Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands or deals, including promoted items.
Forum Thread

Costco members - Samsung 65" Class - Q850T Series - 8K UHD QLED LCD TV - $100 Allstate Protection Plan Bundle Included $1999

$1,999.00
+7 Deal Score
16,689 Views
price valid till 4/18. TV and All-State insurance 3 yr included. total 5 yrs insured.

https://www.costco.com/samsung-65...01280.html
Add Comment
Created 04-03-2021 at 09:13 AM by SDUser1121
If you purchase something through a post on our site, Slickdeals may get a small share of the sale.
Deal
Score
+7
16,689 Views

Your comment cannot be blank.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined Apr 2021
L1: Learner
> bubble2 6 Posts
14 Reputation
SeriousSeagull789
04-03-2021 at 09:17 AM.
04-03-2021 at 09:17 AM.
Same price best buy
Buy dig and amazon
2
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Mar 2019
L3: Novice
> bubble2 215 Posts
34 Reputation
KevinC19
04-03-2021 at 10:41 AM.
04-03-2021 at 10:41 AM.
Only a deal if you specifically have 8k content, which is rare. 8k tv is substantially worse than 4k tv in picture quality.
3
8
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Nov 2005
L12: Badger
> bubble2 1,407 Posts
309 Reputation
miotch
04-03-2021 at 11:02 AM.
04-03-2021 at 11:02 AM.
Quote from KevinC19 :
Only a deal if you specifically have 8k content, which is rare. 8k tv is substantially worse than 4k tv in picture quality.
Why? It's double the number of pixels of 4K (4x the number of pixels of 1080p) so it should scale perfectly fine unless there's some sort of image processing issue with this particular TV that I'm not aware of.

It's not like trying to watch 480 or 720 content on your 1080 or 4k set.
4
1
2
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply

This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users

Show Comment
Joined Nov 2010
L5: Journeyman
> bubble2 637 Posts
280 Reputation
Dang_lang23
04-03-2021 at 11:18 AM.
04-03-2021 at 11:18 AM.
Quote from miotch :
Why? It's double the number of pixels of 4K (4x the number of pixels of 1080p) so it should scale perfectly fine unless there's some sort of image processing issue with this particular TV that I'm not aware of.

It's not like trying to watch 480 or 720 content on your 1080 or 4k set.

Screens always perform best when content is matched to the native resolution. Using 4 pixels for 1 in no way improves the picture quality
2
1
3
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Sep 2013
L7: Teacher
> bubble2 2,290 Posts
318 Reputation
SteveA7911
04-03-2021 at 11:37 AM.
04-03-2021 at 11:37 AM.
Quote from miotch :
Why? It's double the number of pixels of 4K (4x the number of pixels of 1080p) so it should scale perfectly fine unless there's some sort of image processing issue with this particular TV that I'm not aware of.

It's not like trying to watch 480 or 720 content on your 1080 or 4k set.
Could be the processor is not powerful enough. Like the Crystal for 4K.
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Jan 2012
L1: Learner
> bubble2 150 Posts
30 Reputation
ScoobyCat
04-03-2021 at 12:24 PM.
04-03-2021 at 12:24 PM.
I'd wait a few months to see how TCL's 2021 8k lineup does and more important is the probable driving down prices across the category. It's b.s. until it ships, but 85" 8k for under $1600 to start has to have some impact. TCL X12 8K.
3
1
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined Jul 2016
New User
> bubble2 2,297 Posts
613 Reputation
HermanMunchther
04-03-2021 at 02:25 PM.
04-03-2021 at 02:25 PM.
Why is there any 8k push when everyone is dragging their feet on providing 4k content?
9
2
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Feb 2021
L3: Novice
> bubble2 288 Posts
58 Reputation
FormerAstronut
04-03-2021 at 02:52 PM.
04-03-2021 at 02:52 PM.
Quote from KevinC19 :
Only a deal if you specifically have 8k content, which is rare. 8k tv is substantially worse than 4k tv in picture quality.
While I won't disagree with the 8k comments. The deal is that it's cheaper than it used to be, how you use it is kind of irrelevant
4
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Mar 2019
L3: Novice
> bubble2 215 Posts
34 Reputation
KevinC19
04-03-2021 at 03:15 PM.
04-03-2021 at 03:15 PM.
Quote from FormerAstronut :
While I won't disagree with the 8k comments. The deal is that it's cheaper than it used to be, how you use it is kind of irrelevant

Im just letting people know that this is a poor tv to spend your money on unless u specifically want to watch 8k content, because almost everything supports only up to 4k, and when it comes to tvs in similar series or price ranges, 4k tvs can display 4k with better picture quality than 8k tvs can.
1
1
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Dec 2014
L10: Grand Master
> bubble2 7,798 Posts
996 Reputation
LEOMHK1.0
04-03-2021 at 04:39 PM.
04-03-2021 at 04:39 PM.
Quote from HermanMunchther :
Why is there any 8k push when everyone is dragging their feet on providing 4k content?
They just want for people to believe that they have old tech and they need to purchase a TV.

Currently, 8K is a complete waste of money. Even if people were able to get sufficient 8K content, it would only make a difference with TVs 85" or bigger.
4
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined May 2006
L10: Grand Master
> bubble2 25,468 Posts
3,321 Reputation
namlook
04-03-2021 at 04:47 PM.
04-03-2021 at 04:47 PM.
Quote from LEOMHK :
They just want for people to believe that they have old tech and they need to purchase a TV.

Currently, 8K is a complete waste of money. Even if people were able to get sufficient 8K content, it would only make a difference with TVs 85" or bigger.
You need 85" or bigger to see a difference between 4k and 8k content? Is that something that has been scientifically measured? It doesn't make any sense that they are making 8K TVs if that's the case.
1
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Dec 2014
L10: Grand Master
> bubble2 7,798 Posts
996 Reputation
LEOMHK1.0
04-03-2021 at 04:52 PM.

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank LEOMHK1.0

04-03-2021 at 04:52 PM.
Quote from namlook :
You need 85" or bigger to see a difference between 4k and 8k content? Is that something that has been scientifically measured? It doesn't make any sense that they are making 8K TVs if that's the case.
Yes, you would need a XL TV AND you have to sit very, very close to it to see a difference.
If you had a 75 inch TV. You would have to sit 2 1/2 feet from it.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/kevi...45afb23036

https://www.techhive.com/article/...el%20count.


http://www.702.co.za/articles/318...ents-bizun


https://www.pcmag.com/news/what-i...tv-or-wait


PeacePeace
4
>
2
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Last edited by LEOMHK April 3, 2021 at 05:00 PM.
Joined May 2006
L10: Grand Master
> bubble2 25,468 Posts
3,321 Reputation
namlook
04-03-2021 at 05:02 PM.
04-03-2021 at 05:02 PM.
Thanks for that info. It seems that people with good vision that sit close can see a small difference in 8K vs 4k. I guess if your vision isn't great or you aren't sitting close you probably can't tell a difference.

"This study supports the notion that 8K is only marginally better than 4K in terms of perceived detail—and only with good visual acuity at a relatively close distance from the screen."
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Page 1 of 3
Start the Conversation
 

More TV Deals & Discounts

Link Copied

The link has been copied to the clipboard.