Did this coupon
work for you?
work for you?
Post Date | Sold By | Sale Price | Activity |
---|---|---|---|
04/10/24 | Home Depot | $1.20 frontpage |
24 |
02/26/24 | Home Depot | $1.20 frontpage |
12 |
02/13/24 | Home Depot | $1.22 popular |
5 |
02/09/24 | Home Depot | $1.20 frontpage |
15 |
02/07/24 | Home Depot | $1.20 frontpage |
9 |
01/20/24 | Home Depot | $1.20 frontpage |
21 |
01/16/24 | Home Depot | $1.20 frontpage |
15 |
01/15/24 | Home Depot | $1.22 popular |
6 |
01/10/24 | Home Depot | $1.22 popular |
3 |
12/30/23 | Home Depot | $1.20 frontpage |
14 |
12/27/23 | Home Depot | $1.20 frontpage |
19 |
11/18/23 | Home Depot | $1.25 frontpage |
14 |
10/26/23 | Home Depot | $1.20 frontpage |
12 |
10/24/23 | Home Depot | $1.22 popular |
6 |
10/11/23 | Home Depot | $1.20 frontpage |
21 |
05/03/23 | Home Depot | $1.22 |
8 |
04/29/23 | Home Depot | $1.20 frontpage |
8 |
Sold By | Sale Price |
---|---|
Office Depot and OfficeMax | $1.89 |
Ace Hardware | $6.99 |
The link has been copied to the clipboard.
18 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Featured Comments
Edit: found an article discussing it. There has been no legal finding that 3M knowingly did this, but settling the case certainly lends credence to the idea that wrongdoing occurred. The earplugs in question were developed by a different company that 3M acquired in 2008, so there's a bit of a stretch in claiming that 3M "knowingly" did this, but regardless, I agree that it's indefensible for any company to market safety equipment to veterans (or anyone else) without ensuring their effectiveness.
Link: https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/29/bu...index.html
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank morningphyre
Edit: found an article discussing it. There has been no legal finding that 3M knowingly did this, but settling the case certainly lends credence to the idea that wrongdoing occurred. The earplugs in question were developed by a different company that 3M acquired in 2008, so there's a bit of a stretch in claiming that 3M "knowingly" did this, but regardless, I agree that it's indefensible for any company to market safety equipment to veterans (or anyone else) without ensuring their effectiveness.
Link: https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/29/bu...index.html
Obviously like most ppl in this country no one gives a shit here about veterans and thus I got like 6 downvotes to 1 up. Oh well it's the truth. If you still wanna buy 3m products that's on you. I try to avoid them personally where possible. And I certainly wouldn't trust my eyesight to them
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/3m...ctive-dual
Obviously like most ppl in this country no one gives a shit here about veterans and thus I got like 6 downvotes to 1 up. Oh well it's the truth. If you still wanna buy 3m products that's on you. I try to avoid them personally where possible. And I certainly wouldn't trust my eyesight to them
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/3m...ctive-dual
"The Department of Justice announced today that 3M Company (3M), headquartered in St. Paul, Minnesota, has agreed to pay $9.1 million to resolve allegations that it knowingly sold the dual-ended Combat Arms Earplugs, Version 2 (CAEv2) to the United States military without disclosing defects that hampered the effectiveness of the hearing protection device. "
"Involved in the litigation" but says "got taxed 6 billion" = random service member who is part of the class-action and not a legal authority.
And I'm a veteran. 🤷
Edit: wow! Downvoting a fellow vet. Classy! 😂
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
And I'm a veteran. 🤷 ♂️
Now they can call me six-eyed
And I'm a veteran. 🤷
Edit: wow! Downvoting a fellow vet. Classy! 😂