Amazon.com has SanDisk 512GB Ultra microSDXC UHS-I Memory Card with Adapter SDSQUAC-512G-GN6MA [New Version] for $27.99.
Shipping is free w/ Amazon Prime or on orders $35+.
Model: SanDisk 512GB Ultra microSDXC UHS-I Memory Card with Adapter - Up to 150MB/s, C10, U1, Full HD, A1, MicroSD Card - SDSQUAC-512G-GN6MA
Deal History
Deal History includes data from multiple reputable stores, such as Best Buy, Target, and Walmart. The lowest price among stores for a given day is selected as the "Sale Price".
Sale Price does not include sale prices at Amazon unless a deal was posted by a community member.
Yo I spent like an hour trying to figure this out and ended up going down a rabbit hole of SD card hieroglyphics...
From what I can tell the SanDisk has a slightly faster read/write time (150 mpbs vs 130 mpbs) but the Samsung is rated better at video and has faster minimum read/write speeds with apps.
To answer your question, when you consider the Samsung was $25 and this SanDisk is $28, I would think the Samsung slightly edges it. Although if you're using the card strictly for data transfer of files and the like, the SanDisk should be the better choice.
The Samsung is currently $30 though...
Either way 512 GB for under 30$ is awesome. I still remember how amazed I was at seeing the first 1gb card
I used to believe Sandisk microsd was the top until I had a few failed ones. Switched to Samsung and never had an issue since. YMMV but just my experience.
Not really.
They don't want you expanding your memory so that you use/pay for their Cloud services. Easy money for them!
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank nuy6n6nn
03-18-2024 at 09:02 AM.
Quote
from SlickGame612
:
Is this better than the Samsung one that was $25 last week?
Yo I spent like an hour trying to figure this out and ended up going down a rabbit hole of SD card hieroglyphics...
From what I can tell the SanDisk has a slightly faster read/write time (150 mpbs vs 130 mpbs) but the Samsung is rated better at video and has faster minimum read/write speeds with apps.
To answer your question, when you consider the Samsung was $25 and this SanDisk is $28, I would think the Samsung slightly edges it. Although if you're using the card strictly for data transfer of files and the like, the SanDisk should be the better choice.
The Samsung is currently $30 though...
Either way 512 GB for under 30$ is awesome. I still remember how amazed I was at seeing the first 1gb card
Yo I spent like an hour trying to figure this out and ended up going down a rabbit hole of SD card hieroglyphics...
From what I can tell the SanDisk has a slightly faster read/write time (150 mpbs vs 130 mpbs) but the Samsung is rated better at video and has faster minimum read/write speeds with apps.
To answer your question, when you consider the Samsung was $25 and this SanDisk is $28, I would think the Samsung slightly edges it. Although if you're using the card strictly for data transfer of files and the like, the SanDisk should be the better choice.
The Samsung is currently $30 though...
Either way 512 GB for under 30$ is awesome. I still remember how amazed I was at seeing the first 1gb card
Doesn't Samsung have better write consistency than SanDisk? Over long term constant writing?
I dunno about that, I think they're both reliable. I've had no problems with either. SanDisk is made by Western Digital which is a decent company. But if your preference is for Samsung that's understandable. Typing this from my S22 Galaxy lol
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank slinson
03-18-2024 at 10:26 AM.
Quote
from BacksKnackin
:
Samsung reliability is much better than Sandisk.
I used to believe Sandisk microsd was the top until I had a few failed ones. Switched to Samsung and never had an issue since. YMMV but just my experience.
Yo I spent like an hour trying to figure this out and ended up going down a rabbit hole of SD card hieroglyphics...
From what I can tell the SanDisk has a slightly faster read/write time (150 mpbs vs 130 mpbs) but the Samsung is rated better at video and has faster minimum read/write speeds with apps.
To answer your question, when you consider the Samsung was $25 and this SanDisk is $28, I would think the Samsung slightly edges it. Although if you're using the card strictly for data transfer of files and the like, the SanDisk should be the better choice.
The Samsung is currently $30 though...
Either way 512 GB for under 30$ is awesome. I still remember how amazed I was at seeing the first 1gb card
I appreciate the deep dive and time spent. Thank you!
