Joined Jul 2005
Scarydevil Monastery
Forum Thread
My friend lives in NJ. His car was stolen, stripped, and abandoned. The city is making him pay for the towing and impound fees.
September 3, 2010 at
06:15 AM
in
Rant
Does that seem right to anyone else? It's basically costing him over $350 to have his car stolen and, since he didn't have theft insurance, it's a total loss. The only possible redemption is going to be today if a mechanic offers him any money for the scrap.
WTF?
I'm not even going into how rude the city employees were to him or how they turned him away yesterday afternoon because they didn't think he could get a tow truck (at his own expense) to the impound lot before they closed at 4:45. OR how they wouldn't help his wife when she was there at noon, because they were all at lunch.
Please reserve any comments about him being dumb for not carrying a theft clause or whatever you call it on his insurance policy. It was an older Honda Civic and he didn't think it was worth insuring for very much. I'm not sure how all of that works but his deductible might even have been more than what he would've gotten for the car, if that applies.
I think it's infuriating that the city is forcing him to pay towing and impound fees when his car was stolen! Does he have any recourse here? Maybe he can deduct the cost of the fees from his taxes or something? Who should he contact?
My friend is a really nice guy--I would've raged out on those impound lot employees for sure. My buddy said he knows when he's defeated and he's licking his wounds and counting his losses, and that his anger is reserved for the car thieves. I understand that, but really, it looks to me like the city's just adding insult to injury here.
Anyone have any experience with this?
WTF?
I'm not even going into how rude the city employees were to him or how they turned him away yesterday afternoon because they didn't think he could get a tow truck (at his own expense) to the impound lot before they closed at 4:45. OR how they wouldn't help his wife when she was there at noon, because they were all at lunch.
Please reserve any comments about him being dumb for not carrying a theft clause or whatever you call it on his insurance policy. It was an older Honda Civic and he didn't think it was worth insuring for very much. I'm not sure how all of that works but his deductible might even have been more than what he would've gotten for the car, if that applies.
I think it's infuriating that the city is forcing him to pay towing and impound fees when his car was stolen! Does he have any recourse here? Maybe he can deduct the cost of the fees from his taxes or something? Who should he contact?
My friend is a really nice guy--I would've raged out on those impound lot employees for sure. My buddy said he knows when he's defeated and he's licking his wounds and counting his losses, and that his anger is reserved for the car thieves. I understand that, but really, it looks to me like the city's just adding insult to injury here.
Anyone have any experience with this?
153 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
With all due respect (because I'm not trying to get into with you
Many places have victims funds that are funded by fines and restitution
My friend had a car stolen years ago, and the police told her the same thing "we rarely catch these guys". Actually what they meant was "your insurance paid you for another car so we're not going to bother looking for it"
About a month after it was stolen (from the parking lot at the mall) we went shopping (in her new car). We actually pulled up and parked beside her stolen car. The only things the theives did was put in new sun visors. They didn't even paint it. We called the police and they came and did nothing. They said "you already have a new car, this one now belongs to the insurance company and they wont pursue it"....
Many places have victims funds that are funded by fines and restitution
Sure, it sucks. But, that's life. Like when thieves went into my business and stole about $2000 worth of high-end designer sunglasses, I was out all that money. I knew that the only way I could collect was if they caught the guys and I sue them for my loss. Or, I could file a claim with my business insurance. I chose not to because it wasn't worth the increase in premiums.
I don't understand how a car theft is different than a home theft. Was the car parked in an area where police could see it was being vandalized? You are saying they should have stopped it so I'm thinking maybe the police saw it happening and did nothing? If so, I would be very angry as well. I'd be angry anyway just because it happened to me.
My friend had a car stolen years ago, and the police told her the same thing "we rarely catch these guys". Actually what they meant was "your insurance paid you for another car so we're not going to bother looking for it"
About a month after it was stolen (from the parking lot at the mall) we went shopping (in her new car). We actually pulled up and parked beside her stolen car. The only things the theives did was put in new sun visors. They didn't even paint it. We called the police and they came and did nothing. They said "you already have a new car, this one now belongs to the insurance company and they wont pursue it"....
By the way, where do you live? What kind of crazy town is that where cops don't care when you have found your stolen car and the person driving it? I have friends who are cops. They would have followed up on it because it's an open and shut case for them when you have a person right there driving the reported stolen car! And, cops get reviewed based on arrests. It would be an easy arrest for them.
By the way, where do you live? What kind of crazy town is that where cops don't care when you have found your stolen car and the person driving it? I have friends who are cops. They would have followed up on it because it's an open and shut case for them when you have a person right there driving the reported stolen car! And, cops get reviewed based on arrests. It would be an easy arrest for them.
This was in the south
I can't speak for my friend but I think I could support higher taxes if they went to pay for more cops on the street and that, in turn, directly led to a decrease in property and other crimes. In fact I'd rather pay higher taxes for that result than be forced by circumstance to purchase insurance against the day when I become the victim of a crime, and then get told "well what did you think was going to happen, you went out and bought something, of course someone was going to take it away from you, by the way you owe us more money for cleaning up after the thief."
I'm not sure anything is going to change my opinion about that but you're welcome to keep telling me how it's going to be my fault when I'm robbed. Oh, unless I pay someone else who promises to replace my stuff. Wait--there's a word for that, what is it...
I'll tell you something else--I'm more pissed about this than my buddy. I made him promise to go to the next town council meeting and raise hell. He wasn't going to do anything and I said I'd come up there this weekend and kick his ass until he did.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
extortioninsurance dues for everything kids! And the attitude from government employees? You deserve it because you're a bad person!In the end my tires were found and I got them back. They had been removed from the rims and had to be remounted and balanced. I was pissed about having to pay for that. But it never occurred to me than anyone but the thief should have been responsible for that cost. I chose not to pursue that but had the thief not been caught I would never have expected someone else to cover the costs.
I have also had a few other semi-valuable items stolen from me over the years and my house was broken into twice. But it wasn't the fault of the police or the city.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.