Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Heads up, this deal has expired. Want to create a deal alert for this item?
expiredKhalidS8701 posted Apr 03, 2024 03:25 PM
expiredKhalidS8701 posted Apr 03, 2024 03:25 PM

Subaru Lease Offer: 2023 Subaru Solterra Compact Electric SUV

w/ Zero Down (+ Tax & License)

Free

1,194 Comments 660,532 Views
Visit Retailer
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
Participating Subaru Dealerships [dealership locator] have 2023 Subaru Solterra Electric Compact SUV (Premium Trim, code PED-11) available to Lease at $241/month for 36 months (total $8,676) plus tax and license fee from participating dealerships w/ zero down for qualified buyers. Contact your local dealership(s) to verify if this offer is available in your area.

Thanks to community member KhalidS8701 for finding this deal.
  • Note: Offer and inventory availability may vary by location.
Features:
  • All-wheel-drive electric crossover
  • Seats five and carries 23.8 cubic feet of cargo behind its rear seats.
  • Range: 228 miles
  • 0-60mph in 6.5 seconds
  • 8.3" of ground clearance
  • Built on Toyota's e-TGNA global battery-electric vehicle platform

Editor's Notes

Written by RevOne | Staff
  • About this deal:
    • Offer valid through April 30, 2024.
    • Subject to credit approval, vehicle insurance approval, & vehicle availability. Not all buyers may qualify. Payments may be higher in some states. Net cap cost & monthly payment excludes tax, license, title, registration, insurance, additional options, & retailer charges. Retailer participation may affect actual payment. At lease end, lessee is responsible for vehicle maintenance & repairs not covered by warranty, excessive wear & tear. Lessee pays personal property & ad valorem taxes (where applicable) & insurance. See participating retailer for details.
  • Please see the original post for additional details & give the WIKI and additional forum comments a read for helpful discussion.

Original Post

Written by KhalidS8701
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Participating Subaru Dealerships [dealership locator] have 2023 Subaru Solterra Electric Compact SUV (Premium Trim, code PED-11) available to Lease at $241/month for 36 months (total $8,676) plus tax and license fee from participating dealerships w/ zero down for qualified buyers. Contact your local dealership(s) to verify if this offer is available in your area.

Thanks to community member KhalidS8701 for finding this deal.
  • Note: Offer and inventory availability may vary by location.
Features:
  • All-wheel-drive electric crossover
  • Seats five and carries 23.8 cubic feet of cargo behind its rear seats.
  • Range: 228 miles
  • 0-60mph in 6.5 seconds
  • 8.3" of ground clearance
  • Built on Toyota's e-TGNA global battery-electric vehicle platform

Editor's Notes

Written by RevOne | Staff
  • About this deal:
    • Offer valid through April 30, 2024.
    • Subject to credit approval, vehicle insurance approval, & vehicle availability. Not all buyers may qualify. Payments may be higher in some states. Net cap cost & monthly payment excludes tax, license, title, registration, insurance, additional options, & retailer charges. Retailer participation may affect actual payment. At lease end, lessee is responsible for vehicle maintenance & repairs not covered by warranty, excessive wear & tear. Lessee pays personal property & ad valorem taxes (where applicable) & insurance. See participating retailer for details.
  • Please see the original post for additional details & give the WIKI and additional forum comments a read for helpful discussion.

Original Post

Written by KhalidS8701

Community Voting

Deal Score
+197
Good Deal
Visit Retailer

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Top Comments

RicardoR5620
1 Posts
10 Reputation
Mine at 100% charge gets 175 miles of range (don't turn on the climate because that knocks it down to 160 miles), dealer says they are working on a fix. But won't look at the car.
nadanunca
333 Posts
952 Reputation
You may want to look at the Hyundai Ioniq 6. Rated for 360 mile range on a 100% charge, and Hyundai's been doing $7,500 cashback to offset the ineligibility for federal credits. And if you're really lucky, your state won't charge sales tax—NJ didn't for mine.
Tarkov
1665 Posts
475 Reputation
Too bad insurance on this would be another $200

