Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
forum threadDr.W posted Today 05:36 PM
forum threadDr.W posted Today 05:36 PM

Apple MacBook Pro (2019/Refurb): 16" 3072x1920 IPS, i7-9750H, 64GB RAM, 512GB SSD, Radeon Pro 5300M 4GB Graphics, Gray $416.67

$417

$2,000

79% off
eBay
19 Comments 1,707 Views
Get Deal at eBay
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
Sold by Tek Deals Store via eBay

2019 Apple MacBook Pro 16" i7 2.60GHz/64GB/512GB SSD (Gray) A2141 - w/Warranty | eBay

https://www.ebay.com/itm/147124898197
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Sold by Tek Deals Store via eBay

2019 Apple MacBook Pro 16" i7 2.60GHz/64GB/512GB SSD (Gray) A2141 - w/Warranty | eBay

https://www.ebay.com/itm/147124898197

Community Voting

Deal Score
-1
Good Deal
Get Deal at eBay

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

19 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Today 05:55 PM
26 Posts
Joined Nov 2012
VVXToday 05:55 PM
26 Posts

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank VVX

Not worth buying a non M-series Mac anymore.

2019 i7 Benchmark (1300 single core, 5200 all cores)
https://browser.geekbench.com/mac...hz-6-cores

2020 M1 Pro Benchmark (2300 single core, 8200 all cores)
https://browser.geekbench.com/mac...-late-2020

The M1 (even like an M1 Air) is going to be nearly twice as fast for most single-core work (ie, basically everything you care about).
1
1
Today 05:57 PM
38 Posts
Joined Mar 2021
ApproximatelyExactToday 05:57 PM
38 Posts
$200 tops
Today 05:58 PM
850 Posts
Joined Nov 2020
ElatedSpaniel543Today 05:58 PM
850 Posts
Wow, I mean, this is a great deal for someone that needs a big, well built Intel computer. In 2019, Apple finally released a full touchpad driver for Windows bootcamp, so this thing makes a great windows machine with a beautiful screen. Should run Linux really well too. The fan could be annoying on this (I had the i9 and it was really annoying) but a bunch of utilities came out that helped stop it. Anyone wanting to run MacOS should get an M series, but if you want to run anything else ... it would be a great general purpose computer, especially with all of the RAM. During Covid mine was great for playing games in Windows like all the Tomb Raiders and Cities Skylines series.
The only concern would be battery life and the quality of any replacement (if replaced)
Last edited by ElatedSpaniel543 February 2, 2026 at 11:00 AM.
Original Poster
Pro
Today 06:11 PM
14,090 Posts
Joined Nov 2020
Dr.W
Original Poster
Pro
Today 06:11 PM
14,090 Posts
Quote from VVX :
Not worth buying a non M-series Mac anymore.

2019 i7 Benchmark (1300 single core, 5200 all cores)
https://browser.geekbench.com/mac...hz-6-cores

