expired
Nikon Mirrorless Camera's: Z7 Body $2297, Z6 Body $1397, Z5 Body
$997
$1,397
28% off
& More + Free S/Hat Adorama
Missed This Deal? Get alerts when similar deals are posted.
& More + Free S/Hat AdoramaDeal Details
Update: This deal is still available.
Adorama has select Nikon Mirrorless Camera Bodies and Bundles on sale for the prices listed below. Shipping is free.
Thanks to Deal Editor iconian for finding this deal.
Available:
Adorama has select Nikon Mirrorless Camera Bodies and Bundles on sale for the prices listed below. Shipping is free.
Thanks to Deal Editor iconian for finding this deal.
Available:
- Nikon Z5 Mirrorless Camera Body Bundle with 32GB SD Card, Bag, PC Software & Acc $996.95 (orig $1396.95)
- Nikon Z5 Mirrorless Camera with 24-50mm Lens Kit w/32GB Card, PC Software & Acc. $1296.95 (orig $1696.95)
- Nikon Z5 Full Frame Mirrorless Camera with NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR Lens $1696.95 (orig $2196.95)
- Per the site: "Coming Soon: This Item is on the way to our warehouse and is expected in a few days."
- Nikon Z6 FX-Format Mirrorless Camera Body $1396.95 (orig $1996.95)
- Nikon Z6 FX-Format Mirrorless Camera with NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/4 S Lens $1996.95 (orig $2596.95)
- Nikon Z7 FX-Format Mirrorless Camera Body With Free MAC Accessory Bundle $2296.95 (orig $2796.95)
- Temporarily on backroder
- Nikon Z7 FX-Format Mirorless Camera with 24-70mm f/4 S Lens W/Free Accessory Kit $2896.95 (orig $3396.95)
- Note: You may also add Nikon Mount Adapter FTZ to any of the above purchases for $96.95 (discount will show in cart)
Editor's Notes
Written by SubZero5 | Staff- About this deal:
- Our research indicates that the offer for the Nikon Z5 Mirrorless Camera Body Bundle is $400 lower (29% savings) than the list price from a reputable merchant with prices starting from $1396.95.
- About these products:
- Nikon 1 Year Limited Warranty.
- Please refer to the forum thread for additional deal ideas & discussion.
- About this store:
- Adorama is an authorised Nikon dealer.
- Details of Adorama's return policy can be found here.
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Update: This deal is still available.
Adorama has select Nikon Mirrorless Camera Bodies and Bundles on sale for the prices listed below. Shipping is free.
Thanks to Deal Editor iconian for finding this deal.
Available:
Adorama has select Nikon Mirrorless Camera Bodies and Bundles on sale for the prices listed below. Shipping is free.
Thanks to Deal Editor iconian for finding this deal.
Available:
- Nikon Z5 Mirrorless Camera Body Bundle with 32GB SD Card, Bag, PC Software & Acc $996.95 (orig $1396.95)
- Nikon Z5 Mirrorless Camera with 24-50mm Lens Kit w/32GB Card, PC Software & Acc. $1296.95 (orig $1696.95)
- Nikon Z5 Full Frame Mirrorless Camera with NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR Lens $1696.95 (orig $2196.95)
- Per the site: "Coming Soon: This Item is on the way to our warehouse and is expected in a few days."
- Nikon Z6 FX-Format Mirrorless Camera Body $1396.95 (orig $1996.95)
- Nikon Z6 FX-Format Mirrorless Camera with NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/4 S Lens $1996.95 (orig $2596.95)
- Nikon Z7 FX-Format Mirrorless Camera Body With Free MAC Accessory Bundle $2296.95 (orig $2796.95)
- Temporarily on backroder
- Nikon Z7 FX-Format Mirorless Camera with 24-70mm f/4 S Lens W/Free Accessory Kit $2896.95 (orig $3396.95)
- Note: You may also add Nikon Mount Adapter FTZ to any of the above purchases for $96.95 (discount will show in cart)
Editor's Notes
Written by SubZero5 | Staff- About this deal:
- Our research indicates that the offer for the Nikon Z5 Mirrorless Camera Body Bundle is $400 lower (29% savings) than the list price from a reputable merchant with prices starting from $1396.95.
