Joined Jul 2007
L7: Teacher
Forum Thread
Coupon Barcode Basics
August 6, 2008 at
08:42 AM
in
Coupon
(2)
Thread Details
Last Edited by slayers750 March 10, 2010 at 08:01 PMTHIS POST IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. PLEASE DO NOT POST COMMENTS RELATING TO WAYS TO CIRCUMVENT THE NARRATIVE / TEXT ON THE COUPONS!!!
A WARNING FOR COUPON FRAUD WILL BE ISSUED TO ANY USER WHO USES THIS INFORMATION IN ANY THREAD TO CIRCUMVENT THE NARRATIVE / TEXT ON THE COUPONS!!!
SHOULD WE GET TOO MANY PEOPLE WHO IGNORE THE STATEMENT ABOVE, THE THREAD WILL BE DELETED FOR GOOD.
SHOULD WE GET TOO MANY PEOPLE WHO IGNORE THE STATEMENT ABOVE, THE THREAD WILL BE DELETED FOR GOOD.
In the past two weeks there have been two instances where valid coupons are beeping and it's resulted in a TON of thread posts with complaints, questions, and stories from frustrated couponers. Just a little bit of knowledge about barcodes can equip you with a lot of ammunition when dealing with cashiers and managers (since most of them are clueless and you'd be teaching them).
I'll explain the coupon barcodes, then show you exactly why the Lifesavers and Pert coupons are beeping.
Coupons will beep if ANY PORTION of the barcode does not match the products in your cart.
A typical coupon barcode looks like this:
1-22222-333-44-5
1 - This portion of the code will be either a 5 or a 9. It deals with doubling. If your store doesn't double coupons, then this number has no purpose. If your store DOES double coupons, then any coupon coded with a 5 will double (up to your store's doubling limit) and any coupon coded with a 9 will not double.
22222 - This number is the manufacturer's code. This code is the reason why the Lifesavers and Pert were beeping, but I'll explain those situations below.
333 - This number is the family code. Most manufacturers break their products into families. If you see a three digit number with no zeros, the coupon is coded for a specific product. If there is one zero at the end, the coupon is coded for more than one *variety* product. If there are two zeros at the end, the coupon is coded for more than one *type or brand* of product. Here's an example of how it works:
25700 100 - any Ziploc or Saran Wrap item
25700 160 - any Ziploc item
25700 170 - any Saran Wrap item
25700 164 - Ziploc containers
25700 175 - Saran Wrap disposable Cutting Sheets
If the family code is 000, then the coupon will not beep with any product which falls under the preceeding 5-digit manufacturer's code.
Some products are not broken into any families and are coded as 992. A 992 coupon will do one of two things, depending on how your store has it's registers programmed. Either it will NEVER beep, even if you didn't buy the product, or it will ALWAYS beep and require cashier intervention. These coupons were severely abused by couponers who wanted to use coupons even though they didn't buy the product, so most major retailers have now programmed their registers to beep at every 992.
44 - This is the value code. It tells the register how much to take off. Regardless of what the wording on the coupon says, this code tells the register what you need to purchase and how much to take off. Yes, in many cases there are some VERY EXTREME differences between the wording on the coupon and what the barcode actually requires you to purchase (since there are only a limited number of value codes available). Here are the codes and, again, PLEASE NO DISCUSSIONS ON HOW TO CIRCUMVENT THE SYSTEM. The wording on the coupon is the manufacturer's intended use for it.
00 "Beep" - Manual Input Required
01 Free Item - Will normally beep so cashier can input value
02 B4G1
03 $1.10
04 $1.35
05 $1.40
06 $1.60
07 B3 $1.50
08 B2 $3.00
09 B3 $2.00
10 $0.10
11 $1.85
12 $0.12
13 B4 $1.00
14 B1G1
15 $0.15
16 B2G1
18 $2.60
19 B3G1
20 $0.20
21 B2 $0.35
22 B2 $0.40
23 B2 $0.45
24 B2 $0.50
25 $0.25
26 $2.85
28 B2 $0.55
29 $0.29
30 $0.30
31 B2 $0.60
32 B2 $0.75
33 B2 $1.00
34 B2 $1.25
35 $0.35
36 B2 $1.50
37 B3 $0.25
38 B3 $0.30
39 $0.39
40 $0.40
41 B3 $0.50
42 B3 $1.00
43 B2 $1.10
44 B2 $1.35
45 $0.45
46 B2 $1.60
47 B2 $1.75
48 B2 $1.85
49 $0.49
50 $0.50
51 B2 $2.00
52 B3 $0.55
53 B2 $0.10
54 B2 $0.15
55 $0.55
56 B2 $0.20
57 B2 $0.25
58 B2 $0.30
59 $0.59
60 $0.60
61 $10.00
62 $9.50
63 $9.00
64 $8.50
65 $0.65
66 $8.00
67 $7.50
68 $7.00
69 $0.69
70 $0.70
71 $6.50
72 $6.00
73 $5.50
74 $5.00
75 $0.75
76 $1.00
77 $1.25
78 $1.50
79 $0.79
80 $0.80
81 $1.75
82 $2.00
83 $2.25
84 $2.50
85 $0.85
86 $2.75
87 $3.00
88 $3.25
89 $0.89
90 $0.90
91 $3.50
92 $3.75
93 $4.00
95 $0.95
96 $4.50
98 B2 $0.65
99 $0.99
5 Check digit...no real relevance to couponers.
Add a Comment
Sorry, this thread is closed.
