Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands or deals, including promoted items.
Frontpage

Slumberjack Backpacking Packs: 65-Liter Dallas Divide Backpack (Green)

$41.50
$47.99
+ Free Shipping
+24 Deal Score
24,720 Views
Walmart has Slumberjack Backpacking Packs on sale from $41.50 as listed below. Shipping is free w/ Walmart+ (free trial available) or on orders $35+, otherwise select free store pickup where stock permits.
  • Note: Availability for pickup may vary by location.
Thanks to Deal Hunter niki4h for finding this deal.

Available:Product Details:
  • Perfect for short to medium trips with a 50 Liter overall capacity or extended trips with a 65 Liter overall capacity
  • Water resistant 200D polyester diamond rip stop and 600D polyester oxford hybrid construction stands up to the elements
  • Large top-loading main compartment
  • Includes a side water bottle pocket so you can stay hydrated on the go
  • Tightens down your gear with dual side compression straps
  • Stashes your trekking pole with handy attachment points
  • Padded shoulder straps take it easy on your shoulders
  • Comfy to carry with a padded waist belt featuring a zippered pocket for your must-have stuff
  • Vented back panel keeps the air circulating and the padding rests comfortably against your back
  • Hydration reservoir compatible means you can add a water bladder
  • Be safe and seen with 360⁰ reflective accents.
  • Attached rain cover can be easily stowed in its own pocket when not in use
Expired:
Good Deal?

Original Post

Written by
Edited April 10, 2024 at 08:37 PM by
Walmart [walmart.com] has Slumberjack Backpacking Packs from $27.23 listed below. Shipping is free w/ Walmart+ (free trial available [walmart.com]) or on orders $35+.

Available:
Add Comment
Created 04-05-2024 at 04:01 PM by niki4h | Staff
If you purchase something through a post on our site, Slickdeals may get a small share of the sale.
Deal
Score
+24
24,720 Views
$41.50
$47.99

Your comment cannot be blank.

Featured Comments

Yes, it is.
It's a normal way to type having to say lbs in this sense.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_sign

Cut to the chase: "#" became typeset symbol for earlier stylized, handwritten "lb." symbol from ≈200 years ago, denoting pounds of weight.(See example in Wiki handwritten by Issac Newton...)

Translation: "#" = "pounds" (weight)

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined Jun 2006
L5: Journeyman
> bubble2 504 Posts
243 Reputation
Blindsorrow
04-12-2024 at 08:29 PM.
04-12-2024 at 08:29 PM.
Quote from blunty :
£ - British pound sign
# - Hashtag
Wink
Brits in a heavy bind, name already taken...
("Hash" from [cross-]"hatch", "tag" is noveau-hipster.)
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Sep 2022
L4: Apprentice
> bubble2 481 Posts
46 Reputation
TealIdea227
04-13-2024 at 07:42 AM.
04-13-2024 at 07:42 AM.
Quote from Blindsorrow :
Brits in a heavy bind, name already taken...
("Hash" from [cross-]"hatch", "tag" is noveau-hipster.)
Not a Perl programmer, I see.
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Aug 2009
L6: Expert
> bubble2 1,526 Posts
156 Reputation
dcguy703
04-15-2024 at 07:11 AM.
04-15-2024 at 07:11 AM.
Got the backpack today 50l. pretty decent for the price
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Oct 2015
L5: Journeyman
> bubble2 561 Posts
126 Reputation
Mrvrsick
04-15-2024 at 05:33 PM.
04-15-2024 at 05:33 PM.
Quote from Blindsorrow :
I'm not an expert in this area, but I'm pretty certain that *lighter* weight backpacks are generally coveted by enthusiasts and command higher prices (have strong, lightweight, "high-tech" materials). 3.5 lbs. (Slumberjack) is quite a bit of weight, come to think of it. This specific Outdoor Products pack is quite durable (from personal experience), but Slumberjack may be as good or better. Consider ordering both, return one, 90 days to do so @ Walmart.
When done right, yes. Not at the expense of features.

For example, first thing I see is that the lighter one doesn't have load lifters. Probably not the biggest deal with smaller packs, but once they start getting tall, they help to keep things from flopping around.

And most glaring is the weight of the Arrowhead pack. Just 2.14 lbs is crazy light.
For comparison, the Osprey Exos 48, a very popular lightweight pack, weighs about 2.8 lbs.

I think the specs of the Arrowhead pack are wrong. The size listed just doesn't match up with a 48 liter pack.
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Dec 2012
L6: Expert
> bubble2 1,137 Posts
131 Reputation
lslal
04-15-2024 at 08:31 PM.
04-15-2024 at 08:31 PM.
Quote from Blindsorrow :
Actually 600D(Denier) material according to manufacturer:
https://slumberjack.com/trail-ridge-50/

The Slumberjack backpack "lifetime" warranty has all sorts of qualifiers/limitations, but that might be the case to weed out egregious abusers.

Anyone have warranty experience with them? Lifetime warranty from reputable company very important in backpack I think. (Jansport is stellar, think Outdoor Products very good, too.)

Also compare this similar, and well-rated pack, with caveat that straps not height adjustable causing problems for taller men (this might also be case with featured Slumberjack):

Outdoor Products Arrowhead 47 L Hiking Backpack, Rucksack, Unisex, Green, Adult, Teen, Polyester https://www.walmart.com/ip/722065632

Thanks for this one! I think this fits for carry on
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Page 3 of 3
Start the Conversation
 

More Sporting Goods Deals & Discounts

More Walmart Deals

Link Copied

The link has been copied to the clipboard.