- About these products:
- Nikon 1 Year Limited Warranty.
- Please refer to the forum thread for additional deal ideas & discussion.
- About this store:
- Adorama is an authorised Nikon dealer.
- Details of Adorama's return policy can be found here.
Community Voting
Deal
Score
+52
Good Deal
Bad Deal
Top Comments
If you're comparing higher end lenses, the Nikon and Sony are about the same, but the Z mount lenses are very expensive, while Sony has many more third party choices. You could adapt older Nikon lenses but that usually results in heavier gear and older optics.
In terms of usage, Sony sucks to use. It is absolutely, and by a huge margin, the worst of the cameras in terms of that. Does that impact quality or usability? No, but don't expect it to feel as comfortable or snappy as others. I'd be aware of that and probably try it out (and program the keys) to see if you're ok with it.
If you're going for higher end lenses, like the Z mount 24-70 f/2.8 or Sony equivalent, the GM, then pricing doesn't really matter, nor does the weight. But if you wanted a cheaper, lighter setup, Sony has the Sigma 28-70, 24-70, and Tamron 28-75, which neither Canon nor Nikon has.
Canon is ridiculously overpriced right now for the R5 but the RF series lenses are pretty incredible and without peer (at the high end); ex: the 24-70 f/2. So you can make your mind up on that.
In terms of image quality, Nikon actually beats the Sony a bit and trades blows in other areas. They have ISO 65 which is great for landscape photography. Sony has resolution though, if you crop a lot like I do. Sony's Eye AF is by far the best, but Nikon and Canon are more than usable.
If you're looking for an all rounder, the Sony is honestly the best of the choices, especially since you said you wanted to be able to do sports in a pinch. None of the others can match up to Sony's AF. In terms of video quality, its the worst but it's still not bad.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
139 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank
Go to mirrorless.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank
My qualm with switching over to mirrorless was really with the lack of the pentaprism (WYSIWYG), but after living with the EVF for a week, found it was a better experience, especially in low light.
Z 5 w/NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR https://smile.amazon.co
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
And I am using Canon lens now. But Canon has lost my favor over the years due to their lack of innovation. I have been looking to jump ship for a while now.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank
And I am using Canon now. But Canon has lost my favor over the years due to their lack of innovation. I have been looking to jump ship for a while now.
If you're comparing higher end lenses, the Nikon and Sony are about the same, but the Z mount lenses are very expensive, while Sony has many more third party choices. You could adapt older Nikon lenses but that usually results in heavier gear and older optics.
In terms of usage, Sony sucks to use. It is absolutely, and by a huge margin, the worst of the cameras in terms of that. Does that impact quality or usability? No, but don't expect it to feel as comfortable or snappy as others. I'd be aware of that and probably try it out (and program the keys) to see if you're ok with it.
If you're going for higher end lenses, like the Z mount 24-70 f/2.8 or Sony equivalent, the GM, then pricing doesn't really matter, nor does the weight. But if you wanted a cheaper, lighter setup, Sony has the Sigma 28-70, 24-70, and Tamron 28-75, which neither Canon nor Nikon has.
Canon is ridiculously overpriced right now for the R5 but the RF series lenses are pretty incredible and without peer (at the high end); ex: the 24-70 f/2. So you can make your mind up on that.
In terms of image quality, Nikon actually beats the Sony a bit and trades blows in other areas. They have ISO 65 which is great for landscape photography. Sony has resolution though, if you crop a lot like I do. Sony's Eye AF is by far the best, but Nikon and Canon are more than usable.
