Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Missed This Deal? Get alerts when similar deals are posted.
expired
iconian | Staff 10.6K Views
Oct 28, 2022 3:59 AM

Mitakon Zhongyi Speedmaster 35mm f/0.95 Mark II Lens for Sony E, Canon EF-M, & Fuji $369 + free s/h

$369

$599

38% off
B&H Photo Video
Visit B&H Photo Video

Why are you downvoting this deal?

Good Deal?
17Comments
Save
Share
Deal Details
Mitakon Zhongyi Speedmaster 35mm f/0.95 Mark II Lens $369 each+ free s/h
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Mitakon Zhongyi Speedmaster 35mm f/0.95 Mark II Lens $369 each+ free s/h

Community Voting

Deal Score
+8
Good Deal
Bad Deal

Why are you downvoting this deal?

Join The Conversation

Share your experience with the Slickdeals community

Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!

17 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Oct 28, 2022 7:11 AM
638 Comments
Joined Apr 2013
thesmart1Oct 28, 2022 7:11 AM
638 Comments

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank

APS-C for the Sony, just fyi
1
Oct 28, 2022 7:18 AM
339 Comments
Joined Apr 2016
sixstringaxisOct 28, 2022 7:18 AM
339 Comments
Oct 28, 2022 3:36 PM
84 Comments
Joined Jul 2011
0xDavideOct 28, 2022 3:36 PM
84 Comments
FWIW this is a manual lens
Oct 28, 2022 4:28 PM
270 Comments
Joined Jun 2008
sk72Oct 28, 2022 4:28 PM
270 Comments
Quote from thesmart1 View quoted comment :
APS-C for the Sony, just fyi
Thanks. I would have bought not knowing it was APS-C not FF.
Oct 29, 2022 12:20 AM
110 Comments
Joined Feb 2011
hellohithereOct 29, 2022 12:20 AM
110 Comments
Lens looks great
Last edited by hellohithere October 28, 2022 at 05:35 PM.
Oct 29, 2022 4:25 AM
340 Comments
Joined May 2012
leepc777Oct 29, 2022 4:25 AM
340 Comments
7 Artisans has the same 35mm f0.9 but $120 cheaper.
One of the review says 7 artisans one is better than Mitakon.
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/pr...ml/reviews
Oct 29, 2022 4:50 AM
181 Comments
Joined Nov 2018
WittyHamster578Oct 29, 2022 4:50 AM
181 Comments
F0.95 for when you want your eyes in focus but your nose and ears blurry bokeh blobs.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Oct 29, 2022 2:16 PM
390 Comments
Joined Oct 2008
TheSonOct 29, 2022 2:16 PM
390 Comments
Quote from WittyHamster578 View quoted comment :
F0.95 for when you want your eyes in focus but your nose and ears blurry bokeh blobs.
Which is virtually impossible with manual focus on a moving subject. Especially with a modern digital camera that doesn't have the viewfinder focusing ring.

I'll stick with my Canon 50 1.2 AF.
Oct 29, 2022 7:50 PM
1.3K Comments
Joined Mar 2017
11AOct 29, 2022 7:50 PM
1.3K Comments
Quote from TheSon View quoted comment :
Which is virtually impossible with manual focus on a moving subject. Especially with a modern digital camera that doesn't have the viewfinder focusing ring.

I'll stick with my Canon 50 1.2 AF.
It's actually the opposite way around. The DOF is so shallow, you can only focus an f0.95 lens manually. AF won't work. That's why there are no f0.95 AF lenses.

I own two cheap 50mm f0.95 lenses: the Brightin Star 50mm f0.95 and the TTArtisan 50mm f0.95. I use them on FF. They are a lot of fun. However, the difference between f1.4 (I have dozen of those off eBay for $30-50 each) is not as big as one would think.

So yes, that Canon EF 50m f1.2 is a beautiful piece of glass. And it has AF. Absolutely no need to go to f0.95. Unless you find one on sale. I bought both my f0.95 lenses on sale, way below MSRP.
1
Oct 29, 2022 7:54 PM
390 Comments
Joined Oct 2008
TheSonOct 29, 2022 7:54 PM
390 Comments
Quote from 11A View quoted comment :
It's actually the opposite way around. The DOF is so shallow, you can only focus an f0.95 lens manually. AF won't work. That's why there are no f0.95 AF lenses.

I own two cheap 50mm f0.95 lenses: the Brightin Star 50mm f0.95 and the TTArtisan 50mm f0.95. I use them on FF. They are a lot of fun. However, the difference between f1.4 (I have dozen of those off eBay for $30-50 each) is not as big as one would think.

So yes, that Canon EF 50m f1.2 is a beautiful piece of glass. And it has AF. Absolutely no need to go to f0.95. Unless you find one on sale. I bought both my f0.95 lenses on sale, way below MSRP.
How is focusing on a moving human's eye easier with manual focus on a digital camera? I'm not understanding. Unless you're saying it'll be 'hunting' the entire time and never find true focus (even more difficult for manual focus though).

