Did this coupon
work for you?
work for you?
Sorry, this deal has expired.
Get notified of deals like this in the future.
Add Deal Alert for this Item
Frontpage
1TB Kingston NV1 M.2 2280 NVMe 3.0 PCIe Solid State Drive Expired
$70
$104.99
+ Free Shipping
Amazon has 1TB Kingston NV1 M.2 2280 NVMe 3.0 PCIe SSD Solid State Drive (SNVS/1000G) on sale for $69.99. Shipping is free.
Kingtson.com has 1TB Kingston NV1 M.2 2280 NVMe 3.0 PCIe SSD Solid State Drive (SNVS/1000G) on sale for $69.99. Shipping is free.
Thanks to community member Suryasis for finding this deal.
Product Details:
Kingtson.com has 1TB Kingston NV1 M.2 2280 NVMe 3.0 PCIe SSD Solid State Drive (SNVS/1000G) on sale for $69.99. Shipping is free.
Thanks to community member Suryasis for finding this deal.
Product Details:
- Speeds up to 2,100MB/s Read and 1,700MB/s Write
- NVMe PCIe Gen 3.0 x 4 Lanes
- 22mm x 80mm x 2.1mm (M.2)
- 240TBW
Editor's Notes & Price Research
Written by
- About this deal:
- This price is $35 lower (33% savings) than the list price.
- About this product:
- This SSD has received an average rating of 4.7 stars out of 5 based on over 6,400 Amazon customer reviews.
- About this store:
- Amazon offers free returns for this item. You can return the item for any reason in new and unused condition: no shipping charges.
- View the Kingston.com returns policy.
- Don't have Amazon Prime? Students can get a free 6-Month Amazon Prime trial with free 2-day shipping, unlimited video streaming & more.
- If you're not a student, there's also a free 1-Month Amazon Prime trial available.
Original Post
Written by
Edited August 12, 2022
at 12:45 PM
in
Solid State Drives (SSD)
(10)
If you purchase something through a post on our site, Slickdeals may get a small share of the sale.
Check Out Similar Computers Deals
View AllFrontpage
$240
& More + Free Shipping
62
90
Frontpage
Frontpage
$1300 or less
+ Free Shipping
48
40
Frontpage
Frontpage
$2800 (or less)
+ Free Shipping
40
60
Price Intelligence
Give Feedback Model: Kingston NV1 1TB M.2 2280 NVMe PCIe Internal SSD Up to 2100 MB/s SNVS/1000G
Deal History
Deal History includes data from multiple reputable stores, such as Best Buy, Target, and Walmart. The lowest price among stores for a given day is selected as the "Sale Price".
Sale Price does not include sale prices at Amazon unless a deal was posted by a community member.
Sale Price does not include sale prices at Amazon unless a deal was posted by a community member.
| Product Name: | Kingston NV1 1TB M.2 2280 NVMe PCIe Internal SSD Up to 2100 MB/s SNVS/1000G |
| Manufacturer: | Kingston Technology, Inc |
| Model Number: | SNVS/1000G |
| Product SKU: | B091BDQ2B6 |
| UPC: | 740617316681 |
Don't have Amazon Prime? Students can get a free 6-Month Amazon Prime trial with free 2-day shipping, unlimited video streaming & more.
If you're not a student, there's also a free 1-Month Amazon Prime trial available.
You can also earn cash back rewards on Amazon and Whole Foods purchases with the Amazon Prime Visa credit card. Read our review to see if it’s the right card for you.
29 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Featured Comments
DRAM is used to store an index (a "map") so that when you look for a file, it knows exactly where to find it (think of a card catalog in a library). DRAM-less SSDs would store this on the NAND flash itself, which is slower than DRAM. Storing this information on the NAND flash would introduce more wear, but that's where wear-leveling technology comes in. Now, wear-leveling also would introduce a bit more latency, but it's a good trade-off to extend the life of the drive.