2020 M1 Pro Benchmark (2300 single core, 8200 all cores)
https://browser.geekbench.com/mac...-late-2020

The M1 (even like an M1 Air) is going to be nearly twice as fast for most single-core work (ie, basically everything you care about).
Completely irrelevant to compare just the processor, when there's a plethora of other things to consider. The M1 you're considering only comes in the MBA with 13" display at this price, while this is the 16", so totally different classes of laptop, to begin with. MBA with M1 only comes with 8GB RAM around this price while this has 8x the RAM of that, and that RAM alone would be more the price of this laptop. And on top of that, this has a dGPU, while the MBA would share it with the 8GB RAM it comes with.
The M1 Pro you compared this with costs around $600+ and that too with only 16GB RAM; that's $200+ more than this.
A processor alone doesn't make the laptop.
2
1
3
Today 06:12 PM
2,348 Posts
Joined Oct 2012
reqUser098Today 06:12 PM
2,348 Posts
this prob worth like $200 for someone who wants to have a intel mac for whatever reason.
1
Today 06:14 PM
966 Posts
Joined Jan 2010
vineauxToday 06:14 PM
966 Posts
I have this with i9, heavy and slow ...yes 16" retina is a plus...but i would take 14" M4 any day (ofcourse depending on config)
Today 06:26 PM
971 Posts
Joined Nov 2017
oharag1Today 06:26 PM
971 Posts
Quote from ElatedSpaniel543 :
Wow, I mean, this is a great deal for someone that needs a big, well built Intel computer. In 2019, Apple finally released a full touchpad driver for Windows bootcamp, so this thing makes a great windows machine with a beautiful screen. Should run Linux really well too. The fan could be annoying on this (I had the i9 and it was really annoying) but a bunch of utilities came out that helped stop it. Anyone wanting to run MacOS should get an M series, but if you want to run anything else ... it would be a great general purpose computer, especially with all of the RAM. During Covid mine was great for playing games in Windows like all the Tomb Raiders and Cities Skylines series.
The only concern would be battery life and the quality of any replacement (if replaced)
It's a shame that Apple didn't port Bootcamp to M series chips. If this happens then M Series over Intel ALL DAY. And I don't believe paying for subscription fees to Parallels is a good solution.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Today 06:28 PM
4,112 Posts
Joined Sep 2019
LavenderPickle7682Today 06:28 PM
4,112 Posts
Quote from VVX :
Not worth buying a non M-series Mac anymore.

2019 i7 Benchmark (1300 single core, 5200 all cores)
https://browser.geekbench.com/mac...hz-6-cores

2020 M1 Pro Benchmark (2300 single core, 8200 all cores)
https://browser.geekbench.com/mac...-late-2020

The M1 (even like an M1 Air) is going to be nearly twice as fast for most single-core work (ie, basically everything you care about).
This right here -- I have the same 16" Pro (but with 16gb ram), and it's awful. It's genuinely one of the worst apple machines I've owned.

The good:
- The butterfly keyboard issue is resolved in this model (and moving forward). The older butterfly keyboard had super low travel, felt like you were typing on concrete, and could break a key if so much as a speck of dust got under the keycap. No joke. It was awful, and many people delayed buying a Macbook because of it. This mac fixes that problem (amazing how a "good" is simply "doesn't have a problem the previous model had"!).
- The audio is genuinely top notch. I can use the internal speakers and microphone as a replacement for higher tier external ones, and I lose very little in the process. They're that good (and this is a trend continued through the M-series 16" Macbook Pro models).

The bad:
- It's slow compared to the M1 Air. Like nearly half the speed. It's figuratively "night and day".
- It's a space heater. Just idling, it puts out a LOT of heat. Great in the winter though if you have cold hands!
- Battery life is abysmal on its own....and compared to the M1 Air, it's insultingly bad.
- It stutters. I've never had a mac NOT be silky smooth in the normal UI before this (unless I was REALLY pushing the machine), but this one stutters randomly under no load.
- It crashes. Yes. I had significantly more crashes EACH MONTH on this machine than I had in 7 years total on a 2013 15" Macbook Pro. And I didn't treat that 2013 MBP nicely either. Guess what, THE 2013 MBP STILL WORKS.

And the ugly:
- As soon as the M1 came out, the older machines lost their resale value overnight. Yes, today we accept that Macs don't resell for large sums of cash, but this was the first time in something like ~15 years where you couldn't recoup a nice chunk of your original purchase price through reselling/trading it in.

My 2 cents: I would NOT buy one of these machines at ANY price. Take your budget, and put it towards literally any M1 Air or M1 Pro/Max. You'll get a better machine. The only way I'd suggest one of these is if you know without a doubt you need an Intel-based mac for your unique circumstances (such as software that's incompatible on the M1).
Last edited by LavenderPickle7682 February 2, 2026 at 11:41 AM.
1
Today 06:32 PM
4,112 Posts
Joined Sep 2019
LavenderPickle7682Today 06:32 PM
4,112 Posts
Quote from Dr.W :
Completely irrelevant to compare just the processor, when there's a plethora of other things to consider. The M1 you're considering only comes in the MBA with 13" display at this price, while this is the 16", so totally different classes of laptop, to begin with. MBA with M1 only comes with 8GB RAM around this price while this has 8x the RAM of that, and that RAM alone would be more the price of this laptop. And on top of that, this has a dGPU, while the MBA would share it with the 8GB RAM it comes with.
The M1 Pro you compared this with costs around $600+ and that too with only 16GB RAM; that's $200+ more than this.
A processor alone doesn't make the laptop.
The M1 Air can be configured with 8gb or 16gb of ram. (Proof: I'm typing on a M1 Air with 16gb ram as we speak!)