Community Wiki
Last Edited by slayers750
March 10, 2010
at
07:56 PM
THIS POST IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. PLEASE DO NOT POST COMMENTS RELATING TO WAYS TO CIRCUMVENT THE NARRATIVE / TEXT ON THE COUPONS!!!
A WARNING FOR COUPON FRAUD WILL BE ISSUED TO ANY USER WHO USES THIS INFORMATION IN ANY THREAD TO CIRCUMVENT THE NARRATIVE / TEXT ON THE COUPONS!!!
SHOULD WE GET TOO MANY PEOPLE WHO IGNORE THE STATEMENT ABOVE, THE THREAD WILL BE DELETED FOR GOOD.
A WARNING FOR COUPON FRAUD WILL BE ISSUED TO ANY USER WHO USES THIS INFORMATION IN ANY THREAD TO CIRCUMVENT THE NARRATIVE / TEXT ON THE COUPONS!!!
SHOULD WE GET TOO MANY PEOPLE WHO IGNORE THE STATEMENT ABOVE, THE THREAD WILL BE DELETED FOR GOOD.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Some stores accept expired coupons. Check this thread to see if any stores near you have a policy to accept expired coupons:
https://slickdeals.net/forums/showthread.php?
530 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
This is all really OT anyway. It's not an issue relating to how to read a barcode. If the coding on that particular coupon is correct, then it's a Wal Mart programming issue.
I do agree with you, more then likely a WM programming issue. After all, it is at WM that nearly every coupon I hand over asks, valid coupon amount? Its as if the register isn't capable of knowing if it is or not. But you never know with WM, wasn't it them who deducted $$ from there own employees paychecks for something those employees did? Perhaps this is another attempt of WM's to bring "lower prices everyday" to there customers, because if an employee takes a bad coupon, and WM doesnt get paid for it, they deduct it from the employees check, and thats why the register wont just deduct the coupon value, but rather forces the employee to double check.
OT a little, but only to explain what could be the reason for why this coupon (among others) beep for cashier assitance (valid coupon amount?).
And this is just speculation, but if his site was constructed post-2003, it's more than likely that the ideas on his site were *borrowed* from dealideal. To my knowledge, DI was the first site of its kind.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
And this is just speculation, but if his site was constructed post-2003, it's more than likely that the ideas on his site were *borrowed* from dealideal. To my knowledge, DI was the first site of its kind.
But regardless, this is all
However, it would be amazingly coincidental if he *wasn't* referring to me. I searched SD and can find no other thread that's referenced his site this week. I'm fairly certain he was referring to the information I posted in this thread and I take it personally that he's claiming I stole from his site.
However, it would be amazingly coincidental if he *wasn't* referring to me. I searched SD and can find no other thread that's referenced his site this week. I'm fairly certain he was referring to the information I posted in this thread and I take it personally that he's claiming I stole from his site.
I never said it was your thread or you that made me take the site off line. Why do you automatically assume that it was something posted this week?
I'm pretty certain what I said was more along the lines of a recent discovery. Oh, and guess what, the thread I'm referring to doesn't even mention my site. however, it does have data on it which was collected from my site and while I may not have hard evidence to that fact, circumstantial evidence definitely points in that direction. I spent many hours developing the site into a very user friendly interface which offered the most accurate results currently available and I will not have those efforts undermined.
I really can't believe I'm being slammed as much as I am for taking a site down, a site which was offered to the public with no expectation of anything in return. Be thankful you had it while it was there and allow me my peace to continue fighting the battle I must fight alone, without assistance of any attorneys, against Coupons, Inc. (again, for something I did for this community and have received nothing in return).
Edited to correct:
I've re-read what I posted on the website and I obviously said "recent posts" instead of "recently discovered posts." If my mistake in language led you to believe I singled out this thread, I apologize.
I never said it was your thread or you that made me take the site off line. Why do you automatically assume that it was something posted this week?
I'm pretty certain what I said was more along the lines of a recent discovery. Oh, and guess what, the thread I'm referring to doesn't even mention my site. however, it does have data on it which was collected from my site and while I may not have hard evidence to that fact, circumstantial evidence definitely points in that direction. I spent many hours developing the site into a very user friendly interface which offered the most accurate results currently available and I will not have those efforts undermined.
I really can't believe I'm being slammed as much as I am for taking a site down, a site which was offered to the public with no expectation of anything in return. Be thankful you had it while it was there and allow me my peace to continue fighting the battle I must fight alone, without assistance of any attorneys, against Coupons, Inc. (again, for something I did for this community and have received nothing in return).
First, my understanding is that this is a civil matter and as such an attorney will not be provided to John as you assert.
Also John remains innocent unless Coupons, Inc. can prove in a court of law that he violated their rights. This is the same rights that you, I, or anyone else in this country are guaranteed. Until this is settled in a court of law it serves no one to assume that he hacked their software and violated their rights.
Finally, unless you have a direct intimate knowledge of John's motives I would suggest that you not speculate about them. This only stirs up hard feeling and detracts from the CVS community.
Hopefully we can move forward in a positive and supportive manner.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.