Still Shopping? Find Last-minute Deals.Still Shopping? Find Last-minute Deals.

View Deals
Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
forum threadhtp182 | Staff posted Nov 17, 2025 03:30 PM
forum threadhtp182 | Staff posted Nov 17, 2025 03:30 PM

8" OXO Professional Frying Pan Skillet Hard Anodized Ceramic Nonstick Cookware $40.59 + Free Shipping

$41

$70

41% off
Amazon
6 Comments 1,725 Views
Get Deal at Amazon
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
Amazon [amazon.com] has 8" OXO Professional Frying Pan Skillet Hard Anodized Ceramic Nonstick Cookware for $40.59. Shipping is free.

Note: Some accounts showing additional 25% off coupon on product page. YMMV

Product Description from Amazon:
  • Ceramic non-stick reinforced with diamonds for impressive performance
  • Free of PFAS, PFOA, lead and cadmium
  • Streamlined rivets eliminate food traps for a seamless, snag-free interior
  • Heavy-duty induction base is optimized for performance on all stovetops
  • Hard-anodized aluminum bodies heat quickly and evenly
  • Unique shape provides up to 35% more room to cook
  • Oven safe up to 600˚F/315˚C
  • Dishwasher safe
Product Info
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Product Info
Community Notes
About the Poster
Amazon [amazon.com] has 8" OXO Professional Frying Pan Skillet Hard Anodized Ceramic Nonstick Cookware for $40.59. Shipping is free.

Note: Some accounts showing additional 25% off coupon on product page. YMMV

Product Description from Amazon:
  • Ceramic non-stick reinforced with diamonds for impressive performance
  • Free of PFAS, PFOA, lead and cadmium
  • Streamlined rivets eliminate food traps for a seamless, snag-free interior
  • Heavy-duty induction base is optimized for performance on all stovetops
  • Hard-anodized aluminum bodies heat quickly and evenly
  • Unique shape provides up to 35% more room to cook
  • Oven safe up to 600˚F/315˚C
  • Dishwasher safe

Community Voting

Deal Score
+1
Good Deal
Get Deal at Amazon

Price Intelligence

Model: OXO Ceramic Pro Frypan

Deal History 

Sale Price
Slickdeal
  • $NaN
  • Today

Current Prices

Sort: Lowest to Highest | Last Updated 12/16/2025, 02:23 AM
Sold By Sale Price
Target$69.99

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

6 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Pro
Nov 17, 2025 03:40 PM
783 Posts
Joined Nov 2013
PowerClerk
Pro
Nov 17, 2025 03:40 PM
783 Posts
This video made me throw mine into the garbage and go full all-clad stainless steel

https://youtu.be/bmAPAyHOW50?si=HvctCMZsrV51LTq-
2
Nov 17, 2025 05:53 PM
1,008 Posts
Joined Apr 2017
iSDealsNov 17, 2025 05:53 PM
1,008 Posts
Quote from PowerClerk :
This video made me throw mine into the garbage and go full all-clad stainless steel https://youtu.be/bmAPAyHOW50?si=HvctCMZsrV51LTq-
This is Ceramic - free of PFAS being discussed in the video. Oxo highlights that, and Ceramic is being used as an alternative by the industry
Pro
Nov 17, 2025 05:54 PM
783 Posts
Joined Nov 2013
PowerClerk
Pro
Nov 17, 2025 05:54 PM
783 Posts
Quote from iSDeals :
This is Ceramic - free of PFAS being discussed in the video. Oxo highlights that, and Ceramic is being used as an alternative by the industry
I already considered that;

Per Grok,

Now I have comprehensive information to provide a thorough answer about ceramic non-stick pans versus regular non-stick pans and microplastics.

## Ceramic Non-Stick Pans vs. Regular Non-Stick: Microplastics and Safety

Ceramic non-stick pans are **not safer** from microplastics leaching compared to regular PTFE non-stick pans—they simply present **different safety concerns**. While ceramic cookware avoids PFAS chemicals entirely, it still has significant microplastics issues and introduces other potential hazards.

### The Microplastics Problem With Both

Both regular non-stick (PTFE-based like Teflon) and ceramic non-stick cookware can shed microplastics into your food when damaged. A single scratch on a PTFE pan can release approximately 9,100 plastic particles. The issue is particularly concerning because both types of coatings are prone to degradation:[1][2][3]

**Regular PTFE non-stick** breaks down when exposed to high heat above 500°F or when scratched, releasing microplastics and PFAS ("forever chemicals").[2][1]

**Ceramic non-stick**, despite marketing claims, experiences similar problems. These pans use sol-gel coatings (essentially sprayed silica and metal oxides) that can decompose even at lower temperatures. Many manufacturers recommend keeping ceramic pans below 500°F, and the coatings deteriorate relatively quickly, sometimes within months of purchase. When the coating breaks down, it can release microplastics and potentially unknown proprietary chemicals into your food.[4][5]

### Hidden Dangers in "Ceramic" Cookware

The term "ceramic" is misleading. Most ceramic-coated cookware is actually "quasi-ceramic"—a thin sol-gel layer sprayed onto aluminum, cast iron, or stainless steel. This raises two additional concerns:[4]

**Aluminum leaching**: Many ceramic non-stick pans have an aluminum layer beneath the ceramic coating, which can leach into food, particularly when cooking acidic dishes. This is a legitimate concern that regular non-stick cookware doesn't share.[3][6]

