Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
frontpageflyeagle8 posted Feb 18, 2026 04:10 AM
frontpageflyeagle8 posted Feb 18, 2026 04:10 AM

Refurbished Nikon Z 50 20.9MP DX Mirrorless Camera w/ Nikkor 16-50mm VR Lens Kit

& More + Free S/H

$500

$900

44% off
Nikon
28 Comments 13,544 Views
Get Deal at Nikon
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
Nikon has Refurbished Nikon Z 50 20.9MP DX Mirrorless Camera w/ Nikkor 16-50mm VR Lens Kit on sale for $499.95. Shipping is free.

Alternatively, Nikon (select the last tab option) also has Refurbished Nikon Z 50 20.9MP DX Mirrorless Camera w/ Nikkor 16-50mm + 50-250mm VR Lens Kit on sale for $649.95. Shipping is free.

Thanks to community member flyeagle8 for finding this deal

Note, product is a Nikon refurbished unit

Includes
  • Refurbished Nikon Z 50 20.9MP DX Mirrorless Camera
  • Refurbished Nikon Nikkor 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR Lens

Editor's Notes

Written by Discombobulated | Staff
  • Price Research
    • This deal match the previous FP deal for those that missed out during late Nov 2025'
  • About the Deal
    • Slim, sleek, rugged design for any occasion; Nikon Z 50 is strong, durable construction w/ all weather-sealing making it tough to take just about anywhere
    • Product will be sold/shipped by the Nikon manufacturer
    • Offer valid while pricing/supplies last
  • Additional Details

Original Post

Written by flyeagle8
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Nikon has Refurbished Nikon Z 50 20.9MP DX Mirrorless Camera w/ Nikkor 16-50mm VR Lens Kit on sale for $499.95. Shipping is free.

Alternatively, Nikon (select the last tab option) also has Refurbished Nikon Z 50 20.9MP DX Mirrorless Camera w/ Nikkor 16-50mm + 50-250mm VR Lens Kit on sale for $649.95. Shipping is free.

Thanks to community member flyeagle8 for finding this deal

Note, product is a Nikon refurbished unit

Includes
  • Refurbished Nikon Z 50 20.9MP DX Mirrorless Camera
  • Refurbished Nikon Nikkor 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR Lens

Editor's Notes

Written by Discombobulated | Staff
  • Price Research
    • This deal match the previous FP deal for those that missed out during late Nov 2025'
  • About the Deal
    • Slim, sleek, rugged design for any occasion; Nikon Z 50 is strong, durable construction w/ all weather-sealing making it tough to take just about anywhere
    • Product will be sold/shipped by the Nikon manufacturer
    • Offer valid while pricing/supplies last
  • Additional Details

Original Post

Written by flyeagle8

Community Voting

Deal Score
+42
Good Deal
Get Deal at Nikon

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Top Comments

LavenderPickle7682
4246 Posts
651 Reputation
Eh, here's my 2 cents folks -- don't get so hung up about "consumer" lenses. "Good enough" is good enough.

Yes, some people screech loudly "Lenses Lenses Lenses! Glass Glass Glass!" when asked 'what is important in photography?'. And they're not wrong.

(You'll absolute see a difference between a $95 variable aperture kit zoom and a $2500 f/1.2 prime. And there are lenses that are real sinkers out there....but here's the thing, those are far and few between since mirrorless took over since the mid-2010s. Kit lenses used to mean "awful"...now, they're just "inexpensive". You don't expect a Toyota Camry to perform like a F1 racecar, but it's not a Flintstones car either.)

But when you're comparing entry-level, consumer, budget lenses (pick whatever name you want to call them), they're all about the same. Same with these bodies. Ranking them is like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.

Find a body and lens at a price point you like. Find something that fits your hand the way you like. Find something that has a button and UI layout that's not offensive to you. And just go with it. They ALL take excellent photos under 'normal conditions'. They all take average video. The amount of overlap between models is absurd, and it's not worth worrying about (especially for general consumer use).

You'll get more value taking a photography class than upgrading to a "slightly better model of consumer-tier camera". Now in 10-15 years, if you upgrade to the next budget model, you'll probably see worthwhile performance gains. Still, take that class. It'll help you now.

28 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Feb 18, 2026 08:31 PM
4,246 Posts
Joined Sep 2019
LavenderPickle7682Feb 18, 2026 08:31 PM
4,246 Posts
Quote from VarmintCong :
MPB is offering $250 for the two lens kit.
Link?
Feb 18, 2026 08:36 PM
4,246 Posts
Joined Sep 2019
LavenderPickle7682Feb 18, 2026 08:36 PM
4,246 Posts
Quote from aem :
Z50 is not ancient, still a very nice camera even if it doesn't have the latest autofocus tech. And the 16-50mm kit lens is one of the best kit lenses for mirrorless. Much better than Canon and Sony kit lenses and actually worth having.