If you're looking for an all rounder, the Sony is honestly the best of the choices, especially since you said you wanted to be able to do sports in a pinch. None of the others can match up to Sony's AF. In terms of video quality, its the worst but it's still not bad.
(...)
None of the others can match up to Sony's AF. In terms of video quality, its the worst but it's still not bad.
For me, it came down to Nikon's handling (disclaimer: I've gotten used to the multitude of Nikons I've owned in the past); so recommendation still applies: if you're able to rent or otherwise get the bodies on loan - you can see which interface you prefer. I've got a lot of friends that love and shoot Sony (and I can't see why - so you see it's very subjective).
If you're comparing higher end lenses, the Nikon and Sony are about the same, but the Z mount lenses are very expensive, while Sony has many more third party choices. You could adapt older Nikon lenses but that usually results in heavier gear and older optics.
In terms of usage, Sony sucks to use. It is absolutely, and by a huge margin, the worst of the cameras in terms of that. Does that impact quality or usability? No, but don't expect it to feel as comfortable or snappy as others. I'd be aware of that and probably try it out (and program the keys) to see if you're ok with it.
If you're going for higher end lenses, like the Z mount 24-70 f/2.8 or Sony equivalent, the GM, then pricing doesn't really matter, nor does the weight. But if you wanted a cheaper, lighter setup, Sony has the Sigma 28-70, 24-70, and Tamron 28-75, which neither Canon nor Nikon has.
Canon is ridiculously overpriced right now for the R5 but the RF series lenses are pretty incredible and without peer (at the high end); ex: the 24-70 f/2. So you can make your mind up on that.
In terms of image quality, Nikon actually beats the Sony a bit and trades blows in other areas. They have ISO 65 which is great for landscape photography. Sony has resolution though, if you crop a lot like I do. Sony's Eye AF is by far the best, but Nikon and Canon are more than usable.
If you're looking for an all rounder, the Sony is honestly the best of the choices, especially since you said you wanted to be able to do sports in a pinch. None of the others can match up to Sony's AF. In terms of video quality, its the worst but it's still not bad.
I would like to use the following lenses:
35mm 1.4
Some type of telephoto like 24-200.
85mm 1.8/1.4
Macro. Sigma 105? Nikon? Still have a Tokina 100mm in my old bag I can probably use.
What is a little concerning is its lens development--Nikon is playing it safe, which is discouraging to its customers when you're that far behind E mount and RF mount. Nikon bragged about the size of its Z mount when it was first launched, which presumably opens up a ton of possible crazy lens ideas; but look at what they have launched after years: a bunch of f/1.8s, f/2.8s, and f/4s, all with F mount equivalents. The only innovation so far is the 50 f/1.2, which is bulkier, more expensive, and less sharp than Sony's new GM. Len launch has also been extremely slow--Sony kept launching new lenses not to mention Tamron and Sigma's E mount lenses, but Nikon hasn't even made any moves this year.
I personally own a handful of F lenses, and I don't care much about the Z lenses even with their better quality because I'm not a professional that zooms to 100% for each photo, and I don't shoot birds or videos so AF speed/noise hasn't been an issue whatsoever. What will make me spend money at this point, is a smaller lens (like Tamron 28-75 f/2.8) or a crazier design (Canon's new f/2 trinity). I'm waiting for Nikon's 24-105 that's supposed to come out this year. It's been speculated to have a variable aperture of f/2.8-4, rather than the f/4 constant aperture from F mount, but more importantly, it would signal Nikon's plan to depart from its F lens designs. I guess we will see about that.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I would like to use the following lenses:
35mm 1.4
Some type of telephoto like 24-200.
85mm 1.8/1.4
Macro. Sigma 105? Nikon? Still have a Tokina 100mm in my old bag I can probably use.
I only have the 24-200 and the 50mm F/1.8 at the moment, both are very good lenses. The 24-200 is sharper than any "travel zoom" has any right to be.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!