Did this coupon
work for you?
work for you?
Post Date | Sold By | Sale Price | Activity |
---|---|---|---|
12/03/23 | Adorama | $1999 frontpage |
53 |
Sold By | Sale Price |
---|---|
Adorama | $1999 |
Best Buy | $1999.99 |
Dell Home & Home Office | $2499 |
The link has been copied to the clipboard.
60 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Featured Comments
Any of the higher quality RF lens prices are eye watering. As an amateur photographer, I felt the EF mount L series lenses were reasonably affordable. But that is no longer the case with the RF line L series lenses.
And unlike the EF mount, where there was plenty of options for high quality third party lenses, Canon has stopped allowing third parties to create any RF mounts, so they pretty much dictate the price on the RF lenses.
So even though the camera is amazing, and you you might be getting a good deal on the body, take into account how much you'll have to sink into the native RF lenses in the future, unless of course you go with a EF mount adapter, but then you might be sacrificing some of the benefits of having the native RF mount lens.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I doubt, this has never gotten a discount before as well. This might be the holiday price
I also just called them and they said only 10% off on Refurb, no discounts on new
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
When I called about 1.5 months ago, Canon said the R6-II was not eligible for the loyalty program as it was too new
If your work doesn't need lots of image stabilization (low light, or very long focal length), the R8 seems like a much better value. I'm holding out for the R6 as I do low light photography and the extra in body stabilization is something I want. Other differences seem not so material. With the R8, one still gets lens based image stabilization
No, this is a 24mp sensor
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank windriver
Any of the higher quality RF lens prices are eye watering. As an amateur photographer, I felt the EF mount L series lenses were reasonably affordable. But that is no longer the case with the RF line L series lenses.
And unlike the EF mount, where there was plenty of options for high quality third party lenses, Canon has stopped allowing third parties to create any RF mounts, so they pretty much dictate the price on the RF lenses.
So even though the camera is amazing, and you you might be getting a good deal on the body, take into account how much you'll have to sink into the native RF lenses in the future, unless of course you go with a EF mount adapter, but then you might be sacrificing some of the benefits of having the native RF mount lens.
thanks, is the low light photography factor consideration is due to missing image stabilization inside the body or the processor issue ? I think image stabilization can be taken care with lens or using tripod. Not sure how much difference it would make, but I am interested in low light photography too.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank seanleeforever
No. The R6 has larger pixels so it has much cleaner pictures at high ISO.
I know it is apples and oranges, but my Olympus picture is bearly useful at anything higher than 3200 but R6 can produce very useful picture at even 102400.
If you application doesn't call for higher than 24MP, you will be pleasantly surprise by the imagine quality