Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Heads up, this deal has expired. Want to create a deal alert for this item?
expired Posted by MichaelL9771 • Jun 7, 2021
expired Posted by MichaelL9771 • Jun 7, 2021

Razer Kiyo Full HD 1080p Streaming Webcam w/ Ring Light & Auto Focus $75

$75

$100

25% off
Amazon
30 Comments 16,907 Views
Visit Amazon
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
Amazon [amazon.com] has a Razer Kiyo webcam for $75

Best Buy [bestbuy.com] also has it for $75
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Amazon [amazon.com] has a Razer Kiyo webcam for $75

Best Buy [bestbuy.com] also has it for $75

Community Voting

Deal Score
+23
Good Deal
Visit Amazon

Price Intelligence

Model: Razer Kiyo Broadcasting Camera with Illumination | Verizon

Deal History 

Sale Price
Slickdeal
  • $NaN
  • Today

Current Prices

Sort: Lowest to Highest | Last Updated 1/24/2025, 12:06 AM
Sold By Sale Price
Macy's$0
Amazon$51.25
Best Buy$51.99
Leave a Comment
To participate in the comments, please log in.

30 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Jun 8, 2021
15 Posts
Joined Nov 2017
Jun 8, 2021
yesiamaplant
Jun 8, 2021
15 Posts
Quote from SuperMario640 :
1080p30. Disgusting.
You can force to 60fps using a third party program. Synapse is awful anyway, so I use OBS.
Jun 8, 2021
37,299 Posts
Joined Aug 2007
Jun 8, 2021
fyu
Jun 8, 2021
37,299 Posts
Quote from cyciumx :
I'm surprised at all the positive reviews. Seriously surprised.

The camera sucks.

The dynamic range is atrocious. You put the ring light on and everything is blown out – so you lower it to minimal brightness and it adjusts exposure... to still be blown out, now with more artifacts!

I use it as my 3D printer timelapse and it sucks for even that.
sucks compared to what?
1
Jun 8, 2021
313 Posts
Joined May 2007
Jun 8, 2021
liedel
Jun 8, 2021
313 Posts
Quote from Hat-Trick :
Bought it for a client. Found the ring light did not do much to help light the users face in a well lit room where the window is behind the user. Maybe in a darkish room it is better?
You're not going to find a camera that works with a lit window behind the user.... even the human eye will see a silhouette in those situations.
Pro
Jun 8, 2021
7,076 Posts
Joined Dec 2014
Jun 8, 2021
cyciumx
Pro
Jun 8, 2021
7,076 Posts
Quote from fyu :
sucks compared to what?
Compared to itself. I literally gave the reason and a working example. There doesn't need to be a counter-point to a piece of trash.
5
Jun 8, 2021
37,299 Posts
Joined Aug 2007
Jun 8, 2021
fyu
Jun 8, 2021
37,299 Posts
Quote from cyciumx :
Compared to itself. I literally gave the reason and a working example. There doesn't need to be a counter-point to a piece of trash.
you gave nothing.
seriously, your example helps nobody.
1
Pro
Jun 9, 2021
7,076 Posts
Joined Dec 2014
Jun 9, 2021
cyciumx
Pro
Jun 9, 2021
7,076 Posts
Quote from fyu :
you gave nothing.
seriously, your example helps nobody.
It shows I'm not lying about it acting as a shitty cam for printing time lapses. Hell you want me to compare it to? Fine the camera on my Macbook Pro is better in image quality in every metric. All I can do is tell people it sucks. If you/they want to waste their cash - be my guest. I don't owe you anything.


P.S. You done upvoting yourself?
4
Jun 9, 2021
37,299 Posts
Joined Aug 2007
Jun 9, 2021
fyu
Jun 9, 2021
37,299 Posts
Quote from cyciumx :
It shows I'm not lying about it acting as a shitty cam for printing time lapses. Hell you want me to compare it to? Fine the camera on my Macbook Pro is better in image quality in every metric. All I can do is tell people it sucks. If you/they want to waste their cash - be my guest. I don't owe you anything.


P.S. You done upvoting yourself?
So you've done the same time lapse with your MacBook pro camera?

My dslr take awesome time lapses, but it's sucks as a webcam.

What upvoting? I'm not op.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Pro
Jun 9, 2021
7,076 Posts
Joined Dec 2014
Jun 9, 2021
cyciumx
Pro
Jun 9, 2021
7,076 Posts
Quote from fyu :
So you've done the same time lapse with your MacBook pro camera?

My dslr take awesome time lapses, but it's sucks as a webcam.

What upvoting? I'm not op.
been here 14 years and you feign not knowing you upvote yourself? lol Pretty easy to see when you get an upvote the second you reply.
3
Pro
Jun 9, 2021
7,076 Posts
Joined Dec 2014
Jun 9, 2021
cyciumx
Pro
Jun 9, 2021
7,076 Posts
Quote from fyu :
So you've done the same time lapse with your MacBook pro camera?

My dslr take awesome time lapses, but it's sucks as a webcam.

What upvoting? I'm not op.
Did you quantify and qualify anyone else's reply in this listing? Surely positive reviews still merit the dingleberry examination you are attempting on me.

EDIT: your argument is dumb as well. Of course the operation of a webcam would need purpose built software/firmware and regular, real cameras can easily not have any focus on that function. Like Nikon and their 720P output.

Thats not what I stated by the way. I said it sucks for its intended purpose because image quality (dynamic range and exposure leading to artifacts) sucks. Therefore I use it for timelapses because I don't care at the moment the image quality sucks. For 480p timelapses that only I care about, it is fine... certainly not worth 80 bucks, but its long passed the return window.

Where In my review did I say it was a timelapse camera review? I merely said, again, thats the use I ended up utilizing it for since I can't return it.

Reading comprehension. Try it sometime.
Last edited by cyciumx June 8, 2021 at 09:23 PM.
4