Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Heads up, this deal has expired. Want to create a deal alert for this item?
expiredAminS posted Aug 08, 2022 02:27 PM
expiredAminS posted Aug 08, 2022 02:27 PM

Samsung EDU/EPP Discount: 65" Samsung Class S95B OLED 4K Smart TV

+ Free Shipping

$1,840

$3,000

38% off
Samsung
179 Comments 51,675 Views
Visit Samsung
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
Samsung has has for EDU/EPP Members: 65" Samsung Class S95B OLED 4K Smart TV (2022, QN65S95BAFXZA) on sale for $1839.99 when you follow the deal instructions below. Shipping is free.

Thanks to community member AminS for finding this deal.

Deal Instructions:
  1. Visit the Samsung Discount Program page and select your qualifying program
  2. Go to 65" Samsung Class S95B OLED 4K Smart TV (2022, QN65S95BAFXZA)
  3. Add to cart
  4. You may be prompted to sign into your EDU/EPP Account
  5. Proceed to checkout
  6. Your total should be $1839.99 + free shipping
Specs:
  • Resolution: 3840x2160
  • Refresh Rate: 120Hz
  • Certified (HDR10+ Adaptive & HDR10+ GAMING)
  • Smart TV with Bixby Voice, Apps and Full Web Browser
  • Ports:
    • 4x HDMI
    • 2x USB
    • 1x Ethernet
    • 1x RF Input
    • 1x Digital Audio Out (Optical)

Editor's Notes

Written by megakimcheelove | Staff
  • About this deal:
    • This offer is $700 lower (23% savings) than list price
  • About this product:

Original Post

Written by AminS
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Samsung has has for EDU/EPP Members: 65" Samsung Class S95B OLED 4K Smart TV (2022, QN65S95BAFXZA) on sale for $1839.99 when you follow the deal instructions below. Shipping is free.

Thanks to community member AminS for finding this deal.

Deal Instructions:
  1. Visit the Samsung Discount Program page and select your qualifying program
  2. Go to 65" Samsung Class S95B OLED 4K Smart TV (2022, QN65S95BAFXZA)
  3. Add to cart
  4. You may be prompted to sign into your EDU/EPP Account
  5. Proceed to checkout
  6. Your total should be $1839.99 + free shipping
Specs:
  • Resolution: 3840x2160
  • Refresh Rate: 120Hz
  • Certified (HDR10+ Adaptive & HDR10+ GAMING)
  • Smart TV with Bixby Voice, Apps and Full Web Browser
  • Ports:
    • 4x HDMI
    • 2x USB
    • 1x Ethernet
    • 1x RF Input
    • 1x Digital Audio Out (Optical)

Editor's Notes

Written by megakimcheelove | Staff
  • About this deal:
    • This offer is $700 lower (23% savings) than list price
  • About this product:

Original Post

Written by AminS

Community Voting

Deal Score
+28
Good Deal
Visit Samsung

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Top Comments

TheNarratorr
3275 Posts
5761 Reputation
Don't see the benefit of Samsung OLEDs when they don't support Dolby Vision. Especially when they're so much more expensive.
DavidA1957
10 Posts
14 Reputation
QD-OLED tv's have much brighter individual colors than a WOLED does because of it's pixel structure. Specific colors get hundreds of nits brighter than on a WOLED. Dolby Vision is nice to have, and it's ridiculous Samsung doesn't include it, but you can get the same panel tech in the Sony A95K with Dolby Vision. The Samsung OLEDs are actually priced cheaper the LG G2 line and have better performance overall.
_blitzkreig_
124 Posts
26 Reputation
This is a QD-OLED with a different pixel sub-structure... Overall, a much brighter OLED panel

179 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Pro
Aug 08, 2022 08:07 PM
14,963 Posts
Joined Aug 2010
turnne
Pro
Aug 08, 2022 08:07 PM
14,963 Posts
Quote from ThirstyCruz :
I'd really like to see where the black levels of the CX is "clearly" better? Could you share the time of the clip you see this at?

