Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Missed This Deal? Get alerts when similar deals are posted.
expired
expired
Dr.W 27.5K Views
Oct 25, 2025 4:59 PM

Apple MacBook Air (2025): 13.2" 2560x1664, M4 10-Core, 16GB RAM, 512GB SSD

$999

$1,199

16% off
+ Free Shippingat Amazon
Visit Amazon

Why are you downvoting this deal?

Good Deal?
40Comments
Save
Share
Deal Details
Amazon has Apple MacBook Air Laptop (Sky Blue, 2025, MC6U4LL/A) on sale for $999. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Community Member Dr.W for sharing this deal.

Specs:
  • Apple M4 10-Core Chip/16-Core Neural Engine, 10-Core GPU Processor
  • 13.6" 2560x1664 Liquid Retina Display w/ 1080p Full HD FaceTime Camera
  • 512GB PCIe NVMe Solid State Drive
  • 16GB Unified RAM
  • WiFi 6E (802.11ax) w/ Bluetooth 5.2
  • Touch ID Sensor/Force Touch Trackpad
  • Backlit Magic Keyboard
  • Apple MacOS

Editor's Notes

Written by SaltyOne | Staff
  • At the time of this posting, our research indicates that this is $77.88 lower than the next best comparable online prices starting from $1,076.88.
  • Don't have Amazon Prime? Students can get a free 6-Month Amazon Prime trial with free 2-day shipping, unlimited video streaming & more.
  • If you're not a student, there's also a free 1-Month Amazon Prime trial available.

Original Post

Written by Dr.W
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Amazon has Apple MacBook Air Laptop (Sky Blue, 2025, MC6U4LL/A) on sale for $999. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Community Member Dr.W for sharing this deal.

Specs:
  • Apple M4 10-Core Chip/16-Core Neural Engine, 10-Core GPU Processor
  • 13.6" 2560x1664 Liquid Retina Display w/ 1080p Full HD FaceTime Camera
  • 512GB PCIe NVMe Solid State Drive
  • 16GB Unified RAM
  • WiFi 6E (802.11ax) w/ Bluetooth 5.2
  • Touch ID Sensor/Force Touch Trackpad
  • Backlit Magic Keyboard
  • Apple MacOS

Editor's Notes

Written by SaltyOne | Staff
  • At the time of this posting, our research indicates that this is $77.88 lower than the next best comparable online prices starting from $1,076.88.
  • Don't have Amazon Prime? Students can get a free 6-Month Amazon Prime trial with free 2-day shipping, unlimited video streaming & more.
  • If you're not a student, there's also a free 1-Month Amazon Prime trial available.

Original Post

Written by Dr.W

Community Voting

Deal Score
+34
Good Deal
Bad Deal

Why are you downvoting this deal?

Visit Amazon

Top Comments

Outrager
4.3KComments
3.5KReputation
I just used a Lenovo Slim 7i for a few days and Windows just doesn't seem great on laptops. I spent like a couple of days just trying to get rid of the bloat and messing with settings just so I could try and get the same battery life all the reviewers said it should have. The speakers were also not great.
Go to Comment
vatoloco4ever
723Comments
53Reputation
I feel like Apple is overcharging people with their storage options and pricing. The 256gb version is sometimes $799, but for $200 more 512gb version is supposed to be a deal? Pretty disappointing to me.
Go to Comment

Community Reviews

The M4 MacBook Air stands out as a thin, premium laptop with strong battery life, a good screen, a nicer webcam, and support for two external displays plus the built in display without a DisplayLink dock. The M series is also described as staying smooth for years, with one M1 Air still running well after four years and holding 7 plus hours of battery life. The main knock is Apple's storage pricing, since the jump from 256GB to 512GB is seen as steep at $200. That makes the 512GB model feel more like a convenience upgrade than a clear value play.

Common Questions (4)

  • The M4 Air is pricier, but it offers Apple's build quality, strong battery life, and a polished laptop experience. Snapdragon and Lunar Lake machines can be competitive on price and battery, but Windows setup, bloat, and speakers can be drawbacks depending on the model.

    veyveyOutragerbd75veyvey

  • The 512GB jump is a $200 premium over the 256GB model, and Apple's storage pricing is widely viewed as steep. If you need the space, it avoids relying on external storage; if not, the upgrade is poor value compared with buying storage separately.

    vatoloco4evercheemadg0129

  • For web browsing and media, the difference is small, but the M4 adds a nicer webcam and slightly better real-world battery life. If you need those extras or two external displays, the M4 has clear advantages; otherwise the M3 can feel very similar.