1,194 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Apr 08, 2024 01:59 PM
50 Posts
Joined Aug 2014
23476Apr 08, 2024 01:59 PM
50 Posts
Anyone find these at this price in SoCal…I can't seem to find any…I've found a few in LA area but no one is selling at that price
Apr 08, 2024 02:15 PM
5 Posts
Joined Mar 2024
CoolVest1366Apr 08, 2024 02:15 PM
5 Posts
i stop by dealer last week when i saw this deal.
they want 5000 down + 335 month for 36month lease.
i said hell no and left.
2
Apr 08, 2024 02:16 PM
100 Posts
Joined May 2019
HadavidApr 08, 2024 02:16 PM
100 Posts
Quote from Tarkov :
Too bad insurance on this would be another $200
Thats true. My insurance is cheap on my Subaru Forester. I will stick with that.
Apr 08, 2024 02:54 PM
3,372 Posts
Joined Jul 2013
madmax718Apr 08, 2024 02:54 PM
3,372 Posts
Quote from Golem20 :
the problem is that solar panels lose efficiency. you buy them, use them for 10-15 years, then you scrap them.
This is an incorrect statement. Average life span of quality panels made in the last 20 years is about 20-25 years. They will still put out power, but just not at the same percentage of efficiency. They will generally still put out over 85% of their originally rated #'s.
Much like everything else, newer panels are getting more efficient, so new panels offer better conversion rates for the same square footprint.
1
Apr 08, 2024 02:59 PM
3,372 Posts
Joined Jul 2013
madmax718Apr 08, 2024 02:59 PM
3,372 Posts
Quote from leeterbike :
You know they recycle the batteries right? And use them multiple times. The materials are nearly 95% recyclable.

You really need to educate yourself, don't let them educate you.
So is a regular car. So is a computer. So is plastic. Regular engine just melts to steel and aluminum mostly. And so does the frame.

You fail to address the issue which is that while things may be recyclable, the cost to recycle is sometimes more expensive than making new, thus.. into the heep it goes.

If you weren't aware, a lot of these companies which "take back" stuff to be recycled, sells to to a shell corp to "be recycled" but namely, shipped overseas to be scrapped. They do a pretty good job of scraping all the gold off the electronics, but there is still a pretty great environmental cost.
1
Apr 08, 2024 03:03 PM
1,052 Posts
Joined Mar 2014
jmhinkleApr 08, 2024 03:03 PM
1,052 Posts
Quote from Knightshade :
Not sure what he owned, but that's not remotely true of most newer EVs that have access to L3 fast chargers, especially those with access to Tesla superchargers. It's trivially easy to take long road trips in those.




This is most certainly not true-- most of the more efficient EVs get north of 100 eMPG-- your Jetta does not.



Note the car in THIS deal doesn't really fit the above-- it's pretty trash on specs because Toyota EV tech is a decade behind-- but that's not representative of most EVs sold.
He has an Ioniq5 and attempted to make a trip from Phoenix to Albuquerque in the winter and got stranded somewhere on I40 because the charge didn't get him anywhere near a recharge station. Perfectly fine car around town, just not dependable like a real car in those circumstances. He had a Tesla prior and had too many issues with quality control to keep that car. He never attempted long trips in that car.

100Empg is not 100MPG. I'll put my Jetta at 50MPG up against any electric car on a 1600 mile trip running 80+ MPH. Lets see who gets there much faster on far fewer stops. It just isn't close. You can't take a real trip in an electric car yet unless you plan an extra day of travel. That's not how I roll. Around town my 42 MPG lasts over a month before I need to fill the tank. Still more pleasant that worrying about find a quick charge to make it home. Like I said, one day they will be comparable and reliable, but we aren't there yet for my needs. I wish they would have done a diesel generator/electric hybrid like a train. That would be ideal.
1
Apr 08, 2024 03:10 PM
3,372 Posts
Joined Jul 2013
madmax718Apr 08, 2024 03:10 PM
3,372 Posts
Quote from Knightshade :
Not sure what he owned, but that's not remotely true of most newer EVs that have access to L3 fast chargers, especially those with access to Tesla superchargers. It's trivially easy to take long road trips in those.




This is most certainly not true-- most of the more efficient EVs get north of 100 eMPG-- your Jetta does not.



