Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Forum Thread

My friend lives in NJ. His car was stolen, stripped, and abandoned. The city is making him pay for the towing and impound fees.

26,675 2,340 September 3, 2010 at 06:15 AM in Rant
Does that seem right to anyone else? It's basically costing him over $350 to have his car stolen and, since he didn't have theft insurance, it's a total loss. The only possible redemption is going to be today if a mechanic offers him any money for the scrap.

WTF?

I'm not even going into how rude the city employees were to him or how they turned him away yesterday afternoon because they didn't think he could get a tow truck (at his own expense) to the impound lot before they closed at 4:45. OR how they wouldn't help his wife when she was there at noon, because they were all at lunch.

Please reserve any comments about him being dumb for not carrying a theft clause or whatever you call it on his insurance policy. It was an older Honda Civic and he didn't think it was worth insuring for very much. I'm not sure how all of that works but his deductible might even have been more than what he would've gotten for the car, if that applies.

I think it's infuriating that the city is forcing him to pay towing and impound fees when his car was stolen! Does he have any recourse here? Maybe he can deduct the cost of the fees from his taxes or something? Who should he contact?

My friend is a really nice guy--I would've raged out on those impound lot employees for sure. My buddy said he knows when he's defeated and he's licking his wounds and counting his losses, and that his anger is reserved for the car thieves. I understand that, but really, it looks to me like the city's just adding insult to injury here.

Anyone have any experience with this?

153 Comments

Your comment cannot be blank.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined Jan 2004
Here's to the future
> bubble2 25,141 Posts
707 Reputation
Iaaaiws
09-03-2010 at 06:52 PM.
09-03-2010 at 06:52 PM.
Just for the heck of it I checked my auto insurance policy. Theft would be a claim under the comprehensive coverage. For my 2010 Escape it costs me $91 for six months with $0 deductible. For my 1980 Malibu I pay $33 for six months again $0 deductible.
Reply
Joined Jul 2005
Scarydevil Monastery
> bubble2 26,675 Posts
2,340 Reputation
Original Poster
veritablequandary
09-03-2010 at 06:54 PM.
09-03-2010 at 06:54 PM.
Quote from Iaaaiws :
VQ, I have sympathy for your friend. I have been in his situation, both financially and on the wrong side of the theft thing. For years I drove cars worth a few hundred dollars because it was all I could afford. The cost of the liability insurance alone was almost enough to keep me from paying my other bills. While I have never had a whole car stolen I did find my truck one day with the tires stolen off of it. Now, my first thought was to call the police, but it wasn't to ask them why the hell they didn't prevent the theft. It was to report the theft. Now you are telling me that my second call should have been to the city to ask for a check to cover my loss?

In the end my tires were found and I got them back. They had been removed from the rims and had to be remounted and balanced. I was pissed about having to pay for that. But it never occurred to me than anyone but the thief should have been responsible for that cost. I chose not to pursue that but had the thief not been caught I would never have expected someone else to cover the costs.

I have also had a few other semi-valuable items stolen from me over the years and my house was broken into twice. But it wasn't the fault of the police or the city.
I'm not asking the city to cut him a check--I'm asking them not to farking threaten to take away his driver's license (they said they'd put points against his driving record) if he doesn't pony up and pay for the goddamn towing and impound fees! How about they called him once they found the car and asked if he wanted it towed someplace else? How about they didn't close the doors to the lot in his face and tack on another day's storage fee? How about they waive the fees and let somebody who parked illegally in a handicapped spot cover the extra (you can't tell me it costs $50 a day or whatever to store a car) and if your car gets stolen you get a pass?

And yeah, maybe I'm laying it on a bit thick with the "cops should've prevented this" stuff, but honestly, isn't it reasonable to expect to live in a mostly crime-free society? Isn't that what we pay taxes for? So if the city fails in that responsibility, why do I have to keep paying taxes? Am I getting what I paid for? And in this case, not only am I not getting what I paid for, I'm being charged extra for their failure. On top of everything else they gave him shitty attitude too?

This is blaming the rape victim, taking all of her cash after you do the rape kit, and then forcing her to eat a shit sandwich with a smile on her face to boot.

Although I do appreciate you backing off from the hyperbole and rhetoric. Going forward I shall endeavor to remain civil also. Smilie

Quote from Iaaaiws :
Just for the heck of it I checked my auto insurance policy. Theft would be a claim under the comprehensive coverage. For my 2010 Escape it costs me $91 for six months with $0 deductible. For my 1980 Malibu I pay $33 for six months again $0 deductible.
This won't help my argument laugh out loud but my friend said if he carried theft coverage it would've doubled his monthly premium, from $75 to $150. So $900/year for a car that was worth maybe $5k and depreciating fast.

