Our research indicates that this offer is $30.99 lower (6% savings) than the next best available price from a reputable merchant with prices starting from $479.99.
About this product:
Rating of 4.4 from over 660 Best Buy customer reviews.
This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
Our research indicates that this offer is $30.99 lower (6% savings) than the next best available price from a reputable merchant with prices starting from $479.99.
About this product:
Rating of 4.4 from over 660 Best Buy customer reviews.
Deal History includes data from multiple reputable stores, such as Best Buy, Target, and Walmart. The lowest price among stores for a given day is selected as the "Sale Price".
Sale Price does not include sale prices at Amazon unless a deal was posted by a community member.
For what it's worth, I own a number of higher end Bluetooth headphones (Sony, Sennheiser, Bang & Olufsen, Master & Dynamic, and these). These are undoubtedly my most used headphones.
Pricey? Sure. Worth it? Absolutely, IF you're deep into the Apple ecosystem and you'll be using these with Apple products, at least an iPhone. (More products = more features.) If not, don't waste your money.
Also, note that these don't come with an aux cable. That's extra, but it's what's needed to get you near audiophile sound.
And no, they *technically* don't do lossless, but unless you have superhuman hearing, you won't be able to tell the difference anymore than you could with, say, a pair of Sennheiser Momentum 3's.
I'd say they're totally worth it at this price if you're looking for a good user experience. If you're just looking for SOUND and nothing else (we'll, other than wireless capabilities), get the Bang & Olufsen H9's ($350 now) or the MW65's (at Costco for $270 now).
TL;DR - for Apple users, these are great. Get them and don't look back. For non-Apple users, don't waste your money. But most people honestly would be well-enough served by finding a pair of good TWSs or wireless headphones for about $200.
Boat anchors on your head with painful clamp force
Sound is fine - good even - but not $549 good and really not $449 good either.
The Apple markup here is similar to the original MSRP on the HomePod (also way too much and we saw how that went...took years to sell the inventory and discontinued)
Writing as I'm listening to the Airpods Max. I also have the Bose 700. The APM may have better clarity and tighter bass, but when the track gets busy, you don't get a clean separation like with well amplified wired headphones. To be honest, the sound quality itself is not significant enough to go with the Airpods. The build quality, design and integration into Apple ecosystem is bar none. The Bose is actually more comfortable. I just don't think bluetooth audio has reach the point where you can squeeze a DAC/Amp in an ear cup to drive the headphones to the levels of a pair of wired headphones. So buy the headphone with the best connectivity and comfort.
I have owned a wide range of headphones all the way up to Hifiman Susvaras.
You're only going to be seeing more deals on these. I'd personally hold off. It's laughable that they don't even support Apple's lossless music. Sure they sound good, but there will be a newer model out almost certainly before the holiday season to take advantage of the biggest new feature offered by Apple Music. So if you love good sound quality, but hate lossless audio and portability in your wireless headphones, this is the set for you!
Lossless audio is very, very difficult to achieve over a Bluetooth connection, so that isn't particularly a knock against the Max. Apple has said you can connect a wired lightning adapter, which may provide higher fidelity, but still won't technically be lossless (since some D/A conversion is happening via the cable).
And, let's be honest here: lossless is completely indistinguishable from modern codecs for the vast majority of ears out there AND it theoretically requires that all of the previous steps along the production chain were also lossless (and how often does that really happen?).
You want lossless on wireless Bluetooth headphones? You're basically stating you don't know what lossless is or how it works. Lossless is insanely overrated in comparison with a high bitrate stream.
I get that you're just not well informed on the subject, but please don't misinform others.
You're only going to be seeing more deals on these. I'd personally hold off. It's laughable that they don't even support Apple's lossless music. Sure they sound good, but there will be a newer model out almost certainly before the holiday season to take advantage of the biggest new feature offered by Apple Music. So if you love good sound quality, but hate lossless audio and portability in your wireless headphones, this is the set for you!
Lossless audio isn't possible via Bluetooth in its current state. Lossless audio compared to high bitrate streams is not noticeably different. The difference is tiny, it's important to people with high end systems, but that's because they're chasing every last detail possible regardless of cost. These are do-it-all headphones with terrific sound quality for being closed back and wireless.
Great price if you want airpods max but beware that the condensation issue is very real. I have zero faith Apple won't just call it "water damage" should something eventually die as a result.
5
1
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
hey senor audio snob, apple is pushing lossless in it's music service. and they release a high end headphone that doesnt support it. sure it has terrific sound quality but the drapes dont match the carpets. please take your audio snobbery elsewhere.
4
7
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Jul 16, 2021 8:08 PM
463 Comments
Joined Dec 2010
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank
Writing as I'm listening to the Airpods Max. I also have the Bose 700. The APM may have better clarity and tighter bass, but when the track gets busy, you don't get a clean separation like with well amplified wired headphones. To be honest, the sound quality itself is not significant enough to go with the Airpods. The build quality, design and integration into Apple ecosystem is bar none. The Bose is actually more comfortable. I just don't think bluetooth audio has reach the point where you can squeeze a DAC/Amp in an ear cup to drive the headphones to the levels of a pair of wired headphones. So buy the headphone with the best connectivity and comfort.
I have owned a wide range of headphones all the way up to Hifiman Susvaras.
