Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
frontpage Posted by Navy-Wife | Staff • 5d ago
frontpage Posted by Navy-Wife | Staff • 5d ago

Prime Members: SAMSUNG Galaxy Watch 7: 44mm $200, 40mm

+ Free Shipping

$160

$300

46% off
Amazon
21 Comments 17,700 Views
Get Deal at Amazon
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
Amazon has for Prime Members: SAMSUNG Galaxy Watch 7 on sale as listed below. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Deal Hunter Navy-Wife for finding this deal.

Available:
  • 40mm (Bluetooth)
  • 44mm (Bluetooth) $199.99

Editor's Notes

Written by megakimcheelove | Staff

Original Post

Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Amazon has for Prime Members: SAMSUNG Galaxy Watch 7 on sale as listed below. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Deal Hunter Navy-Wife for finding this deal.

Available:
  • 40mm (Bluetooth)
  • 44mm (Bluetooth) $199.99

Editor's Notes

Written by megakimcheelove | Staff

Original Post

Community Voting

Deal Score
+37
Good Deal
Get Deal at Amazon

Price Intelligence

Model: Samsung Galaxy Watch7 40mm BT Smartwatch - Cream

Deal History 

Sale Price
Slickdeal
  • $NaN
  • Today

Current Prices

Sort: Lowest to Highest | Last Updated 7/13/2025, 07:49 PM
Sold By Sale Price
Abt Electronics$209.99

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

20 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

5d ago
4,613 Posts
Joined Dec 2009
5d ago
masterz13
5d ago
4,613 Posts
I can't remember if I got this or the Watch 5 Pro refurbished for Christmas, but it was incredibly slow.
4
5d ago
666 Posts
Joined Jan 2004
5d ago
funky_herbal_t
5d ago
666 Posts
Quote from masterz13 :
I can't remember if I got this or the Watch 5 Pro refurbished for Christmas, but it was incredibly slow.

It must have been the 5. I have this watch and it works well. I think I had the 4 before, and it worked well too, but had poor battery life. I had to charge it every night. The 7 is a lot better, I charge it once every few days. That being said I got it much cheaper with a trade in deal a while back.

Edit: just checked, it was ~$55 after trade in
Last edited by funky_herbal_t July 8, 2025 at 12:50 PM.
1
5d ago
450 Posts
Joined Jun 2013
5d ago
LZircom
5d ago
450 Posts
Got this for $75 with trade in last fall. No problems with it although I don't use it every day
5d ago
618 Posts
Joined Jan 2011
5d ago
nurrburt
5d ago
618 Posts

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank nurrburt

I got this watch during the Samsung trade-in deal for $100. Coming from a Versa 2, it's a nice watch overall and mimics Fitbit capabilities surprisingly well, but you have to go through and change a lot of settings out of the box to get it that way. There are also a few interesting features that are unavailable unless you're using a Samsung phone, like ECG (there are modded APKs for Samsung Health floating around to bypass the limitations, but there are downsides).

The biggest flaw for me, however, is that after you enable the settings to get it up to par with a Fitbit for health tracking, the battery life is pretty horrible. With my Versa 2, I was able to get about 2+ days of battery life on a charge. With this watch I'm down to about 10% battery after 24 hours or so, and it starts winding down watch functionality to save battery around that point - and that's just wearing the thing, barely opening any apps.
2
5d ago
70 Posts
Joined Feb 2020
5d ago
MrTechie
5d ago
70 Posts
Pretty good deal.
I have one and I have a new band on the way, it's very uncomfortable with the stock band.
I'll add that the base Apple Watch Series 10 is way more comfortable. But, unfortunately, having an iPhone is a requirement for using an Apple Watch.
Also, the features and software fragmentation is probably worse on WearOS than it is with Android. It's pretty disappointing as it takes some effort to really get the most out of these devices.
5d ago
45 Posts
Joined May 2024
5d ago
Ch3apSk8te
5d ago
45 Posts
until the battery technology allows you to use this for a week before needing a charge it's not worth it. I have to charge mine every day.
1
4d ago
2,732 Posts
Joined Sep 2019
4d ago
LavenderPickle7682
4d ago
2,732 Posts
No idea what the purpose of this device is....seems expensive for a basic watch.
4

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

4d ago
62 Posts
Joined Jul 2014
4d ago
rent4him
4d ago
62 Posts
Quote from Ch3apSk8te :
until the battery technology allows you to use this for a week before needing a charge it's not worth it. I have to charge mine every day.

Try Garmin forerunner
4d ago
1,412 Posts
Joined Dec 2013
4d ago
Swampthinq
4d ago
1,412 Posts
Quote from LZircom :
Got this for $75 with trade in last fall. No problems with it although I don't use it every day
what did you trade in?
3d ago
36 Posts
Joined Jun 2016
3d ago
pdptgif
3d ago
36 Posts
Quote from funky_herbal_t :
It must have been the 5. I have this watch and it works well. I think I had the 4 before, and it worked well too, but had poor battery life. I had to charge it every night. The 7 is a lot better, I charge it once every few days. That being said I got it much cheaper with a trade in deal a while back.Edit: just checked, it was ~$55 after trade in
Wow $55 after trade-in that's crazy. I'll trade in my Watch 4 for $55 any day... but you're right, the 4 needs to be charged every day.
Yesterday
79 Posts
Joined Oct 2014
Yesterday
Jasonc1482
Yesterday
79 Posts
Quote from Swampthinq :
what did you trade in?

I traded my watch 5 for watch 7 and it was 79.99 This year's trade in sucks. I would need to pay 179 trading in my watch 7.
Yesterday
613 Posts
Joined Feb 2014
Yesterday
Disposed
Yesterday
613 Posts
Quote from masterz13 :
I can't remember if I got this or the Watch 5 Pro refurbished for Christmas, but it was incredibly slow.
nvm thinking of something else
Yesterday
613 Posts
Joined Feb 2014
Yesterday
Disposed
Yesterday
613 Posts
Quote from Jasonc1482 :
I traded my watch 5 for watch 7 and it was 79.99 This year's trade in sucks. I would need to pay 179 trading in my watch 7.

Not at all surprised considering the new watch starts with a higher MSRP and is a compete redesign.

The watch 7 was just a faster watch 6 and there is no 7 classic. They really needed to give incentives to sell the 7.
Yesterday
79 Posts
Joined Oct 2014
Yesterday
Jasonc1482
Yesterday
79 Posts
Quote from Disposed :
Not at all surprised considering the new watch starts with a higher MSRP and is a compete redesign.

The watch 7 was just a faster watch 6 and there is no 7 classic. They really needed to give incentives to sell the 7.

The 8 doesnt have any spec upgrades, right? Almost everything seemed to be identical watch 8 vs watch 7

and you are right. the watch 7 was 329 and 8 is 379... watch 7 was 250 off and watch 8 200 off so thats the 100 difference.
Last edited by Jasonc1482 July 12, 2025 at 10:45 AM.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Yesterday
613 Posts
Joined Feb 2014
Yesterday
Disposed
Yesterday
613 Posts
Quote from Jasonc1482 :
The 8 doesnt have any spec upgrades, right? Almost everything seemed to be identical watch 8 vs watch 7

and you are right. the watch 7 was 329 and 8 is 379... watch 7 was 250 off and watch 8 200 off so thats the 100 difference.

It's still a compete redesign. People are going to want the new design and the classic. They don't need to give incentives to sell it.

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Popular Deals

View All

Trending Deals

View All