This is why I said "let's leave the insurance part out of this" in the OP Harhar
Reply
Last edited by veritablequandary September 3, 2010 at 06:56 PM.
Joined Mar 2007
serving up a tall glass..
> bubble2 4,047 Posts
3,480 Reputation
.teri.
09-03-2010 at 06:57 PM.
09-03-2010 at 06:57 PM.
Quote from veritableqndry :
I'm not blaming the cops--I understand the thief is the bad guy here and my friend said the same thing. What I'm saying is that it's a goddamned shame when you are the victim of a crime and the people you pay to prevent that kind of thing, instead of saying "how can we help you recover from this," tell you "too bad, so sad," and stick their hand out--no, worse than that, they FORCE you to pay more money on top of that! And the answer is, "well you should've been paying extra money all along because everyone knows we can't protect you from this kind of thing, so it's your fault, sucks to be you!"
How did the robbery happen? Was the car parked at work, or in a parking lot or something? Did your friend come out of work to find the car gone, or was it in the same place he left it but stripped down? How long was it missing? What I don't understand is why it was towed without first notifying your friend so that he would have the option of moving it himself and saving the cost of impoundment.
Reply
Joined Aug 2004
Slickdeals Admin
> bubble2 2,390 Posts
1,607 Reputation
Admin
bryantq | Staff
09-03-2010 at 06:59 PM.
09-03-2010 at 06:59 PM.
VQ, I dont know how it works in NJ, but i can tell you that here in Arizona, when the police call for a tow and impound, it is all third party services. They have nothing to do with that actual police agency other than the fact that they got called by them.

We'll call and someone like "Shamrock Towing" will come pick up your car, and take it to their impound lot. Shamrock doesnt give a damn about what happened to the car, other than they had to transport it and store it and they expect to be paid.

The police probably saw this abandoned/stripped car on the road and called to have it towed since it is obviously not appropriate for it to be left there like that.

Your aggression and emotion towards blaming the local police seems misguided.

Ultimately the owner of the vehicle is responsible for it. If he saw his car was stripped and decided to leave it there, rather than have it towed to his house, he bears the responsibility when the police come by and have it towed for him. Its unfortunate, but true. People are also not allowed to break laws just because something unfavorable happened to them.
Reply
Joined Jul 2005
Scarydevil Monastery
> bubble2 26,675 Posts
2,340 Reputation
Original Poster
veritablequandary
09-03-2010 at 07:01 PM.
09-03-2010 at 07:01 PM.
Quote from .teri. :
How did the robbery happen? Was the car parked at work, or in a parking lot or something? Did your friend come out of work to find the car gone, or was it in the same place he left it but stripped down? How long was it missing? What I don't understand is why it was towed without first notifying your friend so that he would have the option of moving it himself and saving the cost of impoundment.
He parked it on the street outside his house on Saturday. He didn't move it Sunday. On Monday when he went out to go to work it was gone. The police found it Tuesday or Wednesday (can't remember which) stripped someplace across town. He found out about it Thursday by which time it had been at the impound lot several days accruing fees. I'm pretty sure (but not 100%) that he called to follow up on the police report he filed & that's when they told him they found it and he needed to come pick it up. They did not contact him to give him the option to move it before impounding the car.
Reply
Joined Dec 2004
L10: Grand Master
> bubble2 70,256 Posts
5,366 Reputation
Schooby
09-03-2010 at 07:02 PM.
09-03-2010 at 07:02 PM.
Quote from bryantq :
VQ, I dont know how it works in NJ, but i can tell you that here in Arizona, when the police call for a tow and impound, it is all third party services. They have nothing to do with that actual police agency other than the fact that they got called by them.

We'll call and someone like "Shamrock Towing" will come pick up your car, and take it to their impound lot. Shamrock doesnt give a damn about what happened to the car, other than they had to transport it and store it and they expect to be paid.

The police probably saw this abandoned/stripped car on the road and called to have it towed since it is obviously not appropriate for it to be left there like that.

Your aggression and emotion towards blaming the local police seems misguided.

Ultimately the owner of the vehicle is responsible for it. If he saw his car was stripped and decided to leave it there, rather than have it towed to his house, he bears the responsibility when the police come by and have it towed for him. Its unfortunate, but true. People are also not allowed to break laws just because something unfavorable happened to them.
EEK! That's racist! Are you implying that only Irish people are tow-truck people?



laugh out loud


oops Hide


Darned taser wielders.
Reply
Joined Aug 2004
Slickdeals Admin
> bubble2 2,390 Posts
1,607 Reputation
Admin
bryantq | Staff
09-03-2010 at 07:04 PM.
09-03-2010 at 07:04 PM.
And in regard to the police force being inadequate - that is entirely true when we live in a day and age when our local governments cannot effectively budget for their constituents' needs. Police agencies are seeing their forces cut all the time, old cars, no overtime, furlough hours, and the like...

