Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Heads up, this deal has expired. Want to create a deal alert for this item?
expiredtDames | Staff posted Jan 28, 2025 05:54 PM
expiredtDames | Staff posted Jan 28, 2025 05:54 PM

SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB GDDR6 Graphics Card $830 + Free Shipping

$830

$900

7% off
Newegg
30 Comments 10,578 Views
Visit Newegg
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
Newegg [newegg.com] has SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB GDDR6 Graphics Card on sale for $829.99. Shipping is free.
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Newegg [newegg.com] has SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB GDDR6 Graphics Card on sale for $829.99. Shipping is free.

Community Voting

Deal Score
+14
Good Deal
Visit Newegg

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

30 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Jan 28, 2025 10:32 PM
1,512 Posts
Joined Jul 2011
LordDrolJan 28, 2025 10:32 PM
1,512 Posts
Quote from rocknrolla4 :
Thank you Thank you Thank you!
The GPU market needs more competition and anyone and everyone purchasing Intel cards right now will make that happen. My hope is that Intel can eventually scale their performance up to compete in the mid to high range and will keep prices low to gain market share. People like you are potentially helping to create a more healthy competitive gpu market and I genuinely thank you!
Nope. Intel loses money on every Battlemage card, and hasn't made very many of them which is why prices have been higher than MSRP. Buyers aren't even delaying the inevitable.

My hope is that Intel continues to scale up their iGPUs, which are quite capable and sold in the hundreds of millions, and delivers an answer to AMD's "mega APUs" like Strix Halo (e.g. the Ryzen AI Max 395+). These could replace low/mid range GPUs in the long run and eliminate VRAM concerns by using large memory pools.
1
Jan 28, 2025 10:40 PM
351 Posts
Joined Nov 2017
16RSJan 28, 2025 10:40 PM
351 Posts
Other than for non-gaming professional applications, I believe $800 gpus should not even exist. But that's me.

Things have gotten WAY outta hand...
Last edited by 16RS January 28, 2025 at 03:07 PM.
Jan 28, 2025 11:22 PM
55 Posts
Joined Apr 2011
biggzzz7Jan 28, 2025 11:22 PM
55 Posts
Quote from YellowSpiderweb05 :
This matches a 4080 Super, right?
In pure rasterized performance, trades blows pretty evenly depending on the game which is impressive. With upscaling tech/or fake generated frames/ray tracing, it falls behind.
Jan 29, 2025 02:47 AM
211 Posts
Joined Nov 2016
ArmorXIIIJan 29, 2025 02:47 AM
211 Posts
Quote from PerkyTurky :
what year is it?
2021 was one of the worst years to buy GPUs, I think this guy is still stuck in that year
Jan 29, 2025 02:57 AM
570 Posts
Joined Jul 2013
JohnJ2996Jan 29, 2025 02:57 AM
570 Posts
Quote from timtheterrible :
Yeah, not sure I would buy this when a new generation is right around the corner.
because the next generation will be out of stock and cost much more than MSRP for similar performance

maybe I'm exaggerating but are you planning on spending double for 15% more performance?

unless you're talking about the next generation of AMD cards. we have heard nothing about it except for the leaks, which is not promising at all.

I think the latest leaks suggest higher MSRP and less performance
Jan 29, 2025 03:46 AM
1,528 Posts
Joined Dec 2009
dealmeister3000Jan 29, 2025 03:46 AM
1,528 Posts
Quote from 16RS :
Other than for non-gaming professional applications, I believe $800 gpus should not even exist. But that's me.

Things have gotten WAY outta hand...
Well I don't think most people who play games on their PC can even afford $800 GPUs. It is up to you if you wish to keep subsidizing this nonsense.
Jan 29, 2025 06:32 AM
2,968 Posts
Joined Jul 2010
MasejoerJan 29, 2025 06:32 AM
2,968 Posts
Quote from LordDrol :
My hope is that Intel continues to scale up their iGPUs, which are quite capable and sold in the hundreds of millions, and delivers an answer to AMD's "mega APUs" like Strix Halo (e.g. the Ryzen AI Max 395+). These could replace low/mid range GPUs in the long run and eliminate VRAM concerns by using large memory pools.
The Wattage numbers finally look promising, but integrated graphics have been promising low-mid range performance for about 15 years now. By the time they actually come to market, they're already behind by some generations, and the available memory bandwidth never comes close to competing.

I've been waiting for an excellent APU though - Zen4-RDNA2 was the first truly decent product years back, and this RDNA3.5 stuff looks like an excellent replacement for larger portables, or small PCs.


Quote from dealmeister3000 :
Well I don't think most people who play games on their PC can even afford $800 GPUs. It is up to you if you wish to keep subsidizing this nonsense.
Yeah, it's not for me, but per-year prices really aren't much different than in the past either. Progress has slowed, but the "cost per year" of upgrades, now kept in service for longer periods of time than in the past, hasn't changed much.

25 years ago I would upgrade my $200 videocards every 8-16 months for 50-100% gains each time. From 2000-2005 I probably spent a bit over $1k on videocards, which would be over $2000 adjusted for inflation, and the final card was probably 800% the performance level of the one 5-years prior. Now if one buys a single card every 5-years, you get double the previous card's performance...for $800-1000.

