For my use case - backing up photos, videos from phones via plex pass & occasional document/files backup from my pc and mac, is this good enough? Need something that I can use for atleast for the next 5 years
I use it for everything you mention except PLEX and it is more than sufficient. It audio and video apps work fine as well so I'd expect basic PLEX use would be fine too. Keep in mind this is a kind of a budget option.
If you want something that can handle any app, go with one of the qnap systems with AMD 1500 embedded processor inside. I mine chia (pays for new drives every 6-9 months), host kids minecraft server, and currently am setting up offsite backup syncing to another family member's qnap for extra peace of mind.
I really like the TS-963AX, but it's spendy... I got the TS-653D when it was on sale a few weeks back, and it is decent, but nowhere near as fast as the 963AX and offers less applications support - qts rather than the qtsHero line.
I'd recommend spending a few more bucks and getting intel processor if you're using plex. Quicksync is amazing, but plex pass is required.
I'm still running strong on a DS216J and if you are just storing files on a local network and not doing any transcoding, the J series are more than enough.
The autosync features to cloud providers like OneDrive and Amazon are great and work just fine on the J series.
I haven't upgraded to the new OS (no real need for what I use the NAS for) and I'll wait until forced or there are no more security upgrades.
Buying the DS216J was the best ~$200 (plus drives) tech purchase that I've spent in the last few years.
I'm new to this. Finally time has come after losing painful amount of my recorded history. I'm looking at this since it's a good entry level just to get me going. My question is around this transcoding business. What does that mean? If I have 4K videos on here (since I will be using this to store and backup my videos on here) can I watch them in 4K? I just want to understand what I am missing out with this vs. DS220+. Thank you.
I'm new to this. Finally time has come after losing painful amount of my recorded history. I'm looking at this since it's a good entry level just to get me going. My question is around this transcoding business. What does that mean? If I have 4K videos on here (since I will be using this to store and backup my videos on here) can I watch them in 4K? I just want to understand what I am missing out with this vs. DS220+. Thank you.
"Transcoding" is when you take video and convert it on the fly to a different resolution.
If you do not run a media service (like Plex) or other things off the NAS, and just access the video files natively, you will not have an issue.
The "J" series Synology NAS have slow processors and cannot convert 4k video to 1080p on the fly like the "Plus" or higher series.
If you have 4k videos and want to stream them right from the NAS (by opening the files themselves) you will not have any issue.
Funny enough I started with a DS211j back in 2011 and, then a DS418j in 2018 which I still use as a backup. Now I have the DS920+ since 2020 which is used for sharing media and downloading lots of shit. I no longer use the 2 bay it's so slow. I guess I'll gift it to someone.
Well, if you don't find anyone in your close circle, I'd take it off your hands if you were looking to get rid of it. I'm starting to think of these, (NASes in general) for my setup but I know almost nothing about them, or more advanced computer stuff like this in general. I'm looking for a 'learner' device and top of that list is not spending a lot of money or wasting money on something I don't need or can't make sense of.
This does sound like a good deal, but then again I might just keep looking.
The only reason why I have been looking at other NAS hardware is I almost lost my data from the WD MyBook Live security bug. Luckily my drive was not hit.
I mainly wanted a NAS to replace the external HDD + router setup I have to a setup with redundancy for when a drive fails. Got down a rabbit hole researching ZFS, and to build a NAS with the specs I wanted (SFF 2-bay + enough CPU/RAM for TrueNAS) would've cost me probably $500 for the server alone, so I ended up settling for the low end 2-bay prebuilt models.
I'm pretty new to NAS, but figured 2GB vs 0.5GB would let me run more apps, if I wanted to. For one, the extra RAM seems to allow the TS-230 to support snapshots whereas the DS220j doesn't. Either one is probably good enough for basic file storage/serving and not much else, so I'd say it's down to how cheap you can find them. FWIW I ended up spending just under $500 before tax for the NAS and 2x 14TB@$170 each, a bit pricy just for file storage but I'm still learning what all a NAS can do.
I have this exact unit. I use it has my file server, backup server, FTP server and my Plex server (no transcoding). Works great for my needs. Very good budget option.
For most folks this will never matter (I hope) but Synology's EULA is one of the strangest in the industry basically giving them the right to search your house if you accept. Also... I'd wait til BF since it's so close. The 220j was $20+ cheaper last BF. Regarding performance: Fine for backup or if you just want to share files. Lower end CPU also translates into better power savings vs the intel based alternatives. If you need to run a lot of apps then yeah get something faster but if not "save the planet" and go with something that meets your requirements without wasting RAM or power.
Section 7. Audit. Synology will have the right to audit your compliance with the terms of this EULA. You agree to grant Synology a right to access to your facilities, equipment, books, records and documents and to otherwise reasonably cooperate with Synology in order to facilitate any such audit by Synology or its agent authorized by Synology.
For most folks this will never matter (I hope) but Synology's EULA is one of the strangest in the industry basically giving them the right to search your house if you accept. Also... I'd wait til BF since it's so close. The 220j was $20+ cheaper last BF. Regarding performance: Fine for backup or if you just want to share files. Lower end CPU also translates into better power savings vs the intel based alternatives. If you need to run a lot of apps then yeah get something faster but if not "save the planet" and go with something that meets your requirements without wasting RAM or power.
