This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
Model: SanDisk 512GB Ultra microSDXC UHS-I Memory Card with Adapter - Up to 150MB/s, C10, U1, Full HD, A1, MicroSD Card - SDSQUAC-512G-GN6MA
Deal History
Deal History includes data from multiple reputable stores, such as Best Buy, Target, and Walmart. The lowest price among stores for a given day is selected as the "Sale Price".
Sale Price does not include sale prices at Amazon unless a deal was posted by a community member.
Yo I spent like an hour trying to figure this out and ended up going down a rabbit hole of SD card hieroglyphics...
From what I can tell the SanDisk has a slightly faster read/write time (150 mpbs vs 130 mpbs) but the Samsung is rated better at video and has faster minimum read/write speeds with apps.
To answer your question, when you consider the Samsung was $25 and this SanDisk is $28, I would think the Samsung slightly edges it. Although if you're using the card strictly for data transfer of files and the like, the SanDisk should be the better choice.
The Samsung is currently $30 though...
Either way 512 GB for under 30$ is awesome. I still remember how amazed I was at seeing the first 1gb card
I used to believe Sandisk microsd was the top until I had a few failed ones. Switched to Samsung and never had an issue since. YMMV but just my experience.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank Obese_ICEagent
Quote
from SlickGame612
:
Is this better than the Samsung one that was $25 last week?
Yo I spent like an hour trying to figure this out and ended up going down a rabbit hole of SD card hieroglyphics...
From what I can tell the SanDisk has a slightly faster read/write time (150 mpbs vs 130 mpbs) but the Samsung is rated better at video and has faster minimum read/write speeds with apps.
To answer your question, when you consider the Samsung was $25 and this SanDisk is $28, I would think the Samsung slightly edges it. Although if you're using the card strictly for data transfer of files and the like, the SanDisk should be the better choice.
The Samsung is currently $30 though...
Either way 512 GB for under 30$ is awesome. I still remember how amazed I was at seeing the first 1gb card
Last edited by nuy6n6nn March 18, 2024 at 09:05 AM.
Yo I spent like an hour trying to figure this out and ended up going down a rabbit hole of SD card hieroglyphics...
From what I can tell the SanDisk has a slightly faster read/write time (150 mpbs vs 130 mpbs) but the Samsung is rated better at video and has faster minimum read/write speeds with apps.
To answer your question, when you consider the Samsung was $25 and this SanDisk is $28, I would think the Samsung slightly edges it. Although if you're using the card strictly for data transfer of files and the like, the SanDisk should be the better choice.
The Samsung is currently $30 though...
Either way 512 GB for under 30$ is awesome. I still remember how amazed I was at seeing the first 1gb card
Doesn't Samsung have better write consistency than SanDisk? Over long term constant writing?
I dunno about that, I think they're both reliable. I've had no problems with either. SanDisk is made by Western Digital which is a decent company. But if your preference is for Samsung that's understandable. Typing this from my S22 Galaxy lol
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank slinson
Quote
from BacksKnackin
:
Samsung reliability is much better than Sandisk.
I used to believe Sandisk microsd was the top until I had a few failed ones. Switched to Samsung and never had an issue since. YMMV but just my experience.
9
2
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Yo I spent like an hour trying to figure this out and ended up going down a rabbit hole of SD card hieroglyphics...
From what I can tell the SanDisk has a slightly faster read/write time (150 mpbs vs 130 mpbs) but the Samsung is rated better at video and has faster minimum read/write speeds with apps.
To answer your question, when you consider the Samsung was $25 and this SanDisk is $28, I would think the Samsung slightly edges it. Although if you're using the card strictly for data transfer of files and the like, the SanDisk should be the better choice.
The Samsung is currently $30 though...
Either way 512 GB for under 30$ is awesome. I still remember how amazed I was at seeing the first 1gb card
I appreciate the deep dive and time spent. Thank you!
Perfect timing. I've been wanting a big storage card for the steam deck and this is an outstanding price, from a legit brand.
In for 2. One for the Deck, one for the Switch. Thanks and repd OP.
The read/write speeds are very similar. Warranty for each is 10 years. I purchased the Samsung SSD card. There are too many complaints about SanDisk honoring the warranty.
Yo I spent like an hour trying to figure this out and ended up going down a rabbit hole of SD card hieroglyphics...
From what I can tell the SanDisk has a slightly faster read/write time (150 mpbs vs 130 mpbs) but the Samsung is rated better at video and has faster minimum read/write speeds with apps.
