanted to pinch every penny than I'm sure this is fine.

However I'd spend the extra ~$20 and get a Crucial MX500 (or similar well known SSD) that has DRAM, TLC, and is just an overall well respected drive.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Nov 26, 2023
4,343 Posts
Joined Jan 2011
Nov 26, 2023
motaku96
Nov 26, 2023
4,343 Posts
Quote from masterz13 :
I don't see a point in SATA SSDs when M.2 is a thing, and they're just as economical and way faster.
I have 3 m2 slots on my motherboard and I've filled them all. Still got spare sata ports.

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Popular Deals

View All

Trending Deals

View All