Alchemy Arktos 120 Mountain Bike - $4199 shipped. Use code "ARKTOSFORSPRING500" for $500 off. Free assembled shipping!
If you are looking for a bike then forget the crappy-specced Intense offered by Costco - Instead, look at the Arktos 120. Amazing price for a very capable bike. Entry level price point for a mid to high-end components package, this will serve you well for a very long time.
https://alchemybikes.com/products...s-120-2022
69 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Edit
$150 professional assembly. So how to get free assembled shipping?
Edit
Any tax to cali?
The big problem with buying online from a super small company is there is no way to see up close or certainly ride it. Very few are dropping this much coin with buying without riding.
The big problem with buying online from a super small company is there is no way to see up close or certainly ride it. Very few are dropping this much coin with buying without riding.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank Glee217
The big problem with buying online from a super small company is there is no way to see up close or certainly ride it. Very few are dropping this much coin with buying without riding.
Looking at the overall geo and the rider height range recommendations from Alchemy I ordered a size XL back in November. After riding the bike for several weeks I started to experience some back and shoulder discomfort that just wouldn't go away. Poring over the geo chart and comparing it to several recent bikes I've comfortably tested, I zeroed in on two numbers as potential culprits: the reach and the stack height. At roughly 520mm of reach, it's the longest bike I've tested by about 10mm (the Pyga Hyrax, which I loved, is 510mm). The Arktos 120 stack height is slightly lower than the average trail bike we looked at last year, and according to my own measurement of the saddle-to-bar drop it's a whopping inch and a half lower than my personal bike.
Test pilot profile height: 190cm (6'3″) weight: 72.5kg (160lb) testing zone: Southeast, USA
After chatting with Ryan at Alchemy and Nic from Simbol we decided to swap out the XL for a size large to reduce the reach. To be honest I was skeptical that would make a difference; my money was on the stack height being too low. Over the past few years many riders have been sizing up in order to get longer reaches, and don't necessarily want or need the taller stack heights and longer seat tube lengths associated with bigger sizes. I also ordered a set of 50mm Diety riser bars as a backup in case the shorter reach (and even lower stack height) didn't improve the fit for me.
Cutting to the chase, the 494mm reach on the size large Arktos provided a more comfortable fit, though still not 100% ideal. I also tried a higher hand position on the size large but found the bike handles better without the riser bar. My takeaway is that the combination of a long reach with a low stack height just stretched me out too much on the bike. I think either one by itself — an extended reach or a low stack height — works ok for me, but not both.
https://www.singletrack
A lot of brands sell directly to the customers - This is how they are able to keep the price competitive. Refer to an earlier comment on "Trek" and "Specialized" - Same specs would cost way more for these guys because they sell through big-bix stores hence more overhead. Having said that, this has nothing to do with carbon vs aluminum frames.
I don't buy/sell bikes privately enough to answer this. In my view, people who are willing to drop north of 5-6k for a mountain bike should know damn well to look beyond the branding. Actually, the boutique/lesser known brands are quite more desirable within my riding circle.