Note the car in THIS deal doesn't really fit the above-- it's pretty trash on specs because Toyota EV tech is a decade behind-- but that's not representative of most EVs sold.
Most EV's start with a significant eco cost that is never computed up front. Also, in the USA, most of the "electricity" used to put into an EV is still from fossil fuels, and not renewables.

His TDI can use biodiesel, which is significantly greener than EV's.

I am not anti EV's, or anti biodiesel, but realistically people need to understand the full soup to nuts comparison.

Im not even a giant mass transit promoter, as running 12 train cars and starting and stopping them for 2 people riding them is being touted as being more "green" than driving.

BTW, for those of you curious, the charge limits imposed (or recommended) by tesla is to keep the life span of the batteries. There are improvements (i.e. LFP batteries) but come at a reduced range. Using the same battery technology and system for your home allows you to peak shave your electrical grid use, and store excess solar generated.

your home also doesn't care that it now delivers 5kw vs 10kw after 8 years. However, a loss from 220miles to 110 miles is very significantly. Just like my solar panel life example before, there is a loss over time, but generating 10kw when new vs 8.5kw after 20 years, while less, is still less inconvenient than barely having enough juice left in your car to drive to and from work.
1

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Apr 08, 2024 03:23 PM
1,734 Posts
Joined Sep 2014
leeterbikeApr 08, 2024 03:23 PM
1,734 Posts
Quote from madmax718 :
So is a regular car. So is a computer. So is plastic. Regular engine just melts to steel and aluminum mostly. And so does the frame.

You fail to address the issue which is that while things may be recyclable, the cost to recycle is sometimes more expensive than making new, thus.. into the heep it goes.

If you weren't aware, a lot of these companies which "take back" stuff to be recycled, sells to to a shell corp to "be recycled" but namely, shipped overseas to be scrapped. They do a pretty good job of scraping all the gold off the electronics, but there is still a pretty great environmental cost.
There's a negative to nearly everything. Look at how Tesla recycles batteries. They wouldn't be recycling batteries if it wasn't profitable.

Nearly 100% recyclable and all done in the USA.
Last edited by leeterbike April 8, 2024 at 08:25 AM.
1
Apr 08, 2024 03:24 PM
15,360 Posts
Joined Sep 2009
KnightshadeApr 08, 2024 03:24 PM
15,360 Posts
Quote from madmax718 :
Most EV's start with a significant eco cost that is never computed up front
I guess you didn't bother to read the previous pages of the thread where all the sources on this were cited?

All the links I cited specifically count that up front-- hence the "cleaner from cradle to grave" description as it counts all costs from start to finish over the entire lifecycle.

EVs are cleaner than gas cars over their lifetime, significantly so, all costs included.


Quote from madmax718 :
. Also, in the USA, most of the "electricity" used to put into an EV is still from fossil fuels, and not renewables.
Of course 0% burned in gas engines is from renewables- so again EVs are better.

Further- it's more efficient (and cleaner) to burn natural gas (the majority of FF burned for electricity in the US) at a central plant than to burn refined gasoline in individual, inefficient, ICEs.


Quote from madmax718 :
His TDI can use biodiesel, which is significantly greener than EV's.
Biofuel in general is certainly not greener- let alone significantly so, compared to EVs/


https://energypost.eu/evs-vs-biof...emissions/

Quote :
For transport, biofuels have lower emissions than gasoline/petrol, but EVs will have the lowest emissions of all.
If you've got something specific on biodisel (as opposed to other biofuels) to support your claims though, please provide them.


Quote from madmax718 :
your home also doesn't care that it now delivers 5kw vs 10kw after 8 years. However, a loss from 220miles to 110 miles is very significantly. .
it would be but that's not how EV batteries actually age.

Even after 200k miles (considerably more than most folks drive in 8 years) Teslas fleet is shown to retail near 90% original range.