The one area OLED remains king is overall dark scenes that have bright elements. Ie, a cityscape at night. OLED do shine.
By the way I used to own a CX....replaced with G1

You do realize there is a fallacy in using a video to determine this right?
You should used the measured specs which clearly show the black level being better in the OLED

Then we can talk about the blooming in a dark background, with light objects, on an LCD..non existent in an OLED

If you want to really try prove this
Show me some measured specs , by a professional, where an LCD has the same black levels
Pro
Aug 08, 2022 08:09 PM
268 Posts
Joined May 2010
Thangsanity
Pro
Aug 08, 2022 08:09 PM
268 Posts
I own this as well as the LG C1 OLED both in 65", paid $1800+ tax for the C1 back in November, and paid $1435 before tax for the S95B in May. I can't reccomend this TV enough even with the updates that made it less bright. If you have windows directly facing the TV. Depending on the time of day with the LG C1 was unwatchable as we have two large windows directly facing the TV so we saw a ton of glare and with dark shows, couldn't see much of anything. The S95B is a much brighter panel and even with the windows, we find that more content is watchable at all times of the day instead of certain times of the day.

LG: Better OS, better remote, support for Dolby Vision
Samsung: Better picture quality, much brighter image, better highlights, reminds me of a high end LCD in terms of brightness.
Aug 08, 2022 08:32 PM
294 Posts
Joined Nov 2010
TheCrimsonShopperAug 08, 2022 08:32 PM
294 Posts
Quote from NervousName3076 :
What size are you coming from?
65 to 65 so not a loss IMO
Aug 08, 2022 08:37 PM
85 Posts
Joined Feb 2022
SlickDeer507Aug 08, 2022 08:37 PM
85 Posts
Reading threads on the S95B is always so fun, it's such a strangely controversial TV. My context/brag is I got the 65C1 in April for $500 from the Target clearance, and then I got the 55S95B for ~$900 from the Samsung bundle deal in May, and love talking about the S95B.

This TV's HDR10 is better than Dolby Vision on 99% of other TVs, including the LG C1 (I haven't seen the C2/G2 yet). If it had DV, maybe it would look better, but it's already so good, there is very little room for improvement. That goes for high end TVs in general. The overall Rtings scores where all OLEDs have scored 8.7-8.9 for years are a good indicator. the C2/G2 has a 9.0 and the S95B has a 9.1. the gap between high end TVs really is that small. Most of the improvements from the last few years won't be noticed by most people, or obvious in most content. If you have a C9, CX, C1, etc, and get this TV, you're going to be amazed by a few demo videos and might see a noticeable jump in a few movies and HDR games, but it won't be much of an improvement in most content. And you can push this TV to be brighter and more colorful (Contrast Enhancer on High and color space set to Native does look amazing on HDR content), but then you're not getting an accurate picture. For movies/TV, I prefer the LG C1 for the more accurate picture and for games, S95B easily wins for me.

The firmware issues were no joke, but on 1303 and after unistalling the Samsung Live TV app, it's been great for me. It is more capable than LG OLEDs, there is just not a lot of chances for it to shine in normal content. This is a great price, so I think a lot of the issues people have with it at $3,000 shouldn't carry much weight here, and the $4,000 Sony A95k shouldn't even be compared for double the price. I think the 65C1 for $1,300 new is realistic so it's definitely the way to go as the prices drop, but if money is less of an issue, the S95B/C2 already dropping this low is great.
Last edited by SlickDeer507 August 8, 2022 at 02:02 PM.
Aug 08, 2022 08:37 PM
2,162 Posts
Joined Apr 2011
Chingu808Aug 08, 2022 08:37 PM
2,162 Posts
Quote from chris041378 :
I have this TV and it's incredible how bright it can get.
And just think it was much brighter before Samsung decided to Dim in down with a firmware update.Mad
Pro
Aug 08, 2022 08:48 PM
3,189 Posts
Joined Jul 2020
ThirstyCruz
Pro
Aug 08, 2022 08:48 PM
3,189 Posts
Quote from turnne :
By the way I used to own a CX....replaced with G1

You do realize there is a fallacy in using a video to determine this right?
You should used the measured specs which clearly show the black level being better in the OLED

Then we can talk about the blooming in a dark background, with light objects, on an LCD..non existent in an OLED

If you want to really try prove this
Show me some measured specs , by a professional, where an LCD has the same black levels
I am NOT a videophile. I enjoy watching TV with. QUALITY picture.