Similarly the 50-250mm f/4.5-6.3 VR, if you opt for the two lens kit, is much better than the lower priced telephoto lenses from Canon and especially Sony.
Eh, here's my 2 cents folks -- don't get so hung up about "consumer" lenses. "Good enough" is good enough.

Yes, some people screech loudly "Lenses Lenses Lenses! Glass Glass Glass!" when asked 'what is important in photography?'. And they're not wrong.

(You'll absolute see a difference between a $95 variable aperture kit zoom and a $2500 f/1.2 prime. And there are lenses that are real sinkers out there....but here's the thing, those are far and few between since mirrorless took over since the mid-2010s. Kit lenses used to mean "awful"...now, they're just "inexpensive". You don't expect a Toyota Camry to perform like a F1 racecar, but it's not a Flintstones car either.)

But when you're comparing entry-level, consumer, budget lenses (pick whatever name you want to call them), they're all about the same. Same with these bodies. Ranking them is like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.

Find a body and lens at a price point you like. Find something that fits your hand the way you like. Find something that has a button and UI layout that's not offensive to you. And just go with it. They ALL take excellent photos under 'normal conditions'. They all take average video. The amount of overlap between models is absurd, and it's not worth worrying about (especially for general consumer use).

You'll get more value taking a photography class than upgrading to a "slightly better model of consumer-tier camera". Now in 10-15 years, if you upgrade to the next budget model, you'll probably see worthwhile performance gains. Still, take that class. It'll help you now.
Last edited by LavenderPickle7682 February 18, 2026 at 01:56 PM.
Feb 18, 2026 08:38 PM
8,063 Posts
Joined Oct 2004
VarmintCongFeb 18, 2026 08:38 PM
8,063 Posts
Quote from LavenderPickle7682 :
Link?
I mean you can sell them to MPB, enter like new condition and it'll generate a quote, gave me an offer of $252.

https://www.mpb.com/en-us/sell-or-trade
5
Feb 19, 2026 12:24 PM
3,348 Posts
Joined Jun 2017
NikonShrFeb 19, 2026 12:24 PM
3,348 Posts
All nikon here...Great deal!
1
Feb 19, 2026 02:06 PM
16,842 Posts
Joined Jan 2004
chong67Feb 19, 2026 02:06 PM
16,842 Posts
Why Nikon and Sony their camera so boxy and square. Thats why I never buy anything but Canon.
1
Feb 19, 2026 02:26 PM
802 Posts
Joined Oct 2011
markng25Feb 19, 2026 02:26 PM
802 Posts
Quote from LavenderPickle7682 :
Eh, here's my 2 cents folks -- don't get so hung up about "consumer" lenses. "Good enough" is good enough.Yes, some people screech loudly "Lenses Lenses Lenses! Glass Glass Glass!" when asked 'what is important in photography?'. And they're not wrong.(You'll absolute see a difference between a $95 variable aperture kit zoom and a $2500 f/1.2 prime. And there are lenses that are real sinkers out there....but here's the thing, those are far and few between since mirrorless took over since the mid-2010s. Kit lenses used to mean "awful"...now, they're just "inexpensive". You don't expect a Toyota Camry to perform like a F1 racecar, but it's not a Flintstones car either.)But when you're comparing entry-level, consumer, budget lenses (pick whatever name you want to call them), they're all about the same. Same with these bodies. Ranking them is like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. Find a body and lens at a price point you like. Find something that fits your hand the way you like. Find something that has a button and UI layout that's not offensive to you. And just go with it. They ALL take excellent photos under 'normal conditions'. They all take average video. The amount of overlap between models is absurd, and it's not worth worrying about (especially for general consumer use). You'll get more value taking a photography class than upgrading to a "slightly better model of consumer-tier camera". Now in 10-15 years, if you upgrade to the next budget model, you'll probably see worthwhile performance gains. Still, take that class. It'll help you now.
Wrong. Low end, budget photography now can be taken care very well by phones. It's worth it to go with a dedicated camera system only if you use high-ends.
4
Pro
Feb 19, 2026 04:57 PM
91 Posts
Joined Nov 2018
ScarletPassenger906
Pro
Feb 19, 2026 04:57 PM
91 Posts
Thanks op..!
1

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Feb 19, 2026 07:35 PM
1,216 Posts
Joined Feb 2010
ROOSKIEFeb 19, 2026 07:35 PM
1,216 Posts
Quote from markng25 :
Wrong. Low end, budget photography now can be taken care very well by phones. It's worth it to go with a dedicated camera system only if you use high-ends.

