Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Heads up, this deal has expired. Want to create a deal alert for this item?
expirediconian | Staff posted Dec 1, 2023 7:22 PM

Onkyo TX-NR6050 7.2-Channel 8k Network Smart AV Receiver

$299

$749

60% off
+ Free Shippingat Adorama
71.6K Views
Visit Adorama
Deal Details
Update: This deal is still available.

Adorama has Onkyo TX-NR6050 7.2-Channel 8K Network AV Receiver (TXNR6050M2BMDC) on sale for $299. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Deal Editor iconian for finding this deal.

Key Features:
  • 200 W/Ch Dynamic Audio Amplification system
  • 5.2.2-ch Dolby Atmos and DTS:X playback
  • Works with Hey Google or Alexa
  • Stream over 5 GHz/2.4 GHz dual-band Wi-Fi supporting the 802.11ac standard
  • HDMI Sub/Zone 2 Out for media transmission to a projector, gaming monitor, or TV
  • Refined chassis, HDMI board, DAC, Digital/Analog inputs, power-amp grounds and power lines
  • AccuEQ with AccuReflex and subwoofer EQ

Editor's Notes

Written by qwikwit | Staff
  • About this deal:
  • About this product:
    • Onkyo 2 Year Limited Warranty
  • Additional Note:
    • Refer to the Forum Thread for discussion regarding this deal.

Original Post

Written by iconian | Staff
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Update: This deal is still available.

Adorama has Onkyo TX-NR6050 7.2-Channel 8K Network AV Receiver (TXNR6050M2BMDC) on sale for $299. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Deal Editor iconian for finding this deal.

Key Features:
  • 200 W/Ch Dynamic Audio Amplification system
  • 5.2.2-ch Dolby Atmos and DTS:X playback
  • Works with Hey Google or Alexa
  • Stream over 5 GHz/2.4 GHz dual-band Wi-Fi supporting the 802.11ac standard
  • HDMI Sub/Zone 2 Out for media transmission to a projector, gaming monitor, or TV
  • Refined chassis, HDMI board, DAC, Digital/Analog inputs, power-amp grounds and power lines
  • AccuEQ with AccuReflex and subwoofer EQ

Editor's Notes

Written by qwikwit | Staff
  • About this deal:
  • About this product:
    • Onkyo 2 Year Limited Warranty
  • Additional Note:
    • Refer to the Forum Thread for discussion regarding this deal.

Original Post

Written by iconian | Staff

Community Voting

Deal Score
+89
Good Deal
Visit Adorama

Price Intelligence

Model: Onkyo TX-NR6050 7.2-Channel 8K Network AV Receiver

Deal History 

Sort: Most Recent
Post Date Sold By Sale Price Activity
10/14/24Amazon$320
1
03/24/24Adorama$299
Frontpage
29
01/26/24Adorama$299
Frontpage
149
12/22/23Adorama$299
Frontpage
105
10/16/23Amazon$350
Frontpage
28
10/02/23Amazon$360
8
11/10/23Adorama$299
Frontpage
238
Show More

Top Comments

Join The Conversation

Share your experience with the Slickdeals community

Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!

159 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Dec 2, 2023 3:00 PM
66 Comments
Joined Jun 2019
AquaRain832Dec 2, 2023 3:00 PM
66 Comments
Quote from LesCaster :
The AVR is meant to be the hub of an entertainment center, not the TV. The TV is classically an edge device.

With a good (and modern) AV Receiver, you're running all of your devices into the receiver which can handle all the different multichannel audio streams you could throw at it and playing it through the connected surround sound speaker system and then (most often) using simple pass-thru to send the untainted video to the TV for display while keeping the audio and video in proper sync (most common use case).

When it comes to a decision on video upscaling, you can test for yourself if you'd rather ask the receiver to do it or your TV. YMMV on which is the best choice, which is why you can opt for pass-thru of video without having the receiver process it -- leaving the TV to do its thing, if that's your preference. I'd wager most people opt for pass-thru but it's a choice you can make should you find that the AVR seems to handle it better than your TV (pretty unlikely, but again -- your choice).

AND, you're running all your HDMI/etc. cables into the receiver and sending one HDMI to the TV so you're TV is always displaying whatever is active coming in from the receiver without needing to switch or to program a multifunction remote to switch to a different TV input for each device. YMMV on the relative benefit of this, but TV's aren't exactly chock full of separate inputs vs. many households rising device count.

At any rate, AVR's serve a very useful purpose in doing that they do best and allow TV's to simply do what THEY do best.
i haven'[t been keeping up with AV receivers in a while. In the past, all my equipment were IR and i have a Logitech Harmony remote to control everything. Now with Roku, Google TV, FireStick, is there any way to keep my AV setup and still use 1 remote control for everything? Could CEC be used to completely remove RF remotes for streaming devices?
Dec 2, 2023 3:21 PM
11 Comments
Joined Aug 2009
cloud654645Dec 2, 2023 3:21 PM
11 Comments
Quote from unpaid-intern :
So many receiver options I don't know what to do. This seems like an incredible deal but I just bought the Pioneer Elite LX305 and then the Denon s970 because it's cheaper and seemed to have everything I need. But now this. It's even cheaper and seems to have what I need. lol.
I bought the Denon and had to return it. It was not compatible with AUX to RCA inputs
2
Dec 2, 2023 3:45 PM
32 Comments
Joined Nov 2011

This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users.