And that's mostly older generation cells too, newer ones are even better.
1
Apr 08, 2024 03:40 PM
1,305 Posts
Joined Jan 2008
mankuApr 08, 2024 03:40 PM
1,305 Posts
Quote from jmhinkle :
Someday, before I die, I'm sure I will own an electric car when they can be what I expect a car to be. My son bought in early to the craze has had a few different kinds and still wants to believe even though he has had issues. For me he just proved I can't leave the city in one and If I had a need for a toy car I would have kept my R32 GTR. They will eventually be viable option for my life, but my 1998 Jetta TDI only has 58k miles, gets better MPG than an electric car and can travel farther than my bladder before needing a refill. They'll get there someday and for many now make perfect sense. I'm still waiting for one to fill my needs to make the price justifiable.
You drive a 26 year old diesel...maybe even a manual?

If you pulled into a car dealer, not one smart salesperson would give you the time of day. You are not a customer. They want people who buy or lease new cars ever few years.

You are certainly frugal, and have saved thousands by driving this car vs someone like me who leases.

My guess is you'll never find any EV justifiable because it's not in your DNA.

1
Apr 08, 2024 03:41 PM
15,360 Posts
Joined Sep 2009
KnightshadeApr 08, 2024 03:41 PM
15,360 Posts
Quote from jmhinkle :
He has an Ioniq5 and attempted to make a trip from Phoenix to Albuquerque in the winter and got stranded somewhere on I40 because the charge didn't get him anywhere near a recharge station

Weird... google says that's a 419 mile drive.

Avg temps in winter in Phoenix where he started the trip are like 45 lows and 70s highs...that ought not change range much...

The Ioniq 5 is between 220 and 303 depending what model they have.

But let's make the worst possible assumption, that it's 220.

Winslow is 185 miles away and has L3 fast chargers (so does Payson, only 90 miles from Phoenix, if he wanted to be SUPER SUPER SUPER cautious (or drive 120 mph the whole trip).

After that another 128 miles down I-40 is Gallup with fast chargers, and it's only 138 miles to Albuquerque from there... though you pass ANOTHER fast charging site halfway there in Grants (plus Albuquerque itself has em).

Note that's just using electrify America-- and that's assuming he got the absolute shortest range model--- if he got anything but the bottom-end trim it's even easier... and there's other charging networks too... and if he had access to the Tesla one it's even easier than that as on that Phoenix to Albuquerque trip he will pass Supercharger stations at gaps of:

~95 miles
~95 miles
~58 miles
~79 miles (at which point he has reached Albuquerque)

And he'd only need ONE stop at any of em to complete the trip.

So again, trivial to do on Teslas network.


Quote from jmhinkle :
100Empg is not 100MPG
I mean- it literally is.

To determine MPGe ratings, the EPA uses the precise amount of electric energy that's equal to the energy in one gallon of gasoline




Quote from jmhinkle :
. I'll put my Jetta at 50MPG up against any electric car on a 1600 mile trip running 80+ MPH. Lets see who gets there much faster on far fewer stops.

That... has literally nothing to do with fuel efficiency my dude.

You just moved those goalposts to a whole other country.

A giant truck that gets 16 mpg but has a 120 gallon tank in the bed would win that race.

But it's garbage efficiency compared even to your Jetta-- let alone a genuinely efficient vehicle like an EV.


Quote from jmhinkle :
It just isn't close.
Agreed... any good EV can go much further than your Jetta can on the same amount of energy.


You're confusing "efficiency" with "size of the fuel tank" though.

They're vastly different things.


Quote from jmhinkle :
You can't take a real trip in an electric car yet unless you plan an extra day of travel.
Outright lie.

A LR Tesla gets you 300-350 miles of range from leaving the house (just over 400 in a Model S but they're pricier)... a single 15-20 minute charging stop, same as you'd do on most road trips to use the bathroom, fuel, get drinks, etc gets you 500+ miles down the road.... which is more than most folks drive in any given day even on a trip. A second 15 minute stop would get you ~700 miles, which certainly is.

Nobody's needing "an extra day" of travel-- you don't even need an extra hour of it unless you're going >1000 miles a day or something insane.




Quote from jmhinkle :
That's not how I roll. Around town my 42 MPG lasts over a month before I need to fill the tank. Still more pleasant that worrying about find a quick charge to make it home.
Does your home not have electricity?