    Outragermrjed7Geeeeeeeek

  • Yes. The M4 MacBook Air can drive two external displays plus its built-in screen without a DisplayLink dock, which is useful if you want a multi-monitor setup without extra adapters.

    mrjed7

AI-generated summary based on comments from the community. Updated ago

Join The Conversation

Share your experience with the Slickdeals community

Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!

40 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Oct 26, 2025 1:41 PM
553 Comments
Joined Jul 2013
airj1012Oct 26, 2025 1:41 PM
553 Comments
Same price as a few weeks ago. I'm holding out for deeper discount around Black Friday. Not sure if that'll happen, but hopeful!
1
Pro
Oct 26, 2025 4:20 PM
7.9K Comments
Joined Sep 2014
CTRL-ALT-DEALS
Pro
Oct 26, 2025 4:20 PM
7.9K Comments
Quote from Outrager View quoted comment :
I just used a Lenovo Slim 7i for a few days and Windows just doesn't seem great on laptops. I spent like a couple of days just trying to get rid of the bloat and messing with settings just so I could try and get the same battery life all the reviewers said it should have. The speakers were also not great.
Intel processors suck for battery life. After apple, AMD is the next best for battery/efficiency.
2
Oct 26, 2025 4:24 PM
4.3K Comments
Joined Dec 2007
OutragerOct 26, 2025 4:24 PM
4.3K Comments
Quote from MostBased View quoted comment :
Intel processors suck for battery life. After apple, AMD is the next best for battery/efficiency.
It was a Lunar Lake Intel processor. Those are, on paper, more efficient than AMD chips.
Oct 26, 2025 5:52 PM
571 Comments
Joined Dec 2017
veyveyOct 26, 2025 5:52 PM
571 Comments
Quote from MostBased View quoted comment :
Intel processors suck for battery life. After apple, AMD is the next best for battery/efficiency.
No it is apple > snapdragon >= intel(lunar lake) > amd
Pro
Oct 26, 2025 6:49 PM
7.9K Comments
Joined Sep 2014
CTRL-ALT-DEALS
Pro
Oct 26, 2025 6:49 PM
7.9K Comments
Quote from Outrager View quoted comment :
It was a Lunar Lake Intel processor. Those are, on paper, more efficient than AMD chips.
On paper only. But in practice AMD allows for granular, per core control over power & clock speeds, so the AMD can be much more efficient than Intel after a good undervolt. Intel users are stuck with the stock settings.
1
Oct 26, 2025 7:39 PM
1.6K Comments
Joined Dec 2009
dealmeister3000Oct 26, 2025 7:39 PM
1.6K Comments
Quote from sr27 View quoted comment :
It's because apple's own powerpc processors (m1) are all the rage now.
Powerpc processors were originally an AIM product. And they are rarely used in actual PCs. They are more of an embedded application chip. The Apple m1 is NOT a Powerpc chip.

Quote from a_land View quoted comment :
It's crazy that Apple laptops are the best values now. I remember in college buying some big clunky MacBook with a core 2 duo for a lot more than this
No average consumer should be paying $1,000 for a laptop let alone a 13" laptop with 512GB storage. That is ridiculous.

With how fast technology is marching on people are better served getting the cheapest PC that gets the job done. Most $500 slickdeal laptops will surf the web and handle basic office tasks just fine.

I keep wanting to upgrade my i7 laptop but my current laptop works just fine and better tech is just around the corner.
4
Oct 26, 2025 7:55 PM
723 Comments
Joined Dec 2006
vatoloco4everOct 26, 2025 7:55 PM
723 Comments
Quote from dealmeister3000 View quoted comment :
Powerpc processors were originally an AIM product. And they are rarely used in actual PCs. They are more of an embedded application chip. The Apple m1 is NOT a Powerpc chip.



No average consumer should be paying $1,000 for a laptop let alone a 13" laptop with 512GB storage. That is ridiculous.

With how fast technology is marching on people are better served getting the cheapest PC that gets the job done. Most $500 slickdeal laptops will surf the web and handle basic office tasks just fine.