Dec 2, 2023 3:48 PM
32 Comments
Joined Nov 2011
unpaid-internDec 2, 2023 3:48 PM
32 Comments
Quote from ShovelWare :
Settle down people. Its $350 on Amazon. Dont get razzle dazzled with the regular $749 tag at adorama

Checking listed and solds on ebay there is an alarming number of this model listed right now for parts only with various problems like error codes.

It could be a good deal but it could be not great.
Yeah, after looking into it more it really does seem like a non deal and with an inflated SRP on Adorama.
Dec 2, 2023 3:51 PM
8.3K Comments
Joined Sep 2010
8.3K Comments
Quote from LesCaster :
The AVR is meant to be the hub of an entertainment center, not the TV. The TV is classically an edge device...
My set up would primarily be for overhead speakers, a sound bar and possibly some future side towers. My goal is primarily for music. Guess what I want to know is, does this fit a simple bill? I'm more of a "let's rip the Flac and toss it on a thumb, then plug it in. TIA
Dec 2, 2023 4:22 PM
258 Comments
Joined Feb 2010
oOOoDec 2, 2023 4:22 PM
258 Comments
Quote from LesCaster :
The AVR is meant to be the hub of an entertainment center, not the TV. The TV is classically an edge device.

With a good (and modern) AV Receiver, you're running all of your devices into the receiver which can handle all the different multichannel audio streams you could throw at it and playing it through the connected surround sound speaker system and then (most often) using simple pass-thru to send the untainted video to the TV for display while keeping the audio and video in proper sync (most common use case).

When it comes to a decision on video upscaling, you can test for yourself if you'd rather ask the receiver to do it or your TV. YMMV on which is the best choice, which is why you can opt for pass-thru of video without having the receiver process it -- leaving the TV to do its thing, if that's your preference. I'd wager most people opt for pass-thru but it's a choice you can make should you find that the AVR seems to handle it better than your TV (pretty unlikely, but again -- your choice).

AND, you're running all your HDMI/etc. cables into the receiver and sending one HDMI to the TV so you're TV is always displaying whatever is active coming in from the receiver without needing to switch or to program a multifunction remote to switch to a different TV input for each device. YMMV on the relative benefit of this, but TV's aren't exactly chock full of separate inputs vs. many households rising device count.

At any rate, AVR's serve a very useful purpose in doing that they do best and allow TV's to simply do what THEY do best.
I get the point of using TV as a monitor. But based on the same idea you could use TV as the hub then route single HDMI to soundbar or dumb amp. No need to worry about if AVR is 4K or any new standard compatible, and one less remote to deal with. Most TVs these days run smart TV OS, can control other devices through HDMI ARC.
2
Dec 2, 2023 4:26 PM
177 Comments
Joined Sep 2014
fassbinderDec 2, 2023 4:26 PM
177 Comments
Quote from daphatty :
Could you quantify the "suckiness"? The Yamaha I bought last year has been terrible at voice audio and I'm looking for an alternative.
Do you have stereo and selected 5.1? The encoding is usually lots of voice out of the center channel so it can appear super quite if you're missing that speaker. Maybe hook one of the L or R to the center and see if it fixes your problem.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Dec 2, 2023 4:59 PM
858 Comments
Joined Nov 2017
LesCasterDec 2, 2023 4:59 PM
858 Comments
Quote from oOOo :
I get the point of using TV as a monitor. But based on the same idea you could use TV as the hub then route single HDMI to soundbar or dumb amp. No need to worry about if AVR is 4K or any new standard compatible, and one less remote to deal with. Most TVs these days run smart TV OS, can control other devices through HDMI ARC.
If you want the best 5.1, 7.x etc. surround sound system, your going to want a quality AVR that has auto-setup/tuning for your room unless you have and are handy with a SPL meter to perform a proper setup for surround sound. Denon, Onkyo, etc. have a device and a program used to auto-tune (you can then fine-tune manually) to ensure proper sound levels in the Center, L/F front, Surrounds, and Sub.

In the scenario you described above, your not going to get that level of surround sound experience using a TV sent to soundbar or 'dumb amp' no matter how many speakers you connect to it. An AVR is not for you, then.

The main use-case I see for eARC is when you're using sound originating at the TV, like smartTV apps (netflix,etc.), so you can get that sound back to the AV Receiver so it plays through your surround sound system and not the craptastic TV speakers.