Police try to protect and serve, but they cannot be everywhere all the time. And to expect to live in a crime free society is like expecting everyone to be honest all the time. A pipedream at best.

Quote from Schooby :
EEK! That's racist! Are you implying that only Irish people are tow-truck people?



laugh out loud


oops Hide


Darned taser wielders.
lol i picked them because they are a real tow company that my agency uses down here in arizona Stick Out Tongue
Reply
Last edited by bryantq | Staff September 3, 2010 at 07:04 PM.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined Jul 2005
Scarydevil Monastery
> bubble2 26,675 Posts
2,340 Reputation
Original Poster
veritablequandary
09-03-2010 at 07:05 PM.
09-03-2010 at 07:05 PM.
Quote from bryantq :
VQ, I dont know how it works in NJ, but i can tell you that here in Arizona, when the police call for a tow and impound, it is all third party services. They have nothing to do with that actual police agency other than the fact that they got called by them.

We'll call and someone like "Shamrock Towing" will come pick up your car, and take it to their impound lot. Shamrock doesnt give a damn about what happened to the car, other than they had to transport it and store it and they expect to be paid.

The police probably saw this abandoned/stripped car on the road and called to have it towed since it is obviously not appropriate for it to be left there like that.

Your aggression and emotion towards blaming the local police seems misguided.

Ultimately the owner of the vehicle is responsible for it. If he saw his car was stripped and decided to leave it there, rather than have it towed to his house, he bears the responsibility when the police come by and have it towed for him. Its unfortunate, but true. People are also not allowed to break laws just because something unfavorable happened to them.
Nope, it was a city impound lot. My buddy didn't "decide" to leave anything anywhere--he found out the car was at the city impound lot and he needed to come pay them for the privilege of having it towed (also at his expense) someplace else. He didn't break any laws on purpose and trying to cast him as such is a bit insulting, to be honest.

Oh, and apparently its a growing trend. [nytimes.com] Hope everybody's got a "rainy day/paying the city when I get robbed" fund stashed someplace!
Reply
Joined Jan 2004
Here's to the future
> bubble2 25,141 Posts
707 Reputation
Iaaaiws
09-03-2010 at 07:05 PM.
09-03-2010 at 07:05 PM.
Quote from veritableqndry :
I'm not asking the city to cut him a check--I'm asking them not to farking threaten to take away his driver's license (they said they'd put points against his driving record) if he doesn't pony up and pay for the goddamn towing and impound fees! How about they called him once they found the car and asked if he wanted it towed someplace else? How about they didn't close the doors to the lot in his face and tack on another day's storage fee? How about they waive the fees and let somebody who parked illegally in a handicapped spot cover the extra (you can't tell me it costs $50 a day or whatever to store a car) and if your car gets stolen you get a pass?
Sure, all of that crap is unnecessary and much is out of line. But that is a people relations issue and not anything to do with auto theft and who is responsible for what. I already said earlier that I think they should waive the impound fees and such that aren't actually costing the city anything. The towing simply is the responsibility of the car owner. If I owned the towing company I would expect to be paid for my services. The tow truck driver shouldn't have to tell his family he can't buy groceries this week because he had to work for free for the victim of a theft.

Quote :
isn't it reasonable to expect to live in a mostly crime-free society?
Don't you? How many times has your car been stolen? How many times per week/month are you a victim of a crime?
Reply
Joined Dec 2004
L10: Grand Master
> bubble2 70,256 Posts
5,366 Reputation
Schooby
09-03-2010 at 07:08 PM.
09-03-2010 at 07:08 PM.
Quote from bryantq :
And in regard to the police force being inadequate - that is entirely true when we live in a day and age when our local governments cannot effectively budget for their constituents' needs. Police agencies are seeing their forces cut all the time, old cars, no overtime, furlough hours, and the like...

Police try to protect and serve, but they cannot be everywhere all the time. And to expect to live in a crime free society is like expecting everyone to be honest all the time. A pipedream at best.


lol i picked them because they are a real tow company that my agency uses down here in arizona Stick Out Tongue
They have Irish people in AZ? Who'da thunk it?

