Amazon has
45-Count 13-Gallon Amazon Basics Tall Kitchen Drawstring Trash Bags for $5.08 - 5% off when you check out via Subscribe & Save =
$4.83.
Shipping is free w/ Prime or on orders $25+.
Thanks to Deal Hunter
Navy-Wife for posting this deal.
Note: You may cancel your Subscribe & Save subscription any time after your order ships.
26 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Featured Comments
These bags are .9 mil fully. They are not a weaved bag having thinner regions within the web.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank notaxstate
With my last purchase of the name brand bags, it seems like they bags were a couple inches shorter than they used to be. I had to put a small empty box at the bottom of my trash can before putting the bag in so the bag wouldn't collapse off the sides of the can. I'm going to try these and hope they are a better fit.
Glad or Hefty trash bags are hit or miss depending on the deal of the month I get, especially tight drawstring and in terms of depth
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank captivater
These are far superior to the Costco bags which are ForceFlex.
These bags are .9 mil fully. They are not a weaved bag having thinner regions within the web.
These bags are .9 mil fully. They are not a weaved bag having thinner regions within the web.
Not saying I don't believe you, but do you have a source on the webbing thinness?
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank InternetCurmudgeon
I've used both... I CANNOT WAIT to exhaust our supply of Amazon brand bags. They are extremely difficult to draw the strings and tie them. I can't tell you how many bags I've ripped. I think I've ripped 3-4x as many bags from our one box of Amazon brand bags than the years of Kirkland brand bags we've used.
These bags are .9 mil fully. They are not a weaved bag having thinner regions within the web.
Fair point
I mean, aside from the fact that flex bags break on me every time. Whereas the plain solid bags don't.
When have you ever known big corporations to do right by consumers? If they can spend less on an inferior product and sell it for more, they will.
WEF policy has been pushing the environment/less plastics agenda for many decades.
Thinner water bottles. Thinner bags. Thinner textiles (yes polyester/microfiber are plastic).
So concrete proof, no. Observational & experiential analysis peppered with an abundance of cynicism leads me to that conclusion.
Do you really think they would measure the thinner part for the advertised thickness?
I mean, aside from the fact that flex bags break on me every time. Whereas the plain solid bags don't.
When have you ever known big corporations to do right by consumers? If they can spend less on an inferior product and sell it for more, they will.
WEF policy has been pushing the environment/less plastics agenda for many decades.
Thinner water bottles. Thinner bags. Thinner textiles (yes polyester/microfiber are plastic).
So concrete proof, no. Observational & experiential analysis peppered with an abundance of cynicism leads me to that conclusion.
Do you really think they would measure the thinner part for the advertised thickness?