VMware Desktop Hypervisor products Fusion and Workstation are used by millions of people every day to run virtual machines on their Windows, Linux and Mac computers. They give users the ability to quickly and easily build "local virtual" environments to install other operating systems, learn about technology, build and test software, complex systems, browsers, apps, games, and more.
Refer to the original post & forum comments for additional details & discussion.
This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
VMware Desktop Hypervisor products Fusion and Workstation are used by millions of people every day to run virtual machines on their Windows, Linux and Mac computers. They give users the ability to quickly and easily build "local virtual" environments to install other operating systems, learn about technology, build and test software, complex systems, browsers, apps, games, and more.
Refer to the original post & forum comments for additional details & discussion.
You have to register for the support portal as shown above. You do not have to create a profile.
Then, you can use the link I provided above to get to all the vmware software, locate the vmware workstation pro section there. When you click on it, it will have links to Workstation Pro downloads. There are two download links there for Windows and Linux marked "Free for Personal Use". Click on your link. It will force you to certify you are a resident of the US and that you will not export the software. Once you have done that, you can start the download.
Here is the Workstation Pro 17 blog with download links as well:
I'm sure there are better options etc. I'm used to the interface after using it over a decade and it works well for running a guest os in my windows 10 host. Pretty solid piece of software for free.
Their philosophy is to keep top tier customers. Like a boutique store or country club you are not open to all but to select few who give you 70-80% of business. It's pricey and exclusive. The rest could buy cheaper products made for the masses. This allows them to cut expenses and make stock more attractive to the investors. I have held their stocks since 2017 and it has been a very rewarding journey so far.
Every business out there is trying different strategy, this is Broadcom's. And I am saying this as a VMware employee who moved to Broadcom after the recent acquisition.
That's right. This is the 20/80 rule that most enterprises have to enforce. Find the 20% of your customers that take 80% of your time and find new homes for them. This allows the market to build new and better products before they eventually have to face the same decision. It's unfortunate that it has to be this way, but it's reality.
I was wondering why my company switched from Symantec to plain old Microsoft Defender, this explains it
IMO, Symantec started going downhill over a decade ago. The company I worked for in 2007-2010 used Symantec Enterprise AV and we frequently had an issue with malware getting on the computers and going undetected - malware which Windows Defender would detect and remove.
VMware has been anti-customer since 2010. They've been following the EMC model, which is to charge as much as the market will bare. Only go after the high-end customers where money isn't an object.
My company used to deploy VMware ESX and ESXi to small and medium-sized businesses. In 2010, VMware decided to jumble their license costs for some reason that is still unclear, but it seemed to be only to get more money. I was mid-deployment at a client's site when this happened. We told the client our concerns and suggested they switch to a F/LOSS tool, KVM/QEMU for their needs. We looked at the new license costs and saw that annual support was going to double for them. If they needed/wanted any new licenses, those would be 50% more than what they'd already paid. Looked like a money grab as their business disappeared to me.
They had no Linux experience and didn't want to make the switch, so we finished the deployment with ESXi and vSphere.
A year later, at license renewal, they had sticker shock and called us. We migrated them to KVM/QEMU - $0 license costs, $0 maintenance costs. The client sent 2 guys in their IT department to Linux training - 1 week at a time, spread over 3 quarters. This was about the same cost of their VMware licenses the year before Now they do their own support and don't need us anymore. They've switched over 50% of their corporate servers to Linux. Also, $0, just hardware and time. The remaining MS-Windows systems are there because the software the business runs requires it. No Linux alternative for their niche industry. All file, print, VoIP, and backups are on Linux systems. Nearly everything is virtualized.
What shocked them most was that backup software was $0 too. With their VMware deployment, it was $1000 for the license and the backups took many hours. With the F/LOSS backup tools, they finished backing up all their servers in less than 1 hour nightly and were able to backup key directories on end-user's workstations too. These were all "pulled" versioned backups, so the clients don't have direct access to the backup storage, which is better for malware/cryptoware recovery.
Anyway, it's a trap. Depending on the OS you have, there are less evil options than stuff from VMware.
Vmware workstation pro has nothing to do with vmware esxi. I personally run a vm in my computer to do work related stuff because the way office 365 manages the computer which will put restrictions in it.