For me, I don't care what the official black levels are etc. I only care by what I can see in the room I use it in.

Have both C1 and QN90, and BOTH are fantastic sets and IMO, equal picture quality overall.

My only gripe with QN90, and it was serious when I first got it, was how much tinkering and resets required to finally get it looking good. Plus it's menu take way too many steps to access (would be same on s95b!)

Besides that, qn90a 85inch, and C1 48" and G1 55" ALL satisfy me equally.

Perhaps when OLED is available at 80+" without costing double more, I'd consider it.

I don't game, I don't do blue ray. That's my use case.

Dolby vision v HDR 10 is merely marketing! But I do understand that feeling of just wanting DV so it doesn't nag.
Pro
Aug 08, 2022 08:51 PM
3,189 Posts
Joined Jul 2020
ThirstyCruz
Pro
Aug 08, 2022 08:51 PM
3,189 Posts
Quote from SlickDeer507 :
Reading threads on the S95B is always so fun, it's such a strangely controversial TV. My context/brag is I got the 65C1 in April for $500 from the Target clearance, and then I got the 55S95B for ~$900 from the Samsung bundle deal in May, and love talking about the S95B.

This TV's HDR10 is better than Dolby Vision on 99% of other TVs, including the LG C1 (I haven't seen the C2/G2 yet). If it had DV, maybe it would look better, but it's already so good, there is very little room for improvement. That goes for high end TVs in general. The overall Rtings scores where all OLEDs have scored 8.7-8.9 for years are a good indicator. the C2/G2 has a 9.0 and the S95B has a 9.1. the gap between high end TVs really is that small. Most of the improvements from the last few years won't be noticed by most people, or obvious in most content. If you have a C9, CX, C1, etc, and get this TV, you're going to be amazed by a few demo videos and might see a noticeable jump in a few movies and HDR games, but it won't be much of an improvement in most content. And you can push this TV to be brighter and more colorful (Contrast Enhancer on High and color space set to Native does look amazing on HDR content), but then you're not getting an accurate picture. For movies/TV, I prefer the LG C1 for the more accurate picture and for games, S95B easily wins for me.

The firmware issues were no joke, but on 1303 and after unistalling the Samsung Live TV app, it's been great for me. It is more capable than LG OLEDs, there is just not a lot of chances for it to shine in normal content. This is a great price, so I think a lot of the issues people have with it at $3,000 shouldn't carry much weight here, and the $4,000 Sony A95k shouldn't even be compared for double the price.
Well said! Things need to be measured in real terms, not by statistics. And I won't ever understand paying double more for a90k, but I've never seen it so perhaps it would amaze me (though my wallet would never agree!(
1

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Aug 08, 2022 08:52 PM
1,815 Posts
Joined Jan 2012
ilikemoneysAug 08, 2022 08:52 PM
1,815 Posts
Quote from turnne :
Black levels are a things of the past?..huh
In the video you linked you can clearly see the better black level in the CX
And honestly he could have gone into the intricate shadow detail that an OLED can do that no LCD can match. Bladerunner 2049 has an excellent scene, in my opinion for an OLED demo, in a dark room where you see the intricate details of the salt and pepper on Harrison Ford's face

Then there is that change of color and brightness off angle that OLED does not have

As for burn in...I have actually had a warranty payout for it for an OLED before
Yep, burn in payout here too, granted, it was a display model originally. It's literally fundamentally impossible for it not to exist as a possibility because it is uneven subpixel degradation. Technically speaking, even with QD OLED, single color subpixel degradation can still lead to visible burn in if the algorithms don't adjust for the brightness shift. It's just a bad video linked by someone who isn't exactly well educated on the subject. No offense intended but one can't be that wrong and well informed at the same time. The real benefit of OLED as you have pointed out, made even more apparent by QD OLED, is in color detail, not to be confused with color gamut or color volume. Instead of having multiple pixels displaying close to, if not exactly the same color due to the limitations of a backlight, each individual pixel can actually display it's own gradation of color. This isn't something that can be reasonably measured for any review because of how labor intensive it is. However, the fact that so few reviewers bring it up all that often really shows how little most of them actually understand about the things they review.
Aug 08, 2022 08:53 PM
1,952 Posts
Joined Aug 2011
robrob777Aug 08, 2022 08:53 PM
1,952 Posts
They should do trade ins for tv... I don't know what to do with my perfectly fine tv
Aug 08, 2022 08:56 PM
542 Posts
Joined Aug 2007
velaniAug 08, 2022 08:56 PM
542 Posts
Quote from ThirstyCruz :
I am NOT a videophile. I enjoy watching TV with. QUALITY picture.

