Be patient if you ordered from them. I had a horrible experience. It took a whole month to get delivered and on top of that they gave the carrier the wrong information which I didn't find out until I called the carrier. The only reply you will get from them is "I;ll get on it ASAP". Again you will get your TV, it will just take A LONG time with no communication.
Is this worth the price difference vs the sony x900f deal?
Yes it does. I have a x900f 85" but I love this tv and it's the closest thing to an OLED. Its 82" is way out of my price range (I paid $1800 for my x900f and was refurb)
I have 65" version of this TV.
Incredible TV. I didn't want to deal with OLED burn in issues. This is as good as OLED without OLED worries. It also gets much brighter than OLED TVs.
I have 65" version of this TV.
Incredible TV. I didn't want to deal with OLED burn in issues. This is as good as OLED without OLED worries. It also gets much brighter than OLED TVs.
Interestingly enough my 10 year old Samsung LCD has started to develop a burn in, the title of a TV show we are watching on Netflix. I didnt think LCD could burn in like that....
Stop it. Not even close to an OLED. I have a 55 of this and a B8 oled. Totally different class. 6 hours a day on b8 no burn in after 3 years.
Quote
from Rtings
:
The Samsung Q90/Q90R and the LG C9 use different panel types, each with their advantages and disadvantages. The C9 looks much better in a dark room, as the OLED panel delivers a nearly infinite contrast ratio and near-perfect black uniformity. The Q90R is significantly brighter, and the brightness doesn't change as much with different content (ABL). The C9 has better gray uniformity and better viewing angles. The C9 has a risk of permanent burn-in when exposed to static content, but the Q90 doesn't. – https://www.rtings.com/tv/tools/c...c9/779/802
I don't know, but reading through the side-by-side and features/comparison, I'd say that's more than "not even close".
29 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
The picture is actual size. Looks like maybe 3/4 of an inch.
75 inches
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Yes it does. I have a x900f 85" but I love this tv and it's the closest thing to an OLED. Its 82" is way out of my price range (I paid $1800 for my x900f and was refurb)
Incredible TV. I didn't want to deal with OLED burn in issues. This is as good as OLED without OLED worries. It also gets much brighter than OLED TVs.
Incredible TV. I didn't want to deal with OLED burn in issues. This is as good as OLED without OLED worries. It also gets much brighter than OLED TVs.
Interestingly enough my 10 year old Samsung LCD has started to develop a burn in, the title of a TV show we are watching on Netflix. I didnt think LCD could burn in like that....
I had B7 for before my x900f. I saw Q90 next to OLED at Costco and To me it's just slightly worse than OLED which noticeable side by side only.