Btw... They do make a canon EF 50mm f1 lens.
1
Oct 30, 2022 12:39 AM
86 Comments
Joined Jan 2017
unskilledgamerOct 30, 2022 12:39 AM
86 Comments
Quote from TheSon View quoted comment :
How is focusing on a moving human's eye easier with manual focus on a digital camera? I'm not understanding. Unless you're saying it'll be 'hunting' the entire time and never find true focus (even more difficult for manual focus though).

Btw... They do make a canon EF 50mm f1 lens.
Only the most recent cameras with reliable eye autofocus can nail focus with a super shallow dof. Prior cameras are generally good at identifying the subject to focus on but not good at identifying what part of the subject to focus on. With most lenses and distances that doesn't matter. With a 0.95 at a meter away it does! Try using those AF adapters on a 0.95. With all but the most recent cameras you'll often miss focus wide open on a still subject. It will find something to focus on but it will often be the nose or shoulder or something just a bit off. At the shallowest DOF if the eyes aren't the sharpest part of the image the photo will not look pleasing
Last edited by unskilledgamer October 29, 2022 at 05:54 PM.
1
Oct 30, 2022 1:12 AM
390 Comments
Joined Oct 2008
TheSonOct 30, 2022 1:12 AM
390 Comments
Quote from unskilledgamer View quoted comment :
Only the most recent cameras with reliable eye autofocus can nail focus with a super shallow dof. Prior cameras are generally good at identifying the subject to focus on but not good at identifying what part of the subject to focus on. With most lenses and distances that doesn't matter. With a 0.95 at a meter away it does! Try using those AF adapters on a 0.95. With all but the most recent cameras you'll often miss focus wide open on a still subject. It will find something to focus on but it will often be the nose or shoulder or something just a bit off. At the shallowest DOF if the eyes aren't the sharpest part of the image the photo will not look pleasing
That's why you choose the AF lock on a single (top) dot and not rely on the full dot matrix for subject-hunting. Way easier than manually focusing. Plus... how do you even see exact eye focus in your subject manually? I guess you have perfect vision? I can barely see their pupil through an EVF... let alone dof. 😅
1
Oct 30, 2022 2:21 AM
84 Comments
Joined Jul 2011
0xDavideOct 30, 2022 2:21 AM
84 Comments
Quote from TheSon View quoted comment :
How is focusing on a moving human's eye easier with manual focus on a digital camera? I'm not understanding. Unless you're saying it'll be 'hunting' the entire time and never find true focus (even more difficult for manual focus though).

Btw... They do make a canon EF 50mm f1 lens.
You tell your subject to stand still. There are also people shooting pictures of other subjects than humans.
1
Nov 6, 2022 2:40 PM
616 Comments
Joined Aug 2014
RickB1248Nov 6, 2022 2:40 PM
616 Comments
Quote from TheSon View quoted comment :
How is focusing on a moving human's eye easier with manual focus on a digital camera? I'm not understanding. Unless you're saying it'll be 'hunting' the entire time and never find true focus (even more difficult for manual focus though).

Btw... They do make a canon EF 50mm f1 lens.Its not focussing
Quote from TheSon View quoted comment :
How is focusing on a moving human's eye easier with manual focus on a digital camera? I'm not understanding. Unless you're saying it'll be 'hunting' the entire time and never find true focus (even more difficult for manual focus though).

Btw... They do make a canon EF 50mm f1 lens.
Its not. This is not a usefull lens for a crop sensor. Focussing on a FF is hard enough. Focus Peaking really helps. I have good eyes and manual 1.4 and below are really hard to get the eyes sharp. You will have lots of misses. Any movement at all kills that 1/4 of an inch DOF. Im using a Zeiss which is way better quality then this and its hard. I do Studio and on location. On a Dslr its difficult outside but in a Studio its impossible unless natural lights or modeling lights are very bright. On my mirror its much easier in darkish conditions. From F to F 1.4 is not that big of a difference. There are easier and better ways then this.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Nov 6, 2022 2:43 PM
616 Comments
Joined Aug 2014
RickB1248Nov 6, 2022 2:43 PM
616 Comments
Quote from TheSon View quoted comment :
That's why you choose the AF lock on a single (top) dot and not rely on the full dot matrix for subject-hunting. Way easier than manually focusing. Plus... how do you even see exact eye focus in your subject manually? I guess you have perfect vision? I can barely see their pupil through an EVF... let alone dof. 😅
You do have to have good vision but many cameras have focus peaking which lights up in a color what is in foocus. This lens is for landscapes. Portrait would be nextto useless

Join The Conversation

Share your experience with the Slickdeals community

Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!