Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
popularDmytro_B posted Dec 10, 2025 06:37 PM
popularDmytro_B posted Dec 10, 2025 06:37 PM

Samsung 34" ViewFinity S50GC Monitor UWQHD (3440x1440) 100Hz, 5ms, HDR10, AMD FreeSync $179.99

$180

$309

41% off
Woot!
5 Comments 2,305 Views
Get Deal at Woot!
Good Deal
Save
Share
Community Notes
About the Poster

Community Voting

Deal Score
+11
Good Deal
Get Deal at Woot!

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

5 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Dec 10, 2025 09:58 PM
445 Posts
Joined Jan 2005
RofSilkDec 10, 2025 09:58 PM
445 Posts

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank RofSilk

The obligatory mention, Panel Type: VA LCD
4
Yesterday 04:42 AM
2,786 Posts
Joined May 2008
TheTomSawyerYesterday 04:42 AM
2,786 Posts
Why aren't you curved
Yesterday 12:13 PM
425 Posts
Joined Mar 2008
40DazeYesterday 12:13 PM
425 Posts
How good would this be to replace 2 24" monitors?
Yesterday 03:07 PM
685 Posts
Joined Mar 2008
kevingt01Yesterday 03:07 PM
685 Posts
Quote from 40Daze :
How good would this be to replace 2 24" monitors?
The continuous ultrawide is nice if you use one application that can really benefit from being ultra wide without the division of 2 monitors. For example, an IDE with git, copilot, command line, solution hierarchy, etc plus a main code window in the middle. Other than that and aesthetics, you give up screen real estate and probably overall resolution vs 2 monitors
Edit: oh and gaming
Yesterday 08:54 PM
835 Posts
Joined Jun 2006
zyberwoofYesterday 08:54 PM
835 Posts
Quote from 40Daze :
How good would this be to replace 2 24" monitors?
It would be better to compare this to a pair of 27" 1440p monitors since this monitor would have a similar height and pixel density. Dual 24" 1080p displays would be shorter, and would have fewer pixels. Or for a different apples to apples comparison, compare dual 24" displays to a single 29" UWQHD.

Dual 16:9 displays, like what you have, tend to be a better value. They are usually cheaper while also giving more overall screen space to work with. For this reason, I'd consider ultrawides a bit more of a luxury purchase.

I personally use an ultrawide for productivity work. Most apps and web pages I work with don't make good use of a 16:9 display. There ends up being a lot of wasted space on either side. However, 16:9 monitors don't feel wide enough to snap 2 most widows side-by-side. I end up with a single app per window, lots of wasted space, and more turning my head from side to side.

A 34" ultrawide, on the other hand, works great for snapping 2 windows side-by-side. Most apps have plenty of width like this. And since one ultra wide is narrower than a pair of 16:9 displays, I turn my head less and use up less desk space. I ended up putting an additional monitor off to the side to hold apps that I don't interact with much, but are nice to have always available. Something like Teams/Outlook/Slack for communication, or Spotify/YouTube for background entertainment. But I sit centered on the ultrawide.

All of this can vary based on how you work and which applications you normally use. Some benefit from the extra width offered by a pair of 16:9 displays. Others primarily use one massive application like media creators, developers, or gamers which benefits from an ultrawide.

That's my $.02.



1

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Popular Deals

Trending Deals