Amazon has
11-oz MW Polar Peeled & Pitted Lychee Asian Fruit on sale for
$2.97.
Shipping is free with Prime or on $35+ orders.
Thanks to community member
pennysave for finding this deal.
Features:- Enjoy premium lychee that's already peeled and pitted for instant snacking, desserts, smoothies, and drinks with zero prep required
- Naturally sweet lychee packed in water with no added sugar. A clean, simple ingredient list great for low-sugar and mindful eating lifestyles
- Gluten-Free, Non-GMO & BPA-Free
- Convenient pull-tab top makes it quick and mess-free to enjoy lychee at home, work, or on the go
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
15 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank SkillfulPiranha7944
When I eat the ones in sugar syrup, I usually save the syrup for drinks. Just diluting it with water provides a natural refreshing lychee beverage. It'll be interesting to see how this xylitol sucralose syrup taste.
In terms of cans, it has nothing to do with the food inside. It invariably applies to the packaging, usually a glue or dye that California doesn't like. But a substance that the government (and most other states) thinks is fine for consumers. I agree with the government because California relies on studies with unrealistically high doses and exposure times. Nothing you'd encounter by simply holding the can. Just wash your hands after touching the label if you're paranoid.
[IMG]https://www.savorysweetspoon.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Che-Thai-1x1-1.jpg[/IMG]
In terms of cans, it has nothing to do with the food inside. It invariably applies to the packaging, usually a glue or dye that California doesn't like. But a substance that the government (and most other states) thinks is fine for consumers. I agree with the government because California relies on studies with unrealistically high doses and exposure times. Nothing you'd encounter by simply holding the can. Just wash your hands after touching the label if you're paranoid.
https://silentspring.or
""Not only have people's exposures to specific toxic chemicals gone down in California, but we also see exposures going down across the country driven in part by Proposition 65," says lead author Kristin Knox, a research scientist at Silent Spring Institute."
"When companies reformulate their products to avoid Prop 65 chemicals, they end up doing that for all their products, not just those sold in California."
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
In terms of cans, it has nothing to do with the food inside. It invariably applies to the packaging, usually a glue or dye that California doesn't like. But a substance that the government (and most other states) thinks is fine for consumers. I agree with the government because California relies on studies with unrealistically high doses and exposure times. Nothing you'd encounter by simply holding the can. Just wash your hands after touching the label if you're paranoid.
Disney Land, I'm not kidding, has a Prop. 65 warning at the entrance.
Because maybe something somewhere might possibly be bad for you, somewhere in or around the park.
https://silentspring.or
""Not only have people's exposures to specific toxic chemicals gone down in California, but we also see exposures going down across the country driven in part by Proposition 65," says lead author Kristin Knox, a research scientist at Silent Spring Institute."
"When companies reformulate their products to avoid Prop 65 chemicals, they end up doing that for all their products, not just those sold in California."
"Prop 65 has not only reduced toxic exposures within California but has also driven nationwide product reformulation and exposure reductions by influencing how companies manufacture and sell consumer goods across the entire country."
Just because you personally find Prop 65 annoying doesn't mean it's ineffective. It doesn't matter whether individual consumers care about the warnings or not. The whole point is to regulate corporations.
If the rising cancer rate genuinely concerns you, you should be mad that there isn't a stronger, most robust version of Prop 65 that is enforced at the federal level. We depend on California to regulate chemicals that other developed countries ban nation-wide because our government is thoroughly captured by corporate interests.
Are you trying to say BPA, lead, and etc aren't harmful?
In terms of cans, it has nothing to do with the food inside. It invariably applies to the packaging, usually a glue or dye that California doesn't like. But a substance that the government (and most other states) thinks is fine for consumers. I agree with the government because California relies on studies with unrealistically high doses and exposure times. Nothing you'd encounter by simply holding the can. Just wash your hands after touching the label if you're paranoid.
Look at it this way, the label has 4 words in massive (aka normal) 12 sized print about prop 65. Yet your kneejerk reaction was paragraph(S). IMO that seems a little silly in comparison because you aren't even trying to fight cancer...
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!