Sorry...just trying to lighten the mood here... Grin Peace
Reply
Joined Feb 2004
L10: Grand Master
> bubble2 7,467 Posts
abeo
09-03-2010 at 07:09 PM.
09-03-2010 at 07:09 PM.
I know a guy that had his car stolen. He didn't have any insurance on it and couldn't afford to buy another car, so instead of reporting the car stolen he reported a lost license plate and got a replacement license plate. He then stole another car that was the same year/make/model/color of his stolen car, attached his replacement plate and drove that car for several years.
Reply
Joined Aug 2010
Permanently Banned
> bubble2 3,549 Posts
129 Reputation
coulditbeSatan
09-03-2010 at 07:09 PM.
09-03-2010 at 07:09 PM.
Quote from bryantq :
VQ, I dont know how it works in NJ, but i can tell you that here in Arizona, when the police call for a tow and impound, it is all third party services. They have nothing to do with that actual police agency other than the fact that they got called by them.

We'll call and someone like "Shamrock Towing" will come pick up your car, and take it to their impound lot. Shamrock doesnt give a damn about what happened to the car, other than they had to transport it and store it and they expect to be paid.

The police probably saw this abandoned/stripped car on the road and called to have it towed since it is obviously not appropriate for it to be left there like that.

Your aggression and emotion towards blaming the local police seems misguided.

Ultimately the owner of the vehicle is responsible for it. If he saw his car was stripped and decided to leave it there, rather than have it towed to his house, he bears the responsibility when the police come by and have it towed for him. Its unfortunate, but true. People are also not allowed to break laws just because something unfavorable happened to them.
Stop making sense!!! Bash
Reply
Joined Jul 2005
Scarydevil Monastery
> bubble2 26,675 Posts
2,340 Reputation
Original Poster
veritablequandary
09-03-2010 at 07:09 PM.
09-03-2010 at 07:09 PM.
Quote from bryantq :
And in regard to the police force being inadequate - that is entirely true when we live in a day and age when our local governments cannot effectively budget for their constituents' needs. Police agencies are seeing their forces cut all the time, old cars, no overtime, furlough hours, and the like...

Police try to protect and serve, but they cannot be everywhere all the time. And to expect to live in a crime free society is like expecting everyone to be honest all the time. A pipedream at best.
So we all roll over and accept it meekly? Really? Just make the "okay" face and lay back and think of England? And anybody who gets mad or speaks out is misguided?

I don't think it's a pipe dream to expect to live in a crime-free society. And I certainly won't accept that as an answer when I ask why something happened. Would you? Can you honestly tell me you could get mugged and then shrug and say, "well, that's the price we pay for living in society! Time to go make more money!" I'm pretty sure I remember reading that you foiled a home invasion or two--par for the course? Just how things are? Price of doing business? Honestly?
Reply
Joined Jul 2005
Scarydevil Monastery
> bubble2 26,675 Posts
2,340 Reputation
Original Poster
veritablequandary
09-03-2010 at 07:12 PM.
09-03-2010 at 07:12 PM.
Quote from Iaaaiws :
Sure, all of that crap is unnecessary and much is out of line. But that is a people relations issue and not anything to do with auto theft and who is responsible for what. I already said earlier that I think they should waive the impound fees and such that aren't actually costing the city anything. The towing simply is the responsibility of the car owner. If I owned the towing company I would expect to be paid for my services. The tow truck driver shouldn't have to tell his family he can't buy groceries this week because he had to work for free for the victim of a theft.



Don't you? How many times has your car been stolen? How many times per week/month are you a victim of a crime?
I could accept paying only for the towing as a compromise. I think I already said that, too. Nobody's asking people not to make a living.

And no, I (knock on wood) have not ever been the victim of a crime. I don't live in NJ either. I'm not sure what that has to do with this argument though.
Reply

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined Aug 2004
Slickdeals Admin
> bubble2 2,390 Posts
1,607 Reputation
Admin
bryantq | Staff
09-03-2010 at 07:12 PM.
09-03-2010 at 07:12 PM.
Even if it was a city impound lot, they likely are not a joint agency with the police dept.

Usually the only time a vehicle makes it to a police impound lot is if it is there for evidence.

You have to look at it objectively:

Car gets stripped. Sucks, no insurance. Owner's responsibility, criminal's fault.

Abandoned, stripped car left on street, police come by, have it towed. Sucks but is proper procedure. By the way, how long was this thing left on the street without being checked to have it stripped and towed without the owners knowledge until after it was impounded? Owner's responsibility, police officer's duty.

Now regarding the wife showing up at noon and not being able to get the car out, that is shitty, and they shouldnt have to pay for the extra day when they made the effort to come out.
Reply
Page 5 of 11
Start the Conversation
 
Link Copied

The link has been copied to the clipboard.