More recently, to reduce the latency of DRAM-less SSDs, modern NVMe drives (NVMe version 1.2 and higher - NOT the same as PCIe version) now leverage HMB technology (host memory buffer), which borrows the system memory in place of a dedicated DRAM. This significantly improved the performance of DRAM-less SSDs, so when you hear things like "DRAM-less SSDs are worse than hard drives!", that's simply not true (and never really was for the vast majority of people). This does not use a significant amount of system memory, so don't go out and upgrade your kit to 64gb.
Even what I said is likely a simplification (there's also stuff to consider such as how much space is needed for the mapping index), but hopefully this helps explain that DRAM-less SSDs are not somehow "garbage" as some would quickly declare.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Same as my Crucial P2 in a i5 6th gen. Samsung 970 performed just about the same.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank muchwow
DRAM is used to store an index (a "map") so that when you look for a file, it knows exactly where to find it (think of a card catalog in a library). DRAM-less SSDs would store this on the NAND flash itself, which is slower than DRAM. Storing this information on the NAND flash would introduce more wear, but that's where wear-leveling technology comes in. Now, wear-leveling also would introduce a bit more latency, but it's a good trade-off to extend the life of the drive.
More recently, to reduce the latency of DRAM-less SSDs, modern NVMe drives (NVMe version 1.2 and higher - NOT the same as PCIe version) now leverage HMB technology (host memory buffer), which borrows the system memory in place of a dedicated DRAM. This significantly improved the performance of DRAM-less SSDs, so when you hear things like "DRAM-less SSDs are worse than hard drives!", that's simply not true (and never really was for the vast majority of people). This does not use a significant amount of system memory, so don't go out and upgrade your kit to 64gb.
Even what I said is likely a simplification (there's also stuff to consider such as how much space is needed for the mapping index), but hopefully this helps explain that DRAM-less SSDs are not somehow "garbage" as some would quickly declare.
DRAM is used to store an index (a "map") so that when you look for a file, it knows exactly where to find it (think of a card catalog in a library). DRAM-less SSDs would store this on the NAND flash itself, which is slower than DRAM. Storing this information on the NAND flash would introduce more wear, but that's where wear-leveling technology comes in. Now, wear-leveling also would introduce a bit more latency, but it's a good trade-off to extend the life of the drive.
More recently, to reduce the latency of DRAM-less SSDs, modern NVMe drives (NVMe version 1.2 and higher - NOT the same as PCIe version) now leverage HMB technology (host memory buffer), which borrows the system memory in place of a dedicated DRAM. This significantly improved the performance of DRAM-less SSDs, so when you hear things like "DRAM-less SSDs are worse than hard drives!", that's simply not true (and never really was for the vast majority of people). This does not use a significant amount of system memory, so don't go out and upgrade your kit to 64gb.
Even what I said is likely a simplification (there's also stuff to consider such as how much space is needed for the mapping index), but hopefully this helps explain that DRAM-less SSDs are not somehow "garbage" as some would quickly declare.
That's gotta be the best and to the point explanation I've heard. Thanks for that.
Same as my Crucial P2 in a i5 6th gen. Samsung 970 performed just about the same.
DRAM is used to store an index (a "map") so that when you look for a file, it knows exactly where to find it (think of a card catalog in a library). DRAM-less SSDs would store this on the NAND flash itself, which is slower than DRAM. Storing this information on the NAND flash would introduce more wear, but that's where wear-leveling technology comes in. Now, wear-leveling also would introduce a bit more latency, but it's a good trade-off to extend the life of the drive.
More recently, to reduce the latency of DRAM-less SSDs, modern NVMe drives (NVMe version 1.2 and higher - NOT the same as PCIe version) now leverage HMB technology (host memory buffer), which borrows the system memory in place of a dedicated DRAM. This significantly improved the performance of DRAM-less SSDs, so when you hear things like "DRAM-less SSDs are worse than hard drives!", that's simply not true (and never really was for the vast majority of people). This does not use a significant amount of system memory, so don't go out and upgrade your kit to 64gb.
Even what I said is likely a simplification (there's also stuff to consider such as how much space is needed for the mapping index), but hopefully this helps explain that DRAM-less SSDs are not somehow "garbage" as some would quickly declare.