The person you replied to was thoughtfully discussing learning how to use a camera and discover if you like it before worrying about which kit lens is best or spending a lot on higher end gear.

Phone cameras are great for many reasons but learning to use a dedicated camera is a fun hobby and experience. One that is vastly different from using a phone. I think that is 'worth it' for many people. There are many types of photography and images that are best suited to a dedicated camera for composing and capturing/creating them with. Of course some things are also better suited to be handled by a phone.
2
Feb 19, 2026 08:03 PM
1 Posts
Joined Feb 2026
RelaxedShape519Feb 19, 2026 08:03 PM
1 Posts
Quote from markng25 :
Wrong. Low end, budget photography now can be taken care very well by phones. It's worth it to go with a dedicated camera system only if you use high-ends.
Well said.
4
Feb 19, 2026 10:53 PM
4,246 Posts
Joined Sep 2019
LavenderPickle7682Feb 19, 2026 10:53 PM
4,246 Posts
Quote from ROOSKIE :


The person you replied to was thoughtfully discussing learning how to use a camera and discover if you like it before worrying about which kit lens is best or spending a lot on higher end gear.

Phone cameras are great for many reasons but learning to use a dedicated camera is a fun hobby and experience. One that is vastly different from using a phone. I think that is 'worth it' for many people. There are many types of photography and images that are best suited to a dedicated camera for composing and capturing/creating them with. Of course some things are also better suited to be handled by a phone.
Thank you -- this right here was my intent.

There are so many very decent budget options out there which radically outperform even the best mobile phones -- Olympus/OM System, Sony, Canon, Nikon, etc. Folks could fill entire forums with suggestions. Like I said, there's a lot of overlap. There's no reason to feel the need to drop serious coin on a camera setup until you're able to clearly articulate the need for it.

And if a mobile telephone's camera works for you, by all means, use it. I sure use mine as a replacement for a point & shoot camera. It's with me everywhere I go -- I probably use it more for a camera than a telephone!

But you'll get a radically different level of control over one's results using a dedicated camera than a mobile. To best use that level of control, one needs to learn the basics of photography -- how's that saying go, "Knowledge is power"? If someone doesn't want to learn, the mobile gives the closest to the old Kodak Brownie experience... "press the shutter and we do the rest."
Feb 20, 2026 12:50 AM
58 Posts
Joined Jul 2011
slickweedFeb 20, 2026 12:50 AM
58 Posts
Quote from markng25 :
Wrong. Low end, budget photography now can be taken care very well by phones. It's worth it to go with a dedicated camera system only if you use high-ends.
Wrong. You can still mount a super telephoto, macro, wide angle, or large aperture lens to this camera. You can't do that with a phone.
Also, while kit lenses vary in quality wide open, most are extremely sharp stopped down. Phones can't complete with the sharpness of a kit lens at f/8.
Sounds like you've never used a dedicated camera before.
1
Feb 20, 2026 01:10 AM
802 Posts
Joined Oct 2011
markng25Feb 20, 2026 01:10 AM
802 Posts
Quote from slickweed :
Wrong. You can still mount a super telephoto, macro, wide angle, or large aperture lens to this camera. You can't do that with a phone. Also, while kit lenses vary in quality wide open, most are extremely sharp stopped down. Phones can't complete with the sharpness of a kit lens at f/8. Sounds like you've never used a dedicated camera before.
LOL...grasshopper you have much to learn.
3
Feb 20, 2026 03:10 PM
8,063 Posts
Joined Oct 2004
VarmintCongFeb 20, 2026 03:10 PM
8,063 Posts
Quote from markng25 :
Wrong. Low end, budget photography now can be taken care very well by phones. It's worth it to go with a dedicated camera system only if you use high-ends.
Phones are great for certain things, and if you only look at pictures on your phone, they'll look the same. I took a landscape shot in New Zealand with my phone and my D7500, and viewed on the phone they look about the same, but on a 27" monitor the sheep are blobby on the phone, and sharp on the DSLR.

We do an annual calendar and you can easily spot which photos are from a phone.

I tend to use my DSLR and Z8 for wildlife shots (cause of the lenses) and for landscapes, which need a large sensor.
1

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Popular Deals

Trending Deals