Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands or deals, including promoted items.
Heads up, this deal has expired. Want to create a deal alert for this item?
expired Posted by mihscr • Feb 14, 2024
  1. Deal Image
Item 1 of 1
expired Posted by mihscr • Feb 14, 2024

Sapphire Pulse Radeon 7900 XT 20GB GDDR6 PCIe 4.0 x16 ATX Video Card

+ Free Shipping

$700

$830

15% off
Amazon
34 Comments 18,738 Views
Visit Amazon
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
Amazon has Sapphire Pulse Radeon 7900 XT 20GB GDDR6 PCIe 4.0 x16 ATX Video Card (11323-02-20G) on sale for $699.99. Shipping is free.

Newegg has Sapphire Pulse Radeon 7900 XT 20GB GDDR6 PCIe 4.0 x16 ATX Video Card (11323-02-20G) on sale for $699.99. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Community Member mihscr for sharing this deal.

About the Product:
  • AMD Radeon RX 7000 Series
  • 20GB GDDR6 Memory Size
  • Triple Fan Cooler
  • ATX Form Factor
  • 1500MHz Core Clock Speed
  • 2075MHz Game Clock Speed
  • 2450MHz Boost Clock Speed
  • 2075Mhz Shader Clock Speed
  • 5376 Stream Processors
  • 2x HDMI 2.1
  • 2x DisplayPort 2.1

Editor's Notes

Written by jimmytx | Staff
  • About this Store:
  • Additional Information:
    • This offer is $130 less (16% savings) than the website's suggested retail price of $829.99.
    • Rated 4.5 out of 5 stars on Amazon based on over 95 customer reviews.
    • Please see the original post for additional details and/or view the Wiki and forum comments for further helpful discussion if available.

Original Post

Written by mihscr
Product Info
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Product Info
Community Notes
About the Poster
Amazon has Sapphire Pulse Radeon 7900 XT 20GB GDDR6 PCIe 4.0 x16 ATX Video Card (11323-02-20G) on sale for $699.99. Shipping is free.

Newegg has Sapphire Pulse Radeon 7900 XT 20GB GDDR6 PCIe 4.0 x16 ATX Video Card (11323-02-20G) on sale for $699.99. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Community Member mihscr for sharing this deal.

About the Product:
  • AMD Radeon RX 7000 Series
  • 20GB GDDR6 Memory Size
  • Triple Fan Cooler
  • ATX Form Factor
  • 1500MHz Core Clock Speed
  • 2075MHz Game Clock Speed
  • 2450MHz Boost Clock Speed
  • 2075Mhz Shader Clock Speed
  • 5376 Stream Processors
  • 2x HDMI 2.1
  • 2x DisplayPort 2.1

Editor's Notes

Written by jimmytx | Staff
  • About this Store:
  • Additional Information:
    • This offer is $130 less (16% savings) than the website's suggested retail price of $829.99.
    • Rated 4.5 out of 5 stars on Amazon based on over 95 customer reviews.
    • Please see the original post for additional details and/or view the Wiki and forum comments for further helpful discussion if available.

Original Post

Written by mihscr

Community Voting

Deal Score
+20
Good Deal
Visit Amazon

Price Intelligence

Model: Sapphire 11323-02-20G Pulse AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT Gaming Graphics Card with 20GB GDDR6, AMD RDNA 3

Deal History 

Sale Price
Slickdeal
  • $NaN
  • Today

Current Prices

Sort: Lowest to Highest | Last Updated 1/14/2025, 12:48 PM
Sold By Sale Price
Amazon$709.99
Leave a Comment
To participate in the comments, please log in.

Top Comments

mihscr
If you're looking for a fight, go elsewhere. I don't work SD or for you, and what I do with my free time is none of your business.

And, like I said, for me, this Amazon deal is better than the other Newegg, eBay, Walmart, etc. deals because I get 5% cash back. Some might find this useful. And those who don't won't. Easy peasy, lemon squeezy.

Have a relaxing rest of the week!
mihscr
Don't like it? Don't buy it. /s

Posted it for those who care or would benefit. For instance, this is the smallest AIB variant, for those with small cases. Plus, if you have the Prime credit card, you get 5% cash back on Amazon. That almost covers sales tax and saves one ~$37.
yimnvs
There are too many nvidia sheeps, they would buy an inferior product for a higher price as long as it has an nvidia logo on it. Truth is, they just want AMD to lower the prices so they can hope to get nvidia for cheaper.

