Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Heads up, this deal has expired. Want to create a deal alert for this item?
expirediconian | Staff posted Jan 16, 2026 9:25 PM

Klipsch RP-600M II Bookshelf Speakers (Pair, Ebony)

$350

$700

50% off
+ Free Shippingat Adorama
20.4K Views
Visit Adorama
Deal Details
Update: This popular deal is available again.

Adorama has Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-600M II Bookshelf Speakers (Pair, Ebony) for $699.99 - $350 when you apply coupon code JHCE9834 at checkout = $349.99. Shipping is free.

Note: Coupon code is applied during checkout under Do you have a gift card or promo code?.

Thanks to Deal Editor iconian for sharing this deal.

About this Item:
  • Two-Way Speaker Design
  • 1x 1" Titanium LTS Vented Tweeter
  • 1x 6.5" Cerametallic Cone Woofer
  • Up to 100W Continuous Power Handling
  • Bi-Wiring & Bi-Amping Capability
  • 90 x 90° Hybrid Tractrix Horn
  • 8-Ohm Impedance
  • 44 Hz to 25 kHz Frequency Response
  • Clean & Deep Bass with Tractrix Ports

Editor's Notes

Written by StrawMan86 | Staff
  • Please see the original post for additional details & give the forum comments a read for helpful discussion.

Original Post

Written by iconian | Staff
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Update: This popular deal is available again.

Adorama has Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-600M II Bookshelf Speakers (Pair, Ebony) for $699.99 - $350 when you apply coupon code JHCE9834 at checkout = $349.99. Shipping is free.

Note: Coupon code is applied during checkout under Do you have a gift card or promo code?.

Thanks to Deal Editor iconian for sharing this deal.

About this Item:
  • Two-Way Speaker Design
  • 1x 1" Titanium LTS Vented Tweeter
  • 1x 6.5" Cerametallic Cone Woofer
  • Up to 100W Continuous Power Handling
  • Bi-Wiring & Bi-Amping Capability
  • 90 x 90° Hybrid Tractrix Horn
  • 8-Ohm Impedance
  • 44 Hz to 25 kHz Frequency Response
  • Clean & Deep Bass with Tractrix Ports

Editor's Notes

Written by StrawMan86 | Staff
  • Please see the original post for additional details & give the forum comments a read for helpful discussion.

Original Post

Written by iconian | Staff

Community Voting

Deal Score
+87
Good Deal
Visit Adorama

Top Comments

Join The Conversation

Share your experience with the Slickdeals community

Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!

35 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Jan 17, 2026 3:14 PM
355 Comments
Joined Dec 2023
FatWesternPigJan 17, 2026 3:14 PM
355 Comments
Will these make my shitty music sound good? It sounds ok on my shitty speakers but if I have good speakers will it take more shit out
2
Jan 17, 2026 3:15 PM
1.3K Comments
Joined Feb 2010
ROOSKIEJan 17, 2026 3:15 PM
1.3K Comments

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank ROOSKIE

Quote from APhamX :
I kind of want to get this to replace my kef q350. My Kef q150 and lsx ii have been great for music, but once I set them up on my home theater tv something felt lacking. The soundstage and the vocal clarity wasn't what I expected. I used to have the klipsch rf 82-ii and loved those. I know klipsch isn't known to be audiophile speakers, but I think hitting measurements isn't everything and maybe their signature is a lot more lively.
Quote from m3n00b :
You're going to be disappointed going from kef to Klipsch
I'd go for these for these models for home theater in most a cases.
I would also pick them over the Q150 or Q350 speakers for hifi music in a living room.
I'd pick the Q150 or similar for nearfield/desktop style usages.

I own the Klipsch RP-160m, RP-600m and RP-600m II & have tested several other Klipsch models.
I own the KEF Q150 and LS50meta & have owned among others the Q350 and R3.

I would pick the Klipsch RP-600m II as my top choice if I had to use one of all of the above speakers in farfield/living room/HT setting in a 2.0. I
would pick the LS50meta for nearfield.
Even with subs involved(and home theater should have at least 1) it would be a toss up between the RP-600m II and the KEF LS50meta as they are both very good but different.

I subjectively found them to equal to the $2000 KEF R3 but they do have slightly different qualities that would be hard to describe quickly here. The point is I enjoyed them equally but they don't sound the same. I would gamble/pure guess that in a blind test of the KEF R3 and the Klipsch RP-600m II, that out of 100 people, 40 would pick the KEF, 30 the Klipsch and 30 have no notable preference.

