Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
frontpagepennysave posted Today 1:28 PM

11-oz MW Polar Peeled & Pitted Lychee Asian Fruit

$3.00

$5.88

48% off
Amazon
2.4K Views
Get Deal at Amazon
Deal Details
Amazon has 11-oz MW Polar Peeled & Pitted Lychee Asian Fruit on sale for $2.97. Shipping is free with Prime or on $35+ orders.

Thanks to community member pennysave for finding this deal.

Features:
  • Enjoy premium lychee that's already peeled and pitted for instant snacking, desserts, smoothies, and drinks with zero prep required
  • Naturally sweet lychee packed in water with no added sugar. A clean, simple ingredient list great for low-sugar and mindful eating lifestyles
  • Gluten-Free, Non-GMO & BPA-Free
  • Convenient pull-tab top makes it quick and mess-free to enjoy lychee at home, work, or on the go

Editor's Notes

Written by megakimcheelove | Staff

Original Post

Written by pennysave
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Amazon has 11-oz MW Polar Peeled & Pitted Lychee Asian Fruit on sale for $2.97. Shipping is free with Prime or on $35+ orders.

Thanks to community member pennysave for finding this deal.

Features:
  • Enjoy premium lychee that's already peeled and pitted for instant snacking, desserts, smoothies, and drinks with zero prep required
  • Naturally sweet lychee packed in water with no added sugar. A clean, simple ingredient list great for low-sugar and mindful eating lifestyles
  • Gluten-Free, Non-GMO & BPA-Free
  • Convenient pull-tab top makes it quick and mess-free to enjoy lychee at home, work, or on the go

Editor's Notes

Written by megakimcheelove | Staff

Original Post

Written by pennysave

Community Voting

Deal Score
+19
Good Deal
Get Deal at Amazon

Join The Conversation

Share your experience with the Slickdeals community

Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!

14 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Today 3:21 PM
2.5K Comments
Joined May 2021
SkillfulPiranha7944Today 3:21 PM
2.5K Comments
Lychees are among my 5 favorite fruits so I'm eager to try this. However, keep in mind that this sugarfree version is sweetened with xylitol and sucralose so the taste might be different from regular canned lychees (and very different from fresh ones).

When I eat the ones in sugar syrup, I usually save the syrup for drinks. Just diluting it with water provides a natural refreshing lychee beverage. It'll be interesting to see how this xylitol sucralose syrup taste.
1
Today 3:25 PM
2.5K Comments
Joined May 2021
SkillfulPiranha7944Today 3:25 PM
2.5K Comments
Look at the 3rd slide. I have never seen such a huge Prop 65 watching before! I don't know how Californians react to them but it's usually ignored or ridiculed in rest of the country.

In terms of cans, it has nothing to do with the food inside. It invariably applies to the packaging, usually a glue or dye that California doesn't like. But a substance that the government (and most other states) thinks is fine for consumers. I agree with the government because California relies on studies with unrealistically high doses and exposure times. Nothing you'd encounter by simply holding the can. Just wash your hands after touching the label if you're paranoid.
Last edited by SkillfulPiranha7944 August 3, 2026 at 08:48 AM.
3
Today 3:42 PM
186 Comments
Joined May 2006
macadamiamanToday 3:42 PM
186 Comments
Product of China, xylitol, sucralose, no thank you
1
1
3
Today 3:48 PM
6.5K Comments
Joined Jun 2005
PhantasmXToday 3:48 PM
6.5K Comments
Just buy yourself some fresh lychee. Taste 100X better than the canned stuff.
1
1
Today 4:22 PM
6.6K Comments
Joined Jul 2006
happygooddealToday 4:22 PM
6.6K Comments
Go any Asian store. Lycee can cost same but double the size 20oz.
1
Today 4:42 PM
107 Comments
Joined Feb 2009
PhatkidToday 4:42 PM
107 Comments
For anyone wondering what can you do with lychee? One of my favorite Viet desserts with Thai origins is Che Thai. Lots of easy to follow recipes online like this one [savorysweetspoon.com]. You can find the ingredients in most asian grocery stores or Amazon.


[IMG]https://www.savorysweetspoon.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Che-Thai-1x1-1.jpg[/IMG]
Last edited by Phatkid August 3, 2026 at 09:46 AM.
Pro
Today 5:05 PM
810 Comments
Joined Apr 2012
theon105
Pro
Today 5:05 PM
810 Comments
Quote from SkillfulPiranha7944 :
Look at the 3rd slide. I have never seen such a huge Prop 65 watching before! I don't know how Californians react to them but it's usually ignored or ridiculed in rest of the country.

In terms of cans, it has nothing to do with the food inside. It invariably applies to the packaging, usually a glue or dye that California doesn't like. But a substance that the government (and most other states) thinks is fine for consumers. I agree with the government because California relies on studies with unrealistically high doses and exposure times. Nothing you'd encounter by simply holding the can. Just wash your hands after touching the label if you're paranoid.
The whole country should be grateful for Prop 65.

https://silentspring.org/news/peo...fornia-law

""Not only have people's exposures to specific toxic chemicals gone down in California, but we also see exposures going down across the country driven in part by Proposition 65," says lead author Kristin Knox, a research scientist at Silent Spring Institute."

