Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Heads up, this deal has expired. Want to create a deal alert for this item?
expiredphoinix | Staff posted Sep 30, 2025 07:10 AM
expiredphoinix | Staff posted Sep 30, 2025 07:10 AM

Prime Members: 24-Count Amazon Basics Rechargeable AAA 800 mAh NiMH Batteries

w/ Subscribe & Save + Free Shipping

$12

$16

25% off
Amazon
21 Comments 8,889 Views
Visit Amazon
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
Amazon has for Prime Members: 24-Count Amazon Basics Rechargeable AAA 800 mAh NiMH Batteries on sale for $12.32 - 5% with Subscribe & Save = $11.70. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Deal Hunter phoinix for sharing this deal.

Editor's Notes

Written by qwikwit | Staff

Original Post

Written by phoinix | Staff
Product Info
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Product Info
Community Notes
About the Poster
Amazon has for Prime Members: 24-Count Amazon Basics Rechargeable AAA 800 mAh NiMH Batteries on sale for $12.32 - 5% with Subscribe & Save = $11.70. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Deal Hunter phoinix for sharing this deal.

Editor's Notes

Written by qwikwit | Staff

Original Post

Written by phoinix | Staff

Community Voting

Deal Score
+28
Good Deal
Visit Amazon

Price Intelligence

Model: AmazonBasics AAA Rechargeable Batteries 12-Pack Pre-Charged - Batter

Deal History 

Sale Price
Slickdeal
  • $NaN
  • Today

Current Prices

Sort: Lowest to Highest | Last Updated 12/26/2025, 10:08 PM
Sold By Sale Price
Amazon$16.10

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

20 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Oct 01, 2025 10:53 PM
541 Posts
Joined Jun 2020
DIW90210Oct 01, 2025 10:53 PM
541 Posts
Quote from labude :
So the eneloops are about <$2 each on sale, (less than the ikea laddas)
and these are 50c each.

i bought one of these battery charger testers a week or so ago.
I dont know if it's accurate but i was really disappointed to see that
my batteries (which arent new but arent so old) were way less than the rated maH ratings.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0DK71WH3Q?th=1

do batteries lose half their maH max charge in a year?
They should hold quite a bit as long as you didn't somehow abuse them and you have legit Eneloops that were made in Japan. I have Eneloops from 2008 that I still use in a smart charger. They hold up extremely well and you should not see more than a 33% drop over a number of years as in mine which are easily passing 2/3rds of rated capacity considering they are about 17 years old.
Oct 01, 2025 10:54 PM
541 Posts
Joined Jun 2020
DIW90210Oct 01, 2025 10:54 PM
541 Posts
Quote from back2basics :
As much as I wish 1.5v Li-on was stable for the masses, I don't think it's ready yet. Even with the high quality Brand Name ones like Xstar or Panasonic and using a special advance $45 charger with safety features, there are still Amazon reviews from people of the batteries exploding or catching on fire! Be careful to monitor those batteries while charging and keep it in an area where a potential (small) explosion or fire won't damage anything / hurt anyone.
True, that is the one thing I still worry about with LiOn batteries.
Oct 01, 2025 10:56 PM
8,857 Posts
Joined Mar 2018
WooHoo2YouOct 01, 2025 10:56 PM
8,857 Posts
Quote from DIW90210 :
I know they are usually 1.2v but Eneloop and other better brands easily reach 1.4+ volts and stay there for a long while whereas the Amazon basics usually top out at 1.3+v and drop to 1.2+v pretty quickly. Just saying these are TRASH compared to other NI-MH batteries.

Secondly, those Temu LiOn 1.5 AA/AAA batteries are pretty soild although I have used them only for a few months so not sure how long they'll hold up. Even their 18650 LiOn cells are simply amazing given you can normally get them on sale for around $1 each.
So your points of comparison are also batteries that "usually" rate exactly the same, or lower, or "other brands" which will go unnamed which are calmed (without evidence) to perform better?

Typical "tRaSh" argument. Pretty much any time someone calls something "trash" then rants about Temu being a better option because of a hollow manufacturer claim, which 99% of time gross exaggerations, you can automatically write off anything they say afterwards.

*The fact you complain rechargeable (standard) AA batteries don't reach 1.5v...and that is somehow a fault, proves me right. You are clearly conflating the rating of disposable batteries with the perceived quality of these because they don't have the same big fat number on the nameplate. Now you are doing anything you can in an attempt to salvage that objectively incorrect premise. FWIW, you've been corrected by multiple people here, all telling you similar.
1
Oct 02, 2025 02:44 AM
5,087 Posts
Joined Feb 2007
mpkbOct 02, 2025 02:44 AM
5,087 Posts
Quote from SensibleHorn8107 :
This is what google said about voltage: A typical AA NiMH (Nickel-Metal Hydride) rechargeable battery has a nominal voltage of 1.2 volts. While alkaline batteries start at around 1.5V and drop, a fully charged NiMH battery will have a voltage that settles at approximately 1.2V after resting, and it will maintain this voltage for most of its discharge cycle
Yep, that has been my experience. Fujitsu/Eneloop or Amazon basics will all be nominal 1.2v because they are all nimh chemistry.
Last edited by mpkb October 1, 2025 at 08:48 PM.
Oct 03, 2025 05:20 PM
541 Posts
Joined Jun 2020
DIW90210Oct 03, 2025 05:20 PM
541 Posts
Quote from WooHoo2You :
So your points of comparison are also batteries that "usually" rate exactly the same, or lower, or "other brands" which will go unnamed which are calmed (without evidence) to perform better?

Typical "tRaSh" argument. Pretty much any time someone calls something "trash" then rants about Temu being a better option because of a hollow manufacturer claim, which 99% of time gross exaggerations, you can automatically write off anything they say afterwards.

*The fact you complain rechargeable (standard) AA batteries don't reach 1.5v...and that is somehow a fault, proves me right. You are clearly conflating the rating of disposable batteries with the perceived quality of these because they don't have the same big fat number on the nameplate. Now you are doing anything you can in an attempt to salvage that objectively incorrect premise. FWIW, you've been corrected by multiple people here, all telling you similar.
I recommend you research my claims before offering criticism; the general consensus already aligns with my findings. Your critique currently offers no data to refute them.
2

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Popular Deals

Trending Deals