As much as I agree that vmware esx is nothing more than a cash grab at this point, there is nothing that comes close to reliability and support, espeically with 3rd party vendors (IE backup vendors.)
I haven't used VMware Fusion Pro on my Mac since before Apple Silicon. Does anyone know if the snapshot feature is available on Apple Silicon devices. Last I checked Parallels on Apple Silicon was still unable to do this.
Proxmox can't compete for large environments unless there's an equivalent to clustering / HA / vCenter management that nobody has told me about.
XCP-NG is a lot closer (with Xen Orchestra) but both of those solutions require a lot more fuss than ESXi. If you're not a Linux expert, get ready for some learning.
Proxmox can't compete for large environments unless there's an equivalent to clustering / HA / vCenter management that nobody has told me about.
XCP-NG is a lot closer (with Xen Orchestra) but both of those solutions require a lot more fuss than ESXi. If you're not a Linux expert, get ready for some learning.
I'm a bit of a rook, but I'm pretty sure that clustering & HA has been built in for a while (I see clustering & HA in my web management portal) and CEPH (cluster storage fs/service) is available for paid subscribers. Again, worth tinkering with to see if it could work for you. It's getting very polished, and I don't mind that I have no vsphere client when the web interface works as well as it does.
Have you guys considered proxmox? I know if you're spending that kind of cash it's not easy, but damn it's worth tinkering with. I'm currently migrating just a few vms from our VMware esxi as the proxmox team just released migration tools a month or two back.
Shoot. Might as well take it up a notch, look at Nutanix.
How does this differ from vSphere, which is already available for free for personal use?
ESXi (free tier) is being phased out. It is a virtualization OS/Platform. Fusion/Workstation are apps you run on an existing OS to provide virtualization services. Fusion for macOS and Workstation for Windows. So if you wanna fun Windows on macOS, Fusion would do the trick.
I'm a bit of a rook, but I'm pretty sure that clustering & HA has been built in for a while (I see clustering & HA in my web management portal) and CEPH (cluster storage fs/service) is available for paid subscribers. Again, worth tinkering with to see if it could work for you. It's getting very polished, and I don't mind that I have no vsphere client when the web interface works as well as it does.
Sorry, referring to host clusters -- e.g. if you have 48 hosts in six clusters of eight, afaik there is no centralized way to manage them all. Does Proxmox have the equivalent of vMotion and storage vMotion?
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank mpetrovsky
Quote
from NavyDolphin310
:
Isn't virtualbox better than this?
Virtualbox (Oracle) is iffy in terms of licensing.
Yes, it is free, works fine and I used to have it to run Linux on my company owned Windows laptop.
One day I installed some add-on, no problem. 6 month later Oracle came after our company and wanted 7-digits figure in backpay and fine for license violation.
Yes, somewhere on page 13 of 24 pages license agreement it says that this add-on required paid license. But who reads it?
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank mpetrovsky
Quote
from yoFu
:
Read the license agreement if you use it outside your home. You may be setting up your company for Oracle to come knocking for their money. They have other places.
Not may. It will. The only question: when. Happened to our company.
Has anyone been able to download VMware Workstation Pro for Personal Use (For Windows)? Mine just spins and nothing downloads. I've tried many internet browsers too.
1
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I was employed in field sales by Symantec Enterprise when Broadcom acquired them. They straight up told us the following:
1. They are only interested in the business of the company's top 100 customers. All the rest could go to hell for all they were concerned.
2. They would refuse to do any single transaction that was under $100K. This mean small / medium and even some large businesses would not be able to transact their renewals and were left stranded without appropriate security updates.
3. They were extorting any of the large customers who were considering leaving Symantec, telling them if they were going to cancel the contract then Broadcom would also refuse to renew any other technology they relied on. Most of these largest enterprises have multiple products owned by Broadcom and it's very difficult to extract themselves from all of them simultaneously.
Needless to say, I quit as soon as possible.
Having worked for BRCM for 10 years, yup. Since Avago and Hock took over, profits went up, margins went up, and satisfaction and screwing markets skyrocketed. I guess that's the only thing that seems to matter these days.