To answer your question, when you consider the Samsung was $25 and this SanDisk is $28, I would think the Samsung slightly edges it. Although if you're using the card strictly for data transfer of files and the like, the SanDisk should be the better choice.
The Samsung is currently $30 though...
Either way 512 GB for under 30$ is awesome. I still remember how amazed I was at seeing the first 1gb card
Yo I spent like an hour trying to figure this out and ended up going down a rabbit hole of SD card hieroglyphics...
From what I can tell the SanDisk has a slightly faster read/write time (150 mpbs vs 130 mpbs) but the Samsung is rated better at video and has faster minimum read/write speeds with apps.
To answer your question, when you consider the Samsung was $25 and this SanDisk is $28, I would think the Samsung slightly edges it. Although if you're using the card strictly for data transfer of files and the like, the SanDisk should be the better choice.
The Samsung is currently $30 though...
Either way 512 GB for under 30$ is awesome. I still remember how amazed I was at seeing the first 1gb card
What's insane to me is that you can get 1 TB for under $100 and it's the size of your fingernail.
2
1
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
Top Comments
From what I can tell the SanDisk has a slightly faster read/write time (150 mpbs vs 130 mpbs) but the Samsung is rated better at video and has faster minimum read/write speeds with apps.
To answer your question, when you consider the Samsung was $25 and this SanDisk is $28, I would think the Samsung slightly edges it. Although if you're using the card strictly for data transfer of files and the like, the SanDisk should be the better choice.
The Samsung is currently $30 though...
Either way 512 GB for under 30$ is awesome. I still remember how amazed I was at seeing the first 1gb card
They don't want you expanding your memory so that you use/pay for their Cloud services. Easy money for them!
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
38 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
In for 2. One for the Deck, one for the Switch. Thanks and repd OP.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank Obese_ICEagent
From what I can tell the SanDisk has a slightly faster read/write time (150 mpbs vs 130 mpbs) but the Samsung is rated better at video and has faster minimum read/write speeds with apps.
To answer your question, when you consider the Samsung was $25 and this SanDisk is $28, I would think the Samsung slightly edges it. Although if you're using the card strictly for data transfer of files and the like, the SanDisk should be the better choice.
The Samsung is currently $30 though...
Either way 512 GB for under 30$ is awesome. I still remember how amazed I was at seeing the first 1gb card
From what I can tell the SanDisk has a slightly faster read/write time (150 mpbs vs 130 mpbs) but the Samsung is rated better at video and has faster minimum read/write speeds with apps.
To answer your question, when you consider the Samsung was $25 and this SanDisk is $28, I would think the Samsung slightly edges it. Although if you're using the card strictly for data transfer of files and the like, the SanDisk should be the better choice.
The Samsung is currently $30 though...
Either way 512 GB for under 30$ is awesome. I still remember how amazed I was at seeing the first 1gb card
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank slinson
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
From what I can tell the SanDisk has a slightly faster read/write time (150 mpbs vs 130 mpbs) but the Samsung is rated better at video and has faster minimum read/write speeds with apps.
To answer your question, when you consider the Samsung was $25 and this SanDisk is $28, I would think the Samsung slightly edges it. Although if you're using the card strictly for data transfer of files and the like, the SanDisk should be the better choice.
The Samsung is currently $30 though...
Either way 512 GB for under 30$ is awesome. I still remember how amazed I was at seeing the first 1gb card
In for 2. One for the Deck, one for the Switch. Thanks and repd OP.
From what I can tell the SanDisk has a slightly faster read/write time (150 mpbs vs 130 mpbs) but the Samsung is rated better at video and has faster minimum read/write speeds with apps.
To answer your question, when you consider the Samsung was $25 and this SanDisk is $28, I would think the Samsung slightly edges it. Although if you're using the card strictly for data transfer of files and the like, the SanDisk should be the better choice.
The Samsung is currently $30 though...
Either way 512 GB for under 30$ is awesome. I still remember how amazed I was at seeing the first 1gb card
In for 2. One for the Deck, one for the Switch. Thanks and repd OP.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
From what I can tell the SanDisk has a slightly faster read/write time (150 mpbs vs 130 mpbs) but the Samsung is rated better at video and has faster minimum read/write speeds with apps.
To answer your question, when you consider the Samsung was $25 and this SanDisk is $28, I would think the Samsung slightly edges it. Although if you're using the card strictly for data transfer of files and the like, the SanDisk should be the better choice.
The Samsung is currently $30 though...
Either way 512 GB for under 30$ is awesome. I still remember how amazed I was at seeing the first 1gb card
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!