Out of the box. Objectively/measurement wise this pair of Klipsch speakers measures very well. They are not far behind the KEF R3meta and yet cost a fraction. Beyond out of the box, if you or anyone reading this is nerdy and can figure out how to tweak with a manual DSP/PEQ you can easily make the Klipsch RP-600m II sound like actual ultra high fidelity reference speakers as the type of 'flaws' they have are easily fixed with minor equalization tweaks.

If you don't have manual DSP/PEQ, and find them slightly bright (remember often it is actually the recording that is bright, especially with music which is often poorly mastered and recorded - even in famous studios) but if they are slightly bright in your room just turn the treble tone control down 1 or 2db and that will bring them in line more with objective neutral. (same for the KEF Q150)

These are the best $350 speakers out there at this price, nothing else is close right now. They are easily worth full retail.

One note they need as much amplifier power as any typical competitor. They are not more efficient vs typical similar sized monitors, that 94db spec is completely made up by Klipsch.
Sensitivity is easily measured, these are about 85-86db with 2.83volts just like most speakers in this class. The horn does not help because in a 2-way like this the maximum sensitivity is determined by the woofer, NOT the horn loaded tweeter. That tweeter has to be brought down to match the woofer in the crossover.
There is no 6.5 woofer anywhere on earth ant any cost that is 94db sensitive and can also play down to 50hrz with decent SPL, so knowing that you already know.
9
Jan 17, 2026 3:20 PM
1.1K Comments
Joined Sep 2014
m3n00bJan 17, 2026 3:20 PM
1.1K Comments
Quote from ROOSKIE :
I'd go for these for these models for home theater in most a cases.I would also pick them over the Q150 or Q350 speakers for hifi music in a living room.I'd pick the Q150 or similar for nearfield/desktop style usages.I own the Klipsch RP-160m, RP-600m and RP-600m II & have tested several other Klipsch models.I own the KEF Q150 and LS50meta & have owned among others the Q350 and R3.I would pick the Klipsch RP-600m II as my top choice if I had to use one of all of the above speakers in farfield/living room/HT setting in a 2.0. I would pick the LS50meta for nearfield.Even with subs involved(and home theater should have at least 1) it would be a toss up between the RP-600m II and the KEF LS50meta as they are both very good but different.I subjectively found them to equal to the $2000 KEF R3 but they do have slightly different qualities that would be hard to describe quickly here. The point is I enjoyed them equally but they don't sound the same. I would gamble/pure guess that in a blind test of the KEF R3 and the Klipsch RP-600m II, that out of 100 people, 40 would pick the KEF, 30 the Klipsch and 30 have no notable preference.Out of the box. Objectively/measurement wise this pair of Klipsch speakers measures very well. They are not far behind the KEF R3meta and yet cost a fraction. Beyond out of the box, if you or anyone reading this is nerdy and can figure out how to tweak with a manual DSP/PEQ you can easily make the Klipsch RP-600m II sound like actual ultra high fidelity reference speakers as the type of 'flaws' they have are easily fixed with minor equalization tweaks.If you don't have manual DSP/PEQ, and find them slightly bright (remember often it is actually the recording that is bright, especially with music which is often poorly mastered and recorded - even in famous studios) but if they are slightly bright in your room just turn the treble tone control down 1 or 2db and that will bring them in line more with objective neutral. (same for the KEF Q150)These are the best $350 speakers out there at this price, nothing else is close right now. They are easily worth full retail.One note they need as much amplifier power as any typical competitor. They are not more efficient vs typical similar sized monitors, that 94db spec is completely made up by Klipsch. Sensitivity is easily measured, these are about 85-86db with 2.83volts just like most speakers in this class. The horn does not help because in a 2-way like this the maximum sensitivity is determined by the woofer, NOT the horn loaded tweeter. That tweeter has to be brought down to match the woofer in the crossover. There is no 6.5 woofer anywhere on earth ant any cost that is 94db sensitive and can also play down to 50hrz with decent SPL, so knowing that you already know.
Thanks for the detailed post. I retract my previous statement. If what you're saying is true, that they rival the R3 then they are the deal of the century at about 15% of the price of the R3.