34 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

11 months ago
311 Posts
Joined Aug 2012
11 months ago
tripknotix
11 months ago
311 Posts
At the moment it makes more sense to get a less powerful nvidia card, but in the future it will maybe make less sense.

It's just nvidia keeps coming up with new ways to increase performance. 2xxx series it was dlss and rt. 3xxx serit. It was fast dlss tech with better visuals and faster rt. 4xxx it was framegen and then a year later is ray reconstruction that sped up rt by reusing data from previous frames rt and increased quality of rt to almost raster levels. Especially when combined with frame gen it can use all that past rt data now since the rt data is held in the pipeline for those frames. They never let amd catch up in tech ... yet.

But atleast fsr3 is looking real good, amd framegen is almost getting there in quality and hopefully they got some ray reconstruction tech on the way. And maybe we'll see that tech in consoles too.

Either way unless you're getting it free or on a very limited budget. Or a discount from a hand me down or a trade of some sort.... it just doesn't make sense to get amd gpu if nvidia gpu is an option. Like most handheld are amd only and spank the intel handheld in graphics thanks to fsr3 and their frame gen tech.

I'm hoping amd framegen tech does get equivalent ray reconstruction features. Even if nvidia comes out with something new atleast it keeps them both on their toes and competition high.

I'd say without the tech, the equivalent amd card value is at 2/3rds price of the nvidia in terms of raster only because knowing of the advantages the nvidia card has outside of raster with their framegen and ray recon that it's way more than 1/3rd difference it's more than 3x - 4x framerate difference when those 2 are used in games that have it.

So I'm very very modest saying 2/3rds price for amd Nvidia equivalent.
Last edited by tripknotix February 15, 2024 at 01:41 PM.
11 months ago
240 Posts
Joined May 2008
11 months ago
trypsin
11 months ago
240 Posts
Quote from dsteele713 :
Exactly how many posts of the same item at the same price do you need to be seeing before you recognize that yet another duplicate post of the same deal is not adding value?
I appreciated the OGs deal post.

It's better to have multiple people listing various places they can buy an item than nobody listing any items.

It's annoying to me that people complain about others taking the time to list a solid deal for others to potentially take advantage of.

If it isn't for you, move on.
11 months ago
381 Posts
Joined Apr 2009
11 months ago
crazygideon
11 months ago
381 Posts
Quote from Fare :
Almost 5x as many people have Nvidia GPUs compared to AMD even though AMD has been the better value for years. The sad truth is undercutting price isn't enough for them. Nvidia simply has better marketing.
This is a false notion that the gap is that huge. If Nvidia was that untouchable the SUPER series would not have been released. Ever since the 40-series launched, with the exception of the 4090, no amount of marketing could save Nvidia's poor segmentation below the 4090. AMD pretty much capitalized in the midrange as demonstrated with the 7800XT. The 7900XTX sold better than the 4080. Nvidia's got too many fanboys… BTW I have a 4090 so it's not like I'm on team RED, just keeping it real.
11 months ago
308 Posts
Joined Jun 2011
11 months ago
UglyTimeTraveler
11 months ago
308 Posts
Helldivers 2 crashes right now on this gpu. Got this a while back with startfield and it's a great gpu, just disappointed helldivers is overworking my cpu because I have a 7000 series gpu. It's a game engine issue not a gpu issue before you ignorant Nvidia shills start jumping all over AMD for driver issues, it's the developer not AMD. Arrowhead has a note on their page about it.
11 months ago
1,155 Posts
Joined Sep 2008
11 months ago
Fare
11 months ago
1,155 Posts
Quote from crazygideon :
This is a false notion that the gap is that huge. If Nvidia was that untouchable the SUPER series would not have been released. Ever since the 40-series launched, with the exception of the 4090, no amount of marketing could save Nvidia's poor segmentation below the 4090. AMD pretty much capitalized in the midrange as demonstrated with the 7800XT. The 7900XTX sold better than the 4080. Nvidia's got too many fanboys… BTW I have a 4090 so it's not like I'm on team RED, just keeping it real.
I should have clarified that those figures are for gamers, but I expect the gap is bigger if anything when you factor in video and AI since Nvidia tends to lead in those.

