expired Posted by tDames | Staff • Mar 26, 2024
Mar 26, 2024 2:56 PM
Item 1 of 4
Item 1 of 4
expired Posted by tDames | Staff • Mar 26, 2024
Mar 26, 2024 2:56 PM
XFX Speedster Qick319 Radeon RX 6750XT 12GB GDDR6 Core Gaming Graphics Card
+ Free Shipping$310
$360
13% offNewegg
Visit NeweggGood Deal
Bad Deal
Save
Share
Top Comments
There are some disadvantages to purchasing an amd gpu instead of an nivida card, namely: substantially worse power efficiency (compared to ada lovelace gpus, the 6750xt has a tdp of 250w while the similarly performing 4060ti has a tdp of 165w), somewhat worse (though still perfectly usable, at least in my experience) drivers, worse raytracing performance in the same price tier (not as much of a concern in the low end price tier), no dlss (which is a more widely supported and substantially superior upscaler compared to fsr), a more limited feature set (no rtx video, rtx hdr, nvidia reflex, etc.), worse ai/ml performance (though the lack of vram hamstrings nvidia gpus in those applications at this price tier), worse encoding performance, and a lack of cuda. That being said, for many gamers those disadvantages are entirely insufficient to justify paying more for cards with less vram and substantially worse cost per frame. On the plus side the radeon adrenaline software is superior to the nvidia control panel and geforce experience imo, though it's possible nvidia's new beta "app" might catch up to it eventually.
It's also worth noting that as a last gen rdna2 card the 6750xt lacks dedicated ai accelerators (not very useful now, but this may become relevant for ai based features in the future), a couple of recent driver features such as the new anti-lag+, and av1 encoding. Once again though, in terms of gaming the 6750xt at $310 provides an excellent value.
Overall, if you're looking for a low tier gpu (calling a $300 gpu "low tier" feels awful, but the current market is awful) for high end 1080p or mid tier 1440p gaming in the near term this is a good deal. If you can wait rdna 4 should be coming out before 2024 ends and based off of current leaks should offer a decent improvement in terms of price to performance.
I'd say this is a super solid buy for a great performer.
31 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank BeigeRoad455
There are some disadvantages to purchasing an amd gpu instead of an nivida card, namely: substantially worse power efficiency (compared to ada lovelace gpus, the 6750xt has a tdp of 250w while the similarly performing 4060ti has a tdp of 165w), somewhat worse (though still perfectly usable, at least in my experience) drivers, worse raytracing performance in the same price tier (not as much of a concern in the low end price tier), no dlss (which is a more widely supported and substantially superior upscaler compared to fsr), a more limited feature set (no rtx video, rtx hdr, nvidia reflex, etc.), worse ai/ml performance (though the lack of vram hamstrings nvidia gpus in those applications at this price tier), worse encoding performance, and a lack of cuda. That being said, for many gamers those disadvantages are entirely insufficient to justify paying more for cards with less vram and substantially worse cost per frame. On the plus side the radeon adrenaline software is superior to the nvidia control panel and geforce experience imo, though it's possible nvidia's new beta "app" might catch up to it eventually.
It's also worth noting that as a last gen rdna2 card the 6750xt lacks dedicated ai accelerators (not very useful now, but this may become relevant for ai based features in the future), a couple of recent driver features such as the new anti-lag+, and av1 encoding. Once again though, in terms of gaming the 6750xt at $310 provides an excellent value.
Overall, if you're looking for a low tier gpu (calling a $300 gpu "low tier" feels awful, but the current market is awful) for high end 1080p or mid tier 1440p gaming in the near term this is a good deal. If you can wait rdna 4 should be coming out before 2024 ends and based off of current leaks should offer a decent improvement in terms of price to performance.