Can you comment on the width of the soundstage on these? That is what made a huge Kef fan out of me. Nothing else seems to rival the UniQ in that respect.
Last edited by m3n00b January 17, 2026 at 07:28 AM.
Jan 17, 2026 4:47 PM
323 Comments
Joined Aug 2005
ripper415Jan 17, 2026 4:47 PM
323 Comments
Quote from ROOSKIE :


I'd go for these for these models for home theater in most a cases.
I would also pick them over the Q150 or Q350 speakers for hifi music in a living room.
I'd pick the Q150 or similar for nearfield/desktop style usages.

I own the Klipsch RP-160m, RP-600m and RP-600m II & have tested several other Klipsch models.
I own the KEF Q150 and LS50meta & have owned among others the Q350 and R3.

I would pick the Klipsch RP-600m II as my top choice if I had to use one of all of the above speakers in farfield/living room/HT setting in a 2.0. I
would pick the LS50meta for nearfield.
Even with subs involved(and home theater should have at least 1) it would be a toss up between the RP-600m II and the KEF LS50meta as they are both very good but different.

I subjectively found them to equal to the $2000 KEF R3 but they do have slightly different qualities that would be hard to describe quickly here. The point is I enjoyed them equally but they don't sound the same. I would gamble/pure guess that in a blind test of the KEF R3 and the Klipsch RP-600m II, that out of 100 people, 40 would pick the KEF, 30 the Klipsch and 30 have no notable preference.

Out of the box. Objectively/measurement wise this pair of Klipsch speakers measures very well. They are not far behind the KEF R3meta and yet cost a fraction. Beyond out of the box, if you or anyone reading this is nerdy and can figure out how to tweak with a manual DSP/PEQ you can easily make the Klipsch RP-600m II sound like actual ultra high fidelity reference speakers as the type of 'flaws' they have are easily fixed with minor equalization tweaks.

If you don't have manual DSP/PEQ, and find them slightly bright (remember often it is actually the recording that is bright, especially with music which is often poorly mastered and recorded - even in famous studios) but if they are slightly bright in your room just turn the treble tone control down 1 or 2db and that will bring them in line more with objective neutral. (same for the KEF Q150)

These are the best $350 speakers out there at this price, nothing else is close right now. They are easily worth full retail.

One note they need as much amplifier power as any typical competitor. They are not more efficient vs typical similar sized monitors, that 94db spec is completely made up by Klipsch.
Sensitivity is easily measured, these are about 85-86db with 2.83volts just like most speakers in this class. The horn does not help because in a 2-way like this the maximum sensitivity is determined by the woofer, NOT the horn loaded tweeter. That tweeter has to be brought down to match the woofer in the crossover.
There is no 6.5 woofer anywhere on earth ant any cost that is 94db sensitive and can also play down to 50hrz with decent SPL, so knowing that you already know.
I struggle to understand the whole speaker sensitivity thing as it equates to real world usage so maybe you can help me out. Would a 2 channel amp capable of producing 60 watts per channel (specifically the Wiim Amp) be sufficient to power these to moderate/high volumes for a seating position 10-15 feet away?
Jan 17, 2026 5:09 PM
1.4K Comments
Joined Jul 2006
m3incorpJan 17, 2026 5:09 PM
1.4K Comments
I use these as my surround sides and rears. They sound great in that application for me.
Jan 17, 2026 5:17 PM
7 Comments
Joined Nov 2022
WFD473Jan 17, 2026 5:17 PM
7 Comments
In for a set. Thank you!!
Jan 17, 2026 6:05 PM
8 Comments
Joined Mar 2025
TheNannerpusJan 17, 2026 6:05 PM
8 Comments
Same price on Amazon and Crutchfield.
EDIT: Nevermind, these are the ii's
Last edited by TheNannerpus January 17, 2026 at 11:44 AM.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Jan 17, 2026 7:19 PM
1.3K Comments
Joined Feb 2010
ROOSKIEJan 17, 2026 7:19 PM
1.3K Comments

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank ROOSKIE

Quote from ripper415 :
I struggle to understand the whole speaker sensitivity thing as it equates to real world usage so maybe you can help me out. Would a 2 channel amp capable of producing 60 watts per channel (specifically the Wiim Amp) be sufficient to power these to moderate/high volumes for a seating position 10-15 feet away?
Sensitivity used to be rated XXdb @1meter distance with 1watt of power back in the day, but now more commonly they rate XXdb @1meter distance with 2.83volts which is more 'accurate' for comparing speakers with different impedances. The concept is still similar and you need double the power for every 3db in required SPL and then you have to factor in losses for distances over 1meter plus add in some room gain from sound bouncing off the walls reinforcing the overall SPL, you get more room gain with lower frequencies and almost none with highs. That is part of why good speakers should not measure flat in room (flat only in anechoic chambers), they should have a downward trend. In smaller rooms at closer distances the same speaker will play much louder with a given power input vs in a huge room with 15ft listening distances.