"When companies reformulate their products to avoid Prop 65 chemicals, they end up doing that for all their products, not just those sold in California."
1

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Today 5:51 PM
623 Comments
Joined May 2019
E_M__Today 5:51 PM
623 Comments
Quote from SkillfulPiranha7944 :
Look at the 3rd slide. I have never seen such a huge Prop 65 watching before! I don't know how Californians react to them but it's usually ignored or ridiculed in rest of the country.

In terms of cans, it has nothing to do with the food inside. It invariably applies to the packaging, usually a glue or dye that California doesn't like. But a substance that the government (and most other states) thinks is fine for consumers. I agree with the government because California relies on studies with unrealistically high doses and exposure times. Nothing you'd encounter by simply holding the can. Just wash your hands after touching the label if you're paranoid.
Everything carries a Prop. 65 warning here. We ignore it.

Disney Land, I'm not kidding, has a Prop. 65 warning at the entrance.
Because maybe something somewhere might possibly be bad for you, somewhere in or around the park.
Today 6:01 PM
64 Comments
Joined Aug 2012
RevelRMToday 6:01 PM
64 Comments
Quote from theon105 :
The whole country should be grateful for Prop 65.https://silentspring.org/news/peo...fornia-law""Not only have people's exposures to specific toxic chemicals gone down in California, but we also see exposures going down across the country driven in part by Proposition 65," says lead author Kristin Knox, a research scientist at Silent Spring Institute.""When companies reformulate their products to avoid Prop 65 chemicals, they end up doing that for all their products, not just those sold in California."
Yet cancer cases are at an all time high. I would be convinced if there was a high quality study, not something like this with just one reference.
1
Today 6:22 PM
40 Comments
Joined Aug 2016
WillS5070Today 6:22 PM
40 Comments
Quote from theon105 :
The whole country should be grateful for Prop 65.

https://silentspring.org/news/peo...fornia-law

""Not only have people's exposures to specific toxic chemicals gone down in California, but we also see exposures going down across the country driven in part by Proposition 65," says lead author Kristin Knox, a research scientist at Silent Spring Institute."

"When companies reformulate their products to avoid Prop 65 chemicals, they end up doing that for all their products, not just those sold in California."
The question is not whether exposure to Prop 65-identified substances has gone down (I'm sure it has) but whether those substances are actually dangerous in the first place
Pro
Today 6:23 PM
810 Comments
Joined Apr 2012
theon105
Pro
Today 6:23 PM
810 Comments
Quote from RevelRM :
Yet cancer cases are at an all time high. I would be convinced if there was a high quality study, not something like this with just one reference.
If you are lazy, ask any LLM. It will give you a list several of peer-reviewed studies conducted by credible institutions that showed:
"Prop 65 has not only reduced toxic exposures within California but has also driven nationwide product reformulation and exposure reductions by influencing how companies manufacture and sell consumer goods across the entire country."

Just because you personally find Prop 65 annoying doesn't mean it's ineffective. It doesn't matter whether individual consumers care about the warnings or not. The whole point is to regulate corporations.

If the rising cancer rate genuinely concerns you, you should be mad that there isn't a stronger, most robust version of Prop 65 that is enforced at the federal level. We depend on California to regulate chemicals that other developed countries ban nation-wide because our government is thoroughly captured by corporate interests.
Pro
Today 6:27 PM
810 Comments
Joined Apr 2012
theon105
Pro
Today 6:27 PM
810 Comments
Quote from WillS5070 :
The question is not whether exposure to Prop 65-identified substances has gone down (I'm sure it has) but whether those substances are actually dangerous in the first place
Why are you questioning what scientists have already agreed on? Yes, those chemicals are dangerous. There's a scientific consensus on it.
Are you trying to say BPA, lead, and etc aren't harmful?
Pro
Today 6:53 PM
10.4K Comments
Joined Mar 2018
WooHoo2You
Pro
Today 6:53 PM
10.4K Comments
Quote from SkillfulPiranha7944 :
Look at the 3rd slide. I have never seen such a huge Prop 65 watching before! I don't know how Californians react to them but it's usually ignored or ridiculed in rest of the country.

In terms of cans, it has nothing to do with the food inside. It invariably applies to the packaging, usually a glue or dye that California doesn't like. But a substance that the government (and most other states) thinks is fine for consumers. I agree with the government because California relies on studies with unrealistically high doses and exposure times. Nothing you'd encounter by simply holding the can. Just wash your hands after touching the label if you're paranoid.
They aren't "ridiculed in rest of the country." Just a small group of people seem to make a habit screaming (needlessly) every time they happen to run across a few letters in a completely normal font...normally when looking for something to manufacturer outrage over.

Look at it this way, the label has 4 words in massive (aka normal) 12 sized print about prop 65. Yet your kneejerk reaction was paragraph(S). IMO that seems a little silly in comparison because you aren't even trying to fight cancer...
Last edited by WooHoo2You August 3, 2026 at 12:03 PM.
Today 7:02 PM
108 Comments
Joined Sep 2007
babaraulToday 7:02 PM
108 Comments
While I wasted time reading a Prop65 debate the price went back up to 8 bucks. Thanks Cali.

Join The Conversation

Share your experience with the Slickdeals community

Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!

Popular Deals

Trending Deals