Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Heads up, this deal has expired. Want to create a deal alert for this item?
expired Posted by sr71 • Mar 29, 2023
expired Posted by sr71 • Mar 29, 2023

Intel Core i3-12100F - Core i3 12th Gen Alder Lake Quad-Core LGA1700 Processor $98

$98

$109

10% off
Newegg
4 Comments 2,855 Views
Visit Newegg
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
Product Info
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Product Info
Community Notes
About the Poster

Community Voting

Deal Score
+8
Good Deal
Visit Newegg

Price Intelligence

Model: BOXED CORE I3-12100F PROCESSOR 12M CACHE, UP TO 4.30 GHZ FC-LGA16A

Deal History 

Sale Price
Slickdeal
  • $NaN
  • Today

Current Prices

Sort: Lowest to Highest | Last Updated 6/19/2025, 12:09 AM
Sold By Sale Price
Amazon$82.49

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

4 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Mar 30, 2023
28 Posts
Joined Dec 2022
Mar 30, 2023
dranzer1378
Mar 30, 2023
28 Posts
This is an amazing budget cpu but I think the ryzen 5 5500 might be better for the price
Mar 30, 2023
2,592 Posts
Joined Nov 2014
Mar 30, 2023
vapor916
Mar 30, 2023
2,592 Posts
Quote from dranzer1378 :
This is an amazing budget cpu but I think the ryzen 5 5500 might be better for the price
Really good comparison between the 5500 vs 5600 vs 12100 vs 13100. The 5500 is 4% slower than the 12100 at 1080p with a 6650XT. But it really depends on what games you play. However, $100 for a 4/8 chip in 2023 is questionable. Remember how the 7600k vs 1600 show went down? 6/12 is the bare minimum for desktop gaming. But, if you want the cheapest gaming rig with tons of upgrade options, the 4100 is $63. The prefer choice is the 5600 but if not then the 5500 isn't bad under $100.

https://www.techspot.com/review/2...yzen-5600/
Mar 31, 2023
189 Posts
Joined Jun 2020
Mar 31, 2023
NervousName6294
Mar 31, 2023
189 Posts
Quote from dranzer1378 :
This is an amazing budget cpu but I think the ryzen 5 5500 might be better for the price
no.

https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Com...vsm1820844
3
Mar 31, 2023
4,902 Posts
Joined Jun 2019
Mar 31, 2023
The_Love_Spud
Mar 31, 2023
4,902 Posts

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank The_Love_Spud

I suspect there's some regular misinterpretation of results at UserBenchmark. Otherwise I overall agree with the comparison and conclusion suggested by dranzer1378, though I'd offer my own example user the database cited by NervousName6294.

Some of this blame is with the UserBenchmark site itself, whose scoring system weighting is often problematic at best and whose conclusions can be generously interpreted as comedy [reddit.com]. (And I say that as someone who otherwise treasures the repository of benchmarks otherwise made available)

Looking at the individual average scores for 1-core to 4-core loads you would rightly assume that single core performance in the Intel CPU is around 10-20% higher than the AMD competitor, which aligns in general with the impressions around Intel's 12th generation Alder Lake CPUs vs Zen 3 cores depending upon the load type (here's just one of many opinion pieces that correctly could be filed under "It's complicated" [techguided.com]).

Of course, the AMD CPU in question has six (6) total cores so when the load is increased to an 8-core model benchmark the AMD makes up a chunk of the performance gap to actually produce more horsepower than the 4-core Intel i3 as documented in the UserBenchmark site. How much this matters to a particular user's workload would be up for a good debate, but this does indeed validate the comparison. And of course this is one factor worthy of consideration, since although one conclusion might be "when fully loaded, the Intel CPU does in 4 cores what the AMD does in 6" there's also the notes regarding costs.

As such, I'd actually recommend a different CPU to make the cost/performance comparison even simpler: the Ryzen 5 3600 [userbenchmark.com]. The older Zen 2 cores of that CPU put a bigger deficit between the it and the Intel i3 in smaller core loads, and leave the Ryzen 5 3600 at just below the Intel competition for the 8-core load benchmark.

Where this matters in the price performance metric in the regular Micro Center deal on the Ryzen 5 3600 which pairs a motherboard and similarly acceptable... [microcenter.com]. In contrast, the typical best price for an associated LGA 1700 motherboard to support the Intel i3 would be around $99 making the Intel combo around $197.

Overall, this Intel CPU is a very good value option in the Intel space. However, ultimately this price still reflects a small price premium to be paid for Intel over the AMD competition.

Good luck!
Jon
1

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Popular Deals

View All

Trending Deals

View All