I wouldn't want to send the audio from a 4k bluray player + nvidia shield + Switch + PS4 direct into the TV, all on separate HDMI (assuming I even have 4 HDMI in), and then re-route their audio via eArc back to a receiver, soundbar, whatever. eARC is more like a workaround to get your TV audio (again, from thingss like built-in smartTV apps, or maybe a digital tuner) back the the receiver/sound system. It isn't really purpose built to make your TV the hub all all things like an AVR is meant to be, though you could certainly trouble yourself to use it so (with enough HDMI ports and proper eARC support).

I'd never want to use regular ARC in any case except an entirely unavoidable one so I could at least get whatever audio I can (like 5.1 compressed) back to the receiver/sound system to avoid the TV speakers. ARC's audio bandwidth is extremely limited and not going to carry uncompressed multi-channel back and not going to carry high bit rate audio back (Atmos, Dolby X, etc.).
1
2
Dec 2, 2023 6:03 PM
7.3K Comments
Joined Aug 2005

This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users.

Dec 2, 2023 6:08 PM
434 Comments
Joined Nov 2014
vince1015Dec 2, 2023 6:08 PM
434 Comments
I'm probably going to get flac for this but I see a lot of nonsense going on here. There is not going to be noticible audio differences or video differences between receiver brands, given similar DAC and amplifier specs. In the same price class, they are all going to use the same burr brown DACs. These units all put out <.08%THD so by definition the only differences have to lie in that .08%. This is a commodity market. The only real differences are aesthetic and feature set. So find the best price, regardless of brand, that has the feature set for YOU. Sometimes processing can suck, all of them have an off switch. Anyone who says "x" brand sounds terrible most likely needs to look at their room, their setup, or their own prejudice.
Last edited by vince1015 December 2, 2023 at 10:12 AM.
1
Dec 2, 2023 6:23 PM
14 Comments
Joined Jul 2009
iluvorngesdaDec 2, 2023 6:23 PM
14 Comments
I bought one 1.5 yrs ago from Costco for $440 and it's still running great.
Dec 2, 2023 9:39 PM
1K Comments
Joined Nov 2012
TheSchlafDec 2, 2023 9:39 PM
1K Comments
Quote from oOOo :
Why do people buy an audio amp that at the same time is the weakest link of the video system? Isn't TV the natural hub for video signals?
What do you mean weakest link?
1
Dec 3, 2023 2:08 AM
1.7K Comments
Joined Jun 2023
LovelySparrow901Dec 3, 2023 2:08 AM
1.7K Comments
Quote from vince1015 :
I'm probably going to get flac for this but I see a lot of nonsense going on here. There is not going to be noticible audio differences or video differences between receiver brands, given similar DAC and amplifier specs. In the same price class, they are all going to use the same burr brown DACs. These units all put out <.08%THD so by definition the only differences have to lie in that .08%. This is a commodity market. The only real differences are aesthetic and feature set. So find the best price, regardless of brand, that has the feature set for YOU. Sometimes processing can suck, all of them have an off switch. Anyone who says "x" brand sounds terrible most likely needs to look at their room, their setup, or their own prejudice.
All true
Dec 3, 2023 3:27 AM
17 Comments
Joined Apr 2016
willostDec 3, 2023 3:27 AM
17 Comments
Quote from LovelySparrow901 :
All true
I don't know if I can get behind tat statement... I have listened to 100's if not 1000's of receivers in my lifetime and can only think of a few instances where 'My Ear' enjoyed a Yamaha receiver, but again that's just my ear. We all hear things differently, that said I have always enjoyed the musical and movie sound amplification from Onkyo and Denon. These two brands fall in my price point range. If I had lots of money I would certainly be commenting on other brands that are audibly superior.
3

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Dec 3, 2023 3:34 AM
1.7K Comments
Joined Jun 2023
LovelySparrow901Dec 3, 2023 3:34 AM
1.7K Comments
Quote from willost :
I don't know if I can get behind tat statement... I have listened to 100's if not 1000's of receivers in my lifetime and can only think of a few instances where 'My Ear' enjoyed a Yamaha receiver, but again that's just my ear. We all hear things differently, that said I have always enjoyed the musical and movie sound amplification from Onkyo and Denon. These two brands fall in my price point range. If I had lots of money I would certainly be commenting on other brands that are audibly superior.
Those are all sighted tests. Confirmation bias. That's like saying you prefer X brand vodka to everything else but don't pick it in a blind taste test. Show me a blind test where someone can pick out a Yamaha from a Denon from an Onkyo, etc, with similar power ratings and all "flat" or bypassed audio settings.
Read on here where coffee experts SWEAR that a particular grind size and type makes a difference, but America's test kitchen did several blind tests and none of them could pick out the different grind sizes and types. It's just like audiophiles claim speaker cables and power cables make a difference. It's all snake oil.
Last edited by LovelySparrow901 December 2, 2023 at 07:37 PM.
1

Join The Conversation

Share your experience with the Slickdeals community

Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!

Popular Deals

Trending Deals