Most of the time(90+%) for most people 60watts will be enough to drive an 85db sensitive speakers to satisfying levels in a decent sized or even in larger rooms.
Siting 12 feet away in a typical medium sized room, a pair these with 60watts each you should cleanly hit about 95db in room peaks, 95db is quite loud. Keep in mind that is the clean actual max limit & for peaks. That said you want headroom because after the 60watt limit most amps hit pure distortion very quickly. So if you really want actual 95db peaks you ideally buy an amp that could drive them to say 98-100db peaks so you have room to play before that amp gives up ---->so that would require about a 150watt per channel amp. That is called 'headroom' you need that because the next track might have those 98db peaks.

With these Klipsch speakers or any speakers with 85db sensitivity ratings 60watts is enough in most but not all cases. Sitting 15feet away, specially if also in a large room is a case that is pushing things IF you want super loud playback. Moderate playback is easy as it use very little power, every 3db in SPL requires 2x the previous amount of power.
So at 15 feet 1watt of power per channel will give you 75-80db averages for a pair in room, but the peaks can be 10db louder so those need 10watts per channel vs the 1watt. Still no problem.
Now listening at 85-90db with +10db peaks it is different. The 85-90db averages need 10watts per channel and the +10db/95-100db peaks would use 100-200watts per channel.

So for very high SPL and high SPL peaks in a large space, 60watts is not enough, 150-200 watts would be good.
Keep in mind the speaker can't handle that amount of power in the low bass so if playing bass heavy material use a sub(s) with bass management to remove the low bas at about 80hrz and down from these speakers.

For high SPL in large rooms, sitting 15feet away I usually recommend beefy tower speakers or large bookshelf/monitors with big subs added in and low bass removed from the monitors. A benefit of most large towers is that contrary to what many think they use less power to to hit higher SPL levels and are often much easier to drive to high SPL levels.

Most people never listen much above 80-85db averages with 90-95db peaks but people some do. In fact some folks are referencing 105db peaks especially for movies or music at something that feels near to 'live'.
Last edited by ROOSKIE January 17, 2026 at 11:26 AM.
2
1
Jan 17, 2026 8:59 PM
720 Comments
Joined Dec 2008
acefrJan 17, 2026 8:59 PM
720 Comments
Amazing speakers. I use them as my main LR for a home theater system and I love them. I enjoy listening to them in 2 ch stereo mode and as LR for movie. Got them for $399 last June on a sale, so $350 is a great price.
Jan 17, 2026 11:47 PM
4 Comments
Joined Mar 2011
elephunkJan 17, 2026 11:47 PM
4 Comments
Looking to purchase these to used for my Fluance record player. Would these be good to use?
Jan 18, 2026 1:03 AM
210 Comments
Joined Nov 2013
BudderbearJan 18, 2026 1:03 AM
210 Comments
Quote from FatWesternPig :
Will these make my shitty music sound good? It sounds ok on my shitty speakers but if I have good speakers will it take more shit out
It's usually the opposite. The better the speakers, the more bad mixes stand out as being bad.
Jan 18, 2026 9:10 AM
104 Comments
Joined Sep 2024
pphunckJan 18, 2026 9:10 AM
104 Comments
Don't need, but definitely a want!
1
Jan 19, 2026 3:25 AM
15 Comments
Joined Nov 2024
FancyMitten7524Jan 19, 2026 3:25 AM
15 Comments
Really great price for what these are.
Jan 20, 2026 5:01 PM
211 Comments
Joined Nov 2017
el_terribleJan 20, 2026 5:01 PM
211 Comments
Quote from elephunk :
Looking to purchase these to used for my Fluance record player. Would these be good to use?
These are passive speakers so you still need an amp and would need an amp with a phono stage unless your record player has line level out which some do.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Jan 21, 2026 9:01 PM
2.6K Comments
Joined Apr 2013
sqa4lifeJan 21, 2026 9:01 PM
2.6K Comments
Quote from acefr :
Amazing speakers. I use them as my main LR for a home theater system and I love them. I enjoy listening to them in 2 ch stereo mode and as LR for movie. Got them for $399 last June on a sale, so $350 is a great price.
Same here. Love them.

Join The Conversation

Share your experience with the Slickdeals community

Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!

Popular Deals

Trending Deals