**Titanium dioxide nanoparticles**: Independent testing has detected high levels of titanium dioxide nanoparticles in popular ceramic-coated brands like GreenPan, Caraway, and Always Pan. Titanium dioxide is banned as a food additive in the European Union due to potential cancer concerns, though the science remains debated. When these nanoparticles are aerosolized or absorbed, they may pose health risks.[7][8][4]

### The Bottom Line

Neither option is clearly safer. You're essentially choosing between different risks:

- **Regular PTFE non-stick**: Concerns about PFAS chemicals and microplastics when scratched
- **Ceramic non-stick**: Different microplastics concerns, potential aluminum leaching, and undisclosed coating ingredients that may include titanium dioxide nanoparticles

If microplastics and chemical leaching are your primary concerns, safer alternatives include **stainless steel**, **cast iron**, **carbon steel**, **glass**, or **enamel-coated cast iron**. These options avoid coatings altogether while still offering durable, functional cooking surfaces.[9][1]
1
4
Nov 30, 2025 12:43 AM
520 Posts
Joined Nov 2016
grayguy1Nov 30, 2025 12:43 AM
520 Posts
Quote from PowerClerk :

I already considered that;

Per Grok,

Now I have comprehensive information to provide a thorough answer about ceramic non-stick pans versus regular non-stick pans and microplastics.

## Ceramic Non-Stick Pans vs. Regular Non-Stick: Microplastics and Safety

Ceramic non-stick pans are **not safer** from microplastics leaching compared to regular PTFE non-stick pans—they simply present **different safety concerns**. While ceramic cookware avoids PFAS chemicals entirely, it still has significant microplastics issues and introduces other potential hazards.

### The Microplastics Problem With Both

Both regular non-stick (PTFE-based like Teflon) and ceramic non-stick cookware can shed microplastics into your food when damaged. A single scratch on a PTFE pan can release approximately 9,100 plastic particles. The issue is particularly concerning because both types of coatings are prone to degradation:[1][2][3]

**Regular PTFE non-stick** breaks down when exposed to high heat above 500°F or when scratched, releasing microplastics and PFAS ("forever chemicals").[2][1]

**Ceramic non-stick**, despite marketing claims, experiences similar problems. These pans use sol-gel coatings (essentially sprayed silica and metal oxides) that can decompose even at lower temperatures. Many manufacturers recommend keeping ceramic pans below 500°F, and the coatings deteriorate relatively quickly, sometimes within months of purchase. When the coating breaks down, it can release microplastics and potentially unknown proprietary chemicals into your food.[4][5]

### Hidden Dangers in "Ceramic" Cookware

The term "ceramic" is misleading. Most ceramic-coated cookware is actually "quasi-ceramic"—a thin sol-gel layer sprayed onto aluminum, cast iron, or stainless steel. This raises two additional concerns:[4]

**Aluminum leaching**: Many ceramic non-stick pans have an aluminum layer beneath the ceramic coating, which can leach into food, particularly when cooking acidic dishes. This is a legitimate concern that regular non-stick cookware doesn't share.[3][6]

**Titanium dioxide nanoparticles**: Independent testing has detected high levels of titanium dioxide nanoparticles in popular ceramic-coated brands like GreenPan, Caraway, and Always Pan. Titanium dioxide is banned as a food additive in the European Union due to potential cancer concerns, though the science remains debated. When these nanoparticles are aerosolized or absorbed, they may pose health risks.[7][8][4]

### The Bottom Line

Neither option is clearly safer. You're essentially choosing between different risks:

- **Regular PTFE non-stick**: Concerns about PFAS chemicals and microplastics when scratched
- **Ceramic non-stick**: Different microplastics concerns, potential aluminum leaching, and undisclosed coating ingredients that may include titanium dioxide nanoparticles

If microplastics and chemical leaching are your primary concerns, safer alternatives include **stainless steel**, **cast iron**, **carbon steel**, **glass**, or **enamel-coated cast iron**. These options avoid coatings altogether while still offering durable, functional cooking surfaces.[9][1]
In a world with chatGPT, Gemini, and Claude, I don't understand the draw to use Grok. Is it a pro Elon Musk thing?
Pro
Nov 30, 2025 12:52 AM
5,994 Posts
Joined Nov 2012
George_P_Burdell
Pro
Nov 30, 2025 12:52 AM
5,994 Posts
Quote from grayguy1 :
In a world with chatGPT, Gemini, and Claude, I don't understand the draw to use Grok. Is it a pro Elon Musk thing?
No, it's not a pro-Musk thing. Grok is usually succinct in its answers. ChatGPT is good, but I feel it's always trying to please. Gemini often introduces hallucinations on borderline confusing topics. I mostly use Grok to write and refine text because ChatGPT was too verbose with my text, whereas I use Gemini mainly for math problems and some legal analysis. New chatgpt is good for shopping and general tech diagnostic questions.
2
Pro
Nov 30, 2025 04:10 AM
783 Posts
Joined Nov 2013
PowerClerk
Pro
Nov 30, 2025 04:10 AM
783 Posts
Quote from grayguy1 :
In a world with chatGPT, Gemini, and Claude, I don't understand the draw to use Grok. Is it a pro Elon Musk thing?
No, it's just the best LLM right now. Check the rankings.
3

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Popular Deals

Trending Deals