7
3
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Jul 16, 2021 8:34 PM
801 Comments
Joined Jun 2012
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users.
Writing as I'm listening to the Airpods Max. I also have the Bose 700. The APM may have better clarity and tighter bass, but when the track gets busy, you don't get a clean separation like with well amplified wired headphones. To be honest, the sound quality itself is not significant enough to go with the Airpods. The build quality, design and integration into Apple ecosystem is bar none. The Bose is actually more comfortable. I just don't think bluetooth audio has reach the point where you can squeeze a DAC/Amp in an ear cup to drive the headphones to the levels of a pair of wired headphones. So buy the headphone with the best connectivity and comfort.
I have owned a wide range of headphones all the way up to Hifiman Susvaras.
I don't believe Bluetooth audio is the limiting factor anymore. HD Bluetooth codecs are quite solid and our ears really aren't that great at hearing the differences amongst those that are fairly close to lossless quality.
The limiting factors appear to be:
Closed back, open back headphones have a more solid image and actual soundstage
Features, to cancel sound or work a transparency mode, the headphones have to create sound that cancels that out while playing the source signal (or it's reproducing the background noise in transparency mode)
Amplifier limitations, this is getting significantly better over the last few years as far as quality of power, but total power is still limited and the driver has to be designed with that in mind.
Cost, having all of these things built in obviously costs more than an unpowered wired headphone. Those drivers can have stronger magnetic force run by more power, and aren't paying for the additional featureset.
The AirPods max clearly have the best build quality of anything close to their price which again adds to the cost. The additional R&D, wireless tech, and amplifier add to the cost.
This should be compared apples to apples, I hope we can all agree there.
Apple arrogance is only equaled by its customers' drooling, slavish worship.
These are uncomfortable and sonically and ANC-tech inferior to both Bose and Sony.
There are an awful lot of reviewers who have done objective measurements which agree almost across the board that the noise cancelling is objectively second to none on the Airpods Max.
Acoustically it's not as clear. Generally I've read that these are better, but just slightly and not by a wide enough margin to justify the price. Sound is a subjective experience anyway. I demo'd them at an Apple store and really enjoyed the sound, but it didn't floor me or anything, it was just very pleasant for the pop and rock I demoed. Noise cancellation and transparency modes both were excellent. End of the day even at $450 too pricey for me.
9
1
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
Top Comments
Pricey? Sure. Worth it? Absolutely, IF you're deep into the Apple ecosystem and you'll be using these with Apple products, at least an iPhone. (More products = more features.) If not, don't waste your money.
Also, note that these don't come with an aux cable. That's extra, but it's what's needed to get you near audiophile sound.
And no, they *technically* don't do lossless, but unless you have superhuman hearing, you won't be able to tell the difference anymore than you could with, say, a pair of Sennheiser Momentum 3's.
I'd say they're totally worth it at this price if you're looking for a good user experience. If you're just looking for SOUND and nothing else (we'll, other than wireless capabilities), get the Bang & Olufsen H9's ($350 now) or the MW65's (at Costco for $270 now).
TL;DR - for Apple users, these are great. Get them and don't look back. For non-Apple users, don't waste your money. But most people honestly would be well-enough served by finding a pair of good TWSs or wireless headphones for about $200.
Had a pair and returned them.
Boat anchors on your head with painful clamp force
Sound is fine - good even - but not $549 good and really not $449 good either.
The Apple markup here is similar to the original MSRP on the HomePod (also way too much and we saw how that went...took years to sell the inventory and discontinued)
I have owned a wide range of headphones all the way up to Hifiman Susvaras.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
178 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
And, let's be honest here: lossless is completely indistinguishable from modern codecs for the vast majority of ears out there AND it theoretically requires that all of the previous steps along the production chain were also lossless (and how often does that really happen?).
I get that you're just not well informed on the subject, but please don't misinform others.
They are heavy and sound "very good"
They should be around $349 honestly.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank
I have owned a wide range of headphones all the way up to Hifiman Susvaras.
I have owned a wide range of headphones all the way up to Hifiman Susvaras.
The limiting factors appear to be:
Closed back, open back headphones have a more solid image and actual soundstage
Features, to cancel sound or work a transparency mode, the headphones have to create sound that cancels that out while playing the source signal (or it's reproducing the background noise in transparency mode)
Amplifier limitations, this is getting significantly better over the last few years as far as quality of power, but total power is still limited and the driver has to be designed with that in mind.
Cost, having all of these things built in obviously costs more than an unpowered wired headphone. Those drivers can have stronger magnetic force run by more power, and aren't paying for the additional featureset.
The AirPods max clearly have the best build quality of anything close to their price which again adds to the cost. The additional R&D, wireless tech, and amplifier add to the cost.
This should be compared apples to apples, I hope we can all agree there.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
These are uncomfortable and sonically and ANC-tech inferior to both Bose and Sony.
Acoustically it's not as clear. Generally I've read that these are better, but just slightly and not by a wide enough margin to justify the price. Sound is a subjective experience anyway. I demo'd them at an Apple store and really enjoyed the sound, but it didn't floor me or anything, it was just very pleasant for the pop and rock I demoed. Noise cancellation and transparency modes both were excellent. End of the day even at $450 too pricey for me.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!