For me, I don't care what the official black levels are etc. I only care by what I can see in the room I use it in.

Have both C1 and QN90, and BOTH are fantastic sets and IMO, equal picture quality overall.

My only gripe with QN90, and it was serious when I first got it, was how much tinkering and resets required to finally get it looking good. Plus it's menu take way too many steps to access (would be same on s95b!)

Besides that, qn90a 85inch, and C1 48" and G1 55" ALL satisfy me equally.

Perhaps when OLED is available at 80+" without costing double more, I'd consider it.

I don't game, I don't do blue ray. That's my use case.

Dolby vision v HDR 10 is merely marketing! But I do understand that feeling of just wanting DV so it doesn't nag.
Would be awesome if someone could post the ideal settings for Q90a. Been looking to make the adjustments
Aug 08, 2022 08:56 PM
443 Posts
Joined Nov 2011
jmoneyfhAug 08, 2022 08:56 PM
443 Posts

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank jmoneyfh

Quote from SoundsGood :
Can you watch a cable news channel all day, every day? Without *any* concern about burn in? You can with LED. You can't with OLED. Can you with QD-OLED?
Your brain will burn.
1
Aug 08, 2022 09:09 PM
635 Posts
Joined Mar 2008
SoundsGoodAug 08, 2022 09:09 PM
635 Posts
Quote from jmoneyfh :
Your brain will burn.
Perhaps, but I was simply making a point. Burn-in on a QD-OLED is still a concern, even if it's less so than on regular OLED. Burn-in on an LED TV is *not* a concern. That's my sole point, plain and simple. Not sure why I got down voted for it.
1
Aug 08, 2022 09:12 PM
2,557 Posts
Joined Mar 2013
giantbruinAug 08, 2022 09:12 PM
2,557 Posts

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank giantbruin

Quote from SoundsGood :
Can you watch a cable news channel all day, every day? Without *any* concern about burn in? You can with LED. You can't with OLED. Can you with QD-OLED?
Sir put the remote down and step away from the CNN and Fox News
1
Pro
Aug 08, 2022 09:17 PM
3,189 Posts
Joined Jul 2020
ThirstyCruz
Pro
Aug 08, 2022 09:17 PM
3,189 Posts
Quote from SoundsGood :
Perhaps, but I was simply making a point. Burn-in on a QD-OLED is still a concern, even if it's less so than on regular OLED. Burn-in on an LED TV is *not* a concern. That's my sole point, plain and simple. Not sure why I got down voted for it.
It's down voted because it's not realistic. Even if you left the TV on ALL day by accident on a static graphic, it shouldn't burn it.

Fwiw, ALL TV degrade, even LED. How fast is another story. I have LED 10 years later still looking great. OLED is too new know for sure.

I suppose if you need a TV to last beyond 5 or 7 years, then avoid OLED simply because the jury is unknown. However, very unlikely they will degrade that much that fast that would make viewing not enjoyable.

For 99% of consumers, they aren't looking to 'upgrade' every 5 years, let alone every single year. I'd say most would expect at least 10 years. IMO TV should last minimum 15, and I say that as my own person opinion. (I only replaced my 2012 60" Samsung only because I was getting tired of squinting! Now it's unplugged and deciding where it should live it's life.. recycled, or give it away.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Aug 08, 2022 09:18 PM
221 Posts
Joined Nov 2014
risktaker84Aug 08, 2022 09:18 PM
221 Posts
Quote from velani :
Would be awesome if someone could post the ideal settings for Q90a. Been looking to make the adjustments
Seconded.
1

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Popular Deals

Trending Deals