The processor change made such a massive difference -- thermals, system stability, power draw, battery efficiency, etc.

It's very clear you haven't used either machine in the slightest, since if you have, you would know just how meaningful of the change this was in the lineup of Macbooks. You didn't even know how much ram the M1 Air could have. Please don't spread misinformation.
Last edited by LavenderPickle7682 February 2, 2026 at 11:59 AM.
1
Today 06:33 PM
4,112 Posts
Joined Sep 2019
LavenderPickle7682Today 06:33 PM
4,112 Posts
Quote from vineaux :
I have this with i9, heavy and slow ...yes 16" retina is a plus...but i would take 14" M4 any day (ofcourse depending on config)
Plus any 14" or 16" M-series Macbook Pro has a significantly higher quality screen in it than the 2019 MBP (XDR? I forget the marketing name for it). I'd happily give up 2" of screen real-estate for that extra-bright display.
1
Today 06:39 PM
4,112 Posts
Joined Sep 2019
LavenderPickle7682Today 06:39 PM
4,112 Posts
Quote from oharag1 :
It's a shame that Apple didn't port Bootcamp to M series chips. If this happens then M Series over Intel ALL DAY. And I don't believe paying for subscription fees to Parallels is a good solution.
I haven't tried this, but from my understanding, you can run ARM-based Windows within emulation.

Parallels is a subscription, but VMware Fusion is now free (though future support may be limited given the nature of how VMware is currently operating).
Today 06:44 PM
349 Posts
Joined Oct 2006
YwVJZXkDToday 06:44 PM
349 Posts
Would this be okay for gaming (running linux or windows)? Like running one of those gaming linux distros on it..., or is there better hardware for the money for that?
Today 06:57 PM
4,112 Posts
Joined Sep 2019
LavenderPickle7682Today 06:57 PM
4,112 Posts
Quote from YwVJZXkD :
Would this be okay for gaming (running linux or windows)? Like running one of those gaming linux distros on it..., or is there better hardware for the money for that?
Unfortunately, even the most current Macs are somewhat average running games. This older one isn't very good either. Unless you are playing relatively low-end games, you'd probably be better served with a Windows machine.

Another option would be looking at Valve's Steam Deck handheld. It's a custom OS sitting on top of a Linux install, and it's pretty amazing for the price. You have a LOT of control over how you can use it, and it interfaces well with monitors/TVs/keyboards/mice/etc through a dock/port extender. It's not a massively powerful handheld compared to most desktops with a dedicated multi-hundred dollar GPU...but I've found very few people to be unhappy with the Steam Deck. It even runs mildly taxing games pretty acceptably, which is amazing for how optimized the system is.
Last edited by LavenderPickle7682 February 2, 2026 at 12:22 PM.
1
Today 07:21 PM
850 Posts
Joined Nov 2020
ElatedSpaniel543Today 07:21 PM
850 Posts
Quote from YwVJZXkD :
Would this be okay for gaming (running linux or windows)? Like running one of those gaming linux distros on it..., or is there better hardware for the money for that?
This thing has a 5300M which is not that great for games (5500M versions much better)
Paired with an external 1080p screen, it would be ok for older games (AAA games before 2019) in windows or Linux.
But the heat problems with this laptop are the issue, the CPU fans kick in very early. The body is thinner that current M series and yet the processor is way less heat efficient.
There are way better gaming laptops for $400 out there. Build quality and screen won't be as nice, but games wilL run smoother.
Last edited by ElatedSpaniel543 February 2, 2026 at 12:25 PM.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Today 07:24 PM
34 Posts
Joined Jan 2024
TealSardine225Today 07:24 PM
34 Posts
Don't buy this. The laptop won't last long considering that: it has been running for 7 years, plus that it is refurbished. Additionally it is likely you don't need 64GB RAM.
1

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Popular Deals

Trending Deals