Oh, and the data is literally from scanning people's computers (Steam hardware survey) so it's not a "false notion" lol.
1
11 months ago
279 Posts
Joined Dec 2014
11 months ago
asifgunz
11 months ago
279 Posts
Quote from TenderLocket2839 :
Perhaps, but RTG has always had seriously flawed designs. I remember when I bought the R9 290, that thing was fast, the fastest even, but by god it was loud as a banshee and hotter than the surface of the sun. Not to mention Catalyst was complete garbage in drivers. Now, they have (more or less) solved the thermal design concerns; their drivers are as good as GeForce, and the interface far superior. They are poised to dominate, it's just a mindset thing. I fully believe they can do it, especially now with Nvidia seriously pissing people off with their ridiculous MSRP.
also one of the main third party vendors EVGA pulled out because of Nvidia's absurd prices. If one or two others follow, Nvidia will be left to do a lot more of their own marketing instead of counting on vendors like PNY , Zotac and so on.
im still on a 2080Ti , Thank God, this card has treated me very well. 1080p IPS, more than happy.
11 months ago
1,575 Posts
Joined Mar 2014
11 months ago
Techngro
11 months ago
1,575 Posts
Quote from Fare :
Almost 5x as many people have Nvidia GPUs compared to AMD even though AMD has been the better value for years. The sad truth is undercutting price isn't enough for them. Nvidia simply has better marketing.
It really isn't just marketing. I always used to buy AMD GPUs. I am building a new gaming rig and had to decide between the 4080 Super and the 7900 XTX. My decision came down to which GPU gave me the most value for my money now and which GPU would likely be a better value in 3 years. Raw performance isn't going to be as valuable in 3 years as DLSS and frame gen, especially when it's only a few percent difference. Neither is 24GB VRAM. It's nice to have, but I doubt it will actually be useful.

AMD needs to get their features (FSR, FMF) working at a level that is competitive to NVIDIA. Undercutting with price just isn't enough anymore, even for people who normally would buy AMD.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

11 months ago
324 Posts
Joined Mar 2014
11 months ago
redcloudmkii
11 months ago
324 Posts
Quote from Techngro :
It really isn't just marketing. I always used to buy AMD GPUs. I am building a new gaming rig and had to decide between the 4080 Super and the 7900 XTX. My decision came down to which GPU gave me the most value for my money now and which GPU would likely be a better value in 3 years. Raw performance isn't going to be as valuable in 3 years as DLSS and frame gen, especially when it's only a few percent difference. Neither is 24GB VRAM. It's nice to have, but I doubt it will actually be useful.

AMD needs to get their features (FSR, FMF) working at a level that is competitive to NVIDIA. Undercutting with price just isn't enough anymore, even for people who normally would buy AMD.
On the other hand, it's bold to assume you'll get all the new DLSS features on your current card. And DLSS isn't supported in every game where you can at least get away with FSR 1.0 on a driver level for AMD (yes, it's not as good, but it seems to be better than what Nvidia did to NIS in recent drivers). For a no-frills, great raster performance card, AMD is competitive. If you know you'll branch into other workloads for the card, then Nvidia starts to make some sense.
11 months ago
1,155 Posts
Joined Sep 2008
11 months ago
Fare
11 months ago
1,155 Posts
Quote from Techngro :
It really isn't just marketing...
Raw performance isn't going to be as valuable in 3 years as DLSS and frame gen, especially when it's only a few percent difference. Neither is 24GB VRAM. It's nice to have, but I doubt it will actually be useful.

AMD needs to get their features (FSR, FMF) working at a level that is competitive to NVIDIA. Undercutting with price just isn't enough anymore, even for people who normally would buy AMD.
You are the proof that it IS the marketing.

- FSR is almost completely caught up to DLSS, so in 3 years we'd expect it to be as good or better
- AMD's frame gen actually gives a greater increase than Nvidia's. Side note, frame gen isn't very useful because it doesn't work at low framerates (when you actually need the frames) and adds latency so it's not good for competitive gaming (main use case for very high frame rates). So the use case is very narrow.

Nvidia manages to convince people like you that its features are superior, thus outselling AMD cards regardless of value.