Perfect timing. I've been wanting a big storage card for the steam deck and this is an outstanding price, from a legit brand.
In for 2. One for the Deck, one for the Switch. Thanks and repd OP.
The read/write speeds are very similar. Warranty for each is 10 years. I purchased the Samsung SSD card. There are too many complaints about SanDisk honoring the warranty.
Yo I spent like an hour trying to figure this out and ended up going down a rabbit hole of SD card hieroglyphics...
From what I can tell the SanDisk has a slightly faster read/write time (150 mpbs vs 130 mpbs) but the Samsung is rated better at video and has faster minimum read/write speeds with apps.
To answer your question, when you consider the Samsung was $25 and this SanDisk is $28, I would think the Samsung slightly edges it. Although if you're using the card strictly for data transfer of files and the like, the SanDisk should be the better choice.
The Samsung is currently $30 though...
Either way 512 GB for under 30$ is awesome. I still remember how amazed I was at seeing the first 1gb card
39 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Featured Comments
From what I can tell the SanDisk has a slightly faster read/write time (150 mpbs vs 130 mpbs) but the Samsung is rated better at video and has faster minimum read/write speeds with apps.
To answer your question, when you consider the Samsung was $25 and this SanDisk is $28, I would think the Samsung slightly edges it. Although if you're using the card strictly for data transfer of files and the like, the SanDisk should be the better choice.
The Samsung is currently $30 though...
Either way 512 GB for under 30$ is awesome. I still remember how amazed I was at seeing the first 1gb card
They don't want you expanding your memory so that you use/pay for their Cloud services. Easy money for them!
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
In for 2. One for the Deck, one for the Switch. Thanks and repd OP.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank nuy6n6nn
From what I can tell the SanDisk has a slightly faster read/write time (150 mpbs vs 130 mpbs) but the Samsung is rated better at video and has faster minimum read/write speeds with apps.
To answer your question, when you consider the Samsung was $25 and this SanDisk is $28, I would think the Samsung slightly edges it. Although if you're using the card strictly for data transfer of files and the like, the SanDisk should be the better choice.
The Samsung is currently $30 though...
Either way 512 GB for under 30$ is awesome. I still remember how amazed I was at seeing the first 1gb card
From what I can tell the SanDisk has a slightly faster read/write time (150 mpbs vs 130 mpbs) but the Samsung is rated better at video and has faster minimum read/write speeds with apps.
To answer your question, when you consider the Samsung was $25 and this SanDisk is $28, I would think the Samsung slightly edges it. Although if you're using the card strictly for data transfer of files and the like, the SanDisk should be the better choice.
The Samsung is currently $30 though...
Either way 512 GB for under 30$ is awesome. I still remember how amazed I was at seeing the first 1gb card
Doesn't Samsung have better write consistency than SanDisk? Over long term constant writing?
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank slinson
I used to believe Sandisk microsd was the top until I had a few failed ones. Switched to Samsung and never had an issue since. YMMV but just my experience.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
From what I can tell the SanDisk has a slightly faster read/write time (150 mpbs vs 130 mpbs) but the Samsung is rated better at video and has faster minimum read/write speeds with apps.
To answer your question, when you consider the Samsung was $25 and this SanDisk is $28, I would think the Samsung slightly edges it. Although if you're using the card strictly for data transfer of files and the like, the SanDisk should be the better choice.
The Samsung is currently $30 though...
Either way 512 GB for under 30$ is awesome. I still remember how amazed I was at seeing the first 1gb card
In for 2. One for the Deck, one for the Switch. Thanks and repd OP.
The read/write speeds are very similar. Warranty for each is 10 years. I purchased the Samsung SSD card. There are too many complaints about SanDisk honoring the warranty.
From what I can tell the SanDisk has a slightly faster read/write time (150 mpbs vs 130 mpbs) but the Samsung is rated better at video and has faster minimum read/write speeds with apps.
To answer your question, when you consider the Samsung was $25 and this SanDisk is $28, I would think the Samsung slightly edges it. Although if you're using the card strictly for data transfer of files and the like, the SanDisk should be the better choice.
The Samsung is currently $30 though...
Either way 512 GB for under 30$ is awesome. I still remember how amazed I was at seeing the first 1gb card
A1 vs A2 which one is better?