Section 7. Audit. Synology will have the right to audit your compliance with the terms of this EULA. You agree to grant Synology a right to access to your facilities, equipment, books, records and documents and to otherwise reasonably cooperate with Synology in order to facilitate any such audit by Synology or its agent authorized by Synology.
There are actually a lot of licensing agreements like this around license enforcement. Whether it's for VPN licenses on network appliances or something else, this isn't that uncommon.
On one hand, this will only realistically be used if they think somebody is somehow circumventing their licensing in some major way (ex: only 5 email licenses are included by default, unless you buy more). On the other hand, it's kinda ridiculous that this isn't tied to specific scenarios to exempt normal home users.
In the end, we complain about it but we still use the stuff. :-(
I have the 2018 version of this (DS218j). The processor is strong enough and I'm baffled why they only put 512 MB of memory in it. I'm even more baffled that the 2020 version (DS220j) in this deal also only has 512 MB of memory.
I am upgrading to the DS220+ instead, which comes with 2 GB of memory and can be upgraded, along with a much stronger processor.
I'm still puzzled why Synology only puts 512MB in the "j" series even though the software offers features that far exceed the memory provided but don't exceed the CPU provided.
121 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Featured Comments
IMO this model is too slow for anything else.
NAS with 2 bays is always better than a single bay (Having a single drive is just begging for data loss).
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I use it for everything you mention except PLEX and it is more than sufficient. It audio and video apps work fine as well so I'd expect basic PLEX use would be fine too. Keep in mind this is a kind of a budget option.
I really like the TS-963AX, but it's spendy... I got the TS-653D when it was on sale a few weeks back, and it is decent, but nowhere near as fast as the 963AX and offers less applications support - qts rather than the qtsHero line.
The autosync features to cloud providers like OneDrive and Amazon are great and work just fine on the J series.
I haven't upgraded to the new OS (no real need for what I use the NAS for) and I'll wait until forced or there are no more security upgrades.
Buying the DS216J was the best ~$200 (plus drives) tech purchase that I've spent in the last few years.
If you do not run a media service (like Plex) or other things off the NAS, and just access the video files natively, you will not have an issue.
The "J" series Synology NAS have slow processors and cannot convert 4k video to 1080p on the fly like the "Plus" or higher series.
If you have 4k videos and want to stream them right from the NAS (by opening the files themselves) you will not have any issue.
Just a thought!
https://slickdeals.net/e/14617717-synology-nas-enclosures-ds220j-2-bay-136-free-shipping?v=1&src=Sit...
https://slickdeals.net/f/14587426-synology-diskstation-ds220-2-bay-nas-enclosure?v=1&s
https://slickdeals.net/e/14562286-qnap-4-bay-personal-cloud-nas-ts-431k-us-newegg-219?v=1&src=SiteSe...
https://slickdeals.net/e/14617792-apc-back-ups-bvn650m1-battery-backup-34-99-office-depot-or-officemax?v=1&s
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
The only reason why I have been looking at other NAS hardware is I almost lost my data from the WD MyBook Live security bug. Luckily my drive was not hit.
I mainly wanted a NAS to replace the external HDD + router setup I have to a setup with redundancy for when a drive fails. Got down a rabbit hole researching ZFS, and to build a NAS with the specs I wanted (SFF 2-bay + enough CPU/RAM for TrueNAS) would've cost me probably $500 for the server alone, so I ended up settling for the low end 2-bay prebuilt models.
I'm pretty new to NAS, but figured 2GB vs 0.5GB would let me run more apps, if I wanted to. For one, the extra RAM seems to allow the TS-230 to support snapshots whereas the DS220j doesn't. Either one is probably good enough for basic file storage/serving and not much else, so I'd say it's down to how cheap you can find them. FWIW I ended up spending just under $500 before tax for the NAS and 2x 14TB@$170 each, a bit pricy just for file storage but I'm still learning what all a NAS can do.
https://www.amazon.com/QNAP-TS-25...RQVYV&th=1 [amazon.com]
https://www.synology.co
Section 7. Audit. Synology will have the right to audit your compliance with the terms of this EULA. You agree to grant Synology a right to access to your facilities, equipment, books, records and documents and to otherwise reasonably cooperate with Synology in order to facilitate any such audit by Synology or its agent authorized by Synology.
https://www.synology.com/en-globa...terms_EULA [synology.com]
Section 7. Audit. Synology will have the right to audit your compliance with the terms of this EULA. You agree to grant Synology a right to access to your facilities, equipment, books, records and documents and to otherwise reasonably cooperate with Synology in order to facilitate any such audit by Synology or its agent authorized by Synology.
On one hand, this will only realistically be used if they think somebody is somehow circumventing their licensing in some major way (ex: only 5 email licenses are included by default, unless you buy more). On the other hand, it's kinda ridiculous that this isn't tied to specific scenarios to exempt normal home users.
In the end, we complain about it but we still use the stuff. :-(
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I am upgrading to the DS220+ instead, which comes with 2 GB of memory and can be upgraded, along with a much stronger processor.
I'm still puzzled why Synology only puts 512MB in the "j" series even though the software offers features that far exceed the memory provided but don't exceed the CPU provided.