Because for those of us who do, we simply wake up to a full 'tank" every morning and never have to even think about stopping for fuel in local driving at all.
Last edited by Knightshade April 8, 2024 at 08:46 AM.
1
Apr 08, 2024 04:16 PM
3,372 Posts
Joined Jul 2013
madmax718Apr 08, 2024 04:16 PM
3,372 Posts
Quote from Knightshade :
I guess you didn't bother to read the previous pages of the thread where all the sources on this were cited?

All the links I cited specifically count that up front-- hence the "cleaner from cradle to grave" description as it counts all costs from start to finish over the entire lifecycle.

EVs are cleaner than gas cars over their lifetime, significantly so, all costs included.




Of course 0% burned in gas engines is from renewables- so again EVs are better.

Further- it's more efficient (and cleaner) to burn natural gas (the majority of FF burned for electricity in the US) at a central plant than to burn refined gasoline in individual, inefficient, ICEs.




Biofuel in general is certainly not greener- let alone significantly so, compared to EVs/


https://energypost.eu/evs-vs-biof...emissions/



If you've got something specific on biodisel (as opposed to other biofuels) to support your claims though, please provide them.




it would be but that's not how EV batteries actually age.

Even after 200k miles (considerably more than most folks drive in 8 years) Teslas fleet is shown to retail near 90% original range.

And that's mostly older generation cells too, newer ones are even better.
From cradle to grave is cleaner only if you do not consider the source and loss from the transportation of that energy. Yes, Natural gas burning is cleaner, but transmission of electricity far distances is not (in the scheme of things). I am not saying there aren't alternatives that can make this work (micro grid generators) and hot swappable batteries, but they aren't quite there yet.

Your quoting bio fuels, not bio diesel, which is primarily made from WASTE oil. Waste tallow is generally made into animal feed, while waste oils such as that from the deep fryer is used. In practice, it is primarily a recycled product. It uses Methanol, not ethanol, (ethanol was the other crap that replaced MTBE). Ethanol has other issues mentioned in your link, which is true, but if you bring up the economics of things, then most EV's make even less sense without govt incentives for both the mfg and the consumer.

You mention the degradation of teslas' specifically, but there is a fleet of nissan Leaf's that have dropped to unusable range. Tesla is pretty much the powerhouse when it comes to battery tech and putting them in vehicles.

Tesla also recycles its own battery tech into its powerwalls; if you see my other parts of this thread, I briefly talk about the capacity vs size indirectly. A battery that holds 80% of its capacity can still provide a decade of service for a home, just not great for an EV.

Why not make a CNG/Hybrid?
2
Apr 08, 2024 04:16 PM
3,372 Posts
Joined Jul 2013
madmax718Apr 08, 2024 04:16 PM
3,372 Posts
Quote from leeterbike :
You know they recycle the batteries right? And use them multiple times. The materials are nearly 95% recyclable.

You really need to educate yourself, don't let them educate you.
BTW, lead acid batteries are also 95 % recycleable. just melt the lead again.
Apr 08, 2024 04:24 PM
1,916 Posts
Joined Apr 2007
topchoApr 08, 2024 04:24 PM
1,916 Posts
Quote from madmax718 :
BTW, lead acid batteries are also 95 % recycleable. just melt the lead again.
Lead acid batteries have million problems. Recyclability is not one of them.
1

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Apr 08, 2024 04:24 PM
3,372 Posts
Joined Jul 2013
madmax718Apr 08, 2024 04:24 PM
3,372 Posts
If one was actually to consider "cost" into the equation, burning natural gas may be "cleaner", but not... really. There is still drilling, green house gases, etc. Even solar panels have their own cost to green house gases, it just is the easiest out of the major 3 (wind is horribly inefficient monetarily).

I just don't understand people's craziness to get an EV before they get solar. You get the EV after you get the solar and geothermal. On a cost and conservation basis, your home (and office) expend significantly more electricity and gas than anything else.

EV's are childsplay when it comes to a family's overall environmental footprint. Just think about the thousands of diapers disposed of which use plastic and is not biodegradable. Getting an EV before the renewable is about the same as buying into a 5% CD or treasury bill when you owe 19% a month on your credit card bill. Paying down the credit card bill is the logical answer.

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Related Searches

Popular Deals

Trending Deals