I'd say this is a super solid buy for a great performer.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank TurtlePerson2
There are some disadvantages to purchasing an amd gpu instead of an nivida card, namely: substantially worse power efficiency (compared to ada lovelace gpus, the 6750xt has a tdp of 250w while the similarly performing 4060ti has a tdp of 165w), somewhat worse (though still perfectly usable, at least in my experience) drivers, worse raytracing performance in the same price tier (not as much of a concern in the low end price tier), no dlss (which is a more widely supported and substantially superior upscaler compared to fsr), a more limited feature set (no rtx video, rtx hdr, nvidia reflex, etc.), worse ai/ml performance (though the lack of vram hamstrings nvidia gpus in those applications at this price tier), worse encoding performance, and a lack of cuda. That being said, for many gamers those disadvantages are entirely insufficient to justify paying more for cards with less vram and substantially worse cost per frame. On the plus side the radeon adrenaline software is superior to the nvidia control panel and geforce experience imo, though it's possible nvidia's new beta "app" might catch up to it eventually.
It's also worth noting that as a last gen rdna2 card the 6750xt lacks dedicated ai accelerators (not very useful now, but this may become relevant for ai based features in the future), a couple of recent driver features such as the new anti-lag+, and av1 encoding. Once again though, in terms of gaming the 6750xt at $310 provides an excellent value.
Overall, if you're looking for a low tier gpu (calling a $300 gpu "low tier" feels awful, but the current market is awful) for high end 1080p or mid tier 1440p gaming in the near term this is a good deal. If you can wait rdna 4 should be coming out before 2024 ends and based off of current leaks should offer a decent improvement in terms of price to performance.
It's important to remember that the majority of PC gamers (according to Steam hardware survey) are still running a 1080p display, so when you think about low/mid/high-end graphics cards, you have to think about 1080p for low-end, 1440p for mid, and 4K for high-end. This card will do fine at 1440p, so it's fair to call it midrange.
It's important to remember that the majority of PC gamers (according to Steam hardware survey) are still running a 1080p display, so when you think about low/mid/high-end graphics cards, you have to think about 1080p for low-end, 1440p for mid, and 4K for high-end. This card will do fine at 1440p, so it's fair to call it midrange.
Ultimately, this is purely an exercise in semantics, and realistically doesn't matter much. The real concern is how much performance you're getting for the money, if the card has your desired feature set, if your card has sufficient vram for it's expected lifetime, and whether it's performance meets your desired threshold. Based off of it's performance relative to cards which are considered "midrange" nowadays, and the compromises inherent to this card's nature as a last gen amd gpu, I personally would consider the 6750xt to be a "low tier" card in the current market, but I can understand if you disagree with me. Irrespective of the labels we attach to this card, the value proposition remains unchanged.
Ultimately, this is purely an exercise in semantics, and realistically doesn't matter much. The real concern is how much performance you're getting for the money, if the card has your desired feature set, if your card has sufficient vram for it's expected lifetime, and whether it's performance meets your desired threshold. Based off of it's performance relative to cards which are considered "midrange" nowadays, and the compromises inherent to this card's nature as a last gen amd gpu, I personally would consider the 6750xt to be a "low tier" card in the current market, but I can understand if you disagree with me. Irrespective of the labels we attach to this card, the value proposition remains unchanged.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank BeigeRoad455
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Edit: I forgot to mention earlier, you should only purchase an intel arc gpu if your cpu and motherboard supports resizable bar. Intel arc cards suffer significant performance degradation and a variety of issues if you don't have rebar enabled.
It's important to remember that the majority of PC gamers (according to Steam hardware survey) are still running a 1080p display, so when you think about low/mid/high-end graphics cards, you have to think about 1080p for low-end, 1440p for mid, and 4K for high-end. This card will do fine at 1440p, so it's fair to call it midrange.
You will need to keep an eye on the Arc software to make sure you keep up
With the driver updates.
Jump on YouTube and watch some comparisons/watch the most latest video of the arc a770 that you can find, as its performance from day 1 is much much better.
You will need to keep an eye on the Arc software to make sure you keep up
With the driver updates.
Jump on YouTube and watch some comparisons/watch the most latest video of the arc a770 that you can find, as its performance from day 1 is much much better.
Yeah I snagged a new msi gaming trio 6750xt for $330 last July from Amazon. Newegg refurbished had the Strix 6700xt for around $240 the other day but sold out very quickly.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.