Reviews:
- Android Authority "Little more than a cheap 5G entry point" [androidauthority.com]
- Engadget "A $240 5G phone that's predictably average" [engadget.com]
- HotHardware "A Budget 5G Phone That Delivers" [hothardware.com]
- PCMag "Budget-friendly 5G, with few downsides" Code:
https://www.pcmag.com/reviews/oneplus-nord-n200-5g
- Phandroid "5G simply isn't enough" [phandroid.com]
- TechRadar "...a promising budget phone" [techradar.com]
- The Verge "T-Mobile's Best Phone Under $250" [theverge.com]
- Tom's Guide "The best budget 5G phone" [tomsguide.com]
Quick specs:
- Snapdragon 480
- Sub6 5G
- 6.49" 1080x2400 90Hz IPS screen
- 4GB RAM
- 64GB storage, with microSD support
- Headphone jack
- 5000mAh battery
- Wi-Fi 5
- Side-mounted fingerprint reader integrated into power button)
- 18W wired charging (no wireless charging)
- NFC
Phone is NOT waterproof!
This post can be edited by most users to provide up-to-date information about developments of this thread based on user responses, and user findings. Feel free to add, change or remove information shown here as it becomes available. This includes new coupons, rebates, ideas, thread summary, and similar items.
Once a Thread Wiki is added to a thread, "Create Wiki" button will disappear. If you would like to learn more about Thread Wiki feature, click here.
Camera:
View this thread. It appears the camera is relatively decent, but the included app may be the issue. This user has better results with GCam:
https://forum.xda-developers.com/...337/page-2
-----------------
Carrier Unlock:
-----------------
Please visit this discussion and send a PM to mobbdeep with the following details in the PM.
Last Name
Telephone #
https://forum.xda-developers.com/...97/page-23
Note: The OnePlus has to be active on T-Mobile network for 3 business days to unlock it.
He/She has been unlocking OnePlus 9/ Pro, Nord200
Only T-Moble not MetroPCS.
EIP need not be paid off for the above unlock process.
-------------------
Trade in Phone:
If you don't have a trade in phone, nice cheap one for $10.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B084GXS58R/
-------------------
Leave a Comment
Top Comments
The distinction which launches the article I shared (which did center on Verizon) is the same for T-Mobile: the form of 5G which would provide the benefits touted by some sources is exceptionally rare. T-Mobile gives their own version of this which is fairly telling:
https://www.t-mobile.com/news/net...-and-speed
T-Mobile's TLDR is that:
AT&T is an open liar (i.e. 5GE is faux 5G)
Verizon has some work to do on expanding mmWave 5G
(And by extension delivering on the promise of 5G)
Please don't take notice that T-Mobile is also not delivering mmWave 5G
(Basically they talk a lot of trash about mmWave without highlighting the distinction on what it delivers: true, low-latency, gigabit 5G capacity)
While T-Mobile touts the expansion of mid-band 5G, you will notice no mention of a huge mmWave deployment of their own... because they don't have one. More specifically they have very little spectrum in that space and no significant plans for deploying it beyond the few high-density scenarios which will distinguish 5G for years to come: stadiums and high-density urban centers like the middle of Times Square.
https://www.fiercewirel
Instead what T-Mobile has done is dedicated more of their existing 4G LTE network to 5G in the same way they quickly repurposed their 3G network to 4G in a bid to maintain relevance in the 4G era. At the time, they lacked the desirable low-band real estate purchased by Verizon, but saw they could maximize the efficiency of the bandwidth they had. The way that plays out similarly today is a 5G network which provides an incremental efficiency improvement over the prior network configuration and whose growth is built upon mid-band spectrum acquired from Sprint.
https://www.wired.com/story/testi...n-edition/
Maybe some of this is interesting to someone(?).
Good luck!
Jon
The A32 only has a 720p screen and Mediatek processor.
Comparison:
https://www.gsmarena.co
The main advantage to the A32 is in theory it should have a physically better camera.
Edit: The deal from Metro has been added to this post with the instant full rebate. Now that's a deal!
2,085 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I did not survive reading past page 10 of the thread. It's still unclear to me if I need to ship the trade-in phone to T-mobile first, or purchase the 5g phone first.
Any clue or page number on detailed instructions will be much appreciated.
I did not survive reading past page 10 of the thread. It's still unclear to me if I need to ship the trade-in phone to T-mobile first, or purchase the 5g phone first.
Any clue or page number on detailed instructions will be much appreciated.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
The distinction which launches the article I shared (which did center on Verizon) is the same for T-Mobile: the form of 5G which would provide the benefits touted by some sources is exceptionally rare. T-Mobile gives their own version of this which is fairly telling:
https://www.t-mobile.com/news/net...-and-speed [t-mobile.com]
T-Mobile's TLDR is that:
- AT&T is an open liar (i.e. 5GE is faux 5G)
- Verizon has some work to do on expanding mmWave 5G
- Please don't take notice that T-Mobile is also not delivering mmWave 5G
While T-Mobile touts the expansion of mid-band 5G, you will notice no mention of a huge mmWave deployment of their own... because they don't have one. More specifically they have very little spectrum in that space and no significant plans for deploying it beyond the few high-density scenarios which will distinguish 5G for years to come: stadiums and high-density urban centers like the middle of Times Square.(And by extension delivering on the promise of 5G)
(Basically they talk a lot of trash about mmWave without highlighting the distinction on what it delivers: true, low-latency, gigabit 5G capacity)
https://www.fiercewireless.com/op...mall-cells [fiercewireless.com]
Instead what T-Mobile has done is dedicated more of their existing 4G LTE network to 5G in the same way they quickly repurposed their 3G network to 4G in a bid to maintain relevance in the 4G era. At the time, they lacked the desirable low-band real estate purchased by Verizon, but saw they could maximize the efficiency of the bandwidth they had. The way that plays out similarly today is a 5G network which provides an incremental efficiency improvement over the prior network configuration and whose growth is built upon mid-band spectrum acquired from Sprint.
https://www.wired.com/story/testi...n-edition/ [wired.com]
Maybe some of this is interesting to someone(?).
Good luck!
Jon
I've seen the wonders T-Mobile low-band has done in rural settings. And I acknowledge that their rollout of low-band is now hand-in-hand with their mid-band 5G deployment. But realistically, the advanced form of 4G LTE T-Mobile was deploying previously is almost (big qualifier here) arbitrarily distinct from their new claimed 5G network (again, features ascribed to 5G are uniquely associated with mmWave). So while TMO previously acknowledged that all their improvements were around low-band, they now cloud those claims but saying they're driven by 5G. In truth, the key for T-Mobile is still about low-band expansion excepting that without a mid-band 5G-capable phone you might no longer reap those benefits.
Verizon was way ahead on low-band deployment, but that early lead them put them in a classic bind when it came time to plan for 5G. Rather than negatively impact their 4G LTE network they've gone down a more conservative approach to 5G conversion (no surprise for the #1 incumbent). Fortunately for them, there's still plenty of daylight between their network coverage and T-Mobile's. And this is why even after having reached the #2 spot, T-Mobile is moving aggressively to 5G much in the same way they did as a scrappy #4 carrier running to 4G LTE (so free 5G-ish phones for everyone!).
Good luck!
Jon
No, It's not working with RedPocket (T-Mobile sim).
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Leave a Comment