Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
popular Posted by doublehelixx | Staff • 3d ago
popular Posted by doublehelixx | Staff • 3d ago

[Prime] Gladiator II (4K UHD + Blu-Ray + Digital) $16.99 + Free Shipping

$17

$38

55% off
Amazon
9 Comments 1,334 Views
Get Deal at Amazon
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
Amazon [amazon.com] has for Prime Members: Gladiator II (4K UHD + Blu-Ray + Digital) for $16.99. Shipping is free.
Product Info
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Product Info
Community Notes
About the Poster
Amazon [amazon.com] has for Prime Members: Gladiator II (4K UHD + Blu-Ray + Digital) for $16.99. Shipping is free.

Community Voting

Deal Score
+6
Good Deal
Get Deal at Amazon

Price Intelligence

Model: Gladiator II [4K UHD + Blu-Ray + Digital]

Deal History 

Sale Price
Slickdeal
  • $NaN
  • Today

Current Prices

Sort: Lowest to Highest | Last Updated 7/12/2025, 04:19 AM
Sold By Sale Price
Amazon$17.89
Target$29.95

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

9 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

3d ago
2,749 Posts
Joined Feb 2013
3d ago
rogere
3d ago
2,749 Posts
Terrible movie. Not even worth $5
3
Pro
2d ago
11,393 Posts
Joined Jul 2010
2d ago
supermanrob
Pro
2d ago
11,393 Posts
Quote from rogere :
Terrible movie. Not even worth $5

I'm not sure I would say terrible but yes wasn't the best.

I will pick it up if/when it hits around $8.
To have both & the transfer on this is pretty much reference.
It's definitely better than the 1st one which is unfortunate.

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Gl...ay/365746/
3
2d ago
1,063 Posts
Joined Dec 2011
2d ago
RussellBell
2d ago
1,063 Posts
This was a bad movie. Denzel seemed to be having fun though.
2d ago
11 Posts
Joined Mar 2012
2d ago
junkrg
2d ago
11 Posts
Terrible movie but may purchase this at around 10-11$ just for watching Denzel who was brilliant as usual.
2d ago
580 Posts
Joined Jul 2022
2d ago
VioletHealth8715
2d ago
580 Posts
Studios ask Ridley Scott to make a 2 hour movie, so he makes a 6 hour movie and then cuts it down to 2.

The pace of this was way too fast, you were thrown into one thing after the other without having a care at all because you didn't have time to associate with any of the characters.

I'd wait for the directors cut to come out. That's when you'll see the movie as the director envisioned it. Granted it'll be like 4 hours long, but that's what's needed here. Nobody liked this because it was way too condensed.

Not defending Ridley, studios time and time again tell him "we need 2-3 hours" and he delivers 6, so they have to cut half of it and it creates problems.

Best characters were the two emperors. Sadly they don't get much screen time.
2d ago
1,063 Posts
Joined Dec 2011
2d ago
RussellBell
2d ago
1,063 Posts
Quote from VioletHealth8715 :
...Best characters were the two emperors. Sadly they don't get much screen time.
Citizen Dondas: Am I a joke to you???
Yesterday
170 Posts
Joined Nov 2012
Yesterday
JakeS5663
Yesterday
170 Posts
Oh man, the box quote for this atrocity is "one of the most entertaining films of the year" Now that is the kind of blind confidence I wish I had.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Yesterday
2,695 Posts
Joined Oct 2006
Yesterday
nin7474
Yesterday
2,695 Posts
Please don't HORRIBLE movie. The sharks scene was LMAO
Yesterday
66 Posts
Joined Sep 2016
Yesterday
MayorOfSexyTown
Yesterday
66 Posts
It was awful movie, we warned you.

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Popular Deals

View All

Trending Deals

View All