1
1
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
Top Comments
This page has both links.
vSphere is a hypervisor. It's also not free anymore. https://blogs.vmware.co
Then, you can use the link I provided above to get to all the vmware software, locate the vmware workstation pro section there. When you click on it, it will have links to Workstation Pro downloads. There are two download links there for Windows and Linux marked "Free for Personal Use". Click on your link. It will force you to certify you are a resident of the US and that you will not export the software. Once you have done that, you can start the download.
Here is the Workstation Pro 17 blog with download links as well:
https://blogs.vmware.co
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
229 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Every business out there is trying different strategy, this is Broadcom's. And I am saying this as a VMware employee who moved to Broadcom after the recent acquisition.
VMware has been anti-customer since 2010. They've been following the EMC model, which is to charge as much as the market will bare. Only go after the high-end customers where money isn't an object.
My company used to deploy VMware ESX and ESXi to small and medium-sized businesses. In 2010, VMware decided to jumble their license costs for some reason that is still unclear, but it seemed to be only to get more money. I was mid-deployment at a client's site when this happened. We told the client our concerns and suggested they switch to a F/LOSS tool, KVM/QEMU for their needs. We looked at the new license costs and saw that annual support was going to double for them. If they needed/wanted any new licenses, those would be 50% more than what they'd already paid. Looked like a money grab as their business disappeared to me.
They had no Linux experience and didn't want to make the switch, so we finished the deployment with ESXi and vSphere.
A year later, at license renewal, they had sticker shock and called us. We migrated them to KVM/QEMU - $0 license costs, $0 maintenance costs. The client sent 2 guys in their IT department to Linux training - 1 week at a time, spread over 3 quarters. This was about the same cost of their VMware licenses the year before Now they do their own support and don't need us anymore. They've switched over 50% of their corporate servers to Linux. Also, $0, just hardware and time. The remaining MS-Windows systems are there because the software the business runs requires it. No Linux alternative for their niche industry. All file, print, VoIP, and backups are on Linux systems. Nearly everything is virtualized.
What shocked them most was that backup software was $0 too. With their VMware deployment, it was $1000 for the license and the backups took many hours. With the F/LOSS backup tools, they finished backing up all their servers in less than 1 hour nightly and were able to backup key directories on end-user's workstations too. These were all "pulled" versioned backups, so the clients don't have direct access to the backup storage, which is better for malware/cryptoware recovery.
Anyway, it's a trap. Depending on the OS you have, there are less evil options than stuff from VMware.
As much as I agree that vmware esx is nothing more than a cash grab at this point, there is nothing that comes close to reliability and support, espeically with 3rd party vendors (IE backup vendors.)
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
XCP-NG is a lot closer (with Xen Orchestra) but both of those solutions require a lot more fuss than ESXi. If you're not a Linux expert, get ready for some learning.
XCP-NG is a lot closer (with Xen Orchestra) but both of those solutions require a lot more fuss than ESXi. If you're not a Linux expert, get ready for some learning.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhEE_QlI1MU [ceph.com]
https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Clus...quiremen
https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/g...-Dashboard
I'm a bit of a rook, but I'm pretty sure that clustering & HA has been built in for a while (I see clustering & HA in my web management portal) and CEPH (cluster storage fs/service) is available for paid subscribers. Again, worth tinkering with to see if it could work for you. It's getting very polished, and I don't mind that I have no vsphere client when the web interface works as well as it does.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhEE_QlI1MU [ceph.com]
https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Clus...quiremen
https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/g...-Dashboard
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank mpetrovsky
Yes, it is free, works fine and I used to have it to run Linux on my company owned Windows laptop.
One day I installed some add-on, no problem. 6 month later Oracle came after our company and wanted 7-digits figure in backpay and fine for license violation.
Yes, somewhere on page 13 of 24 pages license agreement it says that this add-on required paid license. But who reads it?
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank mpetrovsky
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
1. They are only interested in the business of the company's top 100 customers. All the rest could go to hell for all they were concerned.
2. They would refuse to do any single transaction that was under $100K. This mean small / medium and even some large businesses would not be able to transact their renewals and were left stranded without appropriate security updates.
3. They were extorting any of the large customers who were considering leaving Symantec, telling them if they were going to cancel the contract then Broadcom would also refuse to renew any other technology they relied on. Most of these largest enterprises have multiple products owned by Broadcom and it's very difficult to extract themselves from all of them simultaneously.
Needless to say, I quit as soon as possible.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!