I keep wanting to upgrade my i7 laptop but my current laptop works just fine and better tech is just around the corner.
I feel like Apple is overcharging people with their storage options and pricing. The 256gb version is sometimes $799, but for $200 more 512gb version is supposed to be a deal? Pretty disappointing to me.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Oct 27, 2025 1:15 AM
2.2K Comments
Joined Apr 2009
bd75Oct 27, 2025 1:15 AM
2.2K Comments
Quote from veyvey View quoted comment :
No it is apple > snapdragon >= intel(lunar lake) > amd
Actually when we tested them for work the Lunar Lake beat the Snapdragon (both Lenovo).
Oct 27, 2025 2:22 PM
159 Comments
Joined Oct 2006
ckkhooOct 27, 2025 2:22 PM
159 Comments
I'm waiting a 24GB ram and doesn't care of storage size
Oct 27, 2025 3:38 PM
1.8K Comments
Joined Feb 2015
SDU-TangoOct 27, 2025 3:38 PM
1.8K Comments
Quote from dealmeister3000 View quoted comment :

Powerpc processors were originally an AIM product. And they are rarely used in actual PCs. They are more of an embedded application chip. The Apple m1 is NOT a Powerpc chip.



No average consumer should be paying $1,000 for a laptop let alone a 13" laptop with 512GB storage. That is ridiculous.

With how fast technology is marching on people are better served getting the cheapest PC that gets the job done. Most $500 slickdeal laptops will surf the web and handle basic office tasks just fine.

I keep wanting to upgrade my i7 laptop but my current laptop works just fine and better tech is just around the corner.
Ibapso am looking to upgrade my laptop,but I don't use much now since I bought the M4 Mini for $500 so until I need one again, I'll check again and it would be significantly better than my A1990 i7 model
Oct 27, 2025 6:59 PM
676 Comments
Joined Dec 2008
cheemaOct 27, 2025 6:59 PM
676 Comments
Quote from veyvey View quoted comment :
No it is apple > snapdragon >= intel(lunar lake) > amd
As others have stated, Intel is now better than Snapdragon.

apple > intel(lunar lake) > snapdragon > amd

In other words, if you value battery life in a laptop, don't get AMD.
Oct 27, 2025 7:03 PM
676 Comments
Joined Dec 2008
cheemaOct 27, 2025 7:03 PM
676 Comments
If seem that you are paying $200 more for the jump from 256GB to 512GB SSD. That seems to be a lot for that small upgrade.
Oct 27, 2025 7:53 PM
141 Comments
Joined Nov 2016
mrjed7Oct 27, 2025 7:53 PM
141 Comments
Quote from Geeeeeeeek View quoted comment :
Why? Besides the 'AI' stuff. They seem to be marginally different.
M4 allows for 2 external displays plus internal display without the use of something like a Displaylink dock for CPU emulated displays. If that's not useful to you, then you are correct there isn't a huge difference other than the webcam upgrade. The M series are absolute powerhouses and I legitimately cannot find an excuse to upgrade from my M1/16gb Macbook Air from 2020. Smooth as the day I bought it and I still get 7hr+ of battery life. Can't imagine how many years one of these M4 will last.
Oct 28, 2025 1:27 AM
571 Comments
Joined Dec 2017
veyveyOct 28, 2025 1:27 AM
571 Comments
From the testing I saw the overall battery life the Snapdragon chips beat out lunar lake(lighter loads) but in terms of battery life during more medium to heavy tasks the lunar lake chip is better.
Quote from bd75 View quoted comment :
Actually when we tested them for work the Lunar Lake beat the Snapdragon (both Lenovo).

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Oct 28, 2025 1:32 AM
571 Comments
Joined Dec 2017
veyveyOct 28, 2025 1:32 AM
571 Comments
This is false.
Lunar lake for example you can't undervolt(you can power limit though) but there is no amount of tuning you can do on any amd or intel chip that would give it equal efficency.

On the intel side you can tune the chips they just need to have an HX or K sku. the arrow lake series for example like the 255hx and 275hx can be tuned. In fact tuned arrow lake will beat out tuned strix point in terms of efficency even though stock it is less efficient because they are made to run at 100+ W comapred to strix point which runs at like 30W out of the box. mostly because arrow lake is on 3nm(same as lunar lake) wheras amd's current top end chips run on 4nm still.

it is a bit confusing bc Intel has so many different architectures and nodes like the core ultra 200H chips are basically on meteor lake using a variety of nodes around 5nm from intel and tsmc. Then the 200 HX chips use tsmc 3nm on arrow lake and the 200V chips use lunar lake on tsmc 3NM. Also the 200 without a letter are still using old raptor lake on intel 10 nm. just an overall terrible naming scheme and lineup

Quote from MostBased View quoted comment :
On paper only. But in practice AMD allows for granular, per core control over power & clock speeds, so the AMD can be much more efficient than Intel after a good undervolt. Intel users are stuck with the stock settings.

Join The Conversation

Share your experience with the Slickdeals community

Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!

Related Searches

ComputersLaptopsFree ShippingAppleAmazon