Even two Voodoo2 12MB cards for SLI would set you back $600 in 1998. The GeForce2 Ultra was a whopping $500 on release. Most people never bought the most expensive option. The 4090 was basically last gen's Titan, and Titans have always been a step above the GeForces - the first model was $1,000, and a lot of people purchased Titans for gaming.

I think 5-year upgrades are about correct now, for a doubling of GPU performance, for anything that is not "Titan" level of performance and price.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Jan 29, 2025 06:54 AM
530 Posts
Joined Sep 2015
spiffytexanJan 29, 2025 06:54 AM
530 Posts
Quote from JK1982 :
Feels like this should
Be closer to 750 when the 5070ti comes out for $750. This does have more vram though
This will spank the 5070ti.
Jan 29, 2025 06:58 AM
530 Posts
Joined Sep 2015
spiffytexanJan 29, 2025 06:58 AM
530 Posts
Quote from YellowSpiderweb05 :
This matches a 4080 Super, right?
Matches 4080 Super. 4080 Super pulls ahead a hair if upscaing is enabled.

This card will age better than the 4080 Super due to it having a lot more Vram. 4080 Super with 16gb is already only "good enough" at 1440p or 4k high refresh rate. In 3 years it will be not enough.

Buy whichever is cheaper.
Jan 29, 2025 08:33 AM
1,243 Posts
Joined Apr 2008
steven99Jan 29, 2025 08:33 AM
1,243 Posts
Quote from 16RS :
Other than for non-gaming professional applications, I believe $800 gpus should not even exist. But that's me.

Things have gotten WAY outta hand...
Those days are never coming back. As long as they have applications that can make use of the computing power of GPU's it will no longer be the sole realm of gamers.
Jan 29, 2025 03:09 PM
1,336 Posts
Joined Jan 2007
noapathyJan 29, 2025 03:09 PM
1,336 Posts
Quote from almightyarts :
Lol the b580? That thing doesn't come close to this
Nah, just a simple b570 for $220. It's not supposed to be flashy or anything. I'm not a hardcore gamer bro, but do occasionally like to play them. And the $600 I didn't spend on this card was enough to build a complete new system. Wink

Quote from LordDrol :
Nope. Intel loses money on every Battlemage card, and hasn't made very many of them which is why prices have been higher than MSRP. Buyers aren't even delaying the inevitable.

My hope is that Intel continues to scale up their iGPUs, which are quite capable and sold in the hundreds of millions, and delivers an answer to AMD's "mega APUs" like Strix Halo (e.g. the Ryzen AI Max 395+). These could replace low/mid range GPUs in the long run and eliminate VRAM concerns by using large memory pools.
I'd like to see them employ multiple strategies simultaneously. They could ramp up production on current gen cards, improve the iGPUs segment as you suggest, and develop/release some high end cards, too. If they do even as decent a job as they have with their ARC cards and don't price the stuff to the moon I know a lot of people would be happy.
Jan 29, 2025 03:36 PM
1,924 Posts
Joined Nov 2010
PatjJan 29, 2025 03:36 PM
1,924 Posts
Love the SD comments and the members are so helpful.

I finally returned a Hellhound 7900xtx to Amazon that I got on a super pre-Black Friday deal (extended returns). I don't play games, but do video Ai upscaling and, unfortunately, the software I employ (Topaz) doesn't appreciate AMD cards, but it does like Nvidia with as much VRAM as possible. I currently use an AMD 7800xt with 16GB, so 24GB would have been a jump, but after ordering, I spent a lot of time reading actual user benchmarks and determined that an Nvidia RTX 3090 would clean the 7900xtx's proverbial clock.
I can find all kinds of used 3090 cards for about $650.
Thanks, as always for this forum
Jan 29, 2025 07:34 PM
395 Posts
Joined Apr 2013
almightyartsJan 29, 2025 07:34 PM
395 Posts
Quote from noapathy :
Nah, just a simple b570 for $220. It's not supposed to be flashy or anything. I'm not a hardcore gamer bro, but do occasionally like to play them. And the $600 I didn't spend on this card was enough to build a complete new system. Wink

I'd like to see them employ multiple strategies simultaneously. They could ramp up production on current gen cards, improve the iGPUs segment as you suggest, and develop/release some high end cards, too. If they do even as decent a job as they have with their ARC cards and don't price the stuff to the moon I know a lot of people would be happy.
I was looking into the b570 myself as well but it looks like it still underperforms at 1080p(which i would be targetting) unless you have a top tier cpu
Jan 30, 2025 12:54 AM
1,336 Posts
Joined Jan 2007
noapathyJan 30, 2025 12:54 AM
1,336 Posts
Quote from almightyarts :
I was looking into the b570 myself as well but it looks like it still underperforms at 1080p(which i would be targetting) unless you have a top tier cpu
Coming from an RX 570 with 4GB...this'll hold me over for a while until the b580 or the yet to be released b7xx series (or whatever else Intel comes up with). Not buying a GPU from team green/red.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Jan 31, 2025 04:02 PM
189 Posts
Joined Mar 2016
PerkyTurkyJan 31, 2025 04:02 PM
189 Posts
Quote from noapathy :
The year I got my first Intel card (and not from any of those shady scalpers). I suggest the same to anyone who asks.
stuck a 580 in the daughters PC build and have 0 regrets, I cant wait to see what they put out for the battlemage stuff, intel coming in hot with